1
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-41486
5,661,117 SHARES
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
-------------------------
All of the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus are owned by
the shareholders listed in the section of this prospectus called "Selling
Shareholders." The selling shareholders may sell any or all of their shares from
time to time. See "Plan of Distribution."
We will not receive any of the proceeds of sales by the selling
shareholders. We have agreed to bear all expenses related to this offering other
than stock transfer fees or expenses (including the cost of all transfer tax
stamps), underwriting or brokerage discounts or commissions and fees and
disbursements of counsel (other than the fees and disbursements of counsel
incurred in connection with the registration of the shares) attributable to the
sale of the shares.
Charter Communications, Inc. agrees to indemnify each selling shareholder
for any losses which arise out of or are based upon any untrue statement or
alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in this registration
statement, or any omission or alleged omission to state herein a material fact
required to be stated herein or necessary to make the statements herein not
misleading. Charter Communications, Inc. will reimburse each such selling
shareholder for any reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by him in
connection with investigating or defending any such claims, except that Charter
Communications, Inc. will not indemnify any selling shareholder for losses which
result from an untrue statement or omission made in reliance upon and in
conformity with written information provided by or on behalf of such selling
shareholder for inclusion in this registration statement.
Each selling shareholder, individually and not jointly, agrees to indemnify
Charter Communications, Inc. and each other selling shareholder for any losses
which arise out of or are based upon any untrue statement or alleged untrue
statement of a material fact contained in this registration statement, or any
omission or alleged omission to state herein a material fact required to be
stated herein or necessary to make the statements herein not misleading, if the
statement or omission was made in reliance upon and in conformity with written
information provided by or on behalf of such selling shareholder for inclusion
in this registration statement.
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"CHTR."
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 TO READ ABOUT FACTORS YOU SHOULD
CONSIDER BEFORE BUYING SHARES OF THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this prospectus is September 26, 2000.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Prospectus Summary.......................................... 1
Risk Factors................................................ 9
Forward-Looking Statements.................................. 23
Use of Proceeds............................................. 24
Dividend Policy............................................. 24
Capitalization.............................................. 25
Dilution.................................................... 27
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.................... 28
Selected Historical Financial Data.......................... 45
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 47
Selling Shareholders........................................ 68
Plan of Distribution........................................ 70
Market for Common Equity.................................... 71
Business.................................................... 73
Regulation and Legislation.................................. 101
Management.................................................. 109
Principal Shareholders...................................... 118
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 121
Description of Certain Indebtedness......................... 138
Description of Capital Stock and Membership Units........... 152
Shares Eligible For Future Sale............................. 163
Legal Matters............................................... 164
Experts..................................................... 164
Where You Can Find Additional Information................... 166
Index to Financial Statements............................... F-1
i
3
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary contains a general discussion of our business and
financial information. Unless stated otherwise, the discussion of our business
in this prospectus includes Charter Communications, Inc. and its direct and
indirect subsidiaries.
OUR BUSINESS
We are the fourth largest operator of cable systems in the United States,
serving approximately 6.3 million customers.
We offer a full range of traditional cable television services in all of
our systems and we are offering digital cable television services to customers
in an increasing number of our systems. Digital technology enables cable
operators to increase the number of channels a cable system can carry by
permitting a significantly increased number of video signals to be transmitted
over a cable system's existing bandwidth. Bandwidth is a measure of the
information-carrying capacity. It is the range of usable frequencies that can be
carried by a cable system. We have also started to introduce a number of other
new products and services, including interactive video programming, which allows
information to flow in both directions, and high-speed Internet access to the
World Wide Web.
We are also exploring opportunities in telephony, which will integrate
telephone services with the Internet through the use of cable. The introduction
of these new services represents an important step toward the realization of our
Wired World(TM) vision, where cable's ability to transmit voice, video and data
at high speeds will enable it to serve as the primary platform for the delivery
of new services to the home and workplace. We are accelerating the upgrade of
our systems to more quickly provide these new services.
We have grown rapidly over the past five years. During this period, our
management team has successfully completed 36 acquisitions, including sixteen
acquisitions closed since January 1, 1999 and a merger with Marcus Cable
Holdings, LLC in April 1999. In addition, we have expanded our customer base
through significant internal growth. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, our
internal customer growth, without giving effect to the cable systems we acquired
in 2000, was 0.7%, compared to the national industry average of 0.4%. In 1999,
our internal customer growth, without giving effect to the cable systems we
acquired in 1999, was 3.1%, compared to the national industry average of 1.8%.
In 1998, our internal customer growth, without giving effect to the cable
systems we acquired in that year, was 4.8%, more than twice the national
industry average of 1.7%.
Our principal executive offices are located at 12444 Powerscourt Drive,
Suite 100, St. Louis, Missouri 63131. Our telephone number is (314) 965-0555 and
our web site is located at www.chartercom.com. The information on our web site
is not part of this prospectus.
1
4
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our objective is to increase our operating cash flow by increasing our
customer base and the amount of cash flow per customer. To achieve this
objective, we are pursuing the following strategies:
- rapidly integrate acquired cable systems and apply our core operating
strategies to raise the financial and operating performance of these
acquired systems;
- expand the array of services we offer to our customers through the
implementation of our Wired World vision;
- upgrade the bandwidth capacity of our systems to 550 megahertz or greater
to enable greater channel capacity and add two-way capability to
facilitate interactive communication. Two-way capability is the ability
to have bandwidth available for upstream, or two-way, communication;
- maximize customer satisfaction by providing reliable, high-quality
service offerings, superior customer service and attractive programming
choices at reasonable rates;
- employ innovative marketing programs tailored to local customer
preferences to generate additional revenues;
- emphasize local management autonomy to better serve our customers while
providing support from regional and corporate offices and maintaining
centralized financial controls; and
- improve the geographic clustering of our cable systems by selectively
trading or acquiring systems to increase operating efficiencies and
improve operating margins. Clusters refer to cable systems under common
ownership that are located within geographic proximity to each other.
2
5
CHARTER ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The chart below sets forth our organizational structure and that of our
direct and indirect subsidiaries and assumes that there has been no exercise of
any of the outstanding options to purchase membership units of Charter
Communications Holding Company, which units are to be exchanged upon issuance
for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. See
"Management -- Option Plan."
Our cable systems are owned by certain of our subsidiaries.
[CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS FLOW CHART]
* These shares are restricted from public sale until registered. See
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale."
** Includes 472,646 shares of Class A common stock recently issued in
connection with the purchase of certain shares of Interactive
Broadcaster Services Corporation doing business as Chat TV. See
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale."
*** These membership units are exchangeable at any time for shares of
Class B common stock which are in turn exchangeable for Charter
Communications, Inc. Class A common stock.
**** These equity interests are exchangeable at any time for shares of our
Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. See "Business -- Charter
Organizational Structure -- Bresnan Sellers."
For a more detailed description of each entity and how it relates to us,
see "Business -- Charter Organizational Structure."
3
6
RECENT EVENTS
ACQUISITIONS
In 1999, we completed eleven acquisitions of cable systems for an aggregate
purchase price of $10.9 billion. In addition, we have closed five acquisitions
in 2000. A summary of information regarding acquisitions closed in 2000 is as
follows:
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
PURCHASE PRICE ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
(INCLUDING -----------------------------
ACQUISITION ASSUMED DEBT) REVENUES
DATE (IN MILLIONS) CUSTOMERS (IN THOUSANDS)
---------------- -------------- ---------- ---------------
Cable system of Interlake Cablevision
Enterprises, LLC..................... 2/00 $ 13 5,800 $ 896
Bresnan Communications Company
Limited Partnership.................. 2/00 3,100 686,100 156,116(a)
Cable systems of Falcon/Capital Cable
Partners, L.P........................ 4/00 60 23,900 5,092
Cable systems of Farmington Cablevision
Company.............................. 4/00 15 5,600 1,014
Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. ......... 9/00 173 48,900 10,231
------ -------- --------
Total................................ $3,361 770,300 $173,349
====== ======== ========
- ---------------
(a) Includes revenues of approximately $0.6 million related to the cable systems
acquired by Bresnan since December 31, 1999.
For additional information regarding acquisitions in 2000, see
"Business -- Acquisitions."
JANUARY 2000 CHARTER HOLDINGS NOTES
On January 12, 2000, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings
Capital Corporation issued $1.5 billion principal amount of senior notes
consisting of:
- $675.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.00% senior notes due
2009;
- $325.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.25% senior notes due
2010; and
- $532.0 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 11.75% senior
discount notes due 2010.
The net proceeds of approximately $1.3 billion were used to consummate
change of control offers for certain of the Falcon, Avalon and Bresnan notes and
debentures.
CHARTER HOLDINGS SENIOR BRIDGE LOAN FACILITY
On August 14, 2000, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings
Capital Corporation borrowed $1.0 billion under a senior bridge loan facility
providing for increasing rate senior bridge loans. Charter Holdings used the
majority of the proceeds to repay a portion of the amounts outstanding under the
Charter Operating revolving credit facility.
4
7
UNAUDITED SUMMARY PRO FORMA DATA
You should read the following unaudited summary pro forma financial data of
Charter Communications, Inc. in conjunction with the historical financial
statements and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, including "Capitalization," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations."
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------
CHARTER 2000 BRIDGE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ACQUISITIONS LOAN TOTAL
-------------------- ------------ -------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SUBSCRIBER DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues................................ $ 1,516,384 $ 47,721 $ -- $ 1,564,105
----------- ---------- -------- ------------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative...................... 778,313 31,323 -- 809,636
Depreciation and amortization......... 1,149,787 35,699 -- 1,185,486
Option compensation expense........... 26,089 -- -- 26,089
Corporate expense charges(a).......... 27,515 449 -- 27,964
Management fees....................... -- 181 -- 181
----------- ---------- -------- ------------
Total operating expenses............ 1,981,704 67,652 -- 2,049,356
----------- ---------- -------- ------------
Loss from operations.................... (465,320) (19,931) -- (485,251)
Interest expense........................ (482,042) (24,381) (32,555) (538,978)
Interest income......................... 6,110 46 -- 6,156
Other expense........................... (2,504) (92) -- (2,596)
----------- ---------- -------- ------------
Loss before minority interest in loss of
subsidiary and extraordinary item..... (943,756) (44,358) (32,555) (1,020,669)
Minority interest in loss of
subsidiary(b)......................... 566,221 16,671 19,289 602,181
----------- ---------- -------- ------------
Loss before extraordinary item.......... $ (377,535) $ (27,687) $(13,266) $ (418,488)
=========== ========== ======== ============
Loss per common share, basic and
diluted(c)............................ $ (1.79)
============
Weighted average common shares
outstanding, basic and diluted(d)..... 233,263,122
============
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
EBITDA(e)............................... $ 681,963 $ 15,676 $ 697,639
EBITDA margin(f)........................ 45.0% 32.8% 44.6%
Adjusted EBITDA(g)...................... $ 738,071 $ 16,398 $ 754,469
Cash flows from operating activities.... 606,832 90,020 696,852
Cash flows used in investing
activities............................ (1,051,136) (38,924) (1,090,060)
Cash flows from financing activities.... (2,701,287) (79,321) (2,780,608)
Cash interest expense................... 444,304
Capital expenditures.................... 1,049,991 102,805 1,152,796
Total debt to estimated annual
EBITDA(h)............................. 8.3x
Total debt to estimated annual adjusted
EBITDA(i)............................. 7.7
EBITDA to cash interest expense......... 1.6
EBITDA to interest expense.............. 1.3
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD):
Total assets............................ $22,025,157 $ 170,846 $ 37,463 $ 22,233,466
Total debt.............................. 11,605,328 -- 43,000 11,648,328
Minority interest(j).................... 4,689,263 (2,076) -- 4,687,187
Redeemable securities(k)................ 1,846,176 -- -- 1,846,176
Shareholders' equity.................... 2,703,188 169,226 -- 2,872,414
OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD, EXCEPT
FOR AVERAGE):
Homes passed(l)......................... 8,911,200 1,155,600 10,066,800
Basic customers(m)...................... 5,492,700 770,300 6,263,000
Basic penetration(n).................... 61.6% 66.7% 62.2%
Premium units(o)........................ 2,952,700 373,800 3,326,500
Premium penetration(p).................. 53.8% 48.5% 53.1%
Average monthly revenue per basic
customer(q)........................... $ 41.62
5
8
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
----------------------------------------------------------------
CHARTER BRIDGE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ACQUISITIONS LOAN TOTAL
-------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SUBSCRIBER DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues................................ $ 1,553,424 $1,397,611 $ -- $ 2,951,035
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative....................... 806,941 703,712 -- 1,510,653
Depreciation and amortization.......... 808,981 887,586 -- 1,696,567
Option compensation expense............ 79,979 -- -- 79,979
Corporate expense charges(a)........... 51,428 59,202 -- 110,630
Management fees........................ -- 16,224 -- 16,224
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Total operating expenses............. 1,747,329 1,666,724 -- 3,414,053
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss from operations.................... (193,905) (269,113) -- (463,018)
Interest expense........................ (536,218) (487,724) (65,111) (1,089,053)
Interest income......................... 4,329 1,335 -- 5,664
Other income (expense).................. 285 (646) -- (361)
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before income taxes, minority
interest in loss of subsidiary and
extraordinary item..................... (725,509) (756,148) (65,111) (1,546,768)
Income tax expense...................... (1,030) (2,717) -- (3,747)
Minority interest in loss of
subsidiary(b).......................... 430,474 444,498 38,578 913,550
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before extraordinary item.......... $ (296,065) $ (314,367) $ (26,533) $ (636,965)
=========== ========== =========== ============
Loss per common share, basic and
diluted(c)............................. $ (2.73)
============
Weighted average common shares
outstanding, basic and diluted(d)...... 233,263,122
============
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
EBITDA(e)............................... $ 615,361 $ 617,827 $ 1,233,188
EBITDA margin(f)........................ 39.6% 44.2% 41.8%
Adjusted EBITDA(g)...................... $ 746,483 $ 693,899 $ 1,440,382
Cash flows from operating activities.... 479,916 485,751 965,667
Cash flows used in investing
activities............................. (768,263) (641,724) (1,409,987)
Cash flows from financing activities.... 412,480 243,024 655,504
Cash interest expense................... 882,702
Capital expenditures.................... 741,508 545,322 1,286,830
Total debt to EBITDA.................... 9.1x
Total debt to adjusted EBITDA........... 7.8
EBITDA to cash interest expense......... 1.4
EBITDA to interest expense.............. 1.1
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD):
Total assets............................ $19,016,789 $3,304,446 $ 37,463 $ 22,358,698
Total debt.............................. 9,002,877 2,128,009 43,000 11,173,886
Minority interest(j).................... 5,381,331 (151,622) -- 5,229,709
Redeemable securities(k)................ 750,937 1,095,239 -- 1,846,176
Shareholders' equity.................... 3,011,079 237,643 -- 3,248,722
OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD, EXCEPT
FOR AVERAGE):
Homes passed(l)......................... 8,706,400 1,146,400 9,852,800
Basic customers(m)...................... 5,452,500 768,100 6,220,600
Basic penetration(n).................... 62.6% 67.0% 63.1%
Premium units(o)........................ 2,800,800 343,700 3,144,500
Premium penetration(p).................. 51.4% 44.7% 50.5%
Average monthly revenue per basic
customer(q)............................ $ 39.53
6
9
(a) From November 12, 1999, the date of the initial public offering of Charter
Communications, Inc., Charter Investment, Inc. provided management services
to subsidiaries of Charter Operating. Since the initial public offering,
Charter Communications, Inc. has provided such management services. See
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
(b) Represents the allocation of losses to the minority interest in loss of
subsidiary based on ownership of Charter Communications Holding Company and
the 2% accretion of the preferred membership units of an indirect subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued to certain Bresnan sellers. These membership
units are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of Class A common
stock of Charter Communications, Inc.
(c) Basic and diluted loss per common share assumes none of the membership units
of Charter Communications Holding Company or preferred membership units in
an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers
as of June 30, 2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A
common stock and none of the outstanding options to purchase membership
units of Charter Communications Holding Company that are automatically
exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock are
exercised. Basic and diluted loss per common share equals net loss divided
by weighted average common shares outstanding. If the membership units were
exchanged or options exercised, the effects would be antidilutive.
FOR THE SIX FOR THE YEAR
MONTHS ENDED ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999
------------- -----------------
Converted loss per Class A common share.................... $ (1.71) $ (2.60)
Weighted average Class A common shares outstanding --
converted................................................ 596,575,345 596,575,345
Converted loss per common share assumes all common membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company and preferred membership units in an
indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers as
of June 30, 2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A
common stock. If all these shares are converted, minority interest would
equal zero. Converted loss per common share is calculated by dividing loss
before minority interest by the weighted average common shares outstanding
-- converted. Weighted average common shares outstanding -- converted
assumes the total common membership units in Charter Communications Holding
Company totaling 339,096,474 and 24,215,749 preferred membership units in an
indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers are
exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock.
(d) Represents all shares outstanding as of January 1, 2000 (195,550,000 shares)
plus additional shares issued under the respective acquisition agreements to
the Rifkin and Falcon sellers through June 30, 2000 (26,539,746 shares) and
shares issued to sellers in the Kalamazoo transaction (11,173,376 shares).
(e) EBITDA represents earnings (loss) before extraordinary item, interest,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and minority interest. EBITDA
is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a cable
company's ability to service indebtedness. However, EBITDA should not be
considered as an alternative to income from operations or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities, as determined in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. EBITDA should also not be
construed as an indication of a company's operating performance or as a
measure of liquidity. Management's discretionary use of funds depicted by
EBITDA may be limited by working capital, debt service and capital
expenditure requirements and by restrictions related to legal requirements,
commitments and uncertainties.
(f) EBITDA margin represents EBITDA as a percentage of revenues.
(g) Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA before option compensation expense, corporate
expense charges, management fees and other expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is
presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a cable
company's ability to service its indebtedness. However, adjusted EBITDA
should not be considered as an alternative to income from operations or to
cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities, as determined
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Adjusted EBITDA
should also not be construed as an indication of a company's operating
performance or as a measure of liquidity. In addition, because adjusted
EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation here
may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
Management's discretionary use of funds depicted by adjusted EBITDA may be
limited by working capital, debt service and capital expenditure
requirements and by restrictions related to legal requirements, commitments
and uncertainties.
(h) Estimated annual EBITDA represents EBITDA for the six months ended June 30,
2000 multiplied by 2.
(i) Estimated annual adjusted EBITDA represents adjusted EBITDA for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 multiplied by 2.
(j) Minority interest consists primarily of (1) total members' equity of Charter
Communications Holding Company multiplied by 59.2% on a pro forma basis at
June 30, 2000, the ownership percentage of Charter Communications Holding
Company not
7
10
owned by us and (2) preferred equity in a subsidiary of Charter Holdings
held by certain Bresnan sellers less a portion of redeemable securities.
Gains (losses) arising from the issuance by Charter Communications Holding
Company of its membership units are recorded as capital transactions,
thereby increasing/(decreasing) shareholders' equity and
(decreasing)/increasing minority interest.
(k) The Rifkin, Falcon, Helicon and Bresnan sellers who own equity interests in
Charter Communications, Inc. and certain subsidiaries may have rescission
rights arising out of possible violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, in connection with the offers and sales of those equity
interests. Accordingly, the maximum cash obligation related to the possible
rescission rights, estimated at $1.8 billion, has been excluded from
shareholders' equity and minority interest, and classified as redeemable
securities. One year after the date of issuance of these equity interests
(when these possible rescission rights will have expired), we will
reclassify the respective amounts to shareholders' equity and minority
interest. See "Certain Trends and Uncertainties -- Possible Rescission
Liability."
(l) Homes passed are the number of living units, such as single residence homes,
apartments and condominium units, passed by the cable television
distribution network in a given cable system service area.
(m) Basic customers are customers who receive basic cable service.
(n) Basic penetration represents basic customers as a percentage of homes
passed.
(o) Premium units represent the total number of subscriptions to premium
channels.
(p) Premium penetration represents premium units as a percentage of basic
customers.
(q) Average monthly revenue per basic customer represents revenues divided by
the number of months in the period divided by the number of basic customers
at the end of the period.
8
11
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Class A common stock entails the following risks. You
should carefully consider these risk factors, as well as the other information
contained in this prospectus.
OUR STRUCTURE
MR. ALLEN HAS THE ABILITY TO CONTROL MATTERS ON WHICH ALL OF CHARTER
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S SHAREHOLDERS MAY VOTE AND HAS THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO VOTE
ON SPECIFIC MATTERS.
Mr. Allen controls approximately 93.5% of the voting power of Charter
Communications, Inc.'s capital stock. Accordingly, Mr. Allen controls Charter
Communications, Inc. Class A common shareholders have very limited voting
interest in Charter Communications, Inc. and a limited indirect equity interest
in Charter Communications Holding Company, although Class A common shareholders
have an equity interest in Charter Communications, Inc. of more than 96.5%,
excluding Mr. Allen's Class A equity interest. The purposes of our structure
are, among other things, to enable Mr. Allen to take advantage for tax purposes
of the losses expected to be generated by Charter Communications Holding Company
and to enable him to maintain control of our business.
Mr. Allen has the ability to control fundamental corporate transactions
requiring equity holder approval, including, but not limited to, the election of
all of our directors, approval of merger transactions involving us and the sale
of all or substantially all of our assets. Mr. Allen's control may continue in
the future through the high vote Class B common stock even if Mr. Allen owns a
minority economic interest in our business.
As the owner of all of our Class B common stock, Mr. Allen is entitled to
elect all but one member of Charter Communications, Inc.'s board of directors.
As an owner of 3.5% of our Class A common stock and owner of all of our Class B
common stock, Mr. Allen presently has voting control in the election by holders
of Class A common stock of the remaining member of our board of directors. In
addition, because of the exclusive voting rights granted to holders of Class B
common stock for specific matters, he has the sole power to amend a number of
important provisions of Charter Communications, Inc.'s certificate of
incorporation, including provisions restricting the scope of our business
activities. See "Description of Capital Stock and Membership Units."
MR. ALLEN MAY HAVE INTERESTS THAT CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS.
Mr. Allen's control over our management and affairs could create conflicts
of interest if he is faced with decisions that could have implications for both
him and for us and the holders of Class A common stock. Further, through his
effective control, Mr. Allen could cause us to enter into contracts with another
entity in which he owns an interest or cause us to decline a transaction that he
or an entity in which he owns an interest ultimately enters into.
Mr. Allen may engage in other businesses involving the operation of cable
television systems, video programming, high-speed Internet access, telephony or
electronic commerce, which is business and financial transactions conducted
through broadband interactivity and Internet services. Mr. Allen may also engage
in other businesses that compete or may in the future compete with us. In
addition, Mr. Allen currently engages and may engage in the future in businesses
that are complementary to our cable television business.
Accordingly, conflicts could arise with respect to the allocation of
corporate opportunities between us and Mr. Allen. Current or future agreements
between us and Mr. Allen or his affiliates may not be the result of arm's-length
negotiations. Consequently, such agreements may be less favorable to us than
agreements that we could otherwise have entered into with unaffiliated third
parties. Further, many past and future transactions with Mr. Allen or his
affiliates are informal in
9
12
nature. As a result, there will be some discretion left to the parties, who are
subject to the potentially conflicting interests described above. We cannot
assure you that the interests of either Mr. Allen or his affiliates will not
conflict with interests of the holders of our Class A common stock. We have not
instituted any formal plans to address conflicts of interest that may arise.
WE ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ENGAGE IN ANY BUSINESS ACTIVITY OTHER THAN THE CABLE
TRANSMISSION OF VIDEO, AUDIO AND DATA UNLESS MR. ALLEN AUTHORIZES US TO PURSUE
THAT PARTICULAR BUSINESS ACTIVITY. THIS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO
OFFER NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OUTSIDE OF THE CABLE TRANSMISSION BUSINESS AND
ENTER INTO NEW BUSINESSES, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR GROWTH, FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Charter Communications, Inc.'s certificate of incorporation and Charter
Communications Holding Company's limited liability company agreement provide
that Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company and
their subsidiaries cannot engage in any business activity outside the cable
transmission business except for the joint venture through Digeo Broadband,
Inc., incidental businesses engaged in as of the closing of Charter
Communications, Inc.'s initial public offering in November 1999 and as an owner
and operator of the business of Chat TV. This will be the case unless the
opportunity to pursue the particular business activity is first offered to Mr.
Allen, he decides not to pursue it and he consents to our engaging in the
business activity. The cable transmission business means the business of
transmitting video, audio, including telephone services, and data over cable
television systems owned, operated or managed by us from time to time. These
provisions may limit our ability to take advantage of attractive business
opportunities. Consequently, our ability to offer new products and services
outside of the cable transmission business and enter into new businesses could
be adversely affected, resulting in an adverse effect on our growth, financial
condition and results of operations. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions -- Allocation of Business Opportunities with Mr. Allen."
MR. ALLEN'S CONTROL AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS
MAY INHIBIT OR PREVENT A TAKEOVER OR A CHANGE IN MANAGEMENT THAT COULD RESULT IN
A CHANGE OF CONTROL PREMIUM OR FAVORABLY IMPACT THE MARKET PRICE OF THE CLASS A
COMMON STOCK.
As a result of his controlling voting interest, Mr. Allen will have the
ability to delay or prevent a change of control or changes in our management
that our other shareholders, including the holders of our Class A common stock,
may consider favorable or beneficial. Provisions in our organizational documents
may also have the effect of delaying or preventing these changes, including
provisions:
- authorizing the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock;
- restricting the calling of special meetings of shareholders; and
- requiring advanced notice for proposals for shareholder meetings.
If a change of control or change in management is delayed or prevented, the
market price of our Class A common stock could suffer or holders may not receive
a change of control premium over the then-current market price of the Class A
common stock.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. IS A HOLDING COMPANY WHICH HAS NO OPERATIONS AND
WILL DEPEND ON ITS OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES FOR CASH. OUR SUBSIDIARIES MAY BE
LIMITED IN THEIR ABILITY TO MAKE FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF OUR DEBT AND
OTHER OBLIGATIONS.
As holding companies, Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter
Communications Holding Company depend entirely on cash from our operating
subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations. These operating subsidiaries may not
be able to make funds available to Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter
Communications Holding Company.
10
13
Charter Communications, Inc. is a holding company whose principal asset is
an approximate 40.8% equity interest and a 100% voting interest in Charter
Communications Holding Company. Charter Communications Holding Company is also a
holding company whose operations are conducted through its indirect
subsidiaries. Neither Charter Communications, Inc. nor Charter Communications
Holding Company holds any significant assets other than their direct and
indirect interests in our subsidiaries. Charter Communications, Inc.'s and
Charter Communications Holding Company's cash flow depends upon the cash flow of
our operating subsidiaries and the payment of funds by these operating
subsidiaries to Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter
Communications, Inc. This will affect the ability of Charter Communications,
Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company to meet their obligations,
including:
- debt or preferred equity obligations that we may issue in the future;
- obligations under employment and consulting agreements;
- obligations under the mutual services agreement with Charter Investment
under which Charter Investment provides Charter Communications, Inc. with
personnel and services; and
- dividends or other distributions to holders of Class A common stock.
Our operating subsidiaries are not obligated to make funds available for
payment of these obligations in the form of loans, distributions or otherwise.
In addition, our operating subsidiaries' ability to make any such loans,
distributions or other payments to Charter Communications Holding Company or to
us will depend on their earnings, business and tax considerations and legal
restrictions. Covenants in the indentures and credit agreements governing the
indebtedness of Charter Communications Holding Company's operating subsidiaries
restrict their ability to make loans, distributions or other payments to Charter
Communications Holding Company or to us.
WE COULD BE DEEMED AN "INVESTMENT COMPANY" UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF
1940. THIS WOULD IMPOSE SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS ON US AND WOULD BE LIKELY TO
HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR GROWTH, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION.
If anything were to happen which would cause us to be deemed an investment
company, the Investment Company Act would impose significant restrictions on us,
including severe limitations on our ability to borrow money, to issue additional
capital stock and to transact business with affiliates. In addition, because our
operations are very different from those of the typical registered investment
company, regulation under the Investment Company Act could affect us in other
ways that are extremely difficult to predict. In sum, if we were deemed to be an
investment company it could become impractical for us to continue our business
as currently conducted and our growth, our financial condition and our results
of operations could suffer materially.
Our principal asset is our equity interest in Charter Communications
Holding Company. If our membership interest in Charter Communications Holding
Company were to constitute less than 50% of the voting securities issued by
Charter Communications Holding Company, then our interest in Charter
Communications Holding Company could be deemed an "investment security" for
purposes of the Investment Company Act. This may occur, for example, if a court
determines that the Class B common stock is no longer entitled to special voting
rights and, in accordance with the terms of the Charter Communications Holding
Company limited liability company agreement, our membership units in this
company were to lose their special voting privileges. A determination that such
investment was an investment security could cause us to be deemed to be an
investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless an exclusion from
registration were available or we were to obtain an order of the Securities and
Exchange Commission excluding or exempting us from registration under this Act.
11
14
IF A COURT DETERMINES THAT THE CLASS B COMMON STOCK IS NO LONGER ENTITLED TO
SPECIAL VOTING RIGHTS, WE WOULD LOSE OUR RIGHTS TO MANAGE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
HOLDING COMPANY. IN ADDITION TO THE INVESTMENT COMPANY RISKS DISCUSSED ABOVE,
THIS COULD MATERIALLY IMPACT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE CLASS A COMMON
STOCK.
If a court determines that the Class B common stock is no longer entitled
to special voting rights, we would no longer have a controlling voting interest
in, and would lose its right to manage, Charter Communications Holding Company.
If this were to occur:
- We would retain our proportional equity interest in Charter
Communications Holding Company but would lose all of our powers to direct
the management and affairs of Charter Communications Holding Company and
its subsidiaries;
- Class A common shareholders would lose any right they had at that time or
might have had in the future to direct, through equity ownership in us,
the management and affairs of Charter Communications Holding Company; and
- We would become strictly a passive investment vehicle.
This result, as well as the impact of being treated by investors as an
investment company, could materially adversely impact:
- the liquidity of the Class A common stock;
- how it trades in the marketplace;
- the price that purchasers would be willing to pay for the Class A common
stock in a change of control transaction or otherwise; and
- the market price of the Class A common stock which could experience a
significant decline as a result.
Uncertainties that may arise with respect to the nature of our management
role and voting power and organizational documents, including legal actions or
proceedings relating thereto, may also materially adversely impact the value of
the Class A common stock.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON CHARTER INVESTMENT, INC. FOR NECESSARY PERSONNEL AND
SERVICES.
We have only fourteen executive officers, all of whom are also executive
officers of Charter Investment. We receive from Charter Investment other
personnel and services necessary to perform our obligations as Charter
Communications Holding Company's sole manager, pursuant to a mutual services
agreement. As we are restricted from holding any significant assets other than
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units, we are substantially
dependent upon Charter Investment for personnel and support services. The
termination or breach by Charter Investment of the mutual services agreement
could adversely affect our ability to manage Charter Communications Holding
Company and, in turn, our cable systems.
THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING
COMPANY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT MAY CAUSE US IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES
TO PAY MORE TAXES THAN IF THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION PROVISIONS WERE NOT IN
EFFECT.
Charter Communications Holding Company's limited liability company
agreement provides that through the end of 2003, tax losses of Charter
Communications Holding Company that would otherwise have been allocated to us
based generally on our percentage of outstanding membership units of Charter
Communications Holding Company will instead be allocated to the membership units
held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment. The purpose of these
special tax allocation provisions is to allow Mr. Allen to take advantage for
tax purposes of the losses expected to be generated by Charter Communications
Holding Company. The limited liability company
12
15
agreement further provides that beginning at the time that Charter
Communications Holding Company first becomes profitable (as determined under the
applicable federal income tax rules for determining book profits), tax profits
that would otherwise have been allocated to us based generally on our percentage
of outstanding membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company will
instead be allocated to membership units held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and
Charter Investment. In some situations, the special tax allocation provisions
could result in our having to pay taxes in an amount that is more than if
Charter Communications Holding Company had allocated losses and profits to us
based generally on our percentage of outstanding membership units from the time
of the completion of the offering. See "Description of Capital Stock and
Membership Units -- Special Allocation of Losses."
OUR MANAGEMENT MAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING OTHER CABLE OPERATIONS AND MAY
NOT DEVOTE THEIR FULL TIME TO OUR OPERATIONS. THIS COULD GIVE RISE TO CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST AND IMPAIR OUR OPERATING RESULTS.
Mr. Allen and certain other of our affiliates may from time to time in the
future acquire cable systems in addition to those owned by us.
We, as well as some of our officers who currently manage our cable systems,
may have a substantial role in managing outside cable systems that may be
acquired in the future. As a result, the time we devote to managing Charter
Communications Holding Company's systems may be correspondingly reduced. This
could adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of
operations. Moreover, allocating our managers' time and other resources and
those of Charter Communications Holding Company between our systems and outside
systems that may be held by our affiliates could give rise to conflicts of
interest. Neither we nor Charter Communications Holding Company have or plan to
create formal procedures for determining whether and to what extent outside
cable television systems acquired in the future will receive priority with
respect to personnel requirements.
13
16
OUR ACQUISITIONS
SPECIFIED FORMER OWNERS OF RIFKIN, FALCON, BRESNAN AND HELICON WHO ACQUIRED
EQUITY INTERESTS MAY BE ENTITLED TO CAUSE US TO REPURCHASE THEIR EQUITY
INTERESTS BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933, AS AMENDED. IF WE DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPITAL TO FUND ANY OR ALL OF
THESE REPURCHASES, ANY OF THE OWNERS OF THESE EQUITY INTERESTS COULD INITIATE
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST US. THIS COULD LEAD TO DEFAULTS UNDER OUR OTHER
OBLIGATIONS.
We acquired Helicon I, L.P. and affiliates (Helicon) in July 1999, Rifkin
Acquisition Partners L.L.L.P. and InterLink Communications Partners, LLLP
(collectively, Rifkin) in September 1999, Falcon Communications, L.P. (Falcon)
in November 1999 and Bresnan in February 2000. The Rifkin, Falcon and Bresnan
sellers who acquired Charter Communications Holding Company membership units or,
in the case of Bresnan, additional equity interests in an indirect subsidiary of
Charter Holdings, in connection with these respective acquisitions and the
Helicon sellers who acquired shares of Class A common stock in our initial
public offering may have rescission rights against us and Charter Communications
Holding Company arising out of possible violations of Section 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the offers and sales of
these equity interests. If all of these equity holders successfully exercised
their possible rescission rights, we or Charter Communications Holding Company
would become obligated to repurchase all such equity interests, and the total
repurchase obligation could be as much as approximately $1.8 billion as follows:
- up to a maximum of $144.0 million to repurchase all of the Rifkin
sellers' equity interests;
- up to a maximum of $594.0 million to repurchase all of the Falcon
sellers' equity interests;
- up to a maximum of $1.095 billion to repurchase all of the Bresnan
sellers' equity interests; and
- up to a maximum of $13.0 million to repurchase the shares of Class A
common stock purchased by Helicon sellers in our directed share program.
We cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain capital sufficient to
fund any required repurchases. If we failed to satisfy these obligations, these
acquisition-related equity holders, as general unsecured creditors, could
initiate legal proceedings against us, including under bankruptcy and
reorganization laws, for any damages they suffer as a result of our
non-performance. Any such action could trigger defaults under our other
obligations, including our credit facilities and debt instruments.
WE MAY NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO INTEGRATE THE NEW CABLE SYSTEMS THAT WE ACQUIRE
AND THE CUSTOMERS THEY SERVE WITH OUR EXISTING CABLE SYSTEMS. THIS COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND GROWTH STRATEGY.
We have grown rapidly through acquisitions of cable systems, and now own
and operate cable systems serving approximately 6.3 million customers. We may
acquire more cable systems in the future, through direct acquisition, system
swaps or otherwise. The integration of the cable systems we have recently
acquired poses a number of significant risks, including:
- our acquisitions may not have a positive impact on our cash flows from
operations;
- the integration of these new systems and customers will place significant
demands on our management and our operations, information services, and
financial, legal and marketing resources. Our current operating and
financial systems and controls and information services
14
17
may not be adequate, and any steps taken to improve these systems and
controls may not be sufficient;
- acquired businesses sometimes result in unexpected liabilities and
contingencies which could be significant; and
- our continued growth will also increase our need for qualified personnel.
We may not be able to hire such additional qualified personnel.
We cannot assure you that we will successfully integrate any acquired
systems into our operations.
OUR BUSINESS
WE HAVE SUBSTANTIAL EXISTING DEBT AND WILL INCUR SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL DEBT,
WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL HEALTH AND OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN
FINANCING IN THE FUTURE AND REACT TO CHANGES IN OUR BUSINESS.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of June 30, 2000, pro forma for
the Kalamazoo transaction, borrowings under the Charter Holdings senior bridge
loan facility and the application of a portion of such borrowings to repay a
portion of the Charter Operating revolving credit facility, our total debt would
have been approximately $11.6 billion, and our total shareholders' equity would
have been approximately $2.9 billion.
Our significant amount of debt could have important consequences to you.
For example, it could:
- make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our credit
facilities and to our noteholders;
- increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and cable industry
conditions, including interest rate increases, because a significant
portion of our borrowings are and will continue to be at variable rates
of interest;
- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations to payments on our debt, which will reduce our funds available
for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
expenses;
- limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and the cable industry;
- place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
proportionately less debt; and
- limit our ability to borrow additional funds in the future, if we need
them, due to applicable financial and restrictive covenants in our debt.
The agreements and instruments governing our debt do not prohibit us from
incurring additional debt, although they do place certain limitations on such
additional debt. Further, the agreements and instruments governing our debt
allow for the incurrence of debt by our subsidiaries. We anticipate incurring
significant additional debt in the future to fund the expansion, maintenance and
upgrade of our cable systems. If new debt is added to our current debt levels,
the related risks that we and you now face could intensify.
15
18
THE AGREEMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS GOVERNING OUR DEBT CONTAIN RESTRICTIONS AND
LIMITATIONS THAT COULD SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO OPERATE OUR BUSINESS.
The credit facilities and the indentures governing the notes of our
subsidiaries contain a number of significant covenants that could adversely
impact our business. These covenants, among other things, restrict our ability
and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- make certain investments or acquisitions;
- dispose of assets or merge;
- incur additional debt;
- issue equity;
- repurchase or redeem equity interests and debt;
- create liens; and
- pledge assets.
Furthermore, in accordance with our credit facilities, a number of our
subsidiaries are required to maintain specified financial ratios and meet
financial tests. The ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by
events beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants will result in a
default under the applicable debt agreement or instrument.
OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE THE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF CASH NEEDED TO SERVICE OUR
DEBT AND GROW OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS ON MANY FACTORS BEYOND OUR CONTROL.
Our ability to make payments on our debt and to fund our planned capital
expenditures for upgrading our cable systems and our ongoing operations will
depend on our ability to generate cash and to secure financing in the future.
This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. If
our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and
sufficient future borrowings are not available to us under our credit facilities
or from other sources of financing, we may not be able to repay our debt, to
grow our business or to fund our other liquidity needs.
WE HAVE GROWN RAPIDLY AND HAVE A LIMITED HISTORY OF OPERATING OUR CURRENT
SYSTEMS. THIS MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO COMPLETELY EVALUATE OUR PERFORMANCE.
We commenced active operations in 1994 and have grown rapidly since then
through acquisitions of cable systems. As of June 30, 2000, after giving effect
to the acquisition of the Kalamazoo system completed since that date, our
systems served approximately 400% more customers than were served as of December
31, 1998. As a result, historical financial information about us may not be
indicative of the future or of results that we can achieve with the cable
systems which will be under our control. Our recent growth in revenue over our
short operating history is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
WE HAVE A HISTORY OF NET LOSSES AND EXPECT TO CONTINUE TO EXPERIENCE NET LOSSES.
CONSEQUENTLY, WE MAY NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO FINANCE FUTURE OPERATIONS.
We have had a history of net losses and expect to continue to report net
losses for the foreseeable future. We expect our net losses to increase as a
result of acquisitions. We reported losses before minority interest of $5
million for 1997, $22 million for 1998, $639 million for 1999 and $944 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2000. On a pro forma basis, giving effect to
the merger of Charter Holdings and Marcus Holdings, acquisitions completed in
1999 and 2000, the sale of the March 1999 and January 2000 Charter Holdings
notes and the drawdown on the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility, we
had net losses before minority interest in loss of subsidiary and
16
19
extraordinary item of $1.5 billion for 1999 and $1.0 billion for the six months
ended June 30, 2000. We cannot predict what impact, if any, continued losses
will have on our ability to finance our operations in the future.
IF WE ARE UNSUCCESSFUL IN IMPLEMENTING OUR GROWTH STRATEGY, OUR FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
If we are unable to grow our cash flow sufficiently, we may be unable to
repay our debt, to grow our business or to fund our other liquidity needs. We
expect that a substantial portion of our future growth will be achieved through
revenues from new products and services. We may not be able to offer these new
products and services successfully to our customers and these new products and
services may not generate adequate revenues.
OUR PROGRAMMING COSTS ARE INCREASING. WE MAY NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO PASS THESE
INCREASES ON TO OUR CUSTOMERS, WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR CASH FLOW AND
OPERATING MARGINS.
Programming has been, and is expected to continue to be, our largest single
expense item. In recent years, the cable industry has experienced a rapid
escalation in the cost of programming, particularly sports programming. This
escalation may continue, and we may not be able to pass programming cost
increases on to our customers. The inability to pass these programming cost
increases on to our customers would have an adverse impact on our cash flow and
operating margins. In addition, as we upgrade the channel capacity of our
systems and add programming to our basic, expanded basic and premium programming
tiers, we may face additional market constraints on our ability to pass
programming costs on to our customers. Basic programming includes a variety of
entertainment and local programming. Expanded basic programming offers more
services than basic programming. Premium service includes unedited,
commercial-free movies, sports and other special event entertainment
programming.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN CAPITAL SUFFICIENT TO FUND OUR PLANNED UPGRADES AND
OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. THIS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO OFFER NEW
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR GROWTH, FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
We intend to upgrade a significant portion of our cable systems over the
coming years and make other capital investments. For the three years ending
December 31, 2002, we plan to spend approximately $6.4 billion for capital
expenditures, approximately $3.2 billion of which will be used to upgrade and
rebuild our systems to bandwidth capacity of 550 megahertz or greater and add
two-way capability so that we may offer advanced services. The remaining $3.2
billion will be used for extensions of systems, development of new products and
services, purchases of converters and system maintenance.
We cannot assure you that these amounts will be sufficient to accomplish
our planned system upgrades, maintenance and expansion. If we cannot obtain the
necessary funds from increases in our operating cash flow, additional borrowings
or other sources, we may not be able to fund our planned upgrades and expansion
and offer new products and services on a timely basis. Consequently, our growth,
financial condition and results of operations could suffer materially.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO FUND THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES NECESSARY TO KEEP PACE WITH
TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS OR OUR CUSTOMERS' DEMAND FOR NEW PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES. THIS COULD LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY. CONSEQUENTLY, OUR
GROWTH, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION COULD SUFFER MATERIALLY.
The cable business is characterized by rapid technological change and the
introduction of new products and services. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to fund the capital expenditures
17
20
necessary to keep pace with technological developments, or that we will
successfully anticipate the demand of our customers for products and services
requiring new technology. This type of rapid technological change could
adversely affect our plans to upgrade or expand our systems and respond to
competitive pressures. Our inability to upgrade, maintain and expand our systems
and provide enhanced services in a timely manner, or to anticipate the demands
of the market place, could adversely affect our ability to compete.
Consequently, our growth, financial condition and results of operations could
suffer materially.
WE MAY BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ON FAVORABLE TERMS AND OUR
CONSTRUCTION COSTS MAY INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY. THIS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
GROWTH, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The expansion and upgrade of our existing systems and the systems we plan
to acquire will require us to hire contractors and enter into a number of
construction agreements. We may have difficulty hiring civil contractors, and
the contractors we hire may encounter cost overruns or delays in construction.
Our construction costs may increase significantly over the next few years as
existing contracts expire and as demand for telecommunications construction
services continues to grow. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
construct new systems or expand or upgrade existing or acquired systems in a
timely manner or at a reasonable cost. This may adversely affect our growth,
financial condition and results of operations.
WE DEPEND ON THIRD-PARTY EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE SUPPLIERS. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO
PROCURE THE NECESSARY EQUIPMENT, OUR ABILITY TO OFFER OUR SERVICES COULD BE
IMPAIRED. THIS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR GROWTH, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
We depend on vendors to supply the set-top converter boxes for analog and
digital cable services. This equipment is available from a limited number of
suppliers. We typically purchase set-top converter boxes under purchase orders
placed from time to time and do not carry significant inventories of set-top
converter boxes. If demand for set-top converter boxes exceeds our inventories
and we are unable to obtain required set-top converter boxes on a timely basis
and at an acceptable cost, our ability to recognize additional revenue from
digital services could be delayed or impaired. In addition, if there are no
suppliers who are able to provide converter devices that comply with evolving
Internet and telecommunications standards or that are compatible with other
products or components we use, our business would be impaired.
THERE SHOULD BE NO EXPECTATION THAT MR. ALLEN WILL FUND OUR OPERATIONS OR
OBLIGATIONS IN THE FUTURE.
In the past, Mr. Allen and his affiliates have contributed funds to us and
our subsidiaries. There should be no expectation that Mr. Allen or his
affiliates will contribute funds to us or to our subsidiaries in the future.
A SALE BY MR. ALLEN OF HIS DIRECT OR INDIRECT EQUITY INTERESTS COULD ADVERSELY
AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE OUR BUSINESS.
Mr. Allen is not prohibited by any agreement from selling the shares of
Class A or Class B common stock he holds in Charter Communications, Inc. or
causing Charter Investment, Inc. or Vulcan Cable III Inc. to sell their
membership units in Charter Communications Holding Company. We cannot assure you
that Mr. Allen or any of his affiliates will maintain all or any portion of his
direct or indirect ownership interests in Charter Communications, Inc. or
Charter Communications Holding Company. In the event he sells all or any portion
of his direct or indirect ownership interest in Charter Communications, Inc. or
Charter Communications Holding Company, we cannot assure you that he would
continue as Chairman of Charter Communications, Inc.'s board of directors or
otherwise participate in our management. The disposition by Mr. Allen or any of
his affiliates of these
18
21
equity interests or the loss of his services by Charter Communications, Inc.
and/or Charter Communications Holding Company could adversely affect our growth,
financial condition and results of operations, or adversely impact the market
price of our Class A common stock.
WE OPERATE IN A VERY COMPETITIVE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT
OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS.
The industry in which we operate is highly competitive. In some instances,
we compete against companies with fewer regulatory burdens, easier access to
financing, greater personnel resources, greater brand name recognition and
long-standing relationships with regulatory authorities. Mergers, joint ventures
and alliances among any of the following businesses could result in providers
capable of offering cable television, Internet and other telecommunications
services in direct competition with us:
- cable television operators;
- regional telephone companies;
- long distance telephone service providers;
- electric utilities;
- local exchange carriers, which are local phone companies that provide
local area telephone services and access to long distance services to
customers;
- providers of cellular and other wireless communications services; and
- Internet service providers.
We face competition within the subscription television industry, which
includes providers of paid television service employing technologies other than
cable, such as direct broadcast satellite or DBS, and excludes broadcast
companies that transmit their signal to customers without assessing a
subscription fee. We also face competition from broadcast companies distributing
television broadcast signals without assessing a subscription fee and from other
communications and entertainment media, including conventional off-air
television and radio broadcasting services, newspapers, movie theaters, the
Internet, live sports events and home video products.
We cannot assure you that upgrading our cable systems will allow us to
compete effectively. Additionally, as we expand and introduce new and enhanced
services, including Internet and telecommunications services, we will be subject
to competition from telecommunications providers and Internet service providers.
We cannot predict the extent to which competition may affect our business and
operations in the future. See "Business -- Competition."
THE LOSS OF KEY EXECUTIVES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE OUR
BUSINESS.
Our success is substantially dependent upon the retention and the continued
performance of Mr. Allen, Chairman of Charter Communications, Inc.'s board of
directors, and Jerald L. Kent, Charter Communications, Inc.'s President and
Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Mr. Allen or Mr. Kent could
adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations.
19
22
REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENTAL LEGISLATION AND REGULATION.
THE APPLICABLE LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS, AND CHANGES TO THEM, COULD ADVERSELY
AFFECT OUR BUSINESS BY INCREASING OUR EXPENSES.
Regulation of the cable industry has increased the administrative and
operational expenses and limited the revenues of cable systems. Cable operators
are subject to, among other things:
- limited rate regulation;
- requirements that, under specified circumstances, a cable system carry a
local broadcast station or obtain consent to carry a local or distant
broadcast station;
- rules for franchise renewals and transfers; and
- other requirements covering a variety of operational areas such as equal
employment opportunity, technical standards and customer service
requirements.
Additionally, many aspects of these regulations are currently the subject
of judicial proceedings and administrative or legislative proposals. There are
also ongoing efforts to amend or expand the state and local regulation of some
of our cable systems, which may compound the regulatory risks we already face.
Certain states and localities, led by Florida, are considering new
telecommunications taxes that could increase operating expenses. We cannot
predict whether in response to these efforts any of the states or localities in
which we now operate will expand regulation of our cable systems in the future
or how they will do so.
WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO OUR NETWORKS TO OTHER INTERNET SERVICE
PROVIDERS. THIS COULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE OUR COMPETITION AND ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE UPGRADE OF OUR SYSTEMS OR OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE NEW PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES.
Recently, a number of companies, including telephone companies and Internet
service providers, have requested local authorities and the Federal
Communications Commission to require cable operators to provide access to
cable's broadband infrastructure, which allows cable to deliver a multitude of
channels and/or services, so that these companies may deliver Internet services
directly to customers over cable facilities. For example, Broward County,
Florida granted open access to an Internet service provider as a condition to a
cable operator's transfer of its franchise for cable service. The cable operator
has commenced legal action at the federal district level. A federal district
court in Virginia and a federal circuit court in California recently struck down
as unlawful open access requirements imposed by two different franchising
authorities. The federal circuit court ruling, which is now the leading
decision, reversed an earlier district court decision that had upheld an open
access requirement.
We believe that allocating a portion of our bandwidth capacity to other
Internet service providers:
- would impair our ability to use our bandwidth in ways that would generate
maximum revenues;
- would strengthen our Internet service provider competitors; and
- may cause us to decide not to upgrade our systems which would prevent us
from introducing our planned new products and services.
In addition, we cannot assure you that if we were required to provide
access in this manner, it would not have a significant adverse impact on our
profitability. This could impact us in many ways, including by:
- increasing competition;
- increasing the expenses we incur to maintain our systems; and/or
- increasing the expense of upgrading and/or expanding our systems.
20
23
OUR CABLE SYSTEMS ARE OPERATED UNDER FRANCHISES WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO NON-RENEWAL
OR TERMINATION. THE FAILURE TO RENEW A FRANCHISE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
BUSINESS IN A KEY MARKET.
Our cable systems generally operate pursuant to franchises, permits or
licenses typically granted by a municipality or other state or local government
controlling the public rights-of-way. Many franchises establish comprehensive
facilities and service requirements, as well as specific customer service
standards and monetary penalties for non-compliance. In many cases, franchises
are terminable if the franchisee fails to comply with material provisions set
forth in the franchise agreement governing system operations. Franchises are
generally granted for fixed terms and must be periodically renewed. Local
franchising authorities may resist granting a renewal if either past performance
or the prospective operating proposal is considered inadequate. Franchise
authorities often demand concessions or other commitments as a condition to
renewal, which have been and may continue to be costly to us. In some instances,
franchises have not been renewed at expiration, and we have operated under
either temporary operating agreements or without a license while negotiating
renewal terms with the local franchising authorities.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all material
provisions of our franchise agreements or that we will be able to renew our
franchises in the future. A termination of and/or a sustained failure to renew a
franchise could adversely affect our business in the affected geographic area.
WE OPERATE OUR CABLE SYSTEMS UNDER FRANCHISES WHICH ARE NON-EXCLUSIVE. LOCAL
FRANCHISING AUTHORITIES CAN GRANT ADDITIONAL FRANCHISES AND CREATE COMPETITION
IN MARKET AREAS WHERE NONE EXISTED PREVIOUSLY.
Our cable systems are operated under franchises granted by local
franchising authorities. These franchises are non-exclusive. Consequently, such
local franchising authorities can grant additional franchises to competitors in
the same geographic area. As a result, competing operators may build systems in
areas in which we hold franchises. In some cases municipal utilities may legally
compete with us without obtaining a franchise from the local franchising
authority. The existence of more than one cable system operating in the same
territory is referred to as an overbuild. These overbuilds could adversely
affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations by increasing
competition or creating competition where none existed previously. As of June
30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, we are aware of overbuild
situations impacting 140,500 of our customers and potential overbuild situations
in areas servicing another 161,500 basic customers, together representing a
total of 302,000 customers. Additional overbuild situations may occur in other
systems.
LOCAL FRANCHISE AUTHORITIES HAVE THE ABILITY TO IMPOSE ADDITIONAL REGULATORY
CONSTRAINTS ON OUR BUSINESS. THIS COULD FURTHER INCREASE OUR EXPENSES.
In addition to the franchise document, cable authorities have also adopted
in some jurisdictions cable regulatory ordinances that further regulate the
operation of cable systems. This additional regulation increases our expenses in
operating our business. We cannot assure you that the local franchising
authorities will not impose new and more restrictive requirements.
Local franchising authorities also have the power to reduce rates and order
refunds of basic service tier rates paid in the previous twelve-month period
determined to be in excess of the maximum permitted rates. Basic service tier
rates are the prices charged for basic programming services. As of June 30,
2000, we have refunded a total of approximately $847,000 since our inception. We
may be required to refund additional amounts in the future.
21
24
DESPITE RECENT DEREGULATION OF EXPANDED BASIC CABLE PROGRAMMING PACKAGES, WE ARE
CONCERNED THAT CABLE RATE INCREASES COULD GIVE RISE TO FURTHER REGULATION. THIS
COULD CAUSE US TO DELAY OR CANCEL SERVICE OR PROGRAMMING ENHANCEMENTS OR IMPAIR
OUR ABILITY TO RAISE RATES TO COVER OUR INCREASING COSTS.
On March 31, 1999, the pricing of expanded basic cable programming packages
was deregulated, permitting cable operators to set their own rates. This
deregulation was not applicable to basic services. However, the Federal
Communications Commission and the United States Congress continue to be
concerned that cable rate increases are exceeding inflation. It is possible that
either the Federal Communications Commission or the United States Congress will
again restrict the ability of cable system operators to implement rate
increases. Should this occur, it would impede our ability to raise our rates. If
we are unable to raise our rates in response to increasing costs, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
IF WE OFFER TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
REGULATORY BURDENS CAUSING US TO INCUR ADDITIONAL COSTS.
If we enter the business of offering telecommunications services, we may be
required to obtain federal, state and local licenses or other authorizations to
offer these services. We may not be able to obtain such authorizations in a
timely manner, or at all, and conditions could be imposed upon such licenses or
authorizations that may not be favorable to us. Furthermore, telecommunications
companies, including Internet protocol telephony companies, generally are
subject to significant regulation as well as higher fees for pole attachments.
Internet protocol telephony companies are companies that have the ability to
offer telephone services over the Internet. Pole attachments are cable wires
that are attached to poles.
In particular, cable operators who provide telecommunications services and
cannot reach agreement with local utilities over pole attachment rates in states
that do not regulate pole attachment rates will be subject to a methodology
prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission for determining the rates.
These rates may be higher than those paid by cable operators who do not provide
telecommunications services. The rate increases are to be phased in over a five-
year period beginning on February 8, 2001. If we become subject to
telecommunications regulation or higher pole attachment rates, we may incur
additional costs which may be material to our business. A recent court decision
suggests that the provision of Internet service may subject cable systems to
higher pole attachment rates.
22
25
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other
things, our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and financial.
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or
suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure
you that we will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus
may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "should," "planned," "estimated" and "potential," among
others. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the forward-looking statements we make in this prospectus are set forth in
this prospectus and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time
with the SEC and include, but are not limited to:
- Our plans to achieve growth by offering new products and services and
through acquisitions and swaps;
- Our anticipated capital expenditures for our planned upgrades and the
ability to fund these expenditures;
- Our beliefs regarding the effects of governmental regulation on our
business; and
- Our ability to effectively compete in a highly competitive environment.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or a person acting on our
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by those cautionary statements.
23
26
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sales of common stock by the
selling shareholders pursuant to this prospectus.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never paid and do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our Class
A common stock in the foreseeable future. Charter Communications Holding Company
is required under certain circumstances to pay distributions pro rata to all its
common members to the extent necessary for any common member to pay taxes
incurred with respect to its share of taxable income attributed to Charter
Communications Holding Company. Covenants in the indentures and credit
agreements governing the indebtedness of Charter Communications Holding
Company's subsidiaries restrict their ability to make distributions to us and,
accordingly, limit our ability to declare or pay cash dividends. We intend to
cause Charter Communications Holding Company and its subsidiaries to retain
future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of the business of Charter
Communications Holding Company and its subsidiaries.
24
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2000 on a consolidated basis:
- the actual capitalization of Charter Communications, Inc.; and
- the pro forma capitalization of Charter Communications, Inc., assuming
completion as of June 30, 2000 of:
(1) the Kalamazoo transaction; and
(2) borrowings under the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility
and the application of a portion of such borrowings to repay a
portion of the Charter Operating revolving credit facility.
The impact of the Chat TV transaction is not presented below because the
effect was not significant.
This table should be read in conjunction with the "Unaudited Pro Forma
Financial Statements" and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
--------------------------
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
LONG-TERM DEBT:
Credit facilities:
Charter Holdings senior bridge loan.................... $ -- $ 1,000,000
Charter Operating(a)................................... 4,232,000 3,275,000
CC V -- Avalon......................................... 170,000 170,000
CC VI -- Fanch......................................... 850,000 850,000
CC VII -- Falcon....................................... 1,059,500 1,059,500
CC VIII Operating -- Bresnan........................... 638,900 638,900
8.250% senior notes due 2007.............................. 598,657 598,657
8.625% senior notes due 2009.............................. 1,496,016 1,496,016
9.920% senior discount notes due 2011..................... 1,026,029 1,026,029
10.00% senior notes due 2009.............................. 675,000 675,000
10.25% senior notes due 2010.............................. 325,000 325,000
11.75% senior discount notes due 2010..................... 316,780 316,780
11.875% senior discount notes due 2008 -- Avalon.......... 124,977 124,977
Other notes(b)............................................ 92,469 92,469
----------- -----------
Total long-term debt................................... 11,605,328 11,648,328
MINORITY INTEREST(c)........................................ 4,689,263 4,687,187
REDEEMABLE SECURITIES(d).................................... 1,846,176 1,846,176
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Class A common stock; $.001 par value; 1.75 billion shares
authorized; 222,039,746 and 233,213,122 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively.......................... 195 206
Class B common stock; $.001 par value; 750 million shares
authorized; 50,000 shares issued and outstanding....... -- --
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 250 million shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding........... -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................ 3,145,798 3,315,013
Accumulated deficit....................................... (443,766) (443,766)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... 961 961
----------- -----------
Total shareholders' equity............................. 2,703,188 2,872,414
----------- -----------
Total capitalization................................... $20,843,955 $21,054,105
=========== ===========
- -------------------------
(a) The decrease in the Charter Operating credit facilities is related to the
use of a portion of the proceeds from the borrowings under the Charter
Holdings senior bridge loan facility to repay a portion of the amounts
outstanding offset by an increase in the credit facilities to fund the
Farmington and Capital Cable acquisitions.
25
28
(b) Primarily represents outstanding notes of our Renaissance subsidiary. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Financing Activities" and "Description of Certain
Indebtedness."
(c) Minority interest consists primarily of (1) total members' equity of Charter
Communications Holding Company multiplied by 60.4% at June 30, 2000 and
59.2% on a pro forma basis at June 30, 2000, the ownership percentage of
Charter Communications Holding Company not owned by us and (2) preferred
equity in a subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers
less a portion of redeemable securities. Gains (losses) arising from the
issuance by Charter Communications Holding Company of its membership units
are recorded as capital transactions, thereby increasing/(decreasing)
shareholders' equity and (decreasing)/increasing minority interest.
(d) The Rifkin, Falcon, Helicon and Bresnan sellers who own equity interests in
Charter Communications, Inc. and certain subsidiaries may have rescission
rights arising out of possible violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, in connection with the offers and sales of those equity
interests. Accordingly, the maximum cash obligation related to the possible
rescission rights, estimated at $1.8 billion, has been excluded from
shareholders' equity and minority interest, and classified as redeemable
securities. One year after the date of issuance of these equity interests
(when these possible recission rights will have expired), we will reclassify
the respective amounts to shareholders' equity and minority interest. See
"Certain Trends and Uncertainties -- Possible Rescission Liability."
26
29
DILUTION
The sales of Class A common stock by the selling shareholders as described
in this prospectus do not dilute the shares of Class A common stock because the
shares of Class A common stock sold under this prospectus are already issued and
outstanding.
27
30
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements of Charter
Communications, Inc. are based on the historical financial statements of Charter
Communications, Inc. Since January 1, 1999, Charter Communications Holding
Company and Charter Holdings have closed numerous acquisitions. In addition,
Charter Holdings merged with Marcus Holdings in March 1999. The consolidated
financial statements are adjusted on a pro forma basis to illustrate the
estimated effects of the Kalamazoo transaction, including the impact of amounts
allocated to minority interest, and borrowings under the Charter Holdings senior
bridge loan facility, as if such transactions had occurred on June 30, 2000 for
the unaudited pro forma balance sheet and to illustrate the estimated effects of
the following transactions as if they had occurred on January 1, 1999 for the
unaudited pro forma statements of operations:
(1) the acquisition of Marcus Cable by Mr. Allen and Marcus Holdings'
merger with and into Charter Holdings effective March 31, 1999;
(2) the acquisitions by Charter Communications Holding Company, Charter
Holdings and their subsidiaries completed since January 1, 1999,
including the Kalamazoo transaction and the transfer of an Indiana
cable system in connection with the acquisition of InterMedia Capital
Partners IV, L.P., InterMedia Partners and affiliates;
(3) the refinancing of the previous credit facilities of the Charter
companies and certain acquired companies;
(4) the sale of the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes and the January 2000
Charter Holdings notes, and the repurchase of certain of the Falcon
Communications, L.P., Avalon Cable of Michigan Holdings, Inc., and
Bresnan notes and debentures; and
(5) borrowings under the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility and
the application of a portion of such borrowings to repay a portion of
the Charter Operating revolving credit facility.
The impact of the Chat TV transaction is not presented in the unaudited pro
forma financial statements because the effect was not significant.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements reflect the application of the
principles of purchase accounting to the transactions listed in items (1) and
(2) above. The allocation of certain purchase prices is based, in part, on
preliminary information, which is subject to adjustment upon obtaining complete
valuation information of intangible assets and is subject to post-closing
purchase price adjustments. We believe that finalization of the purchase prices
and the allocation will not have a material impact on the results of operations
or financial position of Charter Communications, Inc.
Immediately after the closing of the Kalamazoo transaction, Charter
Communications, Inc. contributed 100% of the equity interest of the direct owner
of the Kalamazoo system to Charter Communications Holding Company in exchange
for 11,173,376 Class B common membership units of Charter Communications Holding
Company. As a result, the economic interest of Charter Communications, Inc. in
Charter Communications Holding Company, increased to 40.8% from 39.6%. The
unaudited pro forma financial statements reflect a minority interest of 59.2%.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements of Charter Communications,
Inc. do not purport to be indicative of what our financial position or results
of operations would actually have been had the transactions described above been
completed on the dates indicated or to project our results of operations for any
future date.
28
31
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA DATA
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 BRIDGE
CHARTER ACQUISITIONS LOAN
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (NOTE A) (NOTE B) TOTAL
-------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SUBSCRIBER DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues.............................................. $ 1,516,384 $ 47,721 $ -- $ 1,564,105
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and administrative............... 778,313 31,323 -- 809,636
Depreciation and amortization....................... 1,149,787 35,699 -- 1,185,486
Option compensation expense......................... 26,089 -- -- 26,089
Corporate expense charges (Note C).................. 27,515 449 -- 27,964
Management fees..................................... -- 181 -- 181
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Total operating expenses.......................... 1,981,704 67,652 -- 2,049,356
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss from operations.................................. (465,320) (19,931) -- (485,251)
Interest expense...................................... (482,042) (24,381) (32,555) (538,978)
Interest income....................................... 6,110 46 -- 6,156
Other income (expense)................................ (2,504) (92) -- (2,596)
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before income taxes, minority interest in loss of
subsidiary and extraordinary item................... (943,756) (44,358) (32,555) $ (1,020,669)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary (Note D)...... 566,221 16,671 19,289 602,181
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before extraordinary item........................ $ (377,535) $ (27,687) $ (13,266) $ (418,488)
=========== ========== =========== ============
Loss per common share, basic and diluted (Note E)..... $ (1.79)
============
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and
diluted (Note F).................................... 233,263,122
============
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
EBITDA (Note G)....................................... $ 681,963 $ 15,676 $ 697,639
EBITDA margin (Note H)................................ 45.0% 32.8% 44.6%
Adjusted EBITDA (Note I).............................. $ 738,071 $ 16,398 $ 754,469
Cash flows from operating activities.................. 606,832 90,020 696,852
Cash flows from investing activities.................. (1,051,136) (38,924) (1,090,060)
Cash flows from financing activities.................. (2,701,287) (79,321) (2,780,608)
Cash interest expense................................. 444,304
Capital expenditures.................................. 1,049,991 102,805 1,152,796
Total debt to estimated annual EBITDA (Note J)........ 8.3x
Total debt to estimated annual adjusted EBITDA (Note
K).................................................. 7.7
EBITDA to cash interest expense....................... 1.6
EBITDA to interest expense............................ 1.3
OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD, EXCEPT FOR AVERAGE):
Homes passed (Note L)................................. 8,911,200 1,155,600 10,066,800
Basic customers (Note M).............................. 5,492,700 770,300 6,263,000
Basic penetration (Note N)............................ 61.6% 66.7% 62.2%
Premium units (Note O)................................ 2,952,700 373,800 3,326,500
Premium penetration (Note P).......................... 53.8% 48.5% 53.1%
Average monthly revenue per basic customer (Note Q)... $ 41.62
29
32
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
NOTE A: Pro forma operating results for our acquisitions completed since
January 1, 2000 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
-------------------------------------------------
2000 ACQUISITIONS -- HISTORICAL
-------------------------------------------------
BRESNAN(A) KALAMAZOO(B) OTHER(C) TOTAL
---------- ------------ -------- --------
Revenues........................................ $37,102 $10,231 $ 3,187 $ 50,520
------- ------- ------- --------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and administrative......... 24,925 6,349 2,759 34,033
Depreciation and amortization................. 8,095 1,215 777 10,087
Corporate expense charges..................... -- 231 3 234
Management fees............................... 1,389 -- 109 1,498
------- ------- ------- --------
Total operating expenses................... 34,409 7,795 3,648 45,852
------- ------- ------- --------
Income (loss) from operations................... 2,693 2,436 (461) 4,668
Interest expense................................ (9,566) -- (1,565) (11,131)
Interest income................................. 44 2,343 2 2,389
Other income (expense).......................... (106) (86) (1) (193)
------- ------- ------- --------
Loss before income taxes and extraordinary
item.......................................... $(6,935) $ 4,693 $(2,025) $ (4,267)
======= ======= ======= ========
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 ACQUISITIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO FORMA
-------------------------------------------------------------
HISTORICAL ACQUISITIONS(D) DISPOSITIONS(E) ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL
---------- --------------- --------------- ----------- --------
Revenues.......................... $ 50,520 $556 $(3,355) $ -- $ 47,721
-------- ---- ------- -------- --------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative............... 34,033 415 (1,507) (1,618)(f) 31,323
Depreciation and amortization... 10,087 107 (10) 25,515(g) 35,699
Corporate expense charges....... 234 47 -- 168(f) 449
Management fees................. 1,498 -- (117) (1,200)(h) 181
-------- ---- ------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses........ 45,852 569 (1,634) 22,865 67,652
-------- ---- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from operations..... 4,668 (13) (1,721) (22,865) (19,931)
Interest expense.................. (11,131) (8) -- (13,242)(i) (24,381)
Interest income................... 2,389 -- -- (2,343)(j) 46
Other income (expense)............ (193) 10 (5) 96(k) (92)
-------- ---- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes,
minority interest in loss of
subsidiary and extraordinary
item............................ (4,267) (11) (1,726) (38,354) (44,358)
Income tax benefit................ -- (5) -- 5(l) --
Minority interest in loss of
subsidiary...................... -- -- -- 16,671(m) 16,671
-------- ---- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before extraordinary
item............................ $ (4,267) $ (6) $(1,726) $(21,688) $(27,687)
======== ==== ======= ======== ========
- -------------------------
(a) Represents the results of operations of Bresnan for period from January 1,
2000 to February 14, 2000, the date of acquisition.
(b) Represents the historical results of operations of Kalamazoo for the six
months ended June 30, 2000.
30
33
(c) Represents the historical results of operations of Capital Cable and
Farmington for the period from January 1, 2000 through April 1, 2000, the
date of acquisitions.
(d) Represents the historical results of operations for the period from January
1, 2000 through the date of purchase for an acquisition completed by
Bresnan. This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. The purchase price was $36.2 million and the transaction closed
in January 2000.
(e) Represents the operating results related to an Indiana cable system that we
did not transfer at the time of the InterMedia closing because some of the
necessary regulatory approvals were still pending. This system was
transferred in March 2000. No material gain or loss occurred on the
disposition as these systems were recently acquired and recorded at fair
value at that time.
(f) Reflects a reclassification of expenses representing corporate expenses
that would have occurred at Charter Investment, Inc. totaling $0.2 million.
The remaining adjustment primarily relates to the elimination of
divestiture costs of $0.8 million and the adjustment for Bresnan loss
contracts of $0.6 million that were included in operating, general and
administrative expense.
(g) Represents additional depreciation and amortization as a result of our
acquisitions completed in 1999 and 2000. A large portion of the purchase
price was allocated to franchises ($2.9 billion) that are amortized over 15
years. The adjustment to depreciation and amortization expense consists of
the following (dollars in millions):
WEIGHTED AVERAGE DEPRECIATION/
FAIR VALUE USEFUL LIFE AMORTIZATION
---------- ---------------- -------------
Franchises................................... $2,882.0 15 $27.0
Cable distribution systems................... 325.7 8 7.6
Land, buildings and improvements............. 10.2 10 0.2
Vehicles and equipment....................... 16.8 3 0.9
-----
Total depreciation and amortization..................................... 35.7
Less -- historical depreciation and amortization........................ (10.2)
-----
Adjustment......................................................... $25.5
=====
(h) Represents the elimination of termination benefits paid in connection with
the Bresnan acquisition.
(i) Reflects additional interest expense on borrowings, which were used to
finance the 2000 acquisitions as follows (dollars in millions):
$631.2 million of credit facilities at a composite current
rate of 8.4% -- Bresnan................................... $ 6.6
January 2000 Charter Holdings notes used to refinance
Bresnan 8.0% senior notes and 9.25% senior discount notes
at composite rate of 10.55%............................... 4.7
Interest expense on additional borrowings used to finance
other acquisitions at a composite current rate of 8.8%.... 13.0
------
Total pro forma interest expense....................... 24.3
Less -- historical interest expense from acquired
companies............................................. (11.1)
------
Adjustment........................................... $ 13.2
======
An increase in the interest rate of 0.125% on all variable rate debt would
result in an increase in interest expense of $4.4 million.
(j) Represents interest income on a historical related party receivable that
will be retained by the seller.
(k) Represents the elimination of gain (loss) on sale of cable systems whose
results of operations have been eliminated in (e) above.
31
34
(l) Represents an adjustment to eliminate income tax benefit as a result of
expected recurring future losses. The losses will not be tax benefited, and
a net deferred tax asset will not be recorded.
(m) Represents the allocation of losses to the minority interest in loss of
subsidiary based on ownership of Charter Communications Holding Company and
the 2% accretion of the preferred membership units in an indirect subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued to certain Bresnan sellers.
NOTE B: Represents an increase in interest expense related to borrowings
under the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility and the application of a
portion of such borrowings to repay a portion of the Charter Operating revolving
credit facility (dollars in millions).
$1.0 billion of Charter Holdings senior bridge loan at a
weighted average rate of 14.52%........................... $ 72.6
Amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the
Charter Holdings senior bridge loan....................... 1.3
Less -- historical interest expense on $957.0 million
Charter Operating credit facilities at a composite
rate of 8.6%......................................... (41.3)
------
$ 32.6
======
Also represents an adjustment to minority interest in loss of subsidiary to
reflect the allocation of 59.2% of the pro forma loss to minority interest.
NOTE C: From November 12, 1999, the date of the initial public offering of
Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Investment, Inc. provided management
services to subsidiaries of Charter Operating. From and after the initial public
offering of Charter Communications Inc., such management services were provided
by Charter Communications, Inc. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
NOTE D: Represents the allocation of losses to the minority interest in
loss of subsidiary based on ownership of Charter Communications Holding Company
and the 2% accretion of the preferred membership units in an indirect subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued to certain Bresnan sellers. These membership units
are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of Class A common stock of
Charter Communications, Inc.
NOTE E: Basic and diluted loss per common share assumes none of the
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company or preferred
membership units in an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain
Bresnan sellers as of June 30, 2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications,
Inc. Class A common stock and none of the outstanding options to purchase
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company that are
automatically exchanged immediately after issuance for Charter Communications,
Inc. Class A common stock are exercised. Basic and diluted loss per common share
equals net loss divided by weighted average common shares outstanding. If the
membership units were exchanged or options exercised, the effects would be
antidilutive.
FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000
-------------
Converted loss per common share........................ $ (1.71)
Weighted average common shares
outstanding -- converted............................. 596,575,345
Converted loss per common share assumes all common membership units of Charter
Communications Holding Company and preferred membership units in an indirect
subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers as of June 30,
2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock. If
all these shares are converted, minority interest would equal zero. Converted
loss per common share is calculated by dividing loss before minority interest by
the weighted average common shares outstanding -- converted. Weighted average
common shares outstanding -- converted assumes the total common membership units
in Charter Communications Holding Company totaling 339,096,474 and 24,215,749
preferred membership units in an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by
certain Bresnan sellers are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A
common stock.
32
35
NOTE F: Represents all shares outstanding as of January 1, 2000
(195,550,000 shares) plus shares issued to the Rifkin and Falcon sellers through
June 30, 2000 (26,539,746 shares) and shares issued in the Kalamazoo transaction
(11,173,376 shares).
NOTE G: EBITDA represents earnings (loss) before extraordinary item,
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and minority interest.
EBITDA is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a
cable company's ability to service indebtedness. However, EBITDA should not be
considered as an alternative to income from operations or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities, as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. EBITDA should also not be construed as
an indication of a company's operating performance or as a measure of liquidity.
In addition, because EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the
presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
other companies. Management's discretionary use of funds depicted by EBITDA may
be limited by working capital, debt service and capital expenditure requirements
and by restrictions related to legal requirements, commitments and
uncertainties.
NOTE H: EBITDA margin represents EBITDA as a percentage of revenues.
NOTE I: Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA before option compensation expense,
corporate expense charges, management fees and other expenses. Adjusted EBITDA
is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a cable
company's ability to service indebtedness. However, adjusted EBITDA should not
be considered as an alternative to income from operations or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities, as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Adjusted EBITDA should also not be
construed as an indication of a company's operating performance or as a measure
of liquidity. In addition, because adjusted EBITDA is not calculated identically
by all companies, the presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly
titled measures of other companies. Management's discretionary use of funds
depicted by adjusted EBITDA may be limited by working capital, debt service and
capital expenditure requirements and by restrictions related to legal
requirements, commitments and uncertainties.
NOTE J: Estimated annual EBITDA represents EBITDA for the six months
ended June 30, 2000 multiplied by 2.
NOTE K: Estimated annual adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 multiplied by 2.
NOTE L: Homes passed are the number of living units, such as single
residence homes, apartments and condominium units, passed by the cable
distribution network in a given cable system service area.
NOTE M: Basic customers are customers who receive basic cable service.
NOTE N: Basic penetration represents basic customers as a percentage of
homes passed.
NOTE O: Premium units represent the total number of subscriptions to
premium channels.
NOTE P: Premium penetration represents premium units as a percentage of
basic customers.
NOTE Q: Average monthly revenue per basic customer represents revenues
divided by six divided by the number of basic customers at June 30, 2000.
33
36
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA DATA
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CHARTER BRIDGE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ACQUISITIONS LOAN
(NOTE A) (NOTE B) (NOTE C) TOTAL
-------------------- ------------ -------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SUBSCRIBER DATA)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues............................................. $1,553,424 $1,397,611 $ -- $ 2,951,035
---------- ---------- -------- -------------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and administrative.............. 806,941 703,712 -- 1,510,653
Depreciation and amortization...................... 808,981 887,586 -- 1,696,567
Option compensation expense........................ 79,979 -- -- 79,979
Corporate expense charges (Note D)................. 51,428 59,202 -- 110,630
Management fees.................................... -- 16,224 -- 16,224
---------- ---------- -------- -------------
Total operating expenses......................... 1,747,329 1,666,724 -- 3,414,053
---------- ---------- -------- -------------
Loss from operations................................. (193,905) (269,113) -- (463,018)
Interest expense..................................... (536,218) (487,724) (65,111) (1,089,053)
Interest income...................................... 4,329 1,335 -- 5,664
Other income (expense)............................... 285 (646) -- (361)
---------- ---------- -------- -------------
Loss before income taxes, minority interest in loss
of subsidiary and extraordinary item............... (725,509) (756,148) (65,111) (1,546,768)
Income tax expense................................... (1,030) (2,717) -- (3,747)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary (Note E)..... 430,474 444,498 38,578 913,550
---------- ---------- -------- -------------
Loss before extraordinary item....................... $ (296,065) $ (314,367) $(26,533) $ (636,965)
========== ========== ======== =============
Loss per common share, basic and diluted (Note F).... $(2.73)
=============
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and
diluted (Note G)................................... 233,263,122
=============
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
EBITDA (Note H)...................................... $ 615,361 $ 617,827 $1,233,188
EBITDA margin (Note I)............................... 39.6% 44.2% 41.8%
Adjusted EBITDA (Note J)............................. $ 746,483 $ 693,899 $1,440,382
Cash flows from operating activities................. 479,916 485,751 965,667
Cash flows used in investing activities.............. (768,263) (641,724) (1,409,987)
Cash flows from financing activities................. 412,480 243,024 655,504
Cash interest expense................................ 882,702
Capital expenditures................................. 741,508 545,322 1,286,830
Total debt to EBITDA................................. 9.1x
Total debt to adjusted EBITDA........................ 7.8
EBITDA to cash interest expense...................... 1.4
EBITDA to interest expense........................... 1.1
OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD, EXCEPT FOR
AVERAGE):
Homes passed (Note K)................................ 8,706,400 1,146,400 9,852,800
Basic customers (Note L)............................. 5,452,500 768,100 6,220,600
Basic penetration (Note M)........................... 62.6% 67.0% 63.1%
Premium units (Note N)............................... 2,800,800 343,700 3,144,400
Premium penetration (Note O)......................... 51.4% 44.7% 50.5%
Average monthly revenue per basic customer (Note
P)................................................. $39.53
34
37
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
NOTE A: Pro forma operating results for Charter Communications, Inc.
consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
HISTORICAL
-----------------------------------
1/1/99
YEAR ENDED THROUGH
12/31/99 3/31/99
CHARTER MARCUS PRO FORMA
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. HOLDINGS(A) ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL
-------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Revenues........................................... $1,428,244 $125,180 $ -- $1,553,424
---------- -------- --------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and administrative............ 737,957 68,984 -- 806,941
Depreciation and amortization.................... 745,315 51,688 11,978(b) 808,981
Option compensation expense...................... 79,979 -- -- 79,979
Corporate expense charges........................ 51,428 -- -- 51,428
Management fees.................................. -- 4,381 (4,381)(c) --
---------- -------- --------- ----------
Total operating expenses....................... 1,614,679 125,053 7,597 1,747,329
---------- -------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) from operations...................... (186,435) 127 (7,597) (193,905)
Interest expense................................... (477,799) (27,067) (31,352)(d) (536,218)
Interest income.................................... 34,467 104 (30,242)(e) 4,329
Other expense...................................... (8,039) (158) 8,482(f) 285
---------- -------- --------- ----------
Loss before income taxes, minority interest in loss
of subsidiary and extraordinary item............. $ (637,806) $(26,994) $ (60,709) $ (725,509)
Income tax expense................................. 1,030 -- -- 1,030
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary............ 572,607 -- (142,133)(g) 430,474
---------- -------- --------- ----------
Loss before extraordinary item..................... $ (66,229) $(26,994) $(202,842) $ (296,065)
========== ======== ========= ==========
- -------------------------
(a) Marcus Holdings represents the results of operations of Marcus Holdings
through March 31, 1999, the date of its merger with Charter Holdings.
(b) As a result of Mr. Allen acquiring the controlling interest in Marcus Cable,
a large portion of the purchase price was recorded as franchises ($2.5
billion) that are amortized over 15 years. This resulted in additional
amortization for the period from January 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999. The
adjustment to depreciation and amortization expense consists of the
following (dollars in millions):
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
USEFUL LIFE DEPRECIATION/
FAIR VALUE (IN YEARS) AMORTIZATION
---------- ---------------- -------------
Franchises.................................................. $2,500.0 15 $ 40.8
Cable distribution systems.................................. 720.0 8 21.2
Land, buildings and improvements............................ 28.3 10 0.7
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 13.6 3 1.0
------
Total depreciation and amortization....................... 63.7
Less -- historical depreciation and amortization of Marcus
Cable................................................... (51.7)
------
Adjustment.............................................. $ 12.0
======
(c) Reflects the elimination of management fees.
(d) Represents the issuance of the following January 2000 Charter Holdings notes
and the reduction of interest expense in connection with the extinguishment
of substantially all of our long-term
35
38
debt in March 1999, excluding borrowings under our previous credit
facilities, and the refinancing of all previous credit facilities (dollars
in millions):
INTEREST
DESCRIPTION EXPENSE
- ----------- --------
$675.0 million of 10.00% senior notes....................... $ 67.5
$325.0 million of 10.25% senior notes....................... 33.3
$532.0 million of 11.75% senior discount notes.............. 36.3
Reduction of interest expense in connection with the
issuance of March 1999 Charter Holding notes.............. (2.8)
Amortization of debt issuance costs......................... 5.0
-------
Total pro forma interest expense.......................... 139.3
Less -- historical interest expense....................... (107.9)
-------
Adjustment............................................. $ 31.4
=======
(e) Reflects the elimination of interest income on excess cash since we assumed
substantially all such cash was used to finance a portion of the
acquisitions completed in 1999.
(f) Reflects the elimination of expenses related to the March 1999
extinguishment and refinancing of debt.
(g) Adjusts minority interest in loss of subsidiary to reflect the allocation of
59.2% of pro forma losses to minority interest.
36
39
NOTE B: Pro forma operating results for our acquisitions completed since
January 1, 1999 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
ACQUISITIONS -- HISTORICAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREATER
AMERICAN MEDIA INTERMEDIA
RENAISSANCE(A) CABLE(A) SYSTEMS(A) HELICON(A) RIFKIN(A) SYSTEMS(A) FALCON(A) FANCH(A)
-------------- -------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- --------
Revenues............... $20,396 $12,311 $42,348 $ 49,564 $152,364 $152,789 $ 371,617 $185,917
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative...... 9,382 6,465 26,067 31,563 95,077 84,174 218,308 85,577
Depreciation and
amortization........ 8,912 5,537 5,195 16,617 77,985 79,325 196,260 62,097
Equity-based deferred
compensation........ -- -- -- -- -- -- 46,400 --
Corporate expense
charges............. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Management fees....... -- 369 -- 2,511 2,513 2,356 -- 6,162
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Total operating
expenses.......... 18,294 12,371 31,262 50,691 175,575 165,855 460,968 153,836
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Income (loss) from
operations............ 2,102 (60) 11,086 (1,127) (23,211) (13,066) (89,351) 32,081
Interest expense....... (6,321) (3,218) (565) (20,682) (34,926) (17,636) (114,993) --
Interest income........ 122 32 -- 124 -- 187 -- --
Other income
(expense)............. -- 2 (398) -- (12,742) (2,719) 8,021 (7,796)
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before
income taxes and
extraordinary item.... (4,097) (3,244) 10,123 (21,685) (70,879) (33,234) (196,323) 24,285
Income tax expense
(benefit)............. (65) 5 4,535 -- (1,975) (2,681) 2,509 197
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item.... $(4,032) $(3,249) $ 5,588 $(21,685) $(68,904) $(30,553) $(198,832) $24,088
======= ======= ======= ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
ACQUISITIONS -- HISTORICAL
-------------------------------------------------------------
AVALON(A) BRESNAN(B) KALAMAZOO(B) OTHER(B) TOTAL
--------- ---------- ------------ -------- ----------
Revenues............... $ 94,383 $283,574 $20,259 $24,826 $1,410,348
-------- -------- ------- ------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative...... 53,089 176,611 12,321 14,232 812,866
Depreciation and
amortization........ 39,943 59,752 3,534 6,792 561,949
Equity-based deferred
compensation........ -- -- 1,868 -- 48,268
Corporate expense
charges............. -- -- 501 -- 501
Management fees....... -- -- -- 910 14,821
-------- -------- ------- ------- ----------
Total operating
expenses.......... 93,032 236,363 18,224 21,934 1,438,405
-------- -------- ------- ------- ----------
Income (loss) from
operations............ 1,351 47,211 2,035 2,892 (28,057)
Interest expense....... (40,162) (67,291) -- (6,180) (311,974)
Interest income........ 764 -- 4,120 (20) 5,329
Other income
(expense)............. 4,499 (344) (189) (30) (11,696)
-------- -------- ------- ------- ----------
Income (loss) before
income taxes and
extraordinary item.... (33,548) (20,424) 5,966 (3,338) (346,398)
Income tax expense
(benefit)............. (13,936) -- -- -- (11,411)
-------- -------- ------- ------- ----------
Income (loss) before
extraordinary item.... $(19,612) $(20,424) $ 5,966 $(3,338) $ (334,987)
======== ======== ======= ======= ==========
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACQUISITIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO FORMA
-------------------------------------------------------------
HISTORICAL ACQUISITIONS(C) DISPOSITIONS(D) ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL
---------- --------------- --------------- ----------- ----------
Revenues............................................. $1,410,348 $43,859 $(53,626) $ (2,970)(e) $1,397,611
---------- ------- -------- --------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and administrative............... 812,866 25,370 (25,493) (109,031)(f) 703,712
Depreciation and amortization....................... 561,949 11,166 (22,850) 337,321(g) 887,586
Equity-based deferred compensation.................. 48,268 -- -- (48,268)(h) --
Corporate expense charges........................... 501 1,280 -- 57,421(f) 59,202
Management fees..................................... 14,821 1,403 -- -- 16,224
---------- ------- -------- --------- ----------
Total operating expenses............................ 1,438,405 39,219 (48,343) 237,443 1,666,724
---------- ------- -------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) from operations........................ (28,057) 4,640 (5,283) (240,413) (269,113)
Interest expense..................................... (311,974) (2,402) 37 (173,385)(i) (487,724)
Interest income...................................... 5,329 126 -- (4,120)(j) 1,335
Other income (expense)............................... (11,696) 49,024 (2,576) (35,398)(k) (646)
---------- ------- -------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority interest
in loss of subsidiary and extraordinary item........ (346,398) 51,388 (7,822) (453,316) (756,148)
Income tax expense (benefit)......................... (11,411) (47) -- 14,175(l) 2,717
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary.............. -- -- -- 444,498(m) 444,498
---------- ------- -------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item.............. $ (334,987) $51,435 $ (7,822) $ (22,993) $ (314,367)
========== ======= ======== ========= ==========
- -------------------------
(a) Renaissance represents the results of operations of Renaissance Media Group,
LLC through April 30, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter Holdings.
American Cable represents the results of operations of American Cable
Entertainment, LLC through May 7, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter
Holdings. Greater Media Systems
37
40
represents the results of operations of cable systems of Greater Media
Cablevision, Inc. through June 30, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter
Holdings. Helicon represents the results of operations of Helicon Partners
I, L.P. and affiliates through July 30, 1999, the date of acquisition by
Charter Holdings. InterMedia represents the results of operations of cable
systems of Intermedia Capital Partners IV, L.P., InterMedia Partners and
affiliates through October 1, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter
Holdings. Falcon represents the results of operations of cable systems of
Falcon Communications, L.P. through November 12, 1999, the date of
acquisition by Charter Communications Holding Company. Fanch represents the
results of operations of cable systems of Fanch Cablevision L.P. and
affiliates through November 15, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter
Communications Holding Company. Avalon represents the results of operations
of cable systems of Avalon Cable of Michigan Holding, Inc. through November
15, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter Communications Holding Company.
Rifkin includes the results of operations of Rifkin Acquisition Partners,
L.L.L.P., Rifkin Cable Income Partners L.P., Indiana Cable Associates, Ltd.
and R/N South Florida Cable Management Limited Partnership, all under common
ownership through September 13, 1999, the date of acquisition by Charter
Holdings, as follows (dollars in thousands):
RIFKIN RIFKIN INDIANA SOUTH
ACQUISITION CABLE INCOME CABLE FLORIDA OTHER TOTAL
----------- ------------ ------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues........................ $ 68,829 $3,807 $ 6,034 $ 17,516 $ 56,178 $152,364
Income (loss) from operations... (6,954) 146 (3,714) (14,844) 2,155 (23,211)
Loss before extraordinary
item.......................... (21,571) (391) (4,336) (15,605) (27,001) (68,904)
(b) Bresnan represents the results of operations of cable systems of Bresnan for
the year ended December 31, 1999. Kalamazoo represents the results of
operations of cable systems of Cablevision of Michigan, Inc., the indirect
owner of a cable system in Kalamazoo, Michigan, for the year ended December
31, 1999. Other represents the results of operations of Vista Broadband
Communications, L.L.C. through July 30, 1999, the date of acquisition by
Charter Holdings, the results of operations of cable systems of Cable
Satellite of South Miami, Inc. through August 4, 1999, the date of
acquisition by Charter Holdings and the results of operations of cable
systems of Capital Cable and Farmington for the year ended December 31,
1999.
(c) Represents the historical results of operations for the period from January
1, 1999 through the date of purchase for acquisitions completed by Bresnan
before December 31, 1999 and the historical results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 1999 for acquisitions completed after December 31,
1999.
These acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. The purchase price in millions and closing dates for
significant acquisitions are as follows:
BRESNAN
ACQUISITIONS
------------
Purchase price.............................................. $40.0
Closing date................................................ January 1999
Purchase price.............................................. $27.0
Closing date................................................ March 1999
Purchase price.............................................. $36.2
Closing date................................................ January 2000
(d) Represents the elimination of the operating results related to the cable
systems transferred to InterMedia as part of a swap of cable systems in
October 1999. The agreed value of our systems transferred to InterMedia was
$420.0 million. This number includes 30,000 customers served by an Indiana
cable system that we did not transfer at the time of the InterMedia closing
because some of the necessary regulatory approvals were still pending. This
system was transferred in March 2000. No material gain or loss occurred on
the disposition as these systems were recently acquired and recorded at fair
value at that time. Also represents the elimination of the operating results
related to the sale of a Bresnan cable system sold in January 1999.
38
41
(e) Reflects the elimination of historical revenues and expenses associated with
an entity not included in the purchase by Charter.
(f) Reflects a reclassification of expenses representing corporate expenses
that would have occurred at Charter Investment, Inc. totaling $57.4
million. The remaining adjustment primarily relates to the elimination of
severance payments of $44.2 million and the write-off of debt issuance
costs of $7.4 million that were included in operating, general and
administrative expense.
(g) Represents additional depreciation and amortization as a result of our
acquisitions completed in 1999 and 2000. A large portion of the purchase
price was allocated to franchises ($12.6 billion) that are amortized over 15
years. The adjustment to depreciation and amortization expense consists of
the following (dollars in millions):
WEIGHTED AVERAGE DEPRECIATION/
FAIR VALUE USEFUL LIFE AMORTIZATION
---------- ---------------- -------------
Franchises................................................. $12,583.4 15 $ 681.8
Cable distribution systems................................. 1,754.9 8 180.1
Land, buildings and improvements........................... 54.7 10 4.2
Vehicles and equipment..................................... 90.4 3 21.5
-------
Total depreciation and amortization................................................... 887.6
Less -- historical depreciation and amortization...................................... (550.3)
-------
Adjustment....................................................................... $ 337.3
=======
(h) Reflects the elimination of approximately $46.4 million of change in control
payments under the terms of Falcon's equity-based compensation plans that
were triggered by the acquisition of Falcon by Charter Communications
Holding Company and the elimination of approximately $1.9 million of change
in control payments under the terms of a stock appreciation rights plan that
were triggered by the acquisition of the Kalamazoo system by Charter
Communications, Inc. These plans were terminated and the employees will
participate in the option plan of Charter Communications Holding Company. As
such, these costs will not recur.
(i) Reflects additional interest expense on borrowings, which were used to
finance the acquisitions as follows (dollars in millions):
$170.0 million of credit facilities at a composite current
rate of 8.6% -- Avalon.................................... $ 12.2
$150.0 million 9.375% senior subordinated notes -- Avalon... 12.3
$196.0 million 11.875% senior discount notes -- Avalon...... 11.6
$850.0 million of credit facilities at a composite current
rate of 8.5% -- Fanch..................................... 62.0
$1.0 billion of credit facilities at a composite current
rate of 8.0% -- Falcon.................................... 71.9
$375.0 million 8.375% senior debentures -- Falcon........... 27.2
$435.3 million 9.285% senior discount
debentures -- Falcon...................................... 26.0
$631.2 million of credit facilities at a composite current
rate of 8.4% -- Bresnan................................... 52.9
$170.0 million 8.0% senior notes -- Bresnan................. 13.6
$275.0 million 9.25% senior discount notes -- Bresnan....... 17.7
Interest expense on additional borrowings used to finance
acquisitions at a composite current rate of 8.8%.......... 180.3
-------
Total pro forma interest expense....................... 487.7
Less -- historical interest expense from acquired
companies............................................. (314.3)
-------
Adjustment........................................... $ 173.4
=======
An increase in the interest rate of 0.125% on all variable rate debt would
result in an increase in interest expense of $8.7 million.
(j) Represents interest income on a historical related party receivable, that
was retained by the seller.
39
42
(k) Represents the elimination of gain (loss) on sale of cable television
systems whose results of operations have been eliminated in (d) above.
(l) Represents an adjustment to eliminate income tax benefit as a result of
expected recurring future losses and record income tax expense. The losses
will not be tax benefited, and a net deferred tax asset will not be
recorded. Income tax expense represents taxes assessed by certain state
jurisdictions for certain indirect subsidiaries.
(m) Represents the allocation of losses to minority interest in loss of
subsidiary based on ownership of Charter Communications Holding Company and
the 2% accretion of the preferred membership units of an indirect subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued to certain Bresnan sellers.
NOTE C: Represents an increase in interest expense related to borrowings
under the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility and the application of a
portion of such borrowings to repay a portion of the Charter Operating revolving
credit facility (dollars in millions).
$1.0 billion of Charter Holdings senior bridge loan at a
weighted average rate of 14.52%........................... $145.2
Amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the
Charter Holdings senior bridge loan....................... 2.5
Less -- historical interest expense on $957.0 million
Charter Operating credit facilities at a composite
rate of 8.6%.......................................... (82.6)
------
$ 65.1
======
Also represents an adjustment to minority interest in loss of subsidiary to
reflect the allocation of 59.2% of the pro forma loss to minority interest.
NOTE D: From November 12, 1999, the date of the initial public offering of
Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Investment, Inc. provided management
services to subsidiaries of Charter Operating. From and after the initial public
offering of Charter Communications Inc., such management services were provided
by Charter Communications, Inc. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
NOTE E: Represents the allocation of losses to the minority interest in
loss of subsidiary based on ownership of Charter Communications Holding Company
and the 2% accretion of the preferred membership units in an indirect subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued to certain Bresnan sellers. These membership units
are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for shares of Class A common stock of
Charter Communications, Inc.
NOTE F: Basic and diluted loss per common share assumes none of the
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company or preferred
membership units in an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain
Bresnan sellers as of June 30, 2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications,
Inc. Class A common stock and none of the outstanding options to purchase
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company that are
automatically exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock
are exercised. Basic and diluted loss per common share equals net loss divided
by weighted average common shares outstanding. If the membership units were
exchanged or options exercised, the effects would be antidilutive.
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999
-----------------
Converted loss per common share............................ $ (2.60)
Weighted average common shares outstanding -- converted.... 596,575,345
Converted loss per common share assumes all common membership unit of Charter
Communications Holding Company and preferred membership units in an indirect
subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers as of June 30,
2000, are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock, if
all these shares are converted, minority interest would equal zero. Converted
loss per common share is calculated by dividing loss before minority interest by
the weighted average common shares outstanding -- converted. Weighted average
common shares outstanding -- converted assumes the total common membership units
in Charter Communications
40
43
Holding Company totaling 339,096,474 and 24,215,749 preferred membership units
in an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings held by certain Bresnan sellers
are exchanged for Charter Communications, Inc. Class A common stock.
NOTE G: Represents all shares issued in connection with initial public
offering (195,550,000 shares) plus shares issued to the Rifkin and Falcon
sellers through June 30, 2000 (26,539,746 shares) and shares issued to sellers
in the Kalamazoo transaction (11,173,376 shares).
NOTE H: EBITDA represents earnings (loss) before extraordinary item
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and minority interest.
EBITDA is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a
cable company's ability to service indebtedness. However, EBITDA should not be
considered as an alternative to income from operations or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities, as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. EBITDA should also not be construed as
an indication of a company's operating performance or as a measure of liquidity.
In addition, because EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the
presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
other companies. Management's discretionary use of funds depicted by EBITDA may
be limited by working capital, debt service and capital expenditure requirements
and by restrictions related to legal requirements, commitments and
uncertainties.
NOTE I: EBITDA margin represents EBITDA as a percentage of revenues.
NOTE J: Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA before option compensation expense,
corporate expense charges, management fees and other expenses. Adjusted EBITDA
is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a cable
company's ability to service indebtedness. However, adjusted EBITDA should not
be considered as an alternative to income from operations or to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities, as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Adjusted EBITDA should also not be
construed as an indication of a company's operating performance or as a measure
of liquidity. In addition, because adjusted EBITDA is not calculated identically
by all companies, the presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly
titled measures of other companies. Management's discretionary use of funds
depicted by adjusted EBITDA may be limited by working capital, debt service and
capital expenditure requirements and by restrictions related to legal
requirements, commitments and uncertainties.
NOTE K: Homes passed are the number of living units, such as single
residence homes, apartments and condominium units, passed by the cable
television distribution network in a given cable system service area.
NOTE L: Basic customers are customers who receive basic cable service.
NOTE M: Basic penetration represents basic customers as a percentage of
homes passed.
NOTE N: Premium units represent the total number of subscriptions to
premium channels.
NOTE O: Premium penetration represents premium units as a percentage of
basic customers.
NOTE P: Average monthly revenue per basic customer represents revenues
divided by twelve divided by the number of basic customers at December 31, 1999.
41
44
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------
KALAMAZOO BRIDGE
CHARTER TRANSACTION LOAN
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (NOTE A) (NOTE B) TOTAL
-------------------- ----------- -------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................... $ 74,021 $ 1 $22,463 $ 96,485
Accounts receivable, net.................... 122,869 260 -- 123,129
Prepaid expenses and other.................. 38,838 135 -- 38,973
----------- -------- ------- -----------
Total current assets................... 235,728 396 22,463 258,587
Property, plant and equipment............... 4,233,878 27,270 -- 4,261,148
Franchises.................................. 17,338,243 143,180 -- 17,481,423
Other assets................................ 217,308 -- 15,000 232,308
----------- -------- ------- -----------
Total assets........................... $22,025,157 $170,846 $37,463 $22,233,466
=========== ======== ======= ===========
Accounts payable and accrued expenses....... $ 1,017,330 $ 3,696 $(5,537) $ 1,015,489
Payables to manager of cable
systems -- related parties................ 2,751 -- -- 2,751
----------- -------- ------- -----------
Total current liabilities.............. 1,020,081 3,696 (5,537) 1,018,240
Long-term debt.............................. 11,605,328 -- 43,000 11,648,328
Deferred management fees -- related
parties................................... 13,751 -- -- 13,751
Other long-term liabilities................. 147,370 -- -- 147,370
Redeemable securities (Note C).............. 1,846,176 -- -- 1,846,176
Minority interest........................... 4,689,263 (2,076) -- 4,687,187
Shareholders' equity........................ 2,703,188 169,226 -- 2,872,414
----------- -------- ------- -----------
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity............................... $22,025,157 $170,846 $37,463 $22,233,466
=========== ======== ======= ===========
42
45
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
NOTE A: The pro forma balance sheet for the Kalamazoo transaction that
closed in September 2000 consists of the following (dollars in thousands):
AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
--------------------------------------
PRO FORMA
-------------------------
HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL
---------- ----------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 1 $ -- $ 1
Accounts receivable, net.................................... 260 -- 260
Receivable from related party............................... 54,974 (54,974)(a) --
Prepaid expenses and other.................................. 135 -- 135
------- -------- --------
Total current assets...................................... 55,370 (54,974) 396
Property, plant and equipment............................... 27,270 -- 27,270
Franchises.................................................. -- 143,180(b) 143,180
Other assets................................................ 657 (657)(c) --
------- -------- --------
Total assets.............................................. $83,297 $ 87,549 $170,846
======= ======== ========
Accounts payable and accrued expenses....................... $ 3,696 $ -- $ 3,696
Minority interest........................................... -- (2,076)(d) (2,076)
Equity...................................................... 79,601 89,625(e) 169,226
------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and equity.............................. $83,297 $ 87,549 $170,846
======= ======== ========
- -------------------------
(a) Reflects assets retained by the seller.
(b) Substantial amounts of the purchase price have been allocated to franchises
based on estimated fair values. The allocation of the purchase price is as
follows (dollars in thousands):
KALAMAZOO
---------
Working capital............................................. $ (3,300)
Property, plant and equipment............................... 27,270
Franchises.................................................. 143,180
--------
$167,150
========
The Kalamazoo transaction was financed through the issuance of 11,173,376
shares of Class A common stock in Charter Communications, Inc. to the
Kalamazoo sellers. After the merger, Charter Communications, Inc.
contributed 100% of the equity interests of the direct owner of the
Kalamazoo system to Charter Communications Holding Company in exchange for
membership units.
(c) Represents the elimination of the unamortized historical cost of goodwill.
(d) Adjusts minority interest to reflect the gain of $2.1 million related to the
issuance of equity by Charter Communications Holding Company (See (e)
below).
(e) Represents the elimination of the historical equity of $79.6 million related
to the Kalamazoo system, the issuance of $167.1 million of Class A common
stock in Charter Communications, Inc. and the gain of $2.1 million related
to the issuance of equity by Charter Communications Holding Company.
NOTE B: Represents additional long-term debt of $1.0 billion resulting
from borrowings under the Charter Holdings senior bridge loan facility, the
application of a portion of such borrowings to repay a portion of the Charter
Operating revolving credit facility and related accrued interest, the addition
to other assets of the estimated expenses paid in connection with the new
borrowings which were capitalized and will be amortized over ten years and the
application of remaining proceeds to cash.
43
46
NOTE C: The Rifkin, Falcon, Helicon and Bresnan sellers who own equity
interests in Charter Communications, Inc. and certain subsidiaries may have
rescission rights arising out of possible violations of Section 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the offers and sales of
those equity interests. Accordingly, the maximum cash obligation related to the
possible rescission rights, estimated at $1.8 billion, has been excluded from
shareholders' equity and minority interest, and classified as redeemable
securities. One year after the date of issuance of these equity interests (when
these possible rescission rights will have expired), we will reclassify the
respective amounts to shareholders' equity and minority interest. See "Certain
Trends and Uncertainties -- Possible Rescission Liability."
44
47
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
On July 22, 1999, Charter Investment, Inc., a company controlled by Mr.
Allen, formed Charter Communications, Inc. with a nominal initial investment. On
November 12, 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. sold 195.5 million shares of
Class A common stock in an initial public offering and 50,000 shares of high
vote Class B common stock to Mr. Allen. The net proceeds from these sales were
used to purchase membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company,
representing an approximate 40.6% economic interest and a 100% voting interest,
before giving effect to the Bresnan acquisition that occurred on February 14,
2000.
Charter Communications, Inc.'s purchase of 50,000 membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company was accounted for as a reorganization of
entities under common control similar to a pooling of interests. Accordingly,
beginning December 23, 1998, the date Mr. Allen first controlled Charter
Communications Holding Company, the assets and liabilities of Charter
Communications Holding Company are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements of Charter Communications, Inc. at Mr. Allen's basis. Minority
interest is recorded representing that portion of the economic interests in
Charter Communications Holding Company not owned by Charter Communications, Inc.
Consolidated financial statements of Charter Communications, Inc. do not
exist for periods prior to December 23, 1998. Instead, for the periods from
October 1, 1995 through December 23, 1998, the consolidated financial statements
of Charter Communications Properties Holdings, LLC (CCPH), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Investment, Inc. and predecessor to Charter
Communications, Inc., are presented. CCPH commenced operations with the
acquisition of a cable system on September 30, 1995.
The selected historical financial data for the period from January 1, 1995
through September 30, 1995 are derived from unaudited financial statements of
CCPH's predecessor business and are not included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected historical financial data below for the period from October 1, 1995
through December 31, 1995, for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and
for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998, are derived from
the consolidated financial statements of CCPH, which have been audited by Arthur
Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, and are included herein. The
selected historical financial data for the period from December 24, 1998 through
December 31, 1998 and the year ended December 31, 1999 are derived from the
consolidated financial statements of Charter Communications, Inc., which have
been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP and are included herein. The selected
historical financial data for the period from January 1, 2000 through June 30,
2000 are derived from the consolidated financial statements of Charter
Communications, Inc. The information presented below should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the historical financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
45
48
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
PREDECESSOR OF
CHARTER
COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
PROPERTIES HOLDINGS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
------------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED
1/1/95 10/1/95 DECEMBER 31, 1/1/98 12/24/98 YEAR ENDED SIX MONTHS
THROUGH THROUGH ----------------- THROUGH THROUGH DECEMBER 31, ENDED
9/30/95 12/31/95 1996 1997 12/23/98 12/31/98 1999 JUNE 30, 2000
------------------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ------------ --------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues................ $ 5,324 $ 1,788 $14,881 $18,867 $ 49,731 $ 13,713 $ 1,428,244 $ 1,516,384
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Operating expenses:
Operating, general and
administrative...... 2,581 931 8,123 11,767 25,952 7,134 737,957 778,313
Depreciation and
amortization........ 2,137 648 4,593 6,103 16,864 8,318 745,315 1,149,787
Option compensation
expense............. -- -- -- -- -- 845 79,979 26,089
Management fees/
corporate expense
charges............. 224 54 446 566 6,176 473 51,428 27,515
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Total operating
expenses.......... 4,942 1,633 13,162 18,436 48,992 16,770 1,614,679 1,981,704
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Income (loss) from
operations............ 382 155 1,719 431 739 (3,057) (186,435) (465,320)
Interest expense........ -- (691) (4,415) (5,120) (17,277) (2,353) (477,799) (482,042)
Interest income......... -- 5 20 41 44 133 34,467 6,110
Other income
(expense)............. 38 -- (47) 25 (728) -- (8,039) (2,504)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Income (loss) before
income taxes and
minority interest in
loss of subsidiary and
extraordinary item.... 420 (531) (2,723) (4,623) (17,222) (5,277) (637,806) (943,756)
Income tax expense...... -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,030 --
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Income (loss) before
minority interest..... 420 (531) (2,723) (4,623) (17,222) (5,277) (638,836) (943,756)
Minority interest in
loss of subsidiary.... -- -- -- -- -- 5,275 572,607 566,221
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Net income (loss)....... $ 420 $ (531) $(2,723) $(4,623) $(17,222) $ (2) $ (66,229) $ (377,535)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Loss per common share,
basic and diluted..... N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $ (0.04) $ (2.22) $ (1.70)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======== ========== =========== ============
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding.... N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50,000 29,811,202 222,003,415
======= ======= ======= ======= ======== ========== =========== ============
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT
END OF PERIOD):
Total assets............ $26,342 $31,572 $67,994 $55,811 $281,969 $4,335,527 $18,966,507 $ 22,025,157
Total debt.............. 10,480 28,847 59,222 41,500 274,698 2,002,206 8,936,455 11,605,328
Minority interest....... -- -- -- -- -- 2,146,549 5,381,331 4,689,263
Redeemable securities... -- -- -- -- -- -- 750,937 1,846,176
Member's equity
(deficit)/
Shareholders'
equity................ 15,311 971 2,648 (1,975) (8,397) 830 3,011,079 2,703,188
46
49
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Reference is made to the "Certain Trends and Uncertainties" section below
in this Management's Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of important
factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations and
non-historical information contained herein. In addition, the following
discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the audited consolidated financial statements
of Charter Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the
year ended December 31, 1999 and for the period from December 24, 1998 through
December 31, 1998 and the audited consolidated financial statements of Charter
Communications Property Holdings, LLC (CCPH) for the period from January 1, 1998
through December 23, 1998 and for the year ended December 31, 1997.
INTRODUCTION
We do not believe that our historical financial condition and results of
operations are accurate indicators of future results because of certain past
significant events, including:
(1) the acquisition by Mr. Allen of CCA Group, CCPH and CharterComm
Holdings, LLC, referred to together with their subsidiaries as the
Charter companies;
(2) the merger of Marcus Holdings with and into Charter Holdings;
(3) the acquisitions by Charter Communications Holding Company and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries completed since January 1, 1999;
(4) the refinancing or replacement of the previous credit facilities of
the Charter companies and certain of our subsidiaries acquired in 1999
and 2000;
(5) the purchase of publicly held notes that had been issued by several of
the direct and indirect subsidiaries of Charter Holdings; and
(6) the allocation of losses to minority interest.
Provided below is a discussion of our organizational history consisting of:
(1) the operations and development of the Charter companies prior to the
acquisition by Mr. Allen, together with the acquisition of the Charter
companies by Mr. Allen;
(2) the merger of Marcus Holdings with and into Charter Holdings;
(3) the acquisitions by Charter Communications Holding Company and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries;
(4) our formation; and
(5) our initial public offering of Class A common stock.
ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY
Prior to the acquisition of the Charter companies by Mr. Allen on December
23, 1998 and the merger of Marcus Holdings with and into Charter Holdings
effective April 7, 1999, the cable systems of the Charter and Marcus companies
were operated under four groups of companies. Three of these groups were
comprised of companies that were managed by Charter Investment and in which
Charter Investment had an ownership interest. The fourth group was comprised of
companies that were subsidiaries of Marcus Holdings which Charter Investment
began managing in October 1998.
The following is an explanation of how:
(1) CCPH, the operating companies that formerly comprised CCA Group and
CharterComm Holdings, and the Marcus companies became wholly owned
subsidiaries of Charter Operating;
47
50
(2) Charter Operating became a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter
Holdings;
(3) Charter Holdings became a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter
Communications Holding Company;
(4) Charter Communications Holding Company became a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc.; and
(5) we became the sole voting member and the sole manager of Charter
Communications Holding Company.
THE CHARTER COMPANIES
Prior to Charter Investment acquiring the remaining interests that it did
not previously own in two of the three groups of Charter companies, namely CCA
Group and CharterComm Holdings, as described below, the operating subsidiaries
of the three groups of Charter companies were parties to separate management
agreements with Charter Investment, pursuant to which Charter Investment
provided management and consulting services. Prior to the acquisition by Mr.
Allen, the Charter companies were as follows:
(1) CCPH
CCPH was a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment. The primary
subsidiary of CCPH, which owned the cable systems, was Charter
Communications Properties, LLC. On May 20, 1998, CCPH acquired certain
cable systems from Sonic Communications, Inc. for a total purchase price,
net of cash acquired, of $228.4 million, including $60.9 million of assumed
debt. In connection with Mr. Allen's acquisition on December 23, 1998, CCPH
was merged out of existence, and Charter Communications Properties became a
direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment.
(2) CCA Group
The controlling interests in CCA Group were held by affiliates of Kelso &
Co., and Charter Investment had only a minority interest. Effective
December 23, 1998, prior to Mr. Allen's acquisition, Charter Investment
acquired from the Kelso affiliates the interests the Kelso affiliates held
in CCA Group. Consequently, the companies comprising CCA Group became
wholly owned subsidiaries of Charter Investment.
CCA Group consisted of the following three sister companies:
(a) CCT Holdings, LLC;
(b) CCA Holdings, LLC; and
(c) Charter Communications Long Beach, LLC.
The cable systems were owned by the various subsidiaries of these three
sister companies. The financial statements for these three sister companies
historically were combined and the term "CCA Group" was assigned to these
combined entities. In connection with Mr. Allen's acquisition on December
23, 1998, the three sister companies and some of the non-operating
subsidiaries were merged out of existence, leaving certain of the operating
subsidiaries owning all of the cable systems under this former group. These
operating subsidiaries became indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of
Charter Investment.
(3) CharterComm Holdings, LLC
The controlling interests in CharterComm Holdings were held by affiliates
of Charterhouse Group International Inc., and Charter Investment had only a
minority interest. Effective December 23, 1998, prior to Mr. Allen's
acquisition, Charter Investment acquired from the
48
51
Charterhouse Group affiliates the interests the Charterhouse Group
affiliates held in CharterComm Holdings. Consequently, CharterComm Holdings
became a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment.
The cable systems were owned by the various subsidiaries of CharterComm
Holdings. In connection with Mr. Allen's acquisition on December 23, 1998, some
of the non-operating subsidiaries were merged out of existence, leaving certain
of the operating subsidiaries owning all of the cable systems under this former
group. CharterComm Holdings was merged out of existence. Charter Communications,
LLC became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment.
The acquisition of Charter Investment by Mr. Allen became effective on
December 23, 1998, through a series of transactions in which Mr. Allen acquired
approximately 94% of the equity interests of Charter Investment for an aggregate
purchase price of $2.2 billion, excluding $2.0 billion in assumed debt. CCPH and
the operating companies that formerly comprised CCA Group and CharterComm
Holdings were contributed to Charter Operating subsequent to Mr. Allen's
acquisition. CCPH is deemed to be our predecessor. Consequently, the
contribution of CCPH was accounted for as a reorganization under common control.
The contributions of the operating companies that formerly comprised CCA Group
and CharterComm Holdings were accounted for in accordance with purchase
accounting. Accordingly, our results of operations for periods after December
23, 1998 include the accounts of CCPH, CCA Group and CharterComm Holdings.
In February 1999, Charter Holdings was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary
of Charter Investment, and Charter Operating was formed as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Holdings. All of Charter Investment's direct interests in
the entities described above were transferred to Charter Operating. All of the
prior management agreements were terminated, and a single new management
agreement was entered into between Charter Investment and Charter Operating to
cover all of the subsidiaries.
In May 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company was formed as a wholly
owned subsidiary of Charter Investment. All of Charter Investment's interests in
Charter Holdings were transferred to Charter Communications Holding Company.
In July 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. was formed as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Investment.
In November 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. conducted its initial public
offering. In our initial public offering, substantially all of our equity
interests were sold to the public, and less than 1% of our equity interests were
sold to Mr. Allen. We contributed substantially all of the proceeds of our
initial public offering to Charter Communications Holding Company, which issued
membership units to us. In November 1999, the management agreement between
Charter Investment and Charter Operating was amended and assigned from Charter
Investment to us. Also in November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company
sold membership units to Vulcan Cable III.
THE MARCUS COMPANIES
In April 1998, Mr. Allen acquired approximately 99% of the non-voting
economic interests in Marcus Cable, and agreed to acquire the remaining
interests. The owner of the remaining partnership interests retained voting
control of Marcus Cable. In October 1998, Marcus Cable entered into a management
consulting agreement with Charter Investment, pursuant to which Charter
Investment provided management and consulting services to Marcus Cable and its
subsidiaries which own cable systems. This agreement placed the Marcus cable
systems under common management with the cable systems of the Charter companies
acquired by Mr. Allen in December 1998.
In March 1999, all of Mr. Allen's interests in Marcus Cable were
transferred to Marcus Holdings, a then newly formed company. Later in March
1999, Mr. Allen acquired the remaining
49
52
interests in Marcus Cable, including voting control, which interests were
transferred to Marcus Holdings. In April 1999, Mr. Allen merged Marcus Holdings
into Charter Holdings, and the operating subsidiaries of Marcus Holdings and all
of the cable systems they owned came under the ownership of Charter Holdings
and, in turn, Charter Operating. For financial reporting purposes, the merger of
Marcus Holdings with and into Charter Holdings was accounted for as an
acquisition of Marcus Holdings effective March 31, 1999, and accordingly, the
results of operations of Marcus Holdings have been included in our consolidated
financial statements since that date.
ACQUISITIONS
In 1999, we completed eleven acquisitions of cable systems for an aggregate
purchase price of $10.9 billion, including assumed debt of $2.3 billion.
On February 14, 2000, Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter
Holdings completed the acquisition of Bresnan. The Bresnan cable systems
acquired are located primarily in Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nebraska.
Prior to the acquisition, Charter Communications Holding Company assigned a
portion of its rights to purchase Bresnan to Charter Holdings. Charter
Communications Holding Company and Charter Holdings purchased 52% of Bresnan
from certain sellers for cash, and certain sellers contributed 18% of Bresnan to
Charter Communications Holding Company for 14.8 million Class C common
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company, a 2.6% equity
interest in Charter Communications Holding Company. Charter Communications
Holding Company then transferred its ownership interest in Bresnan to Charter
Holdings. Thereafter, Charter Holdings and certain other sellers contributed all
of the outstanding interests in Bresnan to CC VIII, LLC (CC VIII), a subsidiary
of Charter Holdings, and Bresnan was dissolved. In exchange for the contribution
of their interests in Bresnan, the other sellers received 24.2 million Class A
preferred membership units in CC VIII, representing 30% of the equity of CC
VIII, and are entitled to a 2% annual return on their preferred membership
units. The purchase price for Bresnan was $3.1 billion, subject to adjustment,
and was comprised of $1.1 billion in cash, $384.6 million in equity in Charter
Communications Holding Company, $629.5 million in equity of CC VIII, and
approximately $963.3 million in assumed debt. All of the membership units
received by the sellers are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for our Class A
common stock.
In September 2000, the merger of Cablevision of Michigan, Inc., the owner
of a cable system in Kalamazoo, Michigan, with and into us was completed. The
merger consideration was paid in 11,173,376 shares of our Class A common stock
valued at approximately $170.6 million. After the merger, we contributed 100% of
the equity interests of the direct owner of the Kalamazoo system to Charter
Communications Holding Company in exchange for membership units. The Kalamazoo
cable system had revenues of approximately $20.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
In addition, we have closed three smaller acquisitions in 2000. A summary
of information regarding acquisitions closed in 2000 is as follows:
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
PURCHASE PRICE ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
(INCLUDING -----------------------------
ACQUISITION ASSUMED DEBT) REVENUES
DATE (IN MILLIONS) CUSTOMERS (IN THOUSANDS)
----------- -------------- ---------- ---------------
Interlake Cablevision Enterprises............. 2/00 $ 13 5,800 $ 896
Bresnan....................................... 2/00 3,100 686,100 156,116
Capital Cable................................. 4/00 60 23,900 5,092
Farmington.................................... 4/00 15 5,600 1,014
Kalamazoo..................................... 9/00 173 48,900 10,231
------ -------- --------
Total....................................... $3,361 770,300 $173,349
====== ======== ========
50
53
Acquisitions in 1999 and 2000 were funded through excess cash from the
issuance by Charter Holdings of the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes and the
January 2000 Charter Holdings notes, borrowings under our credit facilities, the
assumption of the outstanding Renaissance, Helicon, Rifkin, Avalon, Falcon and
Bresnan notes and debentures, equity issued to specified sellers in the Helicon,
Rifkin, Falcon and Bresnan acquisitions, the net proceeds of our Class A common
stock initial public offering and equity contributions to Charter Communications
Holding Company by Mr. Allen through Vulcan Cable III.
OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Approximately 88% and 87% of our historical revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2000, and for the year ended December 31, 1999, respectively, are
attributable to monthly subscription fees charged to customers for our basic,
expanded basic and premium cable programming services, equipment rental and
ancillary services provided by our cable systems. In addition, we derive other
revenues from installation and reconnection fees charged to customers to
commence or reinstate service, pay-per-view programming, where users are charged
a fee for individual programs requested, advertising revenues and commissions
related to the sale of merchandise by home shopping services. We have generated
increased revenues in each of the past three fiscal years, primarily through
internal customer growth, basic and expanded tier rate increases, customer
growth from acquisitions and revenues from new services and products. These new
services and products are expected to significantly contribute to our future
revenues provided that the necessary equipment is available from our vendors.
One of these services is digital cable, which provides customers with additional
programming options. We are also offering high-speed Internet access to the
World Wide Web through cable modems. In addition, we are launching video on
demand service in certain systems. Our television-based Internet access allows
us to offer users TV-based e-mail and other Internet access. Finally, we
continue to work together with several equipment vendors in a field trial of
telephony.
Our expenses primarily consist of operating costs, general and
administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense
and management fees/corporate expense charges. Operating costs primarily include
programming costs, cable service related expenses, marketing and advertising
costs, franchise fees and expenses related to customer billings. Programming
costs accounted for approximately 45% and 44% of our operating, general and
administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and for the year
ended December 31, 1999, respectively. Programming costs have increased in
recent years and are expected to continue to increase due to additional
programming being provided to customers and increased cost to produce or
purchase cable programming due to inflation and other factors affecting the
cable television industry. As we continue to upgrade and rebuild our cable
systems, additional channel capacity will be available, resulting in increased
programming costs. In each year we have operated, our costs to acquire
programming have exceeded customary inflationary increases. Significant factors
with respect to increased programming costs are the rate increases and
surcharges imposed by national and regional sports networks directly tied to
escalating costs to acquire programming for professional sports packages in a
competitive market. We have benefited in the past from our membership in an
industry cooperative that provided members with volume discounts from
programming networks. This industry cooperative no longer exists. However, we
believe our increased size gives us substantially equivalent buying power. Also,
we have been able to negotiate favorable terms with premium networks in
conjunction with the premium packages we offer, which minimized the impact on
margins and provided substantial volume incentives to grow the premium category.
Although we believe that we will be able to pass future increases in programming
costs through to customers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do
so.
51
54
General and administrative expenses primarily include accounting and
administrative personnel and professional fees. Depreciation and amortization
expense relates to the depreciation of our tangible assets and the amortization
of our franchise costs (both increase with the closing of acquisitions).
Corporate expense charges are fees paid or charges for management services.
Pursuant to a mutual services agreement between Charter Communications, Inc. and
Charter Investment, each entity provides services to the other in order to
manage Charter Communications Holding Company and to manage and operate the
cable systems owned by its subsidiaries. We record actual expenses incurred by
Charter Investment on our behalf. All expenses and costs incurred by Charter
Investment with respect to the services provided are paid by us. Our credit
facilities limit the amount of such reimbursements.
We have had a history of net losses and expect to continue to report net
losses for the foreseeable future. The principal reasons for our prior and
anticipated net losses include depreciation and amortization expenses associated
with our acquisitions and capital expenditures related to construction and
upgrading of our systems, and interest costs on borrowed money. We cannot
predict what impact, if any, continued losses will have on our ability to
finance our operations in the future.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discusses the results of operations for:
(1) Charter Communications, Inc., comprised of the Charter companies
and the following for the six months ended June 30, 1999:
- Marcus Holdings for the period from March 31, 1999, the date Mr. Allen
acquired voting control, through June 30, 1999;
- Renaissance Media Group LLC for the period from April 30, 1999, the
acquisition date, through June 30, 1999; and
- American Cable Entertainment, LLC for the period from May 7, 1999, the
acquisition date, through June 30, 1999.
(2) Charter Communications, Inc., comprised of the Charter companies,
all acquisitions closed during 1999 and the following for the six months
ended June 30, 2000:
- Cable system of Interlake from February 1, 2000, the acquisition date,
through June 30, 2000;
- Bresnan from February 14, 2000, the acquisition date, through June 30,
2000;
- Cable system of Farmington from April 1, 2000, the acquisition date,
through June 30, 2000; and
- Cable system of Capital Cable from April 1, 2000, the acquisition
date, through June 30, 2000.
52
55
The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues that items in
the statements of operations constitute for the indicated periods (dollars in
thousands, except per share data):
SIX MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 JUNE 30, 2000
------------------ -------------------
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues........................................... $ 468,993 100.0% $1,516,384 100.0%
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Operating expenses:
Operating costs.................................. 160,285 34.2% 518,804 34.2%
General and administrative costs................. 81,056 17.3% 259,509 17.1%
Depreciation and amortization.................... 249,952 53.3% 1,149,787 75.9%
Option compensation expense...................... 38,194 8.1% 26,089 1.7%
Corporate expense charges........................ 11,073 2.4% 27,515 1.8%
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Total operating expenses........................... 540,560 115.3% 1,981,704 130.7%
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Loss from operations............................... (71,567) (15.3%) (465,320) (30.7%)
Interest expense................................... (157,669) (33.6%) (482,042) (31.8%)
Interest income.................................... 10,085 2.2% 6,110 0.4%
Other income (expense)............................. (4,954) (1.1%) (2,504) (0.1)
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Loss before minority interest...................... (224,105) (47.8%) (943,756) (62.2%)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary............ 224,015 47.8% 566,221 37.3%
--------- ----- ---------- -----
Net loss........................................... $ (90) -- $ (377,535) (24.9%)
========= ===== ========== =====
Loss per common share, basic and diluted........... $ (1.80) $ (1.70)
========= ==========
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Since January 1, 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter
Holdings have closed numerous acquisitions. In addition, Charter Holdings merged
with Marcus Holdings in April 1999. As of June 30, 2000, our cable systems
served approximately 400% more customers than we served as of December 31, 1998.
Thus, amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2000, are not comparable to
those for the six months ended June 30, 1999.
REVENUES. Revenues increased by $1,047.4 million, from $469.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $1,516.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2000. The increase in revenues primarily resulted from acquisitions.
OPERATING COSTS. Operating costs increased by $358.5 million, from $160.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $518.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2000. This increase was due primarily to acquisitions.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. General and administrative costs
increased by $178.5 million, from $81.1 million for the six months ended June
30, 1999, to $259.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due primarily to acquisitions.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $899.8 million, from $250.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 1999, to $1,149.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. This
increase was due primarily to acquisitions and franchises acquired. In addition,
capital expenditures for system upgrades have increased, resulting in greater
property, plant and equipment balances and a corresponding increase in
depreciation expense.
OPTION COMPENSATION EXPENSE. Option compensation expense decreased by
$12.1 million, from $38.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to
$26.1 million for the six months ended
53
56
June 30, 2000. This expense results from granting options to employees prior to
Charter's initial public offering at exercise prices less than the estimated
fair values of the underlying membership units at time of grant, resulting in
compensation expense being accrued over the vesting period of each grant.
CORPORATE EXPENSE CHARGES. Corporate expense charges increased by $16.4
million, from $11.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $27.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The increase was primarily the
result of increased costs incurred by the manager due to our growth from
acquisitions.
INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense increased by $324.4 million, from
$157.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $482.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2000. This increase resulted primarily from interest
on debt used to finance acquisitions.
INTEREST INCOME. Interest income decreased by $4.0 million, from $10.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $6.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2000. This decrease is attributed to the fact that we had
more excess cash for investment in 1999 (resulting from required credit
facilities drawdowns and the issuance and sale of the March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes) as compared to the amount available in 2000 (resulting from the
issuance and sale of the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes prior to completing
the change of control offers described in this prospectus).
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE). Other expense decreased by $2.5 million from $5.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $2.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2000. In March 1999, we extinguished all then-existing
long-term debt, excluding borrowings under our then-existing credit facilities,
and refinanced substantially all then-existing credit facilities at various
subsidiaries with a new credit facility. The excess of the amount paid over the
carrying value, net of deferred financing costs, of the then-existing long-term
debt was recorded in other income (expense). The expense in 1999 was partially
offset by a gain on the sale of aircraft.
MINORITY INTEREST. Minority interest was $224.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 1999, and $566.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
The minority interest represents the ownership in Charter Communications Holding
Company by entities other than Charter Communications, Inc. For financial
reporting purposes, 50,000 of the membership units Charter Communications
Holding Company previously issued to companies controlled by Mr. Allen are
considered held by Charter Communications, Inc. since December 24, 1998.
NET LOSS. Net loss increased by $377.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2000 compared to the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase in
revenues that resulted from acquisitions was not sufficient to offset the
increased expenses (including depreciation and amortization) associated with the
acquired systems.
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE. The loss per common share decreased by $0.10, from
$1.80 per common share for the six months ended June 30, 1999, to $1.70 per
common share for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
The following discusses the results of operations for:
(1) CCPH, for the year ended December 31, 1997, and for the period from
January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998;
(2) Charter Communications, Inc., comprised of the Charter companies for
the period from December 24, 1998 through December 31, 1998; and
(3) Charter Communications, Inc., comprised of the following for the year
ended December 31, 1999:
- the Charter Companies for the entire period;
54
57
- Marcus Holdings for the period from March 31, 1999, the date Mr.
Allen acquired voting control, through December 31, 1999;
- Renaissance Media Group LLC for the period from April 30, 1999, the
acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- American Cable Entertainment, LLC for the period from May 7, 1999,
the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Cable systems of Greater Media Cablevision, Inc. for the period from
June 30, 1999, the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Helicon Partners I, L.P. and affiliates for the period from July 30,
1999, the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Vista Broadband Communications, L.L.C. for the period from July 30,
1999, the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Cable system of Cable Satellite of South Miami, Inc. for the period
from August 4, 1999, the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Rifkin Acquisition Partners, L.L.L.P. and InterLink Communications
Partners, LLLP for the period from September 13, 1999, the
acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Cable systems of InterMedia Capital Partners IV, L.P., InterMedia
Partners and affiliates for the period from October 1, 1999, the
"swap" transaction date, through December 31, 1999;
- Cable systems of Fanch Cablevision L.P. and affiliates from November
12, 1999, the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999;
- Falcon Communications, L.P. for the period from November 12, 1999,
the acquisition date, through December 31, 1999; and
- Avalon Cable of Michigan Holdings, Inc. from November 15, 1999, the
acquisition date, through December 31, 1999.
55
58
The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues that items in
the statements of operations constitute for the indicated periods (dollars in
thousands, except per share data):
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
PROPERTIES HOLDINGS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
------------------------------------ --------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED 1/1/98 12/24/98 YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, THROUGH THROUGH DECEMBER 31,
1997 12/23/98 12/31/98 1999
---------------- ----------------- ---------------- -------------------
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
Revenues.................................... $18,867 100.0% $ 49,731 100.0% $13,713 100.0% $1,428,244 100.0%
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------
Operating expenses:
Operating costs........................... 9,157 48.5% 18,751 37.7% 4,757 34.7% 500,477 35.1%
General and administrative costs.......... 2,610 13.8% 7,201 14.5% 2,377 17.3% 237,480 16.6%
Depreciation and amortization............. 6,103 32.4% 16,864 33.9% 8,318 60.7% 745,315 52.2%
Option compensation expense............... -- -- -- -- 845 6.2% 79,979 5.6%
Management fees/corporate expense
charges................................. 566 3.0% 6,176 12.4% 473 3.4% 51,428 3.6%
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------
Total operating expenses.................... 18,436 97.7% 48,992 98.5% 16,770 122.3% 1,614,679 113.1%
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------
Income (loss) from operations............... 431 2.3% 739 1.5% (3,057) (22.3%) (186,435) (13.1%)
Interest expense............................ (5,120) (27.1%) (17,277) (34.7%) (2,353) (17.2%) (477,799) (33.4%)
Interest income............................. 41 0.2% 44 0.1% 133 1.0% 34,467 2.4%
Other income (expense)...................... 25 0.1% (728) (1.5%) -- -- (8,039) (0.6%)
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------
Loss before income taxes and minority
interest.................................. (4,623) (24.5%) (17,222) (34.6%) (5,277) (38.5%) (637,806) (44.7%)
Income tax expense.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,030) --
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary..... -- -- -- -- 5,275 38.5% 572,607 40.1%
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ ---------- ------
Net loss.................................... $(4,623) (24.5%) $(17,222) (34.6%) $ (2) -- $ (66,229) (4.6%)
======= ====== ======== ====== ======= ====== ========== ======
Loss per common share, basic and diluted.... $ (0.04) $ (2.22)
======= ==========
1999 COMPARED TO PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 23, 1998
REVENUES. Revenues increased by $1,378.5 million, from $49.7 million for
the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $1,428.2 million in
1999. The increase in revenues primarily resulted from the acquisitions of CCA
Group and CharterComm Holdings, Marcus Holdings and 1999 acquisitions.
Additional revenues from these entities included for the year ended December 31,
1999 were $618.8 million, $386.7 million and $350.1 million, respectively.
OPERATING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. Operating, general and
administrative costs increased by $712.0 million, from $26.0 million for the
period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $738.0 million in 1999.
This increase was due primarily to the acquisitions of CCA Group and CharterComm
Holdings, Marcus Holdings and 1999 acquisitions. Additional operating, general
and administrative expenses from these entities included for the year ended
December 31, 1999 were $338.5 million, $209.3 million and $158.8 million,
respectively.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $728.5 million, from $16.9 million for the period from January 1,
1998 through December 23, 1998 to $745.3 million in 1999. There was a
significant increase in amortization expense resulting from the acquisitions of
CCA Group and CharterComm Holdings, Marcus Holdings and 1999 acquisitions.
Additional depreciation and amortization expense from these entities included
for the year ended December 31, 1999 was $346.3 million, $203.5 million and
$195.1 million, respectively. The increases were offset by the elimination of
depreciation and amortization expense related to dispositions of cable systems.
OPTION COMPENSATION EXPENSE. Option compensation expense in 1999 was $80.0
million due to the granting of options to employees in December 1998, February
1999 and April 1999. The exercise prices of the options on the date of grant
were deemed to be less than the estimated fair values of the
56
59
underlying membership units, resulting in compensation expense accrued over the
vesting period of each grant that varies from four to five years.
MANAGEMENT FEES/CORPORATE EXPENSE CHARGES. Management fees/corporate
expense charges increased by $45.3 million, from $6.2 million for the period
from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $51.4 million in 1999. The
increase was the result of the acquisitions of CCA Group and CharterComm
Holdings, Marcus Holdings and 1999 acquisitions.
INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense increased by $460.5 million, from $17.3
million for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $477.8
million in 1999. This increase resulted primarily from interest on the notes and
credit facilities used to finance the acquisitions of CCA Group and CharterComm
Holdings, Marcus Holdings and 1999 acquisitions.
INTEREST INCOME. Interest income increased by $34.4 million, from $44,000
for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $34.5 million
in 1999. The increase was primarily due to investing excess cash that resulted
from required credit facilities drawdowns and the sale of the March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes.
MINORITY INTEREST. Minority interest was $5.3 million for the period from
December 24, 1998 through December 31, 1998 and $572.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 1999. The minority interest represents the ownership in
Charter Communications Holding Company by entities other than us. For financial
reporting purposes, 50,000 membership units in Charter Communications Holding
Company previously issued to companies controlled by Mr. Allen are considered
held by us since December 24, 1998.
NET LOSS. Net loss increased by $49.0 million, from $17.2 million for the
period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 to $66.2 million in 1999.
The increase in revenues that resulted from the acquisitions of CCA Group,
CharterComm Holdings and Marcus Holdings was not sufficient to offset the
operating expenses associated with the acquired systems.
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE. The loss per common share increased by $2.18, from
$0.04 per common share for the period from December 24, 1998 through December
31, 1998, to $2.22 in 1999.
PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 24, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1998
This period is not comparable to any other period presented. The financial
statements represent eight days of operations. This period not only contains the
results of operations of CCPH, but also the results of operations of those
entities purchased in the acquisition of the Charter companies by Mr. Allen. As
a result, no comparison of the operating results for this eight-day period is
presented.
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 23, 1998 COMPARED TO 1997
REVENUES. Revenues increased by $30.9 million, or 163.6%, from $18.9
million in 1997 to $49.7 million for the period from January 1, 1998 through
December 23, 1998. The increase in revenues primarily resulted from the
acquisition of Sonic, which had revenues for that period of $29.8 million.
OPERATING COSTS. Operating costs increased by $9.6 million, or 104.8%,
from $9.2 million in 1997 to $18.8 million for the period from January 1, 1998
through December 23, 1998. This increase was due primarily to the acquisition of
Sonic, which had operating costs for that period of $9.4 million, partially
offset by the loss of $1.4 million on the sale of a cable system in 1997.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. General and administrative costs
increased by $4.6 million, or 175.9%, from $2.6 million in 1997 to $7.2 million
for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998. This increase was
due primarily to the acquisition of Sonic, which had general and administrative
costs for that period of $6.0 million.
57
60
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $10.8 million, or 176.3%, from $6.1 million in 1997 to $16.9
million for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998. There was
a significant increase in amortization resulting from the acquisition of Sonic.
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense related to the acquisition of
Sonic was $9.9 million.
MANAGEMENT FEES/CORPORATE EXPENSE CHARGES. Corporate expense charges
increased by $5.6 million, or 991.2% from $0.6 million in 1997 to $6.2 million
for the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998. The increase from
1997 compared to the period from January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 was
the result of additional Charter Investment charges related to equity
appreciation rights plans of $3.8 million for the period from January 1, 1998
through December 23, 1998 and an increase of $0.9 million in management services
provided by Charter Investment as a result of the acquisition of Sonic.
INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense increased by $12.2 million, or 237.4%,
from $5.1 million in 1997 to $17.3 million for the period from January 1, 1998
through December 23, 1998. This increase resulted primarily from the
indebtedness of $220.6 million, including a note payable for $60.9 million,
incurred in connection with the acquisition of Sonic, resulting in additional
interest expense.
NET LOSS. Net loss increased by $12.6 million, or 272.5%, from $4.6
million in 1997 to $17.2 million for the period from January 1, 1998 through
December 23, 1998. The increase in revenues that resulted from cable television
customer growth was not sufficient to offset the operating expenses related to
the acquisition of Sonic.
OUTLOOK
Our business strategy emphasizes the increase of our operating cash flow by
increasing our customer base and the amount of cash flow per customer. We
believe that there are significant advantages in increasing the size and scope
of our operations, including:
- improved economies of scale in management, marketing, customer service,
billing and other administrative functions;
- reduced costs for our cable systems and our infrastructure in general;
- increased leverage for negotiating programming contracts; and
- increased influence on the evolution of important new technologies
affecting our business.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business requires significant cash to fund acquisitions, capital
expenditures, debt service costs and ongoing operations. We have historically
funded and expect to fund future liquidity and capital requirements through cash
flows from operations, equity contributions, borrowings under our credit
facilities and debt and equity financings. Our historical cash flows from
operating activities were $606.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000,
and $479.9 million and $30.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
We have substantial ongoing capital expenditure requirements. We make
capital expenditures primarily to upgrade, rebuild and expand our cable systems,
as well as for system maintenance, the development of new products and services,
and converters. Converters are set-top devices added in front of a subscriber's
television receiver to change the frequency of the cable television signals to a
suitable channel. The television receiver is then able to tune and to allow
access to premium service.
58
61
Upgrading our cable systems will enable us to offer new products and
services, including digital television, additional channels and tiers, expanded
pay-per-view options, high-speed Internet access and interactive services.
We made capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions of cable systems, of
$1.0 billion and $741.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and for
the year ended December 31, 1999, respectively. The majority of these capital
expenditures in 2000 relate to our accelerated rebuild and upgrade program and
converters and were funded from cash flows from operations and borrowings under
credit facilities.
For the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002, we plan to spend
approximately $6.4 billion for capital expenditures, approximately $3.2 billion
of which will be used to upgrade and rebuild our systems to a bandwidth capacity
of 550 megahertz or greater and add two-way capability, so that we may offer
advanced services. The remaining $3.2 billion will be used for extensions of
systems, roll-out of new products and services, converters and system
maintenance. Capital expenditures for 2000 are expected to be approximately $2.7
billion, and aggregate capital expenditures for 2001 and 2002 are expected to be
approximately $3.7 billion. We currently expect to finance the anticipated
capital expenditures with cash generated from operations and additional
borrowings under credit facilities. We cannot be assured that these amounts will
be sufficient to accomplish our planned system upgrades, expansion and
maintenance or that we can acquire necessary plant and equipment from vendors to
complete these as scheduled. If we are not able to obtain amounts sufficient for
our planned upgrades and other capital expenditures, it could adversely affect
our ability to offer new products and services and compete effectively, and
could adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of
operations. See "-- Certain Trends and Uncertainties" for further information.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
As of June 30, 2000, our total debt was approximately $11.6 billion. Our
significant amount of debt may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing
in the future and react to changes in our business. Our credit facilities and
other debt instruments contain various financial and operating covenants that
could adversely impact our ability to operate our business, including
restrictions on the ability of our operating subsidiaries to distribute cash to
their parents. See "-- Certain Trends and Uncertainties -- Restrictive
Covenants," for further information.
MARCH 1999 CHARTER HOLDINGS NOTES. On March 17, 1999, Charter Holdings and
Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation issued $3.6 billion
principal amount of senior notes. The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes
consisted of $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.250% senior notes
due 2007, $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due
2009, and $1.475 billion in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9.920%
senior discount notes due 2011. The net proceeds of approximately $3.0 billion,
combined with the borrowings under our credit facilities, were used to
consummate tender offers for publicly held debt of several of our subsidiaries,
as described below, to refinance borrowings under our previous credit
facilities, for working capital purposes and to finance a number of
acquisitions.
As of June 30, 2000, a total of $2.1 billion was outstanding under the
8.250% notes and the 8.625% notes, and the accreted value of the outstanding
9.920% notes was $1.0 billion.
NOTES OF THE CHARTER COMPANIES AND THE MARCUS COMPANIES. In February and
March 1999, we commenced cash tender offers to purchase the 14% senior discount
notes issued by Charter Communications Southeast Holdings, LLC, the 11.25%
senior notes issued by Charter Communications Southeast, LLC, the 13.50% senior
subordinated discount notes issued by Marcus Cable Operating Company, L.L.C.,
and the 14.25% senior discount notes issued by Marcus Cable. All such notes,
except for $1.1 million in principal amount, were repaid in full for an
aggregate amount of $1.0 billion. The remaining $1.1 million of such notes was
repaid in September 1999.
59
62
CHARTER OPERATING CREDIT FACILITIES. The Charter Operating credit
facilities provide for two term facilities, one with a principal amount of $1.0
billion that matures in September 2007 (Term A), and the other with a principal
amount of $1.85 billion that matures in March 2008 (Term B). The Charter
Operating credit facilities also provide for a $1.25 billion revolving credit
facility with a maturity date in September 2007 and, at the option of the
lenders, supplemental credit facilities in the amount of $500.0 million
available until March 18, 2002. Amounts under the Charter Operating credit
facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar rate, as defined,
plus a margin of up to 2.75% (8.28% to 9.50% as of June 30, 2000). A quarterly
commitment fee of between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the
unborrowed balance of Term A and the revolving credit facility.
In March 2000, the credit facilities were amended to increase the amount of
the supplemental credit facility to $1.0 billion. In connection with this
amendment, $600.0 million of the supplemental credit facilities was borrowed,
thereby increasing the Term B facility to $2.45 billion and the total borrowing
capacity to $4.7 billion. The remaining $400.0 million of the supplemental
credit facilities is subject to our ability to obtain additional commitments
from the lenders. As of June 30, 2000, outstanding borrowings were approximately
$4.2 billion, and the unused availability was $0.5 billion.
RENAISSANCE NOTES. When we acquired Renaissance in April 1999, Renaissance
had outstanding $163.2 million principal amount at maturity of 10% senior
discount notes due 2008. The Renaissance notes do not require the payment of
interest until April 15, 2003. From and after April 15, 2003, the Renaissance
notes bear interest, payable semi-annually in cash, on April 15 and October 15,
commencing on October 15, 2003. The Renaissance notes are due on April 15, 2008.
In May 1999, $48.8 million aggregate face amount of the Renaissance notes was
repurchased at 101% of the accreted value plus accrued and unpaid interest. As
of June 30, 2000, the accreted value of the Renaissance notes that remain
outstanding was approximately $87.2 million.
HELICON NOTES. We acquired Helicon in July 1999 and assumed Helicon's
$115.0 million in principal amount of 11% senior secured notes due 2003. On
November 1, 1999, we redeemed all of the Helicon notes at a purchase price equal
to 103% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, for $124.8
million.
RIFKIN NOTES. We acquired Rifkin in September 1999 and assumed Rifkin's
outstanding $125.0 million in principal amount of 11.125% senior subordinated
notes due 2006. In October 1999, we repurchased an individually held $3.0
million Rifkin promissory note for $3.4 million and publicly held notes with a
total outstanding principal amount of $124.1 million for a total of $140.6
million, including a consent fee to noteholders who delivered timely consents to
amend the indenture governing those notes to eliminate substantially all of the
restrictive covenants. In February 2000, we repurchased $0.5 million in
principal amount of these notes. As of June 30, 2000, $0.4 million in principal
amount of Rifkin notes remained outstanding.
FALCON DEBENTURES. We acquired Falcon in November 1999 and assumed
Falcon's outstanding $375.0 million in principal amount of 8.375% senior
debentures due 2010 and 9.285% senior discount debentures due 2010 with an
accreted value of approximately $319.1 million. Falcon's 11.56% subordinated
notes due 2001 were paid off for a total of $16.3 million, including principal,
accrued and unpaid interest and premiums, at the closing of the Falcon
acquisition.
In February 2000, through change of control offers and purchases in the
open market, all of the Falcon 8.375% senior debentures with a principal amount
of $375.0 million were repurchased for $388.0 million, and all of the Falcon
9.285% senior discount debentures with an aggregate principal amount at maturity
of $435.3 million were repurchased for $328.1 million.
FALCON CREDIT FACILITIES. In connection with the Falcon acquisition, the
previous Falcon credit facilities were amended to provide for two term
facilities, one with a principal amount of $197.0 million that matures June 2007
(Term B), and the other with the principal amount of $295.5 million that matures
December 2007 (Term C). The Falcon credit facilities also provide for a $646.0
million
60
63
revolving credit facility with a maturity date of December 2006 and, at the
option of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities in the amount of $700.0
million with a maturity date in December 2007. At June 30, 2000, $110.0 million
was outstanding under the supplemental credit facilities. Amounts under the
Falcon credit facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar rate,
as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.5% (8.03% to 9.50% as of June 30, 2000). A
quarterly commitment fee of between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the
unborrowed balance. As of June 30, 2000, outstanding borrowings were $1,059.5
million, and unused availability was $189.1 million.
AVALON CREDIT FACILITIES. The Avalon credit facilities have maximum
borrowings of $300.0 million, consisting of a revolving facility in the amount
of $175.0 million that matures May 15, 2008, and a Term B loan in the amount of
$125.0 million that matures on November 15, 2008. The Avalon credit facilities
also provide, at the option of the lenders, for supplemental credit facilities
in the amount of $75.0 million available until December 31, 2003. Amounts under
the Avalon credit facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar
rate, as defined, plus a margin up to 2.75% (8.04% to 9.04% as of June 30,
2000). A quarterly commitment fee of between 0.250% and 0.375% per annum is
payable on the unborrowed balance. The Company borrowed $165.0 million under the
Avalon credit facilities to fund a portion of the Avalon purchase price. As of
June 30, 2000, outstanding borrowings were $170.0 million, and unused
availability was $130.0 million.
AVALON NOTES. We acquired Avalon in November and assumed Avalon's
outstanding 11.875% senior discount notes due 2008 with an accreted value of
$123.3 million and $150.0 million in principal amount of 9.375% senior
subordinated notes due 2008. After December 1, 2003, cash interest on the Avalon
11.875% notes will be payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each
year, commencing June 1, 2004.
In January 2000, we completed change of control offers in which we
repurchased $16.3 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 11.875%
notes at a purchase price of 101% of accreted value as of January 28, 2000, for
$10.5 million. As of June 30, 2000, Avalon 11.875% notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $179.8 million at maturity remained outstanding with an
accreted value of $121.2 million.
At the same time, through change of control offers and purchases in the
open market, we repurchased all of the $150.0 million aggregate principal amount
of the Avalon 9.375% notes. The aggregate repurchase price was $153.7 million
and was funded with equity contributions from Charter Holdings, which made the
cash available from the proceeds of its sale of the January 2000 Charter
Holdings notes.
FANCH CREDIT FACILITIES. The Fanch credit facilities provide for two term
facilities, one with a principal amount of $450.0 million that matures May 2008
(Term A), and the other with a principal amount of $400.0 million that matures
November 2008 (Term B). The Fanch credit facilities also provide for a $350.0
million revolving credit facility with a maturity date in May 2008 and, at the
option of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities in the amount of $300.0
million available until December 31, 2004. Amounts under the Fanch credit
facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar rate, as defined,
plus a margin of up to 3.0% (8.53% to 9.28% as of June 30, 2000). A quarterly
commitment fee of between 0.250% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the
unborrowed balance. We used $850.0 million of the credit facilities to fund a
portion of the Fanch purchase price. As of June 30, 2000, outstanding borrowings
were $850.0 million, and unused availability was $350.0 million.
BRESNAN NOTES. We acquired Bresnan in February 2000 and assumed Bresnan's
outstanding $170.0 million in principal amount of 8% senior notes due 2009 and
$275.0 million in principal amount at maturity of 9.25% senior discount notes
due 2009 with an accreted value of $192.2 million. In March 2000, we repurchased
all of the outstanding Bresnan notes at purchase prices of 101% of
61
64
the outstanding principal amounts plus accrued and unpaid interest or accreted
value, as applicable, for a total of $369.7 million, using proceeds from the
sale of the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes.
BRESNAN CREDIT FACILITIES. Upon the closing of the Bresnan acquisition, we
amended and assumed the previous Bresnan credit facilities. The Bresnan credit
facilities provide for borrowings of up to $900.0 million. The Bresnan credit
facilities provide for two term facilities, one with a principal amount of
$403.0 million (Term A), and the other with a principal amount of $297.0 million
(Term B). The Bresnan credit facilities also provide for a $200.0 million
revolving credit facility with a maturity date in June 2007 and, at the option
of lenders, supplemental facilities in the amount of $200.0 million. Amounts
under the Bresnan credit facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the
Eurodollar Rate, as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.75% (8.27% to 9.03% as of
June 30, 2000). A quarterly commitment fee of between 0.250% and 0.375% is
payable on the unborrowed balance of Term A and the revolving credit facility.
At the closing of the Bresnan acquisition, we borrowed approximately $599.9
million to replace the borrowings outstanding under the previous credit
facilities and an additional $31.3 million to fund a portion of the Bresnan
purchase price. As of June 30, 2000, $638.9 million was outstanding, and $261.1
million was available for borrowing.
JANUARY 2000 CHARTER HOLDINGS NOTES. On January 12, 2000, Charter Holdings
and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation issued $1.5 billion
principal amount of senior notes. The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes
consisted of $675.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.00% senior notes
due 2009, $325.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.25% senior notes
due 2010, and $532.0 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 11.75%
senior discount notes due 2010. The net proceeds of approximately $1.3 billion
were used to consummate change of control offers for certain of the Falcon,
Avalon and Bresnan notes and debentures.
In June 2000, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital
Corporation exchanged these notes for new January 2000 Charter Holdings notes,
with substantially similar terms, except that the new January 2000 Charter
Holdings notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and,
therefore, do not bear legends restricting their transfer.
As of June 30, 2000, $1.0 billion of the January 2000 Charter Holdings
10.00% and 10.25% senior notes were outstanding, and the accreted value of the
11.75% senior discount notes was approximately $316.8 million.
CHARTER HOLDINGS SENIOR BRIDGE LOAN FACILITY. On August 4, 2000, Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation entered into a
senior bridge loan agreement providing for senior increasing rate bridge loans
in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.0 billion.
On August 14, 2000, Charter Holdings borrowed $1.0 billion under the senior
bridge loan facility and used the majority of the proceeds to repay a portion of
the amounts outstanding under the Charter Operating revolving credit facility.
The bridge loan initially bears interest at an annual rate equal to the yield
corresponding to the bid price on Charter Holdings 10.25% notes less 0.25%
(10.21% as of August 14, 2000). If this loan is not repaid within 90 days
following August 14, 2000, the interest rate will increase by 1.25% at the end
of such 90-day period and will increase by an additional 0.50% at the end of
each additional 90-day period. Unless additional default interest is assessed,
the interest rate on the bridge loan will not exceed 15% annually. If the bridge
loan has not been repaid in full by August 14, 2001, then it will be converted
to a term loan. The term loan will bear interest at a fixed rate equal to the
greater of the applicable rate of the bridge loan on the date of the conversion
plus 0.50% and the yield corresponding to the bid price on Charter Holdings
10.25% notes as of the date immediately prior to the conversion. If the term
loan is not repaid within 90 days after the conversion of the bridge loan, the
interest rate will increase by 0.50% at the end of each 90-
62
65
day period. The interest rate on the term loan will not exceed 15% annually. The
term loan will mature on the tenth anniversary of the initial senior bridge loan
borrowing.
CONTRIBUTIONS BY AFFILIATES. In August 1999, Vulcan Cable III Inc.
contributed to Charter Communications Holding Company $500.0 million in cash
and, in September 1999, an additional $825.0 million, of which approximately
$644.3 million was in cash and approximately $180.7 million was in the form of
equity interests acquired by Vulcan Cable III Inc. in connection with the Rifkin
acquisition. Charter Communications Holding Company in turn contributed the cash
and equity interests to Charter Holdings. In November 1999, in connection with
Charter Communications, Inc.'s initial public offering, Vulcan Cable III
contributed to Charter Communications Holding Company $750.0 million in cash. In
connection with the Rifkin, Falcon and Bresnan acquisitions, Charter
Communications Holding Company issued equity interests totaling approximately
$1.1 billion to certain sellers in each of these acquisitions, and a subsidiary
of Charter Holdings issued preferred equity interests totaling $629.5 million to
certain sellers in the Bresnan acquisition.
For a description of our acquisitions completed in 1999 and 2000, see
"Business -- Acquisitions."
CERTAIN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The following discussion highlights a number of trends and uncertainties,
in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this prospectus, that could
materially impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
SUBSTANTIAL LEVERAGE. As of June 30, 2000, our total debt was
approximately $11.6 billion. We anticipate incurring significant additional debt
in the future to fund the expansion, maintenance and upgrade of our cable
systems.
Our ability to make payments on our debt and to fund our planned capital
expenditures for upgrading our cable systems and our ongoing operations will
depend on our ability to generate cash and secure financing in the future. This,
to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. We cannot assure
you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or
that future borrowings will be available to us under our existing credit
facilities, new facilities or from other sources of financing at acceptable
rates or in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our debt, to grow our
business or to fund our other liquidity and capital needs.
VARIABLE INTEREST RATES. At June 30, 2000, approximately 44% of our debt
bears interest at variable rates that are linked to short-term interest rates.
In addition, a significant portion of our existing debt, assumed debt or debt we
might arrange in the future will bear interest at variable rates. If interest
rates rise, our costs relative to those obligations will also rise. At June 30,
2000, our weighted-average rate on outstanding bank commitments is approximately
8.6% and approximately 9.5% on high-yield debt, resulting in a blended
weighted-average rate of 9.0%. See "-- Interest Rate Risk."
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. Our credit facilities and the indentures governing
our outstanding debt contain a number of significant covenants that, among other
things, restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- make certain investments or acquisitions;
- dispose of assets or merge;
- incur additional debt;
- issue equity;
63
66
- repurchase or redeem equity interests and debt;
- create liens; and
- pledge assets.
Furthermore, in accordance with our credit facilities we are required to
maintain specified financial ratios and meet financial tests. The ability to
comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control. The
breach of any of these covenants will result in a default under the applicable
debt agreement or instrument, which could trigger acceleration of the debt. Any
default under our credit facilities or the indentures governing our outstanding
debt may adversely affect our growth, our financial condition and our results of
operations.
NEW SERVICES AND PRODUCTS GROWTH STRATEGY. We expect that a substantial
portion of any of our future growth will be achieved through revenues from
additional services. We cannot assure you that we will be able to offer new
advanced services successfully to our customers or that those new advanced
services will generate revenues. The amount of our capital expenditures and
related roll-out of advanced services may be limited by the availability of
certain equipment (in particular, digital converter boxes and cable modems) due
to production capacity constraints of certain vendors and/or materials
shortages. We continue to work with our primary vendors to address such problems
and have been assured that we will have an adequate supply to meet our demand.
If we are unable to grow our cash flow sufficiently, we may be unable to fulfill
our obligations or obtain alternative financing.
MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH. We have experienced rapid growth that has placed and
is expected to continue to place a significant strain on our management,
operations and other resources. Our future success will depend in part on our
ability to successfully integrate the operations acquired and to be acquired and
to attract and retain qualified personnel. No significant severance cost was
incurred in conjunction with acquisitions in 1999 and 2000. The failure to
retain or obtain needed personnel or to implement management, operating or
financial systems necessary to successfully integrate acquired operations or
otherwise manage growth when and as needed could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
REGULATION AND LEGISLATION. Cable systems are extensively regulated at the
federal, state, and local level. Effective March 31, 1999, the scope of rate
regulation was reduced so that it continues to impact only the lowest level of
basic cable service and associated equipment. This change affords cable
operators much greater pricing flexibility, although Congress could revisit this
issue if confronted with substantial rate increases.
Cable operators also face significant regulation of their channel capacity.
They currently can be required to devote substantial capacity to the carriage of
programming that they would not carry voluntarily, including certain local
broadcast signals, local public, educational and government access users, and
unaffiliated commercial leased access programmers. This carriage burden could
increase in the future, particularly if the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC)were to require cable systems to carry both the analog and digital versions
of local broadcast signals. The FCC is currently conducting a proceeding in
which it is considering this channel usage possibility.
There is also uncertainty whether local franchising authorities, state
regulators, the FCC, or the U.S. Congress will impose obligations on cable
operators to provide unaffiliated Internet service providers with access to
cable plant on non-discriminatory terms. If they were to do so, and the
obligations were found to be lawful, it could complicate our operations in
general, and our Internet operations in particular, from a technical and
marketing standpoint. These access obligations could adversely impact our
profitability and discourage system upgrades and the introduction of new
products and services. Recently, a federal district court in Virginia and a
federal circuit court in
64
67
California struck down as unlawful open access requirements imposed by two
different franchising authorities. The federal circuit court ruling reversed an
earlier district court decision that had upheld an open access requirement. The
FCC has announced that it will soon consider how Internet service provided over
cable systems should be classified for regulatory purposes and what, if any,
regulations should be imposed.
POSSIBLE RESCISSION LIABILITY. The Rifkin, Falcon and Bresnan sellers who
acquired Charter Communications Holding Company membership units or, in the case
of Bresnan, additional equity interests in one of our subsidiaries, in
connection with these respective acquisitions and the Helicon sellers who
acquired shares of Class A common stock in our initial public offering may have
rescission rights against Charter Communications Holding Company and us arising
out of possible violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act in connection with
the offers and sales of these equity interests.
If all of these equity holders successfully exercised their possible
rescission rights, we or Charter Communications Holding Company would become
obligated to repurchase all such equity interests, and the total repurchase
obligation could be as much as approximately $1.8 billion as of June 30, 2000.
For financial reporting purposes, this maximum potential obligation has been
excluded from shareholders' equity and minority interest and has been classified
as redeemable securities (temporary equity). After one year from the dates of
issuance or purchase of these equity securities (when these possible rescission
rights will have expired), we will reclassify the respective amounts to
shareholders' equity and minority interest. We cannot assure you that we would
be able to obtain capital sufficient to fund any required repurchases. This
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The use of interest rate risk management instruments, such as interest rate
exchange agreements, interest rate cap agreements and interest rate collar
agreements, is required under the terms of the credit facilities of our
subsidiaries. Our policy is to manage interest costs using a mix of fixed and
variable rate debt. Using interest rate swap agreements, we agree to exchange,
at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest
amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount.
Interest rate cap agreements are used to lock in a maximum interest rate should
variable rates rise, but enable us to otherwise pay lower market rates. Collars
limit our exposure to and benefits from interest rate fluctuations on variable
rate debt to within a certain range of rates.
Our participation in interest rate hedging transactions involves
instruments that have a close correlation with our debt, thereby managing our
risk. Interest rate hedge agreements have been designed for hedging purposes and
are not held or issued for speculative purposes.
At June 30, 2000, we had outstanding $2.4 billion, $15.0 million and $760.0
million in notional amounts of interest rate swaps, caps and collars,
respectively.
The notional amounts of interest rate instruments are used to measure
interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to
credit loss. While swaps, caps and collars represent an integral part of our
interest rate risk management program, their incremental effect on interest
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and for the year ended December
31, 1999, was not significant.
The fair value of fixed-rate debt at June 30, 2000, was $4.0 billion. The
fair value of fixed-rate debt is based on quoted market prices. The fair value
of variable-rate debt approximates the carrying value of $6.95 billion at June
30, 2000, since this debt bears interest at current market rates.
65
68
OPTIONS
In accordance with an employment agreement and a related option agreement
with Jerald L. Kent, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kent was
issued an option to purchase 7,044,127 membership units in Charter
Communications Holding Company in December 1998. The option vests over a
four-year period from the date of grant and expires ten years from the date of
grant.
In February 1999, Charter Holdings adopted an option plan, which was
assumed by Charter Communications Holding Company in May 1999, providing for the
grant of options to employees, consultants and directors of Charter
Communications Holding Company and its affiliates to purchase up to 25,009,798
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units. Options granted under
the plan will be fully vested after five years from the date of grant. Options
not exercised accumulate and are exercisable, in whole or in part, in any
subsequent period, but not later than ten years from the date of grant.
Membership units received upon exercise of the options issued to Mr. Kent
and to optionees under the plan are automatically exchanged for shares of our
Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
The following chart sets forth the number of options outstanding and the
exercise price of such options as of August 31, 2000:
OPTIONS
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE
-------------------------------- REMAINING -----------
NUMBER OF EXERCISE TOTAL LIFE NUMBER OF
OPTIONS PRICE DOLLARS (IN YEARS) OPTIONS(4)
---------- ------------ ------------- ---------- -----------
Outstanding as of January 1,
1999(1)..................... 7,044,127 $ 20.00 $ 140,882,540 10.0(3) 2,935,053(5)
Granted:
February 9, 1999(2)......... 9,111,681 20.00 182,233,620 2,647,599
April 5, 1999(2)............ 473,000 20.73 9,805,290 99,850
November 8, 1999(2)......... 4,781,400 19.00 90,846,600 240,000
February 15, 2000(2)........ 5,566,600 19.47 108,375,022 --
May 1, 2000(2).............. 1,469,200 15.03 22,083,986 --
July 26, 2000(2)............ 1,469,800 14.31 21,036,513 --
Cancelled..................... (2,072,523) 15.03-20.73 (40,479,503) --
---------- ------------ ------------- ---- ---------
Outstanding as of
August 31, 2000............. 27,843,285 $ 19.21(3) $ 534,784,068 8.9(3) 5,922,502(5)
========== ============ ============= ==== =========
- ---------------
(1) Granted to Jerald L. Kent pursuant to his employment agreement and related
option agreement.
(2) Granted pursuant to the option plan.
(3) Weighted average.
(4) As of August 31, 2000.
(5) The weighted average exercise price for options exercisable was $20.00 and
$19.21 at December 31, 1998 and August 31, 2000, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $12.59 and $12.50 at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
66
69
We follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees" to account for options issued under the option plan and the
options held by Mr. Kent. We recorded option compensation expense of $845,000
for the period from December 24, 1998 through December 31, 1998, $80.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $26.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2000, in the financial statements since the exercise prices were less
than the estimated fair values of the underlying membership units on the date of
grant. The estimated fair value was determined using the valuation inherent in
Mr. Allen's acquisition of Charter Investment and valuations of public companies
in the cable industry adjusted for factors specific to us. Compensation expense
is accrued over the vesting period of each grant that varies from four to five
years. As of June 30, 2000, deferred compensation remaining to be recognized in
future periods totaled $49.6 million.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS RECENTLY IMPLEMENTED
FASB Interpretation No. 44 (FIN No. 44), Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, provides guidance for applying APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. FIN No. 44 applies
prospectively, with certain exceptions, to new awards, exchanges of awards in a
business combination, modifications to outstanding awards and changes in grantee
status on or after July 1, 2000. Management believes that the adoption of FIN
No. 44 will not have a significant effect on our financial condition or results
of operations.
In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB
101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, which summarizes certain of
the SEC staff's views on applying generally accepted accounting principles to
revenue recognition in financial statements. We adopted the accounting
provisions of SAB 101 effective April 1, 2000. Management believes that the
implementation of SAB 101 has not had a significant effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
ACCOUNTING STANDARD NOT YET IMPLEMENTED
SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that
every derivative instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or
liability measured at its fair value and that changes in the derivative's fair
value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting
criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's
gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the income
statement, and requires that a company must formally document, designate and
assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. SFAS No.
137 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -- Deferral of
the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133 -- An Amendment of FASB No. 133"
has delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 133 to fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000. We have not yet quantified the impacts of adopting SFAS No. 133
on our consolidated financial statements, nor have we determined the timing or
method of our adoption of SFAS No. 133. However, SFAS No. 133 could increase
volatility in earnings (losses).
67
70
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the number of shares
of Class A common stock held by each selling shareholder as of the date of this
prospectus and the shares being offered from time to time by each selling
shareholder. The table indicates the nature of any position, office or other
material relationship that the selling shareholder has had within the past three
years with us or any of our affiliates. This prospectus relates to the offer and
sale by the selling shareholders of up to 5,661,117 shares of common stock.
Information with respect to shares owned after this offering assumes the sale of
all of the shares offered and no other purchases or sales of shares of Class A
common stock. All or part of the shares of Class A common stock offered by this
prospectus may be offered from time to time by the selling shareholders named
below.
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
SHARES OF SHARES TO NUMBER
CLASS A BE OF
COMMON OFFERED FOR SHARES TO
STOCK THE ACCOUNT BE
OWNED OF THE OWNED
BEFORE THIS SELLING AFTER THIS
NAME OFFERING SHAREHOLDER OFFERING
---- ----------- -------------- ----------
Paul A. Bambei....................................... 6,819 6,819 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
BancBoston Capital, Inc.(2).......................... 81,778 81,778 0
Jeffrey D. Bennis(a)................................. 148,971 148,971 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Ruth Rifkin Bennis(b)................................ 190,536 190,536 0
5570 Preserve Drive
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80121
Chatham Investments LLLP............................. 276,591 276,591 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
CRM II Limited Partnership, LLLP..................... 180,300 180,300 0
c/o Charles R. Morris III(3)
Stephen E. Hattrup(c)................................ 18,158 18,158 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Lucille A. Maun(d)................................... 5,020 5,020 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Morris Children Trust................................ 52,045 52,045 0
c/o Charles R. Morris III(3)
James Pinto(4)....................................... 20,444 20,444 0
Monroe M. Rifkin(e).................................. 267,388 267,388 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Rifkin & Associates, Inc............................. 1,633,281 1,633,281 0
c/o Monroe M. Rifkin
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Rifkin Children's Trust.............................. 162,186 162,186 0
c/o Monroe M. Rifkin, Co-Trustee
R & A Management, LLC(1)
68
71
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
SHARES OF SHARES TO NUMBER
CLASS A BE OF
COMMON OFFERED FOR SHARES TO
STOCK THE ACCOUNT BE
OWNED OF THE OWNED
BEFORE THIS SELLING AFTER THIS
NAME OFFERING SHAREHOLDER OFFERING
---- ----------- -------------- ----------
Rifkin Children Trust-II............................. 86,822 86,822 0
c/o Monroe M. Rifkin, Co-Trustee
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Rifkin Children's Trust-III.......................... 344,486 344,486 0
c/o Monroe M. Rifkin, Co-Trustee
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Rifkin Family Investment Company, L.L.L.P............ 2,148,045 2,148,045 0
c/o Monroe M. Rifkin, General Partner
R & A Management, LLC(1)
Cameron Rogers Trust(5).............................. 4,091 4,091 0
William L. Rogers(5)................................. 16,355 16,355 0
Peter N. Smith....................................... 17,801 17,801 0
R & A Management, LLC(1)
--------- ---------- --
Total................................................ 5,661,117 5,661,117 0
========= ========== ==
- ---------------
(1) The address for these persons is 360 South Monroe Street, Suite 600, Denver,
Colorado 80209.
(2) The address for BancBoston Capital, Inc., is 175 Federal Street, 10th Floor,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-2003.
(3) The address for these persons is 4875 South El Camino Drive, Englewood,
Colorado 80111.
(4) The address for James Pinto is 520 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor, New York, New
York 10022.
(5) The address for William L. Rogers is 1601 Moore Road, Santa Barbara,
California 93108.
(a) Jeffrey D. Bennis was an officer of (i) RT Investment Corp., which is the
general partner of Rifkin Acquisition Management L.P., which is the general
partner of Rifkin Acquisition Partners, L.L.L.P. and (ii) Rifkin, Co., the
general partner of Interlink Communications Partners, LLLP.
(b) Ruth Rifkin Bennis is the wife of Jeffrey D. Bennis and the daughter of
Monroe M. Rifkin.
(c) Stephen E. Hattrup was an officer of (i) Rifkin Acquisition Management,
L.P., the general partner of Rifkin Acquisition Partners, L.L.L.P. and (ii)
Rifkin, Co., the general partner of Interlink Communications Partners, LLLP.
(d) Lucille Maun was an officer of (i) Rifkin Acquisition Management, L.P., the
general partner of Rifkin Acquisition Partners, L.L.L.P. and (ii) Rifkin,
Co., the general partner of Interlink Communications Partners, LLLP.
(e) Monroe M. Rifkin is an officer and director of (i) Rifkin, Co., the general
partner of Interlink Communications Partners, LLLP and Rifkin Acquisition
Management, L.P., the general partner of Rifkin Acquisition Partners
L.L.L.P. and (ii) Indiana Cablevision Management Corp.
69
72
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The shares of Class A common stock covered by this prospectus are owned by
the selling shareholders. As used in the rest of this section of the prospectus,
the term "selling shareholders" includes the named selling shareholders and any
of their pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors in interest selling
shares received from a named selling shareholder after the date of this
prospectus. The selling shareholders may offer and sell, from time to time, some
or all of the shares of common stock registered hereby. We have registered the
shares for sale by the selling shareholders so that the shares will be freely
tradeable by them. Registration of the shares does not mean, however, that the
shares necessarily will be offered or sold. We will not receive any proceeds
from any offering or sale by the selling shareholders of the shares. We will pay
all costs, expenses and fees in connection with the registration of the shares.
The selling shareholders will pay all stock transfer fees or expenses (including
the cost of all transfer tax stamps), underwriting or brokerage discounts or
commissions and fees and disbursements of counsel (other than the fees and
disbursements of counsel incurred in connection with the registration of the
shares), attributable to the sale of the shares.
The selling shareholders will act independently of us in making decisions
with respect to the timing, manner and size of each sale. The shares may be sold
by or for the account of the selling shareholders from time to time in
transactions at prices quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. These sales may be
at fixed prices or prices that may be changed, at market prices prevailing at
the time of sale, at prices related to these prevailing market prices or at
negotiated prices. The shares may be sold by means of one or more of the
following methods.
- in a block trade in which a broker-dealer will attempt to sell a block of
shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as
principal to facilitate the transaction;
- purchases by broker-dealer as principal and resale by that broker-dealer
for its account pursuant to this prospectus;
- on markets where our common stock is traded or in an exchange
distribution in accordance with the rules of the exchange;
- through broker-dealers, that may act as agents or principals;
- directly to one or more purchasers;
- through agents;
- in connection with the loan or pledge of shares to a broker-dealer, and
the sale of the shares so loaned or the sale of the shares so pledged
upon a default;
- in connection with put or call option transactions, in hedge
transactions, and in settlement of other transactions in standardized or
over-the-counter options;
- through short sales of the shares by the selling shareholders or
counterparties to those transactions, in privately negotiated
transactions; or
- in any combination of the above.
In effecting sales, brokers or dealers engaged by the selling shareholders
may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate. The broker-dealer
transactions may include:
- purchases of the shares by a broker-dealer as principal and resales of
the shares by the broker-dealer for its account pursuant to this
prospectus;
- ordinary brokerage transactions; or
- transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers.
If a material arrangement with any broker-dealer or other agent is entered
into for the sale of any shares of common stock through a block trade, special
offering, exchange distribution, secondary
70
73
distribution, or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a prospectus supplement will
be filed, if necessary, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act
disclosing the material terms and conditions of these arrangements.
The selling shareholders and any broker-dealers or agents participating in
the distribution of the shares may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the
meaning of the Securities Act, and any profit on the sale of the shares of
common stock by the selling shareholders and any commissions received by a
broker-dealer or agents, acting in this capacity, may be deemed to be
underwriting commissions under the Securities Act.
Charter Communications, Inc. agrees to indemnify each selling shareholder
for any losses which arise out of or are based upon any untrue statement or
alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in this prospectus, or any
omission or alleged omission to state herein a material fact required to be
stated herein or necessary to make the statements herein not misleading. Charter
Communications, Inc. will reimburse each such selling shareholder for any
reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by him in connection with
investigating or defending any such claims, except that Charter Communications,
Inc. will not indemnify any selling shareholder for losses which result from an
untrue statement or omission made in reliance upon and in conformity with
written information provided by or on behalf of such selling shareholder for
inclusion in this prospectus.
Each selling shareholder, individually and not jointly, agrees to indemnify
Charter Communications, Inc. and each other selling shareholder for any losses
which arise out of or are based upon any untrue statement or alleged untrue
statement of a material fact contained in this registration statement, or any
omission or alleged omission to state herein a material fact required to be
stated herein or necessary to make the statements herein not misleading, if the
statement or omission was made in reliance upon and in conformity with written
information provided by or on behalf of such selling shareholder for inclusion
in this prospectus.
The selling shareholders are not restricted as to the price or prices at
which they may sell their shares of common stock. Sales of such shares may have
an adverse effect on the market price of the common stock. Moreover, the selling
shareholders are not restricted as to the number of shares that may be sold at
any time, and it is possible that a significant number of shares could be sold
at the same time, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of the
common stock.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY
MARKET INFORMATION
Our Class A common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ National Market under the
symbol "CHTR." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
range of high and low bid information per share of the common stock as included
for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market.
2000 HIGH LOW
- ---- ---- ---
First Quarter.............................................. $22 5/8 $14
Second Quarter............................................. $16 9/16 $10
Third Quarter (through September 21, 2000)................. $17 1/16 $12 3/8
1999 HIGH LOW
- ---- ---- ---
Period Ended December 31, 1999*............................ $27 3/4 $19 1/2
- ---------------
* We completed our initial public offering of Class A common stock on November
12, 1999. The initial public offering price per share was $19.00.
71
74
HOLDERS
As of August 31, 2000, there were 2,161 holders of our Class A common stock
of record and one holder of our Class B common stock. No preferred stock is
outstanding.
DIVIDEND INFORMATION
There have been no stock dividends paid on any of our equity securities. We
do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to
retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business.
Charter Communications Holding Company is required under certain circumstances
to pay distributions pro rata to all holders of its common membership units,
including us, to the extent necessary for any holder of common membership units
to pay income taxes incurred with respect to its share of taxable income
attributed to Charter Communications Holding Company. Covenants in the
indentures governing the debt obligations of Charter Communications Holding
Company's subsidiaries restrict their ability to make distributions to us, and,
accordingly, limit our ability to declare or pay cash dividends.
72
75
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We are the fourth largest operator of cable television systems in the
United States serving approximately 6.3 million customers.
We offer a full range of traditional cable television services in all of
our systems. Our service offerings include the following programming packages:
- basic programming;
- expanded basic programming;
- premium service; and
- pay-per-view television programming.
As part of our Wired World vision, we are also beginning to offer an array
of new services including:
- digital television;
- interactive video programming;
- high-speed Internet access; and
- television-based Internet access.
We are also exploring opportunities in telephony.
The new products and services described above will take advantage of the
significant bandwidth of our cable systems. We are accelerating the upgrade of
our cable systems to more quickly provide these products and services.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, pro forma for our merger with Marcus
Holdings and the acquisitions completed since the beginning of 1999, our
revenues would have been approximately $3.0 billion. For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, pro forma for acquisitions closed since January 1, 2000, our
revenues would have been approximately $1.6 billion.
Mr. Allen, the principal owner of Charter Communications, Inc. and one of
the computer industry's visionaries, has long believed in a Wired World in which
cable technology will facilitate the convergence of television, computers and
telecommunications. We believe cable's ability to deliver voice, video and data
at high speeds will enable it to serve as the primary platform for the delivery
of new services to the home and workplace.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our objective is to increase our operating cash flow by increasing our
customer base and the amount of cash flow per customer. To achieve this
objective, we are pursuing the following strategies:
INTEGRATE AND IMPROVE ACQUIRED CABLE SYSTEMS. We seek to rapidly integrate
acquired cable systems and apply our core operating strategies to raise the
financial and operating performance of these acquired systems. Our integration
process occurs in three stages:
System Evaluation. We conduct an extensive evaluation of each system
we acquire. This process begins prior to reaching an agreement to purchase
the system and focuses on:
- the system's demographic profile of the market, the number of homes
passed and the customers currently using the system;
- business plan;
- customer service standards;
- management capabilities; and
- technological capacity and compatibility.
73
76
We also evaluate opportunities to consolidate headends and billing and
other administrative functions. Based upon this evaluation, we formulate plans
for customer service centers, plant upgrades, market positioning, new product
and service launches and human resource requirements.
IMPLEMENTATION OF OUR CORE OPERATING STRATEGIES. To achieve our high
standards for customer satisfaction and financial and operating performance, we:
- attract and retain high quality local management;
- empower local managers with a high degree of day-to-day operational
autonomy;
- set key financial and operating benchmarks for management to meet,
such as revenue and cash flow per subscriber, subscriber growth,
customer service and technical standards; and
- provide incentives to all employees through grants of cash bonuses
and equity options.
ONGOING SUPPORT AND MONITORING. We provide local managers with regional
and corporate management guidance, marketing and other support for
implementation of their business plans. We monitor performance of our acquired
cable systems on a frequent basis to ensure that performance goals can be met.
The turn-around in our Fort Worth system, which our management team began
to manage in October 1998, is an example of our success in integrating newly
acquired cable systems into our operations. We introduced a customer care team
that has worked closely with city governments to improve customer service and
local government relations, and each of our customer service representatives
attended a training program. We also conducted extensive training programs for
our technical and engineering, dispatch, sales and support, and management
personnel. We held a series of sales events and service demonstrations to
increase customer awareness and enhance our community exposure and reputation.
We reduced the new employee hiring process from two to three weeks to three to
five days. As a result of these and other actions taken by the Charter
management team, relations with local franchising authorities are greatly
improved, customer service has been significantly enhanced, and the number of
customers and operating cash flow have increased.
Under our management team's direction, the Marcus Cable systems reported
1.6% internal customer growth, 11.9% revenue growth and 20.4% adjusted EBITDA
growth for the six months ended June 30, 2000 as compared to the same period in
1999. Prior to our management team overseeing their operations the Marcus Cable
systems had virtually no customer growth, 8.4% revenue growth and less than 5%
adjusted EBITDA growth for the year ended December 31, 1998. In addition, the
Marcus Cable systems average monthly adjusted EBITDA per customer has increased
from $17.38 to $20.60.
OFFER NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. We offer an array of products and
services to our customers implementing our Wired World vision. Using digital
technology, we offer additional channels on our existing service tiers, create
new service tiers, introduce multiple packages of premium services and increase
the number of pay-per-view channels. We also offer digital music services and
interactive program guides that are comprehensive guides to television program
listings that can be accessed by network, time, date or programming genre. In
addition, we offer advanced services, including interactive video programming
and high-speed Internet access, and we are currently exploring opportunities in
telephony. We have entered into agreements with several providers of high-speed
Internet access and other interactive services, including High Speed Access
Corp., EarthLink Network, Inc., Excite@Home Corporation, Convergence.com,
WorldGate Communications, Inc. and Wink Communications, Inc. We have recently
entered into a joint venture with Vulcan Ventures Inc. and Go2Net, Inc. to
deliver high-speed Internet portal services to our customers.
UPGRADE THE BANDWIDTH CAPACITY OF OUR SYSTEMS. We plan to spend
approximately $6.4 billion from 2000 to 2002 for capital expenditures.
Approximately $3.2 billion will be used to upgrade our
74
77
systems to bandwidth capacity of 550 megahertz or greater. Upgrading to at least
550 megahertz of bandwidth capacity will allow us to:
- offer advanced services, such as digital television, Internet access and
other interactive services;
- increase channel capacity up to 82 analog channels, or even more
programming channels if some of our bandwidth is used for digital
services; and
- permit two-way communication which will give our customers the ability
to send and receive signals over the cable system so that high-speed
cable services, such as Internet access, will not require a separate
telephone line and will enable our systems to provide telephony
services.
The remaining capital will be spent on plant extensions, new services,
converters and system maintenance.
As of June 30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, approximately
57.2% of our customers were served by cable systems with at least 550 megahertz
bandwidth capacity, and approximately 41.2% of our customers had two-way
communication capability. By year-end 2003, we expect that approximately 97.3%
of our customers will be served by cable systems with at least 550 megahertz
bandwidth capacity, and approximately 91.5% of our customers will be served by
cable systems with at least 750 megahertz bandwidth and two-way communication
capability.
Our planned upgrades are designed to reduce the number of headends from
1,295 at June 30, 2000, including the Kalamazoo transaction, to 484 at year-end
2003. Reducing the number of headends will reduce headend equipment and
maintenance expenditures and, together with other upgrades, will provide
enhanced picture quality and system reliability. In addition, by year-end 2003,
we expect that approximately 89% of our customers will be served by headends
serving at least 10,000 customers.
MAXIMIZE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. To maximize customer satisfaction, we
operate our business to provide reliable, high-quality products and services,
superior customer service and attractive programming choices at reasonable
rates. We have implemented stringent customer service standards which we believe
meet or exceed those established by the National Cable Television Association,
the Washington, D.C.-based trade association for the cable industry. We believe
that our customer service efforts have contributed to our superior customer
growth and will strengthen the Charter brand name and increase acceptance of our
new products and services.
EMPLOY INNOVATIVE MARKETING. We have developed and successfully
implemented a variety of innovative marketing techniques to attract new
customers and increase revenue per customer. Our marketing efforts focus on
tailoring Charter-branded entertainment and information services that provide
value, choice, convenience and quality to our customers. We use demographic
"cluster codes" to address messages to target audiences through direct mail and
telemarketing. Cluster codes identify customers by marketing type such as young
professionals, retirees or families. In addition, we promote our services on
radio, in local newspapers and by door-to-door selling. In many of our systems,
we offer discounts to customers who purchase multiple premium services such as
Home Box Office or Showtime. We also have a coordinated strategy for retaining
customers that includes televised retention advertising to reinforce the link
between quality service and the Charter brand name and to encourage customers to
purchase higher service levels. Successful implementation of these marketing
techniques has contributed to internal customer growth rates in excess of the
cable industry average in each year from 1996 through 1999 for the systems we
owned in each of those years.
75
78
EMPHASIZE LOCAL MANAGEMENT AUTONOMY WHILE PROVIDING REGIONAL AND CORPORATE
SUPPORT AND CENTRALIZED FINANCIAL CONTROLS. Our local cable systems are
organized into twelve operating regions. A regional management team oversees
multiple local system operations in each region. We believe that a strong
management presence at the local system level:
- improves our customer service;
- increases our ability to respond to customer needs and programming
preferences;
- reduces the need for a large centralized corporate staff;
- fosters good relations with local governmental authorities; and
- strengthens community relations.
Our regional management teams work closely with both local managers and
senior management in our corporate office to develop budgets and coordinate
marketing, programming, purchasing and engineering activities. Our centralized
financial management enables us to set financial and operating benchmarks and
monitor performance on an ongoing basis. In order to attract and retain high
quality managers at the local and regional operating levels, we provide a high
degree of operational autonomy and accountability along with cash and
equity-based compensation. Under the Charter Communications Option Plan
directors, consultants and substantially all employees, including members of
corporate management and key regional and system-level management personnel,
receive options exercisable for Charter Communications Holding Company
membership units that are automatically exchanged for shares of Charter
Communications, Inc. Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
CONCENTRATE OUR SYSTEMS IN TIGHTER GEOGRAPHICAL CLUSTERS. To improve
operating margins and increase operating efficiencies, we regularly seek to
improve the geographic clustering of our cable systems by selectively swapping
our cable systems for systems of other cable operators or acquiring systems in
close proximity to our systems. We believe that by concentrating our systems in
clusters, we will be able to generate higher growth in revenues and operating
cash flow. Clustering enables us to consolidate headends and spread fixed costs
over a larger subscriber base. We are negotiating with several other cable
operators whose systems we consider to be potential acquisition candidates.
CHARTER ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The following is a description of the entities in our organizational
structure and how they relate to us. In our discussion of the following
entities, we make the same assumption as on page 3 with respect to our
organizational chart.
OWNERSHIP OF CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Mr. Allen owns less than 4% of
the outstanding capital stock of Charter Communications, Inc. and controls
approximately 93.5% of the voting power of Charter Communications, Inc.'s
capital stock. The remaining equity interest and voting control are held by the
public. Mr. Allen's voting control arises from his ownership of Charter
Communications, Inc.'s high vote Class B common stock, his Class A common stock,
his ownership interests in Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, both of
which own membership units in Charter Communications Holding Company that are
exchangeable for shares of high vote Class B common stock of Charter
Communications, Inc.
VULCAN CABLE III INC. Mr. Allen owns 100% of the equity of Vulcan Cable
III. Vulcan Cable III has a 18.6% equity interest and no voting rights in
Charter Communications Holding Company. In August 1999, Mr. Allen, through
Vulcan Cable III, contributed to Charter Communications Holding Company $500
million in cash. In September 1999, he contributed an additional $825 million to
Charter Communications Holding Company through Vulcan Cable III, of which
approximately $644.3 million was in cash and approximately $180.7 million was in
the form of equity interests Vulcan Cable III acquired in connection with the
Rifkin acquisition. Upon each of
76
79
these contributions, Vulcan Cable III received Charter Communications Holding
Company membership units at a price per membership unit of $20.73. In addition,
in November 1999, Mr. Allen, through Vulcan Cable III, made a $750 million cash
equity contribution to Charter Communications Holding Company for which Vulcan
Cable III received additional membership units at a price per membership unit of
$18.24.
CHARTER INVESTMENT, INC. Charter Investment, Inc. has a 38.0% equity
interest and no voting rights in Charter Communications Holding Company. Mr.
Allen owns approximately 96.8% of the outstanding stock of Charter Investment,
Inc. The remaining 3.2% equity is beneficially owned by our founders, Jerald L.
Kent, Howard L. Wood and Barry L. Babcock.
FORMER OWNERS OF BRESNAN. Under the terms of the Bresnan acquisition, some
of the sellers received a portion of their purchase price in Charter
Communications Holding Company common membership units rather than in cash.
These common membership units are exchangeable for shares of Charter
Communications, Inc. Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. In addition,
certain other sellers received a portion of the purchase price in preferred
membership units in an indirect subsidiary of Charter Holdings. The preferred
membership units are also exchangeable for shares of Charter Communications,
Inc. Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. If all of the Bresnan sellers
exchanged their membership units in Charter Communications Holding Company or
such indirect subsidiary, as applicable, these equity holders as a group would
have a total 14.3% equity interest in Charter Communications, Inc.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC. Charter Communications
Holding Company is the direct 100% parent of Charter Holdings. Charter
Communications Holding Company is owned 40.8% by Charter Communications, Inc.,
18.6% by Vulcan Cable III Inc., 38.0% by Charter Investment, Inc. and 2.6% by
certain sellers in our Bresnan acquisition. Charter Communications, Inc.
controls 100% of the voting power of Charter Communications Holding Company. All
of the outstanding membership units in Charter Communications Holding Company
are exchangeable for shares of Class B common stock of Charter Communications,
Inc. on a one-for-one basis at any time which are in turn exchangeable for Class
A common stock of Charter Communications, Inc.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC. Charter Holdings is a co-issuer of
$3.575 billion aggregate principal amount of notes issued in March 1999 and
$1.532 billion aggregate principal amount of notes issued in January 2000.
Charter Holdings owns 100% of Charter Communications Holdings Capital
Corporation, the co-issuer of the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes and the
January 2000 Charter Holdings notes. Charter Holdings also owns the various
subsidiaries that conduct all of our cable operations, including the Charter,
Falcon, Fanch, Avalon and Bresnan companies described below.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS CAPITAL CORPORATION. Charter
Communications Holdings Capital Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Charter Holdings and a co-issuer of the notes described in the preceding
paragraph.
CHARTER COMPANIES. These companies are subsidiaries of Charter Holdings
and own or operate all of the cable systems originally managed by Charter
Investment, Inc. (namely Charter Communications Properties Holdings, LLC, CCA
Group and CharterComm Holdings, LLC), the cable systems obtained through the
merger of Marcus Holdings with Charter Holdings and the cable systems we
acquired in 1999 and 2000, other than the Falcon, Fanch, Avalon and Bresnan
systems described below. Historical financial information is presented
separately for these acquired entities. Charter Operating, a direct subsidiary
of Charter Holdings, owns all of the Charter companies' operating subsidiaries
and is the borrower under the Charter Operating credit facilities. The Charter
companies also include the issuers of the outstanding publicly held notes of
Renaissance.
77
80
FALCON COMPANIES. These companies are subsidiaries of Charter Holdings and
own or operate all of the cable systems acquired in the Falcon acquisition and
Falcon Cable Communications, which is the borrower under the Falcon credit
facilities.
FANCH COMPANIES. These companies are subsidiaries of Charter Holdings and
own or operate all of the cable systems acquired in the Fanch acquisition and CC
VI Operating, LLC, which is the borrower under the Fanch credit facilities.
AVALON COMPANIES. These companies are subsidiaries of Charter Holdings and
own or operate all of the cable systems acquired in the Avalon acquisition,
including CC Michigan, LLC and CC New England, LLC, which are the borrowers
under the Avalon credit facilities. CC V Holdings, LLC (formerly Avalon Cable
LLC) and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc. (formerly Avalon Cable Finance Holdings,
Inc.) are co-issuers of the outstanding publicly held Avalon notes.
BRESNAN COMPANIES. These companies are subsidiaries of Charter Holdings
and own or operate all of the cable systems acquired in the Bresnan acquisition
and CC VIII Operating, LLC, which is the borrower under the Bresnan credit
facilities.
ACQUISITIONS
Our primary criterion in considering acquisition and swapping opportunities
is the financial return that we expect to ultimately realize. We consider each
acquisition in the context of our overall existing and planned operations,
focusing particularly on the impact on our size and scope and the ability to
reinforce our clustering strategy, either directly or through future swaps or
acquisitions. Other specific factors we consider in acquiring a cable system
are:
- the demographic profile of the market, the number of homes passed and the
customers currently using the system;
- the per customer revenues, operating cash flow and opportunities to
increase these financial benchmarks;
- the proximity to our existing cable systems or the potential for
developing new clusters of systems;
- the technological state of such system; and
- the level of competition within the local market.
We believe that there are significant advantages in the increased size and
scope of our operations, including:
- improved economies of scale in management, marketing, customer service,
billing and other administrative functions;
- reduced costs for our cable plants and our infrastructure in general;
- increased leverage for negotiating programming contracts; and
- increased influence on the evolution of important new technologies
affecting our business.
We believe that as a result of our acquisition strategy and our systems
upgrade we are well positioned to have cable systems with economies of scale
sufficient to allow us to execute our strategy to expand the array of products
and services that we offer to our customers as we implement our Wired World
vision. We will, however, continue to explore acquisitions and swaps of cable
systems that would further complement our existing cable systems.
ACQUISITIONS COMPLETED IN 1999
MERGER WITH MARCUS HOLDINGS. On April 23, 1998, Mr. Allen acquired
approximately 99% of the non-voting economic interests in Marcus Cable Company,
L.L.C., and agreed to acquire the remaining interests in Marcus Cable. The
aggregate purchase price was approximately $1.4 billion, excluding $1.8 billion
in assumed liabilities. On February 22, 1999, Marcus Holdings was formed, and
78
81
all of Mr. Allen's interests in Marcus Cable were transferred to Marcus Holdings
on March 15, 1999. On March 31, 1999, Mr. Allen completed the acquisition of all
remaining interests of Marcus Cable. On April 7, 1999, the holding company
parent of the Marcus companies, Marcus Holdings, merged into Charter Holdings,
which was the surviving entity of the merger. The subsidiaries of Marcus
Holdings became subsidiaries of Charter Operating. In October 1998, during the
period of obtaining the requisite regulatory approvals for the transaction, the
Marcus systems came under common management with our subsidiaries, pursuant to
the terms of a management agreement.
The cable systems we acquired in the merger with Marcus Holdings are
located in Wisconsin, Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia, California, Alabama
and Texas, have approximately 976,300 customers and are operated as part of our
North Central, Southeast, Southern California, Gulf Coast and National regions.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Marcus systems had revenues of
approximately $511.9 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Marcus
systems had revenues of approximately $255.5 million.
RENAISSANCE. In April 1999, one of our subsidiaries purchased Renaissance
Media Group LLC for approximately $459 million, consisting of $348 million in
cash and $111 million of assumed debt. Renaissance owns cable systems located in
Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee, has approximately 135,000 customers and is
operated as part of our Gulf Coast and Mid-South regions. For the year ended
December 31, 1999, the Renaissance systems had revenues of approximately $62.4
million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Renaissance systems had
revenues of approximately $33.6 million.
AMERICAN CABLE. In May 1999, one of our subsidiaries purchased American
Cable Entertainment, LLC for approximately $240 million. American Cable owns
cable systems located in California serving approximately 68,700 customers and
is operated as part of our Southern California region. For the year ended
December 31, 1999, the American Cable systems had revenues of approximately
$37.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the American Cable
systems had revenues of approximately $20.4 million.
GREATER MEDIA SYSTEMS. In June 1999, one of our subsidiaries purchased
certain cable systems of Greater Media Cablevision Inc. for approximately $500
million. The Greater Media systems are located in Massachusetts, have
approximately 177,100 customers and are operated as part of our Northeast
Region. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Greater Media systems had
revenues of approximately $85.9 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000,
the Greater Media systems had revenues of approximately $46.8 million.
HELICON. In July 1999, one of our subsidiaries acquired Helicon Partners
I, L.P. and affiliates for approximately $550 million, consisting of $410
million in cash, $115 million of assumed debt, and $25 million in the form of
preferred limited liability company interest of Charter-Helicon LLC, a direct
wholly owned subsidiary. The Helicon systems are located in Alabama, Georgia,
New Hampshire, North Carolina, West Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Vermont, have approximately 173,100 customers and
are operated as part of our Southeast, South-Atlantic, Mid-South, Northeast,
Gulf Coast and Mid-Atlantic regions. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the
Helicon systems had revenues of approximately $85.2 million. For the six months
ended June 30, 2000, the Helicon systems had revenues of approximately $44.2
million.
VISTA AND CABLE SATELLITE. One of our subsidiaries acquired Vista
Broadband Communications, LLC in July 1999 and acquired a cable system of Cable
Satellite of South Miami, Inc. in August 1999. These cable systems are located
in Georgia and southern Florida and serve a total of approximately 34,900
customers and are operated as part of our South-Atlantic regions. The total
purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $148 million in cash.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, these systems had revenues of
approximately $19.0 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, these
systems had revenues of approximately $9.4 million.
79
82
RIFKIN. In September 1999, one of our subsidiaries acquired Rifkin
Acquisition Partners L.L.L.P. and InterLink Communications Partners, LLLP for a
purchase price of approximately $1.46 billion, consisting of $1.2 billion in
cash, $133.3 million in equity in Charter Communications Holding Company and
$128.0 million in assumed debt. The Rifkin systems are located primarily in
Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia,
serving approximately 458,200 customers and are operated as part of our Central,
South-Atlantic, Mid-South and Mid-Atlantic regions. For the year ended December
31, 1999, Rifkin had revenues of approximately $219.9 million. For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, Rifkin had revenues of approximately $116.7 million.
INTERMEDIA SYSTEMS. In October 1999, one of our subsidiaries purchased
certain cable systems of InterMedia Capital Partners IV, L.P., InterMedia
Partners and their affiliates in exchange for approximately $873 million in cash
and certain of our cable systems. The InterMedia systems serve approximately
409,800 customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. As
part of this transaction, we agreed to "swap" some of our non-strategic cable
systems serving approximately 142,000 customers in Indiana, Montana, Utah and
northern Kentucky.
At the closing, we retained a cable system located in Indiana serving
approximately 30,000 customers for which we were unable to timely obtain the
necessary regulatory approvals of the system transfer. Such approval was
subsequently obtained and the Indiana system assets were transferred in March
2000. This transaction, including the transfer of the retained Indiana system,
resulted in a net increase of 265,000 customers concentrated in our Southeast
and Mid-South regions. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the InterMedia
systems had revenues of approximately $179.3 million ($126.2 million, net of
disposed systems). For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the InterMedia
systems had revenues of approximately $112.3 million ($108.9 million, net of
disposed Indiana systems).
FANCH. In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company purchased
the partnership interests of Fanch Cablevision of Indiana, L.P., specified
assets of Cooney Cable Associates of Ohio, Limited Partnership, Fanch-JV2 Master
Limited Partnership, Mark Twain Cablevision Limited Partnership,
Fanch-Narragansett CSI Limited Partnership, North Texas Cablevision, Ltd., Post
Cablevision of Texas, Limited Partnership and Spring Green Communications, L.P.
and the stock of Tioga Cable Company, Inc., Cable Systems, Inc. and, indirectly,
Hornell Television Service, Inc. for a total combined purchase price of
approximately $2.4 billion in cash.
Under the Fanch purchase agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the
Fanch acquisition, certain assets of TWFanch-one Co. were distributed to Fanch
Cablevision of Indiana and Hornell Television Service in exchange for all of
their partnership interests in TWFanch-one. In addition, immediately prior to
the closing of the Fanch acquisition, certain assets of TWFanch-two Co. were
distributed to Fanch-JV2 Master and Cooney Cable in exchange for all of their
partnership interests in TWFanch-two.
The cable systems acquired in this acquisition are primarily located in
Colorado, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin, serve approximately
535,300 customers and are operated as part of our Central, North Central,
Michigan, National, Mid-South, Gulf Coast and Mid-Atlantic regions. For the year
ended December 31, 1999, these systems had revenues of approximately $218.2
million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, these systems had revenues of
approximately $122.0 million.
FALCON. In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company purchased
partnership interests in Falcon Communications, L.P. from Falcon Holding Group,
L.P. and TCI Falcon Holdings, LLC, interests in a number of Falcon entities held
by Falcon Cable Trust and Falcon Holding Group, Inc., specified interests in
Enstar Communications Corporation and Enstar Finance Company, LLC held by Falcon
Holding Group, L.P., and specified interests in Adlink held by DHN Inc.
80
83
The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $3.5 billion,
consisting of cash, $550 million in common membership units in Charter
Communications Holding Company issued to certain of the Falcon sellers and $1.7
billion in assumed debt.
The Falcon cable systems are located in California and the Pacific
Northwest, Missouri, North Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Georgia, Texas
and Utah, serve approximately 964,800 customers and are operated as part of our
Central, Southern California, Northwest, Michigan, National, Southeast,
South-Atlantic, Mid-South, Northeast, Gulf Coast and Mid-Atlantic regions. For
the year ended December 31, 1999, these systems had revenues of approximately
$427.7 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, these systems had
revenues of approximately $215.2 million.
AVALON. In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company purchased
directly and indirectly all of the equity interests of Avalon LLC from Avalon
Cable Holdings LLC, Avalon Investors, L.L.C. and Avalon Cable of New England
Holdings, Inc. for approximately $832 million, consisting of $558.2 million in
cash and $273.8 million in assumed notes.
The Avalon systems are located primarily in Michigan and New England, serve
approximately 269,100 customers and are operated as part of our North Central,
Michigan and Northeast regions. For the year ended December 31, 1999, Avalon had
revenues of approximately $108.3 million. For the six months ended June 30,
2000, the Avalon systems had revenues of $57.2 million.
ACQUISITIONS COMPLETED IN 2000
BRESNAN. In February 2000, we purchased Bresnan Communications Company
Limited Partnership for a total purchase price of approximately $3.1 billion,
consisting of approximately $1.1 billion in cash, $1.0 billion in membership
units in Charter Communications Holding Company and an indirect subsidiary of
Charter Communications Holding Company and $963.3 million in assumed debt.
The cable systems acquired in the Bresnan acquisition are primarily located
in Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nebraska, serve approximately 686,100
customers and are operated as part of our North Central, Michigan and National
regions. For the year ended December 31, 1999, these systems and systems
acquired by Bresnan have revenues of approximately $290.7 million. For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, these systems had revenues of $156.1 million.
CAPITAL CABLE AND FARMINGTON. In April 2000, one of our subsidiaries
purchased a cable system of Falcon Capital Cable Partners, L.P. and another
cable system of Farmington Cablevision Company for a total purchase price of
$75.0 million. These cable systems are primarily located in Illinois, Indiana
and Missouri, serve approximately 29,500 customers and are operated as part of
our Central region. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was
approximately $75.0 million and was paid in cash. For the year ended December
31, 1999, these systems had revenues of approximately $13.5 million. For the six
months ended June 30, 2000, these systems had revenues of $6.1 million.
KALAMAZOO. In September 2000, we completed a stock-for-stock merger with
Cablevision of Michigan, Inc., the owner of a cable system in Kalamazoo,
Michigan. In the merger, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Cablevision
of Michigan in exchange for 11,173,376 shares of our Class A common stock valued
at approximately $170.6 million. After the merger, we contributed 100% of the
equity interests acquired to Charter Communications Holding Company in exchange
for membership units. Charter Communications Holding Company in turn contributed
these equity interests to Charter Holdings, which in turn contributed the equity
interests to a subsidiary. The Kalamazoo system has approximately 48,900
customers and had revenues of approximately $20.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Kalamazoo system
had revenues of $10.2 million.
81
84
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
We offer our customers a full array of traditional cable television
services and programming and we have begun to offer new and advanced high
bandwidth services such as high-speed Internet access. We plan to continually
enhance and upgrade these services, including adding new programming and other
telecommunications services, and will continue to position cable television as
an essential service.
TRADITIONAL CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES. As of June 30, 2000, approximately
83% of our customers subscribed to both "basic" and "expanded basic" service and
generally receive a line-up of between 33 and 85 channels of television
programming, depending on the bandwidth capacity of the system. Customers who
pay additional amounts can also subscribe to additional channels, either
individually or in packages of several channels, as add-ons to the basic
channels. As of June 30, 2000, more than 22% of our customers subscribed to
premium channels, with additional customers subscribing to other special add-on
packages. We tailor both our basic channel line-up and our additional channel
offerings to each system according to demographics, programming preferences,
competition, price sensitivity and local regulation.
Our traditional cable television service offerings include the following:
- BASIC CABLE. All of our customers receive basic cable services, which
generally consist of local broadcast television, local community
programming, including governmental and public access, and limited
satellite programming. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the average
monthly fee was $13.54 for our basic service. For the six months ended
June 30, 2000, the average monthly fee for basic services was $13.54.
- EXPANDED BASIC CABLE. This expanded tier includes a group of
satellite-delivered or non-broadcast channels, such as Entertainment and
Sports Programming Network (ESPN), Cable News Network (CNN) and Lifetime
Television, in addition to the basic channel line-up. For the year ended
December 31, 1999, the average monthly fee was $14.88 for our expanded
basic service. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the average
monthly fee for expanded tier services was $17.45.
- PREMIUM CHANNELS. These channels provide unedited, commercial-free
movies, sports and other special event entertainment programming. Home
Box Office, Cinemax and Showtime are typical examples. We offer
subscriptions to these channels either individually or in packages. For
the year ended December 31, 1999, the average monthly fee was $6.15 per
premium subscription. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, the
average monthly fee was $5.91 per premium subscription.
- PAY-PER-VIEW. These channels allow customers to pay to view a single
showing of a recently released movie, a one-time special sporting event
or music concert on an unedited, commercial-free basis. We currently
charge a fee that ranges from $2.95 to $8.95 for movies. For special
events, such as championship boxing matches, we have charged a fee of up
to $54.95.
We have employed a variety of targeted marketing techniques to attract new
customers by focusing on delivering value, choice, convenience and quality. We
employ direct mail and telemarketing, using demographic "cluster codes" to
convey specific messages to target audiences. In many of our systems, we offer
discounts to customers who purchase premium services on a limited trial basis in
order to encourage a higher level of service subscription. We also have a
coordinated strategy for retaining customers that includes televised retention
advertising to reinforce the decision to subscribe and to encourage customers to
purchase higher service levels.
82
85
NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. A variety of emerging technologies and the
rapid growth of Internet usage have presented us with substantial opportunities
to provide new or expanded products and services to our customers and to expand
our sources of revenue. The desire for such new technologies and the use of the
Internet by businesses in particular have triggered a significant increase in
our commercial market penetration. As a result, we are in the process of
introducing a variety of new or expanded products and services, beyond the
traditional offerings of analog television programming, for the benefit of both
our residential and commercial customers. These new products and services
include:
- digital television and its related enhancements;
- high-speed Internet access via cable modems installed in personal
computers;
- WorldGate television-based Internet access, which allows customers to
access the Internet through the use of our two-way capable cable plant
without the need for a personal computer;
- interactive services, such as Wink, which adds interactivity and
electronic commerce opportunities to traditional programming and
advertising; and
- telephony and data transmission services, which are private network
services interconnecting locations for a customer.
Cable's high bandwidth allows cable to be well positioned to deliver a
multitude of channels and/or new and advanced products and services. We believe
that this high bandwidth will be a key factor in the successful delivery of
these products and services.
DIGITAL TELEVISION. As part of upgrading our systems, we are installing
headend equipment capable of delivering digitally encoded cable transmissions to
a two-way digital-capable set-top converter box in the customer's home. This
digital connection offers significant advantages. For example, we can compress
the digital signal to allow the transmission of up to twelve digital channels in
the bandwidth normally used by one analog channel. This will allow us to
increase both programming and service offerings, including near video-on-demand
for pay-per-view customers. We expect to increase the amount of these services
purchased by our customers.
Digital service customers receive additional television programming, an
interactive electronic programming guide, and up to 45 channels of digital
music. We offer digital service to our customers in three different packages:
Charter Digital Complete Basic(TM), Charter Digital Select(TM), and Charter
Digital MVP(TM). All three packages include a digital set-top converter, the
interactive programming guide, digital music channels, pay-per-view channels,
local broadcast channels, regular cable channels and digital basic channels.
Customers who select the Charter Digital Select package also receive one premium
channel of their choice with "multiplexes." Multiplexes give customers access to
several different versions of the same premium channel that are varied as to
time of broadcast or programming content theme. Customers who select the Charter
Digital MVP package receive four premium channels with multiplexes: HBO,
Showtime, Cinemax and The Movie Channel.
As part of our pricing strategy for digital services, we have established
retail rates of $34 to $56 for the Charter Digital Complete Basic package, $57
to $69 for the Charter Digital Select package, and $64 to $76 for the Charter
Digital MVP Package.
As of June 30, 2000, approximately 375,000 of our customers subscribed to
the digital service offered in 155 markets. As of June 30, 2000, approximately
6.5 million of our homes passed were served by cable systems capable of
delivering digital services. By year-end 2000, we anticipate that digital
services will be available in approximately 8.3 million homes.
83
86
VIDEO-ON-DEMAND. We are beginning to offer video-on-demand (VOD) service
to some of our customers. With VOD service, customers can access hundreds of
movies and other programming at any time, with digital picture quality. VOD
allows customers to pause, rewind and fast-forward programs. They can also stop
a program and resume watching it several hours later during the rental period.
VOD service requires the use of a digital set-top converter and is offered as a
standard feature of our digital service packages. Generally, customers pay for
VOD on a per-selection basis.
We have signed an agreement to offer VOD to the Los Angeles and Atlanta
areas and other future markets with DIVA Systems Corporation (DIVA), a company
providing interactive VOD products and services to the cable industry. DIVA will
provide us with hardware, software, programming and operational support as part
of this agreement. We have worked with DIVA for over a year on a VOD trial with
more than 6,000 customers in our Gwinnett County, Georgia cable system. VOD has
now been launched in this North Atlanta system, and every new digital subscriber
there receives VOD service. We intend to complete testing of DIVA's VOD service
in our Los Angeles service area and launch VOD there in October 2000.
INTERNET ACCESS. We currently provide Internet access to our customers by
two principal means:
- via cable modems attached to personal computers, either directly or
through an outsourcing contract with an Internet service provider; and
- through television access, via a service such as WorldGate.
We also provide Internet access in some markets through traditional dial-up
telephone modems, using a third party service provider.
The principal advantage of cable Internet connections is the high speed of
data transfer over a cable system. We currently offer Internet access service to
our residential customers over coaxial cable at speeds that can range up to
approximately 50 times the speed of a conventional telephone modem. Furthermore,
a two-way communication cable system using a hybrid fiber optic/coaxial
structure can support the entire connection at cable modem speeds without the
need for a separate telephone line. If the cable system only supports one-way
signals from the headend to the customer, the customer must use a separate
telephone line in order to send signals to the provider, although such customer
still receives the benefit of high speed cable access when receiving
information, which is the primary reason for using cable as an Internet
connection. In addition to Internet access over our traditional coaxial system,
we also provide our commercial customers fiber optic cable access.
In the past, cable Internet connections have provided customers with widely
varying access speeds because each customer accessed the Internet by sending and
receiving data through a node. Users connecting simultaneously through a single
node share the bandwidth of that node, so that users' connection speeds may
diminish as additional users connect through the same node. To induce users to
switch to our Internet services, we guarantee our cable modem customers the
minimum access speed selected from several speed options we offer. We also
provide higher guaranteed access speeds for customers willing to pay an
additional cost. In order to meet these guarantees, we are increasing the
bandwidth of our systems and "splitting" nodes easily and cost-effectively to
reduce the number of customers per node.
CABLE MODEM-BASED INTERNET ACCESS. We have deployed cable modem-based
Internet access services in 119 markets including most of our significant
operating clusters.
84
87
As of June 30, 2000, we provided Internet access service to approximately
149,300 residential customers. The following table indicates the projected
availability of cable modem-based Internet access services in our systems, as of
the dates indicated. Only a small percentage of our customers currently
subscribe to these services.
HOMES MADE AVAILABLE FOR
ADVANCED DATA SERVICES
----------------------------------
JUNE 30, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 2000
------------- -----------------
HIGH-SPEED INTERNET ACCESS VIA CABLE MODEMS:
High Speed Access Corp...................................... 1,868,100 2,900,000
EarthLink/Charter Pipeline.................................. 896,800 772,700
Excite@Home................................................. 958,500 757,700
Convergence.com............................................. 263,200 --
In-House/Other.............................................. 600,500 523,700
--------- ---------
Total cable modems........................................ 4,587,100 4,954,100
========= =========
Internet access via WorldGate............................... 428,800 488,800
========= =========
We have a relationship with High Speed Access Corp. to offer Internet
access in some of our smaller systems. High Speed Access also provides Internet
access services to our customers under the Charter Pipeline brand name. Although
the Internet access service is provided by High Speed Access, the Internet
"domain name" of our customer's e-mail address and web site, if any, is
"Charter.net," allowing the customer to switch or expand to our other Internet
services without a change of e-mail address.
High Speed Access provides two different models of service to us. The
network services agreement model is similar to our arrangements with EarthLink
and Excite@Home described below. The full service model bears all capital,
operating and marketing costs of providing the service, and seeks to build
economies of scale in our smaller systems that we cannot efficiently build
ourselves by simultaneously contracting to provide the same services to other
small geographically contiguous systems. As of June 30, 2000, we have made cable
modem-based Internet access available to approximately 1,868,100 of our homes
passed, and approximately 30,500 customers signed up for the service. From July
1, 2000 through the end of 2000, we anticipate making available for service
approximately 1,031,900 additional homes passed. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions -- Business Relationships."
We have an agreement with EarthLink Network, Inc., an independent Internet
service provider, to provide service marketed and branded as Charter
Pipeline(TM), which is a cable modem-based, high-speed Internet access service
we offer. EarthLink and MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. merged in February 2000
creating the second-largest Internet service provider (ISP) in the United
States. We currently charge a monthly usage fee of between $24.95 and $74.95.
Our customers have the option to lease a cable modem for $3.95 to $15 a month or
to purchase a modem for between $200 and $300. As of June 30, 2000, we made
EarthLink Internet access available to approximately 896,800 homes passed and
had approximately 18,200 customers who subscribed to this service.
We have a revenue sharing agreement with Excite@Home, under which
Excite@Home provides Internet service to customers in our systems serving Fort
Worth, University Park and Highland Park, Texas. The Excite@Home network
provides high-speed, cable modem-based Internet access using our cable
infrastructure. As of June 30, 2000, we have made Excite@Home available to
approximately 958,500 of our homes passed and had approximately 38,800 customers
who subscribed to this service.
We also have services agreements with Convergence.com under which
Convergence.com provides Internet service to customers in systems acquired in
the Rifkin acquisition. The Convergence.com network provides high-speed, cable
modem-based Internet access using our cable infrastructure. As of
85
88
June 30, 2000, we have made available Convergence.com service to approximately
263,200 homes passed and had approximately 8,600 customers.
We actively market our cable modem service to businesses in each one of our
systems where we have the capability to offer such service. Our marketing
efforts are often door-to-door, and we have established a separate division
whose function is to make businesses aware that this type of Internet access is
available through us. We also provide several virtual local area networks for
municipal and educational facilities in our Los Angeles cluster including
California Institute of Technology located in Pasadena, the City of Pasadena and
the City of West Covina.
TV-BASED INTERNET ACCESS. We have a non-exclusive agreement with WorldGate
to provide its TV-based e-mail and Internet access to our cable customers.
WorldGate's technology is only available to cable systems with two-way
capability. WorldGate offers easy, low-cost Internet access to customers at
connection speeds ranging up to 128 kilobits per second. For a monthly fee, we
provide our customers with e-mail and Internet access that does not require the
use of a PC, an existing or additional telephone line, or any additional
equipment. Instead, the customer accesses the Internet through the set-top box,
which the customer already has on his television set, and a wireless keyboard,
that is provided with the service and which interfaces with the box. WorldGate
works on advanced analog and digital converters and, therefore, can be installed
utilizing advanced analog converters already deployed. In contrast, other
converter-based, non-PC Internet access products require a digital platform and
a digital converter prior to installation.
Customers who opt for television-based Internet access are generally
first-time Internet users who prefer this more user-friendly interface. Although
the WorldGate service bears the WorldGate brand name, the Internet domain name
of the customers who use this service is "Charter.net." This allows customers to
switch or expand to our other Internet services without a change of e-mail
address.
We first offered WorldGate to customers on the upgraded portion of our
systems in St. Louis in April 1998. We are also currently offering this service
in five other systems. In addition, we plan to introduce it in four additional
systems during 2000. As of June 30, 2000, we provided WorldGate Internet service
to approximately 7,200 customers.
INTERNET PORTAL SERVICES. On October 1, 1999, Charter Communications
Holding Company, Vulcan Ventures, an entity controlled by Mr. Allen, and Go2Net,
Inc. entered into a joint venture to form Digeo Broadband, Inc. Digeo Broadband
will provide access to the Internet through a "portal" to our customers on the
digital service tier. A portal is an Internet web site that serves as a user's
initial point of entry to the World Wide Web. By offering selected content,
services and links to other web sites, a portal guides and directs users through
the World Wide Web. In addition, the portal generates revenues from advertising
on its own web pages and by sharing revenues generated by linked or featured web
sites.
Revenue splits and other economic terms in this arrangement will be at
least as favorable to us as terms between Digeo Broadband and any other parties.
Charter Communications Holding Company has agreed to use Digeo Broadband's
portal services exclusively for an initial six-year period that will begin when
the portal services are launched, except that Charter Communications Holding
Company's existing agreements with other Internet high-speed portal services and
High Speed Access may run for their current term to the extent that such
agreements do not allow for the carriage of content provided by Charter
Communications Holding Company or Vulcan Ventures. The joint venture is for an
initial 25-year term, subject to successive five-year renewals by mutual
consent. Vulcan Ventures will own 55.2%, Charter Communications Holding Company
will own 24.9% and Go2Net will own 19.9% of Digeo Broadband's equity interests
and Vulcan Ventures will have voting control over the Digeo Broadband entity.
Digeo Broadband's board of directors will consist of three directors designated
by Vulcan Ventures and one by each of Charter Communications Holding Company and
Go2Net.
86
89
Each of Digeo Broadband's investors will be obligated to provide their pro
rata share of funding for Digeo Broadband's operations and capital expenditures,
except that Vulcan Ventures will fund our portion of Digeo Broadband's expenses
for the first four years and will fund Go2Net's portion of Digeo Broadband's
expenses to the extent Go2Net's portion exceeds budget for the first four years.
We believe that our participation in the Digeo Broadband joint venture will
facilitate the delivery of a broad array of Internet products and services to
our customers over the television through the use of an advanced digital set-top
box or through the personal computer.
Our advanced technology team continues to work with Digeo Broadband to
develop our portal service. We expect to launch the service in St. Louis before
the end of 2000. We do not anticipate that our participation in the Digeo
Broadband joint venture will have a material adverse impact on our financial
condition or results of operations for the foreseeable future.
WINK-ENHANCED PROGRAMMING. We have formed a relationship with Wink, which
sells technology to embed interactive features, such as additional information
and statistics about a program or the option to order an advertised product,
into programming and advertisements. A customer with a Wink-enabled set-top box
and a Wink-enabled cable provider sees an icon flash on the screen when
additional Wink features are available to enhance a program or advertisement. By
pressing the select button on a standard remote control, a viewer of a
Wink-enhanced program is able to access additional information regarding such
program, including, for example, information on prior episodes or the program's
characters. A viewer watching an advertisement would be able to access
additional information regarding the advertised product and may also be able to
utilize the two-way transmission features to order a product. We have bundled
Wink's services with our traditional cable services in both our advanced analog
and digital platforms. Wink's services are provided free of charge. A company
controlled by Mr. Allen has 3.8% equity interest in Wink.
Various programming networks, including CNN, NBC, ESPN, HBO, Showtime,
Lifetime, VH1, the Weather Channel, and Nickelodeon, are currently producing
over 1,000 hours of Wink-enhanced programming per week. Under certain
revenue-sharing arrangements, we will modify our headend technology to allow
Wink-enabled programming to be offered on our systems. We receive fees from Wink
each time one of our customers uses Wink to request certain additional
information or order an advertised product.
TELEPHONE SERVICES. We expect to be able to offer cable telephony services
in the near future in selected markets using our systems' direct, two-way
connections to homes and other buildings. We are exploring technologies using
Internet protocol telephony, as well as traditional switching technologies that
are currently available, to transmit digital voice signals over our systems.
AT&T and other telephone companies have already begun to pursue strategic
partnering and other programs which make it attractive for us to acquire and
develop this alternative Internet protocol technology. For the last two years,
we have sold telephony services as a competitive access provider in the state of
Wisconsin through one of our subsidiaries, and are currently looking to expand
our services as a competitive access provider into other states.
JOINT VENTURE WITH RCN CORPORATION. On October 1, 1999, Charter
Communications Holding Company and RCN Corporation (RCN), in which Vulcan
Ventures, an entity controlled by Mr. Allen, owns a 28.0% equity interest,
entered into a binding term sheet containing the principal terms of a
non-exclusive joint venture to provide a broad range of telephony services to
the customers in our Los Angeles franchise territory. RCN is engaged in the
businesses of bundling residential voice, video and Internet access operations,
cable operations and certain long distance telephony operations. RCN is
developing advanced fiber optic networks to provide a wide range of
telecommunications services, including long distance telephone, video
programming and data services, such as high-speed Internet access.
87
90
Charter Communications Holding Company will provide access to our Los
Angeles customer base and will provide the capital necessary to develop
telephony capability in Los Angeles. In addition, Charter Communications Holding
Company will provide the necessary personnel to oversee and manage the telephony
services. RCN will provide the necessary personnel and support services to
develop and implement telephony services to be provided by Charter
Communications Holding Company. We will pay RCN's fees at rates consistent with
industry market compensation. We will have all rights to the telephony business
and assets and will receive all revenues derived from the telephony business
unless the parties expand RCN's role by mutual agreement. We believe that our
telephony joint venture, together with Mr. Allen's investment in RCN, may allow
us to take advantage of RCN's telephony experience as we deliver telephone
services to our customers, although we cannot assure you that we will realize
anticipated advantages.
The term sheet contains only the principal terms of this joint venture and
provides that the parties will enter into definitive agreements, which will
contain, among other terms, details of the compensation to be received by RCN.
To date, we have only had preliminary discussions with RCN regarding specific
operational matters and have not determined a timetable for the commencement of
services by the joint venture. We do not anticipate that this joint venture will
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations in
the foreseeable future.
OUR SYSTEMS
As of June 30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, our cable
systems consisted of approximately 185,800 route miles, including approximately
19,400 sheath miles of fiber optic cable, passing approximately 10.1 million
households and serving approximately 6.3 million customers. Coaxial cable is a
type of cable used for broadband data and cable systems. This type of cable has
excellent broadband frequency characteristics, noise immunity and physical
durability. The cable is connected from each node to individual homes or
buildings. A node is a single connection to a cable system's main high-capacity
fiber optic cable that is shared by a number of customers. A sheath mile is the
actual length of cable in miles. Fiber optic cable is a communication medium
that uses hair-thin glass fibers to transmit signals over long distances with
minimum signal loss or distortion. As of June 30, 2000, without giving effect to
Kalamazoo transaction, approximately 57.2% of our customers were served by
systems with at least 550 megahertz bandwidth capacity, approximately 41.2% had
at least 750 megahertz bandwidth capacity and approximately 41.2% were served by
systems capable of providing two-way interactive communication capability. Such
two-way interactive communication capability includes two-way Internet
connections, services provided by Wink and interactive program guides.
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT. Pursuant to a services agreement between Charter
Communications, Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc., Charter Investment, Inc.
leases the necessary personnel and provides services to manage Charter
Communications Holding Company, Charter Holdings and their subsidiaries. These
personnel and services are provided to Charter Communications, Inc. on a cost
reimbursement basis. Management of Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter
Investment, Inc. consists of approximately 350 people led by Charter
Communications, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer Jerald L. Kent. They are
responsible for coordinating and overseeing our operations, including certain
critical functions, such as marketing and engineering, that are conducted by
personnel at the regional and local system level. The corporate office also
performs certain financial control functions such as accounting, finance and
acquisitions, payroll and benefit administration, internal audit, purchasing and
programming contract administration on a centralized basis.
OPERATING REGIONS. To manage and operate our systems, we have established
two divisions that contain a total of twelve operating regions. Each of the two
divisions is managed by a Senior Vice President who reports to David G. Barford,
Chief Operating Officer, and is responsible for overall supervision of the
operating regions within the division. Mr. Barford reports directly to Mr. Kent.
88
91
Each region is managed by a team consisting of a Senior Vice President or a Vice
President, supported by operational, marketing and engineering personnel. Within
each region, certain groups of cable systems are further organized into
clusters. We believe that much of our success is attributable to our operating
philosophy which emphasizes decentralized management, with decisions being made
as close to the customer as possible.
The following table provides an overview of customer data for each of our
operating regions as of June 30, 2000.
CUSTOMER DATA AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
CHARTER 2000 KALAMAZOO
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ACQUISITIONS SUBTOTAL TRANSACTION TOTAL
-------------------- ------------ --------- ----------- ---------
WESTERN DIVISION
Central................... 459,800 27,900 487,700 -- 487,700
North Central............. 424,100 377,400 801,500 -- 801,500
Southern California....... 635,300 -- 635,300 -- 635,300
Northwest................. 476,700 -- 476,700 -- 476,700
Michigan.................. 310,400 254,900 565,300 48,900 614,200
National.................. 383,400 61,200 444,600 -- 444,600
--------- ------- --------- ------ ---------
2,689,700 721,400 3,411,100 48,900 3,460,000
EASTERN DIVISION
Southeast................. 559,600 -- 559,600 -- 559,600
South-Atlantic............ 382,900 -- 382,900 -- 382,900
Mid-South................. 549,000 -- 549,000 -- 549,000
Northeast................. 359,800 -- 359,800 -- 359,800
Gulf Coast................ 419,500 -- 419,500 -- 419,500
Mid-Atlantic.............. 532,200 -- 532,200 -- 532,200
--------- ------- --------- ------ ---------
2,803,000 -- 2,803,000 -- 2,803,000
--------- ------- --------- ------ ---------
Total..................... 5,492,700 721,400 6,214,100 48,900 6,263,000
========= ======= ========= ====== =========
The following discussion provides a description of our operating regions as
of June 30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction.
CENTRAL REGION. The Central region consists of cable systems serving
approximately 487,700 customers, of which approximately 244,000 customers reside
in and around St. Louis County or in adjacent areas in Illinois. The remaining
customers primarily reside in small to medium-sized communities in Missouri,
Illinois and Indiana.
NORTH CENTRAL REGION. The North Central region consists of cable systems
serving approximately 801,500 customers located throughout the states of
Wisconsin and Minnesota. Approximately 576,000 and 225,000 customers reside in
the states of Wisconsin and Minnesota, respectively. Within the state of
Wisconsin, the two largest operating clusters are located in and around Madison,
serving approximately 230,000 customers, and Fond du Lac, serving approximately
109,000 customers. Within the state of Minnesota, the two largest operating
clusters are located in and around Rochester, serving approximately 146,000
customers, and St. Cloud, serving approximately 67,000 customers.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION. The Southern California region consists of
cable systems serving approximately 635,300 customers located in California,
with approximately 514,000 customers in the
89
92
Los Angeles metropolitan area. These customers reside primarily in the
communities of Pasadena, Alhambra, Glendale, Long Beach and Riverside. We also
have approximately 121,000 customers in central California, principally located
in the communities of San Luis Obispo and Turlock.
NORTHWEST REGION. The Northwest region was formed in connection with the
Fanch and Falcon acquisitions. The Northwest region consists of cable systems
serving approximately 476,700 customers in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and
California. The two largest operating clusters in the Northwest region are
located in and around Kennewick, Washington, serving approximately 87,000
customers, and Medford, Oregon, serving approximately 74,000 customers.
MICHIGAN REGION. The Michigan region was formed in connection with the
Fanch, Avalon, Falcon and Bresnan acquisitions. Pro forma for the Kalamazoo
transaction, the Michigan region consists of cable systems serving approximately
614,200 customers. The largest operating cluster in the Michigan region is
located in and around Bay City, Michigan, serving approximately 134,000
customers.
NATIONAL REGION. The National region consists of cable systems serving
approximately 444,600 customers residing in small to medium-sized communities in
Nebraska, Texas, New Mexico, North Dakota, Kansas, Colorado, Oklahoma and Utah.
Cable systems serving approximately 289,000 customers are located in Texas, of
which approximately 190,000 are served by the Fort Worth, Texas operating
cluster.
SOUTHEAST REGION. The Southeast region consists of cable systems serving
approximately 559,600 customers residing primarily in small to medium-sized
communities in North Carolina and South Carolina. There are significant clusters
of cable systems in and around the cities and counties of
Greenville/Spartanburg, South Carolina, serving approximately 325,000 customers,
and Hickory, North Carolina, serving approximately 126,000 customers.
SOUTH-ATLANTIC REGION. The South-Atlantic region consists of cable systems
serving approximately 382,900 customers residing primarily in small to
medium-sized communities in Georgia and Florida. A significant cluster of cable
systems is located in and around Atlanta, Georgia, serving approximately 210,000
customers.
MID-SOUTH REGION. The Mid-South region consists of cable systems serving
approximately 549,000 customers in Tennessee, Kentucky and Georgia. The
Mid-South region has a significant cluster of cable systems in and around
Kingsport, Tennessee, serving approximately 123,000 customers.
NORTHEAST REGION. The Northeast region consists of cable systems serving
approximately 359,800 customers residing in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York
and Vermont. The Northeast region has a significant cluster of cable systems in
and around Worcester, Massachusetts, and Willimantic, Connecticut, serving
approximately 166,000 customers.
GULF COAST REGION. The Gulf Coast region was formed in connection with the
Fanch and Falcon acquisitions. The Gulf Coast region consists of cable systems
serving approximately 419,500 customers in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama.
Within Alabama, the two largest operating clusters are located in and around
Birmingham, serving approximately 119,000 customers, and Montgomery, serving
approximately 26,000 customers.
MID-ATLANTIC REGION. The Mid-Atlantic region consists of cable systems
serving approximately 532,200 customers in Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, New York and Maryland. The Mid-Atlantic region has significant
clusters of cable systems in and around the cities of Charleston, West Virginia,
serving approximately 197,000 customers, and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, serving
approximately 77,000 customers.
90
93
PLANT AND TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW. We have engaged in an aggressive program to
upgrade our existing cable plant over the next three years. For the period from
January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2002, we plan to spend approximately $6.4
billion for capital expenditures, approximately $3.2 billion of which will be
used to upgrade our systems to bandwidth capacity of 550 megahertz or greater,
so that we may offer advanced services. The remaining capital will be spent on
plant extensions, new services, converters and system maintenance.
The following table describes the current technological state of our
systems and the anticipated progress of planned upgrades through 2003, based on
the percentage of our customers who will have access to the bandwidths listed
below and two-way capability.
550 MEGAHERTZ
LESS THAN TO TWO-WAY
550 MEGAHERTZ 660 MEGAHERTZ 750 MEGAHERTZ 870 MEGAHERTZ CAPABILITY
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------
June 30, 2000........... 42.8% 16.0% 36.1% 5.1% 41.2%
December 31, 2000....... 33.2% 9.5% 49.7% 7.6% 57.3%
December 31, 2001....... 18.2% 7.3% 49.7% 24.8% 74.5%
December 31, 2002....... 6.7% 5.7% 49.7% 37.9% 87.6%
December 31, 2003....... 2.7% 5.8% 49.7% 41.8% 91.5%
We have adopted the hybrid fiber coaxial cable (HFC) architecture as the
standard for our ongoing systems upgrades. HFC architecture combines the use of
fiber optic cable, which can carry hundreds of video, data and voice channels
over extended distances, with coaxial cable, which requires a more extensive
signal amplification in order to obtain the desired transmission levels for
delivering channels. In most systems, we deliver our signals via fiber optic
cable to individual nodes serving a maximum of 500 homes or commercial
buildings. Currently, our average node size is approximately 380 homes per node.
Our HFC architecture consists of six strands of fiber to each node, with two
strands activated and four strands reserved for future services. We believe that
this network design provides high capacity and superior signal quality, and will
enable us to provide the newest forms of telecommunications services to our
customers. The primary advantages of HFC architecture over traditional coaxial
cable networks include:
- increased channel capacity of cable systems;
- reduced number of amplifiers, which are devices to compensate for signal
loss associated with coaxial cable, needed to deliver signals from the
headend to the home, resulting in improved signal quality and
reliability;
- reduced number of homes connected to an individual node, improving the
capacity of the network to provide high-speed Internet access and
reducing the number of households affected by disruptions in the
network; and
- sufficient dedicated bandwidth for two-way services, which avoids
reverse signal interference problems that can otherwise occur with
two-way communication capability.
The HFC architecture will enable us to offer new and enhanced services,
including:
- additional channels and tiers;
- expanded pay-per-view options;
- high-speed Internet access;
- wide area networks, which permit a network of computers to be connected
together beyond an area;
91
94
- point-to-point data services, which can switch data links from one point
to another; and
- digital advertising insertion, which is the insertion of local, regional
and national programming.
The upgrades will facilitate our new services in two primary ways:
- Greater bandwidth allows us to send more information through our
systems. This provides us with the capacity to provide new services in
addition to our current services. As a result, we will be able to roll
out digital cable programming in addition to existing analog channels.
- Enhanced design configured for two-way communication with the customer
allows us to provide cable Internet services without telephone support
and other interactive services, such as an interactive program guide,
impulse pay-per-view, video-on-demand and Wink, that cannot be offered
without upgrading the bandwidth capacity of our systems.
This HFC architecture will also position us to offer cable telephony
services in the future, using either Internet protocol technology or
switch-based technology, another method of linking communications.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Providing a high level of service to our customers has been a central
driver of our historical success. Our emphasis on system reliability,
engineering support and superior customer satisfaction is key to our management
philosophy. In support of our commitment to customer satisfaction, we operate a
24-hour customer service hotline for most systems and offer on-time installation
and service guarantees. It is our policy that if an installer is late for a
scheduled appointment the customer receives free installation, and if a service
technician is late for a service call the customer receives a $20 credit.
As of June 30, 2000, we maintained eighteen call centers located in our
twelve regions, which are responsible for handling call volume for approximately
51% of our customers. They are staffed with dedicated personnel who provide
service to our customers 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We believe operating
regional call centers allows us to provide "localized" service, which also
reduces overhead costs and improves customer service. We have invested
significantly in both personnel and equipment to ensure that these call centers
are professionally managed and employ state-of-the-art technology. As of June
30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, we employed approximately
3,100 customer service representatives. Our customer service representatives
receive extensive training to develop customer contact skills and product
knowledge critical to successful sales and high rates of customer retention. As
of June 30, 2000, we had approximately 5,700 technical employees who are
encouraged to enroll in courses and attend regularly scheduled on-site seminars
conducted by equipment manufacturers to keep pace with the latest technological
developments in the cable industry. We utilize surveys, focus groups and other
research tools as part of our efforts to determine and respond to customer
needs. We believe that all of this improves the overall quality of our services
and the reliability of our systems, resulting in fewer service calls from
customers.
We are also committed to fostering strong community relations in the towns
and cities our systems serve. We support many local charities and community
causes in various ways, including marketing promotions to raise money and
supplies for persons in need, and in-kind donations that include production
services and free air-time on major cable networks. Recent charity affiliations
include campaigns for "Toys for Tots," United Way, local theatre, children's
museums, local food banks and volunteer fire and ambulance corps. We also
participate in the "Cable in the Classroom" program, whereby cable television
companies throughout the United States provide schools with free cable
television service. In addition, we install and provide free basic cable service
to public schools, government buildings and non-profit hospitals in many of the
communities in which we operate. We
92
95
also provide free cable modems and high-speed Internet access to schools and
public libraries in our franchise areas. We place a special emphasis on
education, and regularly award scholarships to employees who intend to pursue
courses of study in the communications field.
SALES AND MARKETING
PERSONNEL RESOURCES. We have a centralized team responsible for
coordinating the marketing efforts of our individual systems. For most of our
systems with over 30,000 customers we have a dedicated marketing manager, while
smaller systems are handled regionally. We believe our success in marketing
comes in large part from new and innovative ideas and from good interaction
between our corporate office, which handles programs and administration, and our
field offices, which implement the various programs. We are also continually
monitoring the regulatory arena, customer perception, competition, pricing and
product preferences to increase our responsiveness to our customer base. Our
customer service representatives are given the incentive to use their daily
contacts with customers as opportunities to market our new service offerings.
MARKETING STRATEGY. Our long-term marketing objective is to increase cash
flow through deeper market penetration and growth in revenue per household. To
achieve this objective and to position our service as an indispensable consumer
service, we are pursuing the following strategies:
- increase the number of rooms per household with cable;
- introduce new cable products and services;
- design product offerings to enable greater opportunity for customer
choices;
- utilize "tiered" packaging strategies to promote the sale of premium
services and niche programming;
- offer our customers more value through discounted bundling of products;
- increase the number of residential consumers who use our set-top box,
which enables them to obtain advanced digital services such as a greater
number of television channels and interactive services;
- target households based on demographic data;
- develop specialized programs to attract former customers, households
that have never subscribed and to convert unauthorized users of the
service to paying customers; and
- employ Charter branding of products to promote customer awareness and
loyalty.
We have innovative marketing programs which utilize market research on
selected systems, compare the data to national research and tailor marketing
programs for individual markets. We gather detailed customer information through
our regional marketing representatives and use the Claritas geodemographic data
program and consulting services to create unique packages of services and
marketing programs. These marketing efforts and the follow-up analysis provide
consumer information down to the city block or suburban subdivision level, which
allows us to create very targeted marketing programs.
We seek to maximize our revenue per customer through the use of "tiered"
packaging strategies to market premium services and to develop and promote niche
programming services.
We regularly use targeted direct mail campaigns to sell these tiers and
services to our existing customer base. We are developing an in-depth profile
database that goes beyond existing and former customers to include all homes
passed. This database information is expected to improve our targeted direct
marketing efforts, bringing us closer toward our objective of increasing total
customers as well as sales per customer for both new and existing customers. For
example, using customer profile data currently available, we are able to
identify customers who have children under a specified age and do
93
96
not currently subscribe to The Disney Channel. We then target our marketing
efforts with respect to The Disney Channel to those households. In 1998, we were
chosen by Claritas Corporation, sponsor of a national marketing competition
across all industries, as the first place winner in their media division, which
includes cable systems operations, telecommunications and newspapers, for our
national segmenting and targeted marketing program.
In 1998, we introduced a new package of premium services. Customers receive
a substantial discount on bundled premium services of HBO, Showtime, Cinemax and
The Movie Channel. We were able to negotiate favorable terms with premium
networks, which allowed minimal impact on margins and provided substantial
volume incentives to grow the premium category. The MVP package has increased
our premium household penetration, premium revenue and cash flow. We are
currently introducing this same premium strategy in the systems we have recently
acquired.
We expect to continue to invest significant amounts of time, effort and
financial resources in the marketing and promotion of new and existing services.
To increase customer penetration and increase the level of services used by our
customers, we use a coordinated array of marketing techniques, including
door-to-door solicitation, telemarketing, media advertising and direct mail
solicitation. We believe we have one of the cable industry's highest success
rates in attracting and retaining customers who have never before subscribed to
cable services. Historically, these "nevers" are the most difficult customers to
attract and retain.
PROGRAMMING
GENERAL. We believe that offering a wide variety of conveniently scheduled
programming is an important factor influencing a customer's decision to
subscribe to and retain our cable services. We devote considerable resources to
obtaining access to a wide range of programming that we believe will appeal to
both existing and potential basic and premium service customers. We rely on
extensive market research, customer demographics and local programming
preferences to determine channel offerings in each of our markets.
PROGRAMMING SOURCES. We obtain basic and premium programming from a number
of suppliers, usually pursuant to a written contract. Recent consolidation in
the cable television industry coupled with our growth through acquisitions
reduced the benefits associated with our participation in TeleSynergy. As a
result of our recent acquisitions, we reviewed our programming arrangements and
terminated our agreement with TeleSynergy, effective January 31, 2000.
Telesynergy has since then ceased to operate. Though we no longer benefit from
Telesynergy's services, such as volume discounts for purchasing programming due
to Telesynergy's large buying base, we believe that our acquisitions in 1999 and
2000 and consequent increased size will significantly aid our purchasing power
in the cable industry.
PROGRAMMING PRICING. Programming tends to be made available to us for a
flat fee per customer. However, some channels are available without cost to us.
In connection with the launch of a new channel, we may receive a distribution
fee to support the channel launch, a portion of which is applied to marketing
expenses associated with the channel launch. The amounts we receive in
distribution fees are not significant.
Our programming contracts generally continue for a fixed period of time,
usually from three to ten years, and are subject to negotiated renewal. Although
longer contract terms are available, we prefer to limit contracts to three years
so that we retain flexibility to change programming and include new channels as
they become available. Some program suppliers offer marketing support or volume
discount pricing structures. Some of our programming agreements with premium
service suppliers offer cost incentives under which premium service unit prices
decline as certain premium service growth thresholds are met.
94
97
For home shopping channels, we receive a percentage of the amount spent in
home shopping purchases by our customers on channels we carry. In 1998, cash
receipts from such purchases totaled approximately $220,000. In 1999, cash
receipts totaled approximately $5.0 million. For the six months ended June 30,
2000, cash receipts totaled approximately $4.5 million.
PROGRAMMING COSTS. Our cable programming costs have increased in recent
years and are expected to continue to increase due to factors including:
- system acquisitions;
- additional programming being provided to customers;
- increased cost to produce or purchase cable programming; and
- inflationary increases.
In every year we have operated, our costs to acquire programming have
exceeded customary inflationary and cost-of-living type increases. Sports
programming costs have increased significantly over the past several years. In
addition, contracts to purchase sports programming sometimes contain built-in
cost increases for programming added during the term of the contract which we
may or may not have the option to add to our service offerings.
Under rate regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, cable
operators may increase their rates to customers to cover increased costs for
programming, subject to certain limitations. See "Regulation and Legislation."
We believe we will, as a general matter, be able to pass increases in our
programming costs to customers, although we cannot assure you that this will be
possible.
RATES
Pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission's rules, we have set
rates for cable-related equipment, such as converter boxes, remote control
devices and installation services. These rates are based on actual costs plus an
11.25% rate of return. We have unbundled these charges from the charges for the
provision of cable service.
Rates charged to our customers vary based on the market served and service
selected, and are typically adjusted on an annual basis. As of June 30, 2000,
the average monthly fee was $13.54 for basic service and $17.45 for expanded
basic service tier. Regulation of the expanded basic service tier was eliminated
by federal law as of March 31, 1999, and such rates are now based on market
conditions. A one-time installation fee, which may be waived in part during
certain promotional periods, is charged to new customers. We believe our rate
practices are in accordance with Federal Communications Commission Guidelines
and are consistent with those prevailing in the industry generally. See
"Regulation and Legislation."
THEFT PROTECTION
The unauthorized tapping of a cable plant and the unauthorized receipt of
programming using cable converters purchased through unauthorized sources are
problems which continue to challenge the entire cable industry. We have adopted
specific measures to combat the unauthorized use of our plant to receive
programming. For instance, in several of our regions, we have instituted a
"perpetual audit" whereby each technician is required to check at least four
other nearby residences during each service call to determine if there are any
obvious signs of piracy, namely, a drop line leading from the main cable line
into other homes. Addresses where the technician observes drop lines are then
checked against our customer billing records. If the address is not found in the
billing records, a sales representative calls on the unauthorized user to
correct the "billing discrepancy" and persuade the user to become a formal
customer. In our experience, approximately 25% of unauthorized users who
95
98
are solicited in this manner become customers. Billing records are then closely
monitored to guard against these new customers reverting to their status as
unauthorized users. Unauthorized users who do not convert are promptly
disconnected and, in certain instances, flagrant violators are referred for
prosecution. In addition, we have prosecuted individuals who have sold cable
converters programmed to receive our signals without proper authorization.
FRANCHISES
As of June 30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, our systems
operated pursuant to a total of approximately 4,600 franchises, permits and
similar authorizations issued by local and state governmental authorities. Each
franchise is awarded by a governmental authority and is usually not transferable
unless the granting governmental authority consents. Most franchises are subject
to termination proceedings in the event of a material breach. In addition, most
franchises require us to pay the granting authority a franchise fee of up to
5.0% of gross revenues generated by cable services under the franchise, which is
the maximum amount that may be charged under the Communications Act.
Our franchises have terms which range from four years to more than 32
years. Prior to the scheduled expiration of most franchises, we initiate renewal
proceedings with the granting authorities. This process usually takes three
years but can take a longer period of time and often involves substantial
expense. The Communications Act provides for an orderly franchise renewal
process in which granting authorities may not unreasonably withhold renewals. If
a renewal is withheld and the granting authority takes over operation of the
affected cable system or awards the cable franchise to another party, the
granting authority must pay the existing cable operator the "fair market value"
of the system. The Communications Act also established comprehensive renewal
procedures requiring that an incumbent franchisee's renewal application be
evaluated on its own merit and not as part of a comparative process with
competing applications. In connection with the franchise renewal process, many
governmental authorities require the cable operator to make certain commitments,
such as technological upgrades to the system, which may require substantial
capital expenditures. We cannot assure you that any particular franchise will be
renewed or that it can be renewed on commercially favorable terms. Our failure
to obtain renewals of our franchises, especially those in major metropolitan
areas where we have the most customers, would have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The following table summarizes our systems' franchises by year of
expiration and approximate number of basic customers as of June 30, 2000, pro
forma for the Kalamazoo transaction:
NUMBER PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
OF OF TOTAL TOTAL BASIC OF TOTAL
YEAR OF FRANCHISE EXPIRATION FRANCHISES FRANCHISES CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS
- ---------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Prior to December 31, 2000.................... 350 8% 313,100 5%
2001 to 2002.................................. 601 13% 1,002,100 16%
2003 to 2005.................................. 1,087 23% 1,252,600 20%
2006 or after................................. 2,581 56% 3,695,200 59%
----- --- --------- ---
Total....................................... 4,619 100% 6,263,000 100%
===== === ========= ===
Under the 1996 Telecom Act, state and local authorities are prohibited from
limiting, restricting or conditioning the provision of telecommunications
services. They may, however, impose "competitively neutral" requirements and
manage the public rights-of-way. Granting authorities may not require a cable
operator to provide telecommunications services or facilities, other than
institutional networks, as a condition of an initial franchise grant, a
franchise renewal, or a franchise transfer. The 1996 Telecom Act also limits
franchise fees to an operator's cable-related revenues and clarifies that they
do not apply to revenues that a cable operator derives from providing new
telecommunications services.
96
99
We believe our relations with the franchising authorities under which our
systems are operated are generally good. Substantially all of the material
franchises relating to our systems which are eligible for renewal have been
renewed or extended at or prior to their stated expiration dates.
COMPETITION
We face competition in the areas of price, service offerings and service
reliability. We compete with other providers of television signals and other
sources of home entertainment. In addition, as we expand into additional
services such as interactive services and telephony, we will face competition
from other providers of each type of service. See "Risk Factors." We operate in
a very competitive business environment which can adversely affect our business
and operations.
To date, we believe that we have not lost a significant number of customers
or a significant amount of revenue to our competitors' systems. However,
competition from other providers of the technologies we expect to offer in the
future may have a negative impact on our business in the future.
Through mergers such as the merger of Tele-Communications, Inc. and AT&T
and the pending merger of America Online, Inc. (AOL) and Time Warner Inc.,
customers will come to expect a variety of services from a single provider.
While these mergers have no direct or immediate impact on our business, they
encourage providers of cable and telecommunications services to expand their
service offerings. They also encourage consolidation in the cable industry as
cable operators recognize the competitive benefits of a large customer base and
expanded financial resources.
Key competitors today include:
BROADCAST TELEVISION. Cable television has long competed with broadcast
television, which consists of television signals that the viewer is able to
receive without charge using an "off-air" antenna. The extent of such
competition is dependent upon the quality and quantity of broadcast signals
available through "off-air" reception compared to the services provided by the
local cable system. The recent licensing of digital spectrum by the Federal
Communications Commission will provide incumbent television licenses with the
ability to deliver high definition television pictures and multiple
digital-quality program streams, as well as advanced digital services such as
subscription video and data transmission.
DBS. Direct broadcast satellite, known as DBS, has emerged as significant
competition to cable systems. The DBS industry has grown rapidly over the last
several years, far exceeding the growth rate of the cable television industry,
and now serves more than 13.4 million subscribers nationwide. DBS service allows
the subscriber to receive video services directly via satellite using a
relatively small dish antenna. Moreover, video compression technology allows DBS
providers to offer more than 100 digital channels, thereby surpassing the
typical analog cable system. DBS companies historically were prohibited from
retransmitting popular local broadcast programming. However, a change to the
copyright laws in November 1999 eliminated this legal impediment. As a result,
DBS companies now need to secure retransmission consent from the popular
broadcast stations they wish to carry, and they will face mandatory carriage
obligations of less popular broadcast stations as of January 2002. In response
to the legislation, DirecTV, Inc. and EchoStar Communications Corporation
already have begun carrying the major network stations in the nation's top
television markets. DBS, however, is limited in the local programming it can
provide because of the current capacity limitations of satellite technology. It
is, therefore, expected that DBS companies will offer local broadcast
programming only in the larger U.S. markets in the foreseeable future. The same
legislation providing for DBS carriage of local broadcast stations reduced the
compulsory copyright fees paid by DBS companies and allows them to continue
offering distant network signals to rural customers. In March 2000, both DirecTV
and EchoStar announced that they would be capable of providing two-way
high-speed Internet access by the end of this year. AOL, the nation's leading
provider of Internet services has announced a plan
97
100
to invest $1.5 billion in Hughes Electronics Corp., DirecTV's parent company,
and these companies intend to jointly market AOL's prospective Internet
television service to DirecTV's DBS customers.
DSL. The deployment of digital subscriber line technology, known as DSL,
will allow Internet access to subscribers at data transmission speeds greater
than those of modems over conventional telephone lines. Several telephone
companies and other companies are introducing DSL service. The Federal
Communications Commission mandates that incumbent telephone companies grant
access to the high frequency portion of the local loop over which they provide
voice services. This enables competitive carriers to provide DSL services over
the same telephone lines simultaneously used by incumbent telephone companies to
provide basic telephone service. However, the Federal Communications Commission
does not mandate that incumbent telephone companies unbundle their internal
packet switching functionality or related equipment for the benefit of
competitive carriers. This functionality or equipment could otherwise be used by
competitive carriers directly to provide DSL or other high-speed broadband
services. We are unable to predict whether the Federal Communications
Commission's decisions regarding access to the local loop or internal packet
switching will be sustained upon administrative or judicial appeal, the
likelihood of success of the Internet access offered by our competitors, or the
impact on our business and operations of these competitive ventures.
TRADITIONAL OVERBUILDS. Cable systems are operated under non-exclusive
franchises granted by local authorities. More than one cable system may legally
be built in the same area. It is possible that a franchising authority might
grant a second franchise to another cable operator and that such a franchise
might contain terms and conditions more favorable than those afforded us. In
addition, entities willing to establish an open video system, under which they
offer unaffiliated programmers non-discriminatory access to a portion of the
system's cable system may be able to avoid local franchising requirements. Well
financed businesses from outside the cable industry, such as public utilities
that already possess fiber optic and other transmission lines in the areas they
serve may over time become competitors. There has been a recent increase in the
number of cities that have constructed their own cable systems, in a manner
similar to city-provided utility services. There has been an increased interest
in traditional overbuilds by private companies. Constructing a competing cable
system is a capital intensive process which involves a high degree of risk. We
believe that in order to be successful, a competitor's overbuild would need to
be able to serve the homes and businesses in the overbuilt area on a more
cost-effective basis than us. Any such overbuild operation would require either
significant access to capital or access to facilities already in place that are
capable of delivering cable television programming.
As of June 30, 2000, we are aware of overbuild situations in some of our
cable systems. Pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, approximately 140,500
basic customers, or approximately 2.2% of our total basic customers, are passed
by these overbuilds. Additionally, we have been notified that franchises have
been awarded, and present potential overbuild situations, in other of our
systems. Approximately 161,500 or 2.6% of our total customers are located in
areas with potential overbuilds. In response to such overbuilds, these systems
have been designated priorities for the upgrade of cable plant and the launch of
new and enhanced services. We have upgraded many of these systems to at least
750 megahertz two-way HFC architecture, and anticipate upgrading the other
systems to at least 750 megahertz by December 31, 2001.
TELEPHONE COMPANIES AND UTILITIES. The competitive environment has been
significantly affected by both technological developments and regulatory changes
enacted under The Telecommunications Act of 1996, which were designed to enhance
competition in the cable television and local telephone markets. Federal
cross-ownership restrictions historically limited entry by local telephone
companies into the cable business. The 1996 Telecom Act modified this
cross-ownership restriction, making it possible for local exchange carriers who
have considerable resources to provide a wide variety of video services
competitive with services offered by cable systems.
98
101
Several telephone companies have obtained or are seeking cable franchises
from local governmental authorities and are constructing cable systems.
Cross-subsidization by local exchange carriers of video and telephony services
poses a strategic advantage over cable operators seeking to compete with local
exchange carriers that provide video services. Some local exchange carriers may
choose to make broadband services available under the open video regulatory
framework of the Federal Communications Commission or through wireless
technology. In addition, local exchange carriers provide facilities for the
transmission and distribution of voice and data services, including Internet
services, in competition with our existing or potential interactive services
ventures and businesses, including Internet service, as well as data and other
non-video services. We cannot predict the likelihood of success of the broadband
services offered by our competitors or the impact on us of such competitive
ventures. Although enthusiasm on the part of local exchange carriers appears to
have waned in recent months, the entry of telephone companies as direct
competitors in the video marketplace may become more widespread and could
adversely affect the profitability and valuation of established cable systems.
As we expand our offerings to include Internet and other telecommunications
services, we will be subject to competition from other telecommunications
providers. The telecommunications industry is highly competitive and includes
competitors with greater financial and personnel resources, who have brand name
recognition and long-standing relationships with regulatory authorities.
Moreover, mergers, joint ventures and alliances among franchise, wireless or
private cable operators, local exchange carriers and others may result in
providers capable of offering cable television, Internet, and telecommunications
services in direct competition with us.
Additionally, we are subject to competition from utilities which possess
fiber optic transmission lines capable of transmitting signals with minimal
signal distortion.
PRIVATE CABLE. Additional competition is posed by satellite master antenna
television systems known as "SMATV systems" serving multiple dwelling units,
referred to in the cable industry as "MDU's", such as condominiums, apartment
complexes, and private residential communities. These private cable systems may
enter into exclusive agreements with such MDUs, which may preclude operators of
franchise systems from serving residents of such private complexes. Such private
cable systems can offer both improved reception of local television stations and
many of the same satellite-delivered program services which are offered by cable
systems. SMATV systems currently benefit from operating advantages not available
to franchised cable systems, including fewer regulatory burdens and no
requirement to service low density or economically depressed communities.
Exemption from regulation may provide a competitive advantage to certain of our
current and potential competitors. The Federal Communications Commission ruled
in 1998 that private cable operators can lease video distribution capacity from
local telephone companies and distribute cable programming services over public
rights-of-way without obtaining a cable franchise. In 1999, both the Fifth and
Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals upheld this Federal Communications Commission
policy.
WIRELESS DISTRIBUTION. Cable television systems also compete with wireless
program distribution services such as multi-channel multipoint distribution
systems or "wireless cable," known as MMDS. MMDS uses low-power microwave
frequencies to transmit television programming over-the-air to paying customers.
Wireless distribution services generally provide many of the programming
services provided by cable systems, and digital compression technology is likely
to increase significantly the channel capacity of their systems. Both analog and
digital MMDS services require unobstructed "line of sight" transmission paths.
Analog MMDS has impacted our customer growth in Riverside and Sacramento,
California and Missoula, Montana. Digital MMDS is a more significant competitor,
presenting potential challenges to us in Los Angeles, California and Atlanta,
Georgia.
99
102
PROPERTIES
Our principal physical assets consist of a cable distribution plant and
equipment, including signal receiving, encoding and decoding devices, headend
reception facilities, distribution systems and customer drop equipment for each
of our cable systems.
Our cable plant and related equipment are generally attached to utility
poles under pole rental agreements with local public utilities and telephone
companies, and in certain locations are buried in underground ducts or trenches.
We own or lease real property for signal reception sites and business offices in
many of the communities served by our systems and for our principal executive
offices. We own most of our service vehicles.
Our subsidiaries own the real property housing a regional data center in
Town & Country, Missouri, as well as the regional office for the Northeast
Region in Newtown, Connecticut and additional real estate located in Hickory,
North Carolina; Hammond, Louisiana; and West Sacramento and San Luis Obispo,
California. Our subsidiaries lease space for our regional data center located in
Dallas, Texas and additional locations for business offices throughout our
operating regions and generally own the towers on which our equipment is
located. Our headend locations are generally located on owned or leased parcels
of land, and we generally own the towers on which our equipment is located.
We believe that our properties are in good operating condition and are
suitable for our business operations.
EMPLOYEES
Pursuant to a mutual services agreement between Charter Communications,
Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc., Charter Investment leases the necessary
personnel and provides services to manage Charter Communications Holding Company
and its subsidiaries. These personnel and services are provided to Charter
Communications, Inc. on a cost reimbursement basis. Charter Communications, Inc.
currently has only fifteen employees, all of whom are senior management and are
also executive officers of Charter Investment, Inc. Our management and the
management of Charter Investment, Inc. consists of approximately 350 people led
by Charter Communications, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer, Jerald L. Kent. They
are responsible for coordinating and overseeing our operations, including
certain critical functions, such as marketing and engineering, that are
conducted by personnel at the regional and local system level. The corporate
office also performs certain financial control functions such as accounting,
finance and acquisitions, payroll and benefit administration, internal audit,
purchasing and programming contract administration on a centralized basis. See
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
As of June 30, 2000, our subsidiaries had approximately 12,700 full-time
equivalent employees of which approximately 360 were represented by the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. We believe we have a good
relationship with our employees and have never experienced a work stoppage.
INSURANCE
We have insurance to cover risks incurred in the ordinary course of
business, including general liability, property coverage, business interruption
and workers' compensation insurance in amounts typical of similar operators in
the cable industry and with reputable insurance providers. As is typical in the
cable industry, we do not insure our underground plant. We believe our insurance
coverage is adequate.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved from time to time in routine legal matters incidental to
our business. We believe that the resolution of such matters will not have a
material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
100
103
REGULATION AND LEGISLATION
The following summary addresses the key regulatory developments and
legislation affecting the cable industry.
The operation of a cable system is extensively regulated by the Federal
Communications Commission, some state governments and most local governments.
The Federal Communications Commission has the authority to enforce its
regulations through the imposition of substantial fines, the issuance of cease
and desist orders and/or the imposition of other administrative sanctions, such
as the revocation of Federal Communications Commission licenses needed to
operate certain transmission facilities used in connection with cable
operations. The 1996 Telecom Act has altered the regulatory structure governing
the nation's communications providers. It removed barriers to competition in
both the cable television market and the local telephone market. Among other
things, it also reduced the scope of cable rate regulation and encourages
additional competition in the video programming industry by allowing local
telephone companies to provide video programming in their own telephone service
areas.
The 1996 Telecom Act required the Federal Communications Commission to
undertake a host of implementing rulemakings. Moreover, Congress and the Federal
Communications Commission have frequently revisited the subject of cable
regulation. Future legislative and regulatory changes could adversely affect our
operations, and there have been calls in Congress and at the Federal
Communications Commission to maintain or even tighten cable regulation in the
absence of widespread effective competition.
CABLE RATE REGULATION. The 1992 Cable Act imposed an extensive rate
regulation regime on the cable television industry, which limited the ability of
cable companies to increase subscriber fees. Under that regime, all cable
systems were subjected to rate regulation, unless they faced "effective
competition" in their local franchise area. Federal law defines "effective
competition" on a community-specific basis as requiring satisfaction of
conditions rarely satisfied in the current marketplace.
Although the Federal Communications Commission established the underlying
regulatory scheme, local government units, commonly referred to as local
franchising authorities, are primarily responsible for administering the
regulation of the lowest level of cable service -- the basic service tier, which
typically contains local broadcast stations and public, educational, and
government access channels. Before a local franchising authority begins basic
service rate regulation, it must certify to the Federal Communications
Commission that it will follow applicable federal rules. Many local franchising
authorities have voluntarily declined to exercise their authority to regulate
basic service rates. Local franchising authorities also have primary
responsibility for regulating cable equipment rates. Under federal law, charges
for various types of cable equipment must be unbundled from each other and from
monthly charges for programming services.
As of June 30, 2000, pro forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, approximately
17% of our local franchising authorities were certified to regulate basic tier
rates. The 1992 Cable Act permits communities to certify and regulate rates at
any time, so that it is possible that additional localities served by the
systems may choose to certify and regulate basic rates in the future.
The Federal Communications Commission historically administered rate
regulation of cable programming service tiers, which are the expanded basic
programming packages that offer services other than basic programming and which
typically contain satellite-delivered programming. As of June 30, 2000, pro
forma for the Kalamazoo transaction, we had cable programming service tier rate
complaints relating to approximately 405,000 customers pending at the Federal
Communications Commission. Under the 1996 Telecom Act, however, the Federal
Communications Commission's authority to regulate cable programming service tier
rates sunset on March 31, 1999. The Federal
101
104
Communications Commission has taken the position that it will still adjudicate
pending cable programming service tier complaints but will strictly limit its
review, and possible refund orders, to the time period predating the sunset
date. We do not believe any adjudications regarding these pre-sunset complaints
will have a material adverse effect on our business. The elimination of cable
programming service tier regulation affords us substantially greater pricing
flexibility.
Under the rate regulations of the Federal Communication Commission, most
cable systems were required to reduce their basic service tier and cable
programming service tier rates in 1993 and 1994, and have since had their rate
increases governed by a complicated price cap scheme that allows for the
recovery of inflation and certain increased costs, as well as providing some
incentive for expanding channel carriage. The Federal Communications Commission
has modified its rate adjustment regulations to allow for annual rate increases
and to minimize previous problems associated with regulatory lag. Operators also
have the opportunity to bypass this "benchmark" regulatory scheme in favor of
traditional "cost-of-service" regulation in cases where the latter methodology
appears favorable. Cost of service regulation is a traditional form of rate
regulation, under which a utility is allowed to recover its costs of providing
the regulated service, plus a reasonable profit. The Federal Communications
Commission and Congress have provided various forms of rate relief for smaller
cable systems owned by smaller operators. Premium cable services offered on a
per-channel or per-program basis remain unregulated. However, federal law
requires that the basic service tier be offered to all cable subscribers and
limits the ability of operators to require purchase of any cable programming
service tier if a customer seeks to purchase premium services offered on a
per-channel or per-program basis, subject to a technology exception which
sunsets in 2002.
As noted above, Federal Communications Commission regulation of cable
programming service tier rates for all systems, regardless of size, sunset
pursuant to the 1996 Telecom Act on March 31, 1999. As a result, the regulatory
regime just discussed is now essentially applicable only to the basic service
tier and cable equipment. The 1996 Telecom Act also relaxes existing "uniform
rate" requirements by specifying that uniform rate requirements do not apply
where the operator faces "effective competition," and by exempting bulk
discounts to multiple dwelling units, although complaints about predatory
pricing still may be made to the Federal Communications Commission.
CABLE ENTRY INTO TELECOMMUNICATIONS. The 1996 Telecom Act creates a more
favorable environment for us to provide telecommunications services beyond
traditional video delivery. It provides that no state or local laws or
regulations may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting any entity from
providing any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service. A cable
operator is authorized under the 1996 Telecom Act to provide telecommunications
services without obtaining a separate local franchise. States are authorized,
however, to impose "competitively neutral" requirements regarding universal
service, public safety and welfare, service quality, and consumer protection.
State and local governments also retain their authority to manage the public
rights-of-way and may require reasonable, competitively neutral compensation for
management of the public rights-of-way when cable operators provide
telecommunications service. The favorable pole attachment rates afforded cable
operators under federal law can be gradually increased by utility companies
owning the poles, beginning in 2001, if the operator provides telecommunications
service, as well as cable service, over its plant. The Federal Communications
Commission clarified that a cable operator's favorable pole rates are not
endangered by the provision of Internet access, but a recent decision by the
11th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and suggested that Internet traffic is
neither cable service nor telecommunications service and might leave cable
attachments that carry Internet traffic ineligible for Pole Attachment Act
protections. This decision could lead to substantial increases in pole
attachment rates. The cable industry has filed an appeal, seeking en banc review
by the Eleventh Circuit.
Cable entry into telecommunications will be affected by the regulatory
landscape now being developed by the Federal Communications Commission and state
regulators. One critical component
102
105
of the 1996 Telecom Act to facilitate the entry of new telecommunications
providers, including cable operators, is the interconnection obligation imposed
on all telecommunications carriers. The Supreme Court upheld most of the Federal
Communications Commission interconnection regulations but recently the Eighth
Circuit Court of Appeals vacated other portions of the Federal Communication
Commission's rules on slightly different grounds. We believe the Eighth
Circuit's decision will be appealed, and may be overturned. Although these
regulations should enable new telecommunications entrants to reach viable
interconnection agreements with incumbent carriers, many issues, including which
specific network elements the Federal Communications Commission can mandate that
incumbent carriers make available to competitors, remain unresolved. If the
Federal Communications Commission's current list of unbundled network elements
is upheld on appeal, it would make it easier for us to provide
telecommunications service. Similarly, if another recent Federal Communications
Commission decision requiring that incumbent telephone companies permit
colocation of competitors' equipment on terms favorable to competitors is
sustained on administrative and judicial appeal, this decision, too, would make
it easier for us to provide telecommunications service.
INTERNET SERVICE. Although there is at present no significant federal
regulation of cable system delivery of Internet services, and the Federal
Communications Commission recently issued several reports finding no immediate
need to impose such regulation, this situation may change as cable systems
expand their broadband delivery of Internet services. In particular, proposals
have been advanced at the Federal Communications Commission and Congress that
would require cable operators to provide access to unaffiliated Internet service
providers and online service providers. The Federal Communications Commission
recently rejected a petition by certain Internet service providers attempting to
use existing modes of access that are commercially leased to gain access to
cable system delivery. Finally, some states and local franchising authorities
are considering the imposition of mandatory Internet access requirements as part
of cable franchise renewals or transfers and a few local jurisdictions have
adopted these requirements.
In June 2000, the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected
an attempt by the City of Portland, Oregon to impose mandatory Internet access
requirements on the local cable operator. In reversing a contrary ruling by the
lower court, the Ninth Circuit court held that Internet service was not a cable
service, and therefore could not be subject to local cable franchising. At the
same time, the Court suggested that at least the transport component of
broadband Internet service could be subject to regulation as a
"telecommunications" service. Although regulation of this form of
telecommunications service would presumably be reserved for the Federal
Communications Commission (which has so far resisted requests for active
regulation), some states may argue that they are entitled to impose "open
access" requirements pursuant to their authority over intrastate
telecommunications. In addition, some local governments may argue that a cable
operator must secure a local telecommunications franchise before providing
Internet service.
In response to the Ninth Circuit decision, the Federal Communications
Commission has announced its intention to initiate a new proceeding to
categorize cable-delivered Internet service and perhaps establish an appropriate
regulatory scheme. The Ninth Circuit decision is the leading case on
cable-delivered Internet service at this point, but the Federal District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia reached a similar deregulatory result in a
May 2000 ruling, albeit using a different legal analysis. It concluded that
broadband Internet service was a cable service, but that multiple provisions of
the Telecommunications Act preempted local regulation. There are other instances
where "open access" requirements have been imposed and judicial challenges are
pending. If regulators are allowed to impose Internet access requirements on
cable operators, it could burden the capacity of cable systems and complicate
our own plans for providing Internet service.
TELEPHONE COMPANY ENTRY INTO CABLE TELEVISION. The 1996 Telecom Act allows
telephone companies to compete directly with cable operators by repealing the
historic telephone
103
106
company/cable cross-ownership ban. Local exchange carriers, including the
regional telephone companies, can now compete with cable operators both inside
and outside their telephone service areas with certain regulatory safeguards.
Because of their resources, local exchange carriers could be formidable
competitors to traditional cable operators. Various local exchange carriers
already are providing video programming services within their telephone service
areas through a variety of distribution methods, including both the deployment
of broadband wire facilities and the use of wireless transmission.
Under the 1996 Telecom Act, local exchange carriers or any other cable
competitor providing video programming to subscribers through broadband wire
should be regulated as a traditional cable operator, subject to local
franchising and federal regulatory requirements, unless the local exchange
carrier or other cable competitor elects to deploy its broadband plant as an
open video system. To qualify for favorable open video system status, the
competitor must reserve two-thirds of the system's activated channels for
unaffiliated entities. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed certain of
the Federal Communications Commission's open video system rules, including its
preemption of local franchising. The Federal Communications Commission
subsequently revised its OVS rules to eliminate this general preemption, thereby
leaving franchising discretion to state and local authorities. It is unclear
what effect this ruling will have on the entities pursuing open video system
operation.
Although local exchange carriers and cable operators can now expand their
offerings across traditional service boundaries, the general prohibition remains
on local exchange carrier buyouts of co-located cable systems. Co-located cable
systems are cable systems serving an overlapping territory. Cable operator
buyouts of co-located local exchange carrier systems, and joint ventures between
cable operators and local exchange carriers in the same market are also
prohibited. The 1996 Telecom Act provides a few limited exceptions to this
buyout prohibition, including a carefully circumscribed "rural exemption." The
1996 Telecom Act also provides the Federal Communications Commission with the
limited authority to grant waivers of the buyout prohibition.
ELECTRIC UTILITY ENTRY INTO TELECOMMUNICATIONS/CABLE TELEVISION. The 1996
Telecom Act provides that registered utility holding companies and subsidiaries
may provide telecommunications services, including cable television,
notwithstanding the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Electric utilities must
establish separate subsidiaries, known as "exempt telecommunications companies"
and must apply to the Federal Communications Commission for operating authority.
Like telephone companies, electric utilities have substantial resources at their
disposal, and could be formidable competitors to traditional cable systems.
Several such utilities have been granted broad authority by the Federal
Communications Commission to engage in activities which could include the
provision of video programming.
ADDITIONAL OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS. The 1996 Telecom Act eliminates
statutory restrictions on broadcast/cable cross-ownership, including broadcast
network/cable restrictions, but leaves in place existing Federal Communications
Commission regulations prohibiting local cross-ownership between co-located
television stations and cable systems.
Pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act, the Federal Communications Commission
adopted rules precluding a cable system from devoting more than 40% of its
activated channel capacity to the carriage of affiliated national video program
services. Also pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act, the Federal Communications
Commission has adopted rules that preclude any cable operator from serving more
than 30% of all U.S. domestic multichannel video subscribers, including cable
and direct broadcast satellite subscribers. The D.C. District Court of Appeals
recently upheld this restriction, and the Federal Communications Commission has
now ruled that AT&T must divest certain cable ownership to come into compliance.
104
107
MUST CARRY/RETRANSMISSION CONSENT. The 1992 Cable Act contains broadcast
signal carriage requirements. Broadcast signal carriage is the transmission of
broadcast television signals over a cable system to cable customers. These
requirements, among other things, allow local commercial television broadcast
stations to elect once every three years between "must carry" status or
"retransmission consent" status. Less popular stations typically elect must
carry, which is the broadcast signal carriage requirement that allows local
commercial television broadcast stations to require a cable system to carry the
station. More popular stations, such as those affiliated with a national
network, typically elect retransmission consent which is the broadcast signal
carriage requirement that allows local commercial television broadcast stations
to negotiate for payments for granting permission to the cable operator to carry
the stations. Must carry requests can dilute the appeal of a cable system's
programming offerings because a cable system with limited channel capacity may
be required to forego carriage of popular channels in favor of less popular
broadcast stations electing must carry. Retransmission consent demands may
require substantial payments or other concessions. Either option has a
potentially adverse effect on our business. The burden associated with must
carry may increase substantially if broadcasters proceed with planned conversion
to digital transmission and the Federal Communications Commission determines
that cable systems must carry all analog and digital broadcasts in their
entirety. This burden would reduce capacity available for more popular video
programming and new internet and telecommunication offerings. A rulemaking is
now pending at the Federal Communications Commission regarding the imposition of
dual digital and analog must carry.
ACCESS CHANNELS. Local franchising authorities can include franchise
provisions requiring cable operators to set aside certain channels for public,
educational and governmental access programming. Federal law also requires cable
systems to designate a portion of their channel capacity, up to 15% in some
cases, for commercial leased access by unaffiliated third parties. The Federal
Communications Commission has adopted rules regulating the terms, conditions and
maximum rates a cable operator may charge for commercial leased access use. We
believe that requests for commercial leased access carriages have been
relatively limited. The Federal Communications Commission recently rejected a
request that unaffiliated Internet service providers be found eligible for
commercial leased access.
ACCESS TO PROGRAMMING. To spur the development of independent cable
programmers and competition to incumbent cable operators, the 1992 Cable Act
imposed restrictions on the dealings between cable operators and cable
programmers. Of special significance from a competitive business posture, the
1992 Cable Act precludes video programmers affiliated with cable companies from
favoring their cable operators over new competitors and requires such
programmers to sell their programming to other multichannel video distributors.
This provision limits the ability of vertically integrated cable programmers to
offer exclusive programming arrangements to cable companies. This prohibition is
scheduled to expire in October 2002, unless the Federal Communications
Commission determines that an extension is necessary to protect competition and
diversity. There also has been interest expressed in further restricting the
marketing practices of cable programmers, including subjecting programmers who
are not affiliated with cable operators to all of the existing program access
requirements, and subjecting terrestrially delivered programming to the program
access requirements. Terrestrially delivered programming is programming
delivered other than by satellite. These changes should not have a dramatic
impact on us, but would limit potential competitive advantages we now enjoy.
Pursuant to the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act, the Federal
Communications Commission has adopted regulations governing retransmission
consent negotiations between broadcasters and all multichannel video programming
distributors, including cable and DBS.
INSIDE WIRING; SUBSCRIBER ACCESS. In an order issued in 1997, the Federal
Communications Commission established rules that require an incumbent cable
operator upon expiration of a multiple dwelling unit service contract to sell,
abandon, or remove "home run" wiring that was installed by the cable operator in
a multiple dwelling unit building. These inside wiring rules are expected to
assist building owners in their attempts to replace existing cable operators
with new programming providers
105
108
who are willing to pay the building owner a higher fee, where such a fee is
permissible. The Federal Communications Commission has also proposed abrogating
all exclusive multiple dwelling unit service agreements held by incumbent
operators, but allowing such contracts when held by new entrants. In another
proceeding, the Federal Communications Commission has preempted restrictions on
the deployment of private antenna on rental property within the exclusive use of
a tenant, such as balconies and patios. This Federal Communications Commission
ruling may limit the extent to which we along with multiple dwelling unit owners
may enforce certain aspects of multiple dwelling unit agreements which otherwise
prohibit, for example, placement of digital broadcast satellite receiver
antennae in multiple dwelling unit areas under the exclusive occupancy of a
renter. These developments may make it even more difficult for us to provide
service in multiple dwelling unit complexes.
OTHER REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. In addition to
the Federal Communications Commission regulations noted above, there are other
regulations of the Federal Communications Commission covering such areas as:
- equal employment opportunity,
- subscriber privacy,
- programming practices, including, among other things,
(1) syndicated program exclusivity, which is a Federal Communications
Commission rule which requires a cable system to delete particular
programming offered by a distant broadcast signal carried on the
system which duplicates the programming for which a local broadcast
station has secured exclusive distribution rights,
(2) network program nonduplication,
(3) local sports blackouts,
(4) indecent programming,
(5) lottery programming,
(6) political programming,
(7) sponsorship identification,
(8) children's programming advertisements, and
(9) closed captioning,
- registration of cable systems and facilities licensing,
- maintenance of various records and public inspection files,
- aeronautical frequency usage,
- lockbox availability,
- antenna structure notification,
- tower marking and lighting,
- consumer protection and customer service standards,
- technical standards,
- consumer electronics equipment compatibility, and
- emergency alert systems.
106
109
The Federal Communications Commission recently ruled that cable customers
must be allowed to purchase cable converters from third parties and established
a multi-year phase-in during which security functions, which would remain in the
operator's exclusive control, would be unbundled from basic converter functions,
which could then be satisfied by third party vendors. The first phase
implementation was July 1, 2000. Compliance was technically and operationally
difficult in some locations, so we and several other cable operators filed a
request at the Federal Communications Commission that the requirement be waived
in those systems. The report resulted in a temporary deferral of the compliance
deadline for those systems.
COPYRIGHT. Cable television systems are subject to federal copyright
licensing covering carriage of television and radio broadcast signals. In
exchange for filing certain reports and contributing a percentage of their
revenues to a federal copyright royalty pool, that varies depending on the size
of the system, the number of distant broadcast television signals carried, and
the location of the cable system, cable operators can obtain blanket permission
to retransmit copyrighted material included in broadcast signals. The parties
recently agreed to a modest increase in the copyright royalty rates, and the
matter is now pending before the U.S. copyright office. The possible
modification or elimination of this compulsory copyright license is the subject
of continuing legislative review and could adversely affect our ability to
obtain desired broadcast programming. We cannot predict the outcome of this
legislative activity. Copyright clearances for nonbroadcast programming services
are arranged through private negotiations.
Cable operators distribute locally originated programming and advertising
that use music controlled by the two principal major music performing rights
organizations, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers and
Broadcast Music, Inc. The cable industry has had a long series of negotiations
and adjudications with both organizations. A prior voluntarily negotiated
agreement with Broadcast Music has now expired, and is subject to further
proceedings. The governing rate court recently set retroactive and prospective
cable industry rates for American Society of Composers music based on the
previously negotiated Broadcast Music rate. Although we cannot predict the
ultimate outcome of these industry proceedings or the amount of any license fees
we may be required to pay for past and future use of association-controlled
music, we do not believe such license fees will be significant to our business
and operations.
STATE AND LOCAL REGULATION. Cable systems generally are operated pursuant
to nonexclusive franchises granted by a municipality or other state or local
government entity in order to cross public rights-of-way. Federal law now
prohibits local franchising authorities from granting exclusive franchises or
from unreasonably refusing to award additional franchises. Cable franchises
generally are granted for fixed terms and in many cases include monetary
penalties for non-compliance and may be terminable if the franchisee fails to
comply with material provisions.
The specific terms and conditions of franchises vary materially between
jurisdictions. Each franchise generally contains provisions governing cable
operations, service rates, franchising fees, system construction and maintenance
obligations, system channel capacity, design and technical performance, customer
service standards, and indemnification protections. A number of states,
including Connecticut, subject cable systems to the jurisdiction of centralized
state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a character
similar to that of a public utility. Although local franchising authorities have
considerable discretion in establishing franchise terms, there are certain
federal limitations. For example, local franchising authorities cannot insist on
franchise fees exceeding 5% of the system's gross cable-related revenues, cannot
dictate the particular technology used by the system, and cannot specify video
programming other than identifying broad categories of programming. Certain
states are considering the imposition of new broadly applied telecommunications
taxes.
107
110
Federal law contains renewal procedures designed to protect incumbent
franchisees against arbitrary denials of renewal. Even if a franchise is
renewed, the local franchising authority may seek to impose new and more onerous
requirements such as significant upgrades in facilities and service or increased
franchise fees as a condition of renewal. Similarly, if a local franchising
authority's consent is required for the purchase or sale of a cable system or
franchise, such local franchising authority may attempt to impose more
burdensome or onerous franchise requirements in connection with a request for
consent. Historically, most franchises have been renewed for and consents
granted to cable operators that have provided satisfactory services and have
complied with the terms of their franchise.
Under the 1996 Telecom Act, states and local franchising authorities are
prohibited from limiting, restricting, or conditioning the provision of
competitive telecommunications services, except for certain "competitively
neutral" requirements and as necessary to manage the public rights-of-way. This
law should facilitate entry into competitive telecommunications services,
although certain jurisdictions still may attempt to impose rigorous entry
requirements. In addition, local franchising authorities may not require a cable
operator to provide any telecommunications service or facilities, other than
institutional networks under certain circumstances, as a condition of an initial
franchise grant, a franchise renewal, or a franchise transfer. The 1996 Telecom
Act also provides that franchising fees are limited to an operator's
cable-related revenues and do not apply to revenues that a cable operator
derives from providing new telecommunications services.
108
111
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The persons listed below are directors of Charter Communications, Inc. Each
of the directors is elected annually.
DIRECTORS AGE POSITION
- --------- --- --------
Paul G. Allen............................. 47 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Jerald L. Kent............................ 44 Director
Marc B. Nathanson......................... 55 Director
Ronald L. Nelson.......................... 48 Director
Nancy B. Peretsman........................ 46 Director
William D. Savoy.......................... 36 Director
Howard L. Wood............................ 61 Director
The following sets forth certain biographical information with respect to
the directors listed above.
PAUL G. ALLEN has been Chairman of the board of directors of Charter
Communications, Inc. since July 1999, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Charter Investment since December 1998. Mr. Allen, a co-founder of Microsoft
Corporation, is and has been a private investor for more than five years, with
economic interests in over 140 companies, each contributing to his Wired World
vision. These companies include Vulcan Ventures Inc., USA Networks, Inc.,
Dreamworks SKG, Vulcan Programming, Inc., and Vulcan Cable III Inc. He is a
director of Microsoft Corporation, USA Networks, Inc. and various private
corporations.
JERALD L. KENT has been the President, Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Charter Communications, Inc. since July 1999 and of Charter
Investment since April 1995. He previously held the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Charter Investment. Prior to co-founding Charter Investment in 1993,
Mr. Kent was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cencom
Cable Associates, Inc. Before that, he held other executive positions at Cencom.
Earlier, he was with Arthur Andersen LLP, where he attained the position of tax
manager. Mr. Kent is a member of the board of directors of High Speed Access
Corp., Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., Com21 Inc. and C-SPAN. He is also a
member of the executive committee and the board of directors of NCTA. Mr. Kent,
a certified public accountant, received his undergraduate and M.B.A. degrees
from Washington University.
MARC B. NATHANSON has been a director of Charter Communications, Inc. since
January 2000. Mr. Nathanson is the Chairman of Mapleton Investments LLC, an
investment vehicle formed in 1999. He also founded and served as Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Falcon Holding Group, Inc., a cable operator, and its
predecessors since 1975. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Enstar Communications Corporation, a cable operator, from 1988 until November
1999. Prior to 1975, Mr. Nathanson held executive positions with Teleprompter
Corporation, Warner Cable, and Cypress Communications Corporation. In 1999, he
was appointed by the President of the United States, and currently serves as,
Chairman of The Broadcasting Board of Governors.
RONALD L. NELSON has been a director of Charter Communications, Inc. since
November 1999. Mr. Nelson is a founding member of Dream Works LLC, a multi-media
entertainment company, where he has served in executive management since 1994.
Prior to that time, during his 15 years at Paramount Communications Inc., he
served in a variety of operating and executive positions and as a member of its
board of directors. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of
Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. and Centre Pacific L.L.C. Mr. Nelson has a B.S.
degree from the University of California at Berkeley and an M.B.A. degree from
the University of California at Los Angeles.
109
112
NANCY B. PERETSMAN has been a director of Charter Communications, Inc.
since November 1999. Ms. Peretsman has been a Managing Director and Executive
Vice President of Allen & Company Incorporated, an investment bank unrelated to
Mr. Allen, since 1995. From 1983 to 1995, she was an investment banker at
Salomon Brothers Inc., where she was a Managing Director since 1990. She is a
director of Priceline.com Incorporated and several privately held companies. She
received a B.A. degree from Princeton University and an M.P.P.M. degree from
Yale University.
WILLIAM D. SAVOY has been a director of Charter Communications, Inc. since
July 1999 and a director of Charter Investment since December 1998. Since 1990,
Mr. Savoy has been an officer and a director of many affiliates of Mr. Allen,
including President and a director of Vulcan Ventures Inc., Vulcan Programming,
Inc. and Vulcan Cable III Inc. Mr. Savoy also serves as a director of
drugstore.com, inc., Go2Net, Inc., High Speed Access Corp., Metricom, Inc.,
Peregrine Systems, Inc., RCN Corporation, Telescan, Inc., Ticketmaster
Online -- CitySearch, Inc., USA Networks, Inc., and Value America, Inc. Mr.
Savoy holds a B.S. degree in computer science, accounting and finance from
Atlantic Union College.
HOWARD L. WOOD has been a director of Charter Communications, Inc. since
January 2000. Mr. Wood co-founded Charter Investment in 1993 and served in
various executive capacities there until November 1999, when he became a
consultant to Charter Communications, Inc. Prior to 1993, Mr. Wood was Chief
Executive Officer of Cencom Cable Associates, Inc., where he also served in
various other executive positions. Earlier he was Partner-in-Charge of the St.
Louis Tax Division of Arthur Andersen LLP. He is a director of First State
Community Bank, Gaylord Entertainment Company and Data Research, Inc. Mr. Wood,
a certified public accountant, graduated from Washington University (St. Louis)
School of Business.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
An Audit Committee was formed by the board of directors of Charter
Communications, Inc. in November 1999 to review and oversee Charter
Communications, Inc.'s internal accounting and auditing procedures, to review
audit and examination results and procedures with independent accountants, to
oversee reporting of financial information, to review related party
transactions, and to make recommendations to the board as to the appointment of
independent accountants. The Audit Committee consists of directors Nancy
Peretsman, Ron Nelson and Howard Wood.
A Compensation Committee was formed by the board in February 2000 for the
purpose of reviewing and approving Charter Communications, Inc.'s compensation
and benefits programs, and approving compensation for senior management. The
members of the Compensation Committee are Paul Allen, Marc Nathanson, William
Savoy and Howard Wood.
An Executive Committee was formed by the board in November 1999, to act in
place of the full board and to exercise all powers of the full board which may
lawfully be delegated when the full board of directors is not in session. The
Executive Committee consists of directors Paul Allen, Jerald Kent and William
Savoy.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The employee directors of Charter Communications, Inc. do not receive any
additional compensation for serving as a director, nor are they paid any fees
for attendance at any meeting of the board of directors. Each non-employee
director of Charter Communications, Inc., other than Mr. Allen, has been issued
40,000 fully vested options in consideration for agreeing to join the board of
directors and may receive additional compensation to be determined. Directors
may also be reimbursed for the actual reasonable costs incurred in connection
with attendance at board meetings.
110
113
Mr. Kent has entered into an employment agreement with Charter
Communications, Inc. Mr. Wood has entered into a consulting agreement with
Charter Communications, Inc. and Mr. Nathanson is party to a letter agreement
with Charter Communications, Inc. These agreements are summarized in this
prospectus in the section entitled "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following persons are executive officers of Charter Communications,
Inc.:
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AGE POSITION
- ------------------ --- --------
Jerald L. Kent......................... 44 President and Chief Executive Officer
David C. Andersen...................... 51 Senior Vice President -- Communications
David G. Barford....................... 42 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mary Pat Blake......................... 45 Senior Vice President -- Marketing and Programming
Eric A. Freesmeier..................... 47 Senior Vice President -- Administration
Thomas R. Jokerst...................... 51 Senior Vice President -- Advanced Technology
Development
Kent D. Kalkwarf....................... 40 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ralph G. Kelly......................... 43 Senior Vice President -- Treasurer
David L. McCall........................ 45 Senior Vice President of Operations -- Eastern
Division
John C. Pietri......................... 50 Senior Vice President -- Engineering
Michael E. Riddle...................... 41 Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Steven A. Schumm....................... 47 Executive Vice President, Assistant to the President
Curtis S. Shaw......................... 51 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Stephen E. Silva....................... 40 Senior Vice President -- Corporate Development and
Technology
James (Trey) H. Smith, III............. 51 Senior Vice President of Operations -- Western
Division
Information regarding our executive officers is set forth below.
Our executive officers, except for Mr. Andersen, Mr. Riddle and Mr. Smith,
were appointed to their positions following our formation in February 1999, and
became employees of Charter Communications, Inc. in November 1999. Prior to that
time, they were employees of Charter Investment. All of our executive officers
simultaneously serve in the same capacity with Charter Investment. The executive
officers are elected by the board of directors annually following the annual
meeting of shareholders, and each officer holds his or her office until his or
her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation
or removal.
JERALD L. KENT, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Charter
Communications, Inc. Mr. Kent has held these positions with Charter
Communications, Inc. since July 1999 and with Charter Investment since April
1995. He previously held the position of Chief Financial Officer of Charter
Investment. Prior to co-founding Charter Investment in 1993, Mr. Kent was
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cencom Cable Associates,
Inc. Before that, he held other executive positions at Cencom. Earlier he was
with Arthur Andersen LLP, where he attained the position of tax manager. Mr.
Kent is a member of the board of directors of High Speed Access Corp., Cable
Television Laboratories, Inc., Com21 Inc. and C-SPAN. He is also a member of the
executive committee and the board of directors of NCTA. Mr. Kent, a certified
public accountant, received his undergraduate and M.B.A. degrees from Washington
University (St. Louis).
DAVID C. ANDERSEN, Senior Vice President -- Communications. Prior to
joining Charter Communications, Inc. in May 2000, Mr. Andersen served as Vice
President of Communications for CNBC, the worldwide cable and satellite business
news network subsidiary of NBC. Before that,
111
114
starting in 1982 when he established their public relations department, Mr.
Andersen served in various management positions at Cox Communications, Inc.,
most recently as Vice President of Public Affairs. Mr. Andersen serves on the
Board of KIDSNET, and is a former Chairman of the National Captioning
Institute's Cable Advisory Board. He received a B.S. degree in Journalism from
the University of Kansas.
DAVID G. BARFORD, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer. Mr. Barford was appointed to his current position in July 2000,
previously serving as Senior Vice President of Operations-Western Division.
Prior to joining Charter Investment in 1995, Mr. Barford held various senior
marketing and operating roles during nine years at Comcast Cable Communications,
Inc. He received a B.A. degree from California State University, Fullerton, and
an M.B.A. degree from National University.
MARY PAT BLAKE, Senior Vice President -- Marketing and Programming. Prior
to joining Charter Investment in 1995, Ms. Blake was active in the emerging
business sector and formed Blake Investments, Inc. in 1993. She has 18 years of
experience with senior management responsibilities in marketing, sales, finance,
systems, and general management. Ms. Blake received a B.S. degree from the
University of Minnesota and an M.B.A. degree from the Harvard Business School.
ERIC A. FREESMEIER, Senior Vice President -- Administration. From 1986
until joining Charter Investment in 1998, Mr. Freesmeier served in various
executive management positions at Edison Brothers Stores, Inc. Earlier he held
management and executive positions at Montgomery Ward. Mr. Freesmeier holds a
bachelor's degree from the University of Iowa and a master's degree from
Northwestern University's Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
THOMAS R. JOKERST, Senior Vice President -- Advanced Technology
Development. Mr. Jokerst joined Charter Investment in 1994. Previously he
served as a vice president of Cable Television Laboratories and as a regional
director of engineering for Continental Cablevision. He is a graduate of Ranken
Technical Institute and of Southern Illinois University.
KENT D. KALKWARF, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Kalkwarf was promoted to the position of Executive Vice President
in July 2000, previously serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Prior to joining Charter Investment in 1995, Mr. Kalkwarf was employed
for 13 years by Arthur Andersen LLP, where he attained the position of senior
tax manager. He has extensive experience in cable, real estate, and
international tax issues. Mr. Kalkwarf has a B.S. degree from Illinois Wesleyan
University and is a certified public accountant.
RALPH G. KELLY, Senior Vice President --Treasurer. Prior to joining
Charter Investment in 1993, Mr. Kelly was controller and then treasurer of
Cencom Cable Associates. He left Charter in 1994, to become Chief Financial
Officer of CableMaxx, Inc., and returned in 1996. Mr. Kelly received his
bachelor's degree in accounting from the University of Missouri -- Columbia and
his M.B.A. degree from Saint Louis University.
DAVID L. MCCALL, Senior Vice President of Operations -- Eastern
Division. Prior to joining Charter Investment in 1995, Mr. McCall was
associated with Crown Cable and its predecessor, Cencom Cable Associates, Inc.,
from 1983 to 1994. Mr. McCall has served as a director of the South Carolina
Cable Television Association for ten years and is a member of the Southern Cable
Association's Tower Club.
JOHN C. PIETRI, Senior Vice President -- Engineering. Prior to joining
Charter Investment in 1998, Mr. Pietri was with Marcus Cable for 9 years, most
recently serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer. Earlier
he was in operations with West Marc Communications and Minnesota Utility
Contracting. Mr. Pietri attended the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh.
MICHAEL E. RIDDLE, Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer. Prior to joining Charter Communications, Inc. in December 1999, Mr.
Riddle was Director of Applied Technologies
112
115
of Cox Communications for 4 years. Prior to that, he held technical and
management positions during 17 years at Southwestern Bell and its subsidiaries.
Mr. Riddle attended Fort Hays State University.
STEVEN A. SCHUMM, Executive Vice President, Assistant to the
President. Prior to joining Charter Investment in 1998, Mr. Schumm was Managing
Partner of the St. Louis office of Ernst & Young LLP, where he was a partner for
14 of 24 years. He served as one of 10 members of the firm's National Tax
Committee. Mr. Schumm earned a B.S. degree from Saint Louis University.
CURTIS S. SHAW, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. From
1988 until he joined Charter Investment in 1997, Mr. Shaw served as corporate
counsel to NYNEX. He has over 26 years of experience as a corporate lawyer,
specializing in mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, public offerings,
financings, and federal securities and antitrust law. Mr. Shaw received a B.A.
degree from Trinity College and a J.D. degree from Columbia University School of
Law.
STEPHEN E. SILVA, Senior Vice President -- Corporate Development and
Technology. From 1983 until joining Charter Investment in 1995, Mr. Silva
served in various management positions at U.S. Computer Services, Inc. He is a
member of the board of directors of High Speed Access Corp.
JAMES (TREY) H. SMITH, III, Senior Vice President of Operations -- Western
Division. Mr. Smith was appointed to his current position in September 2000,
previously serving as a Division President of AT&T Broadband. Before that, he
was President and CEO of Rogers Cablesystems Ltd., Senior Vice President of the
Western Region for MediaOne/Continental Cable and Executive Vice President of
Operations for Times Mirror Cable TV, Inc. He received B.B.A. and M.B.A. degrees
from Georgia State University and is a certified public accountant.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Most executive officer compensation determinations have been made based
upon the recommendations of Mr. Kent. Prior to November 1999, these
determinations were made by the board of directors of Charter Investment, with
option grant determinations being made in conjunction with the board of
directors of Charter Communications Holding Company. During this period, the
board of Charter Investment included Messrs. Allen, Savoy and Kent, and the
board of Charter Communications Holding Company included Messrs. Savoy and Kent.
Commencing in November 1999, when Charter Communications, Inc. became the
successor employer of the executive officers, the board of directors of Charter
Communications, Inc. took over the role of the Charter Investment board in the
decision-making process. In November 1999, the board of directors of Charter
Communications, Inc. was comprised of Messrs. Allen, Savoy, Kent and Nelson, and
Ms. Peretsman. Commencing in February 2000, when the Charter Communications,
Inc. board of directors appointed a compensation committee comprised of Messrs.
Allen, Savoy, Nathanson and Wood, executive officer compensation matters,
including option grants, were delegated to the committee. No Charter
Communications, Inc. executive officer currently serves on a compensation
committee or any similar committee of any other public company.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid
to executive officers of Charter Communications, Inc., during the fiscal years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, including the Chief Executive Officer, each of
the other four most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31,
1999, and two other highly compensated executive officers who resigned during
1999. Through the beginning of November 1999, such executive officers had
received their compensation from Charter Investment. Effective in November 1999,
such officers began receiving their compensation from Charter Communications,
Inc. Pursuant to a mutual services agreement between Charter Communications,
Inc. and Charter Investment, each of those entities leases the necessary
personnel and provides services to each other, including the knowledge and
expertise of their respective officers. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
113
116
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARD
---------------------------------------- ------------
YEAR OTHER SECURITIES
ENDED ANNUAL UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION DEC. 31 SALARY($) BONUS($) COMPENSATION($) OPTIONS(#) COMPENSATION($)
- --------------------------- ------- --------- -------- --------------- ------------ ---------------
Jerald L. Kent................... 1999 1,250,000 625,000 80,799(1) -- --
President and Chief Executive 1998 790,481 641,353 -- 7,044,127 --
Officer
Steven A. Schumm(2).............. 1999 400,000 60,000 -- 782,681 --
Executive Vice President 1998 12,307 12,300 -- -- --
David G. Barford(3).............. 1999 235,000 80,000 -- 200,000 --
Senior Vice President of 1998 220,000 225,000(4) -- -- 8,390,888(5)
Operations -- Western
Division
Curtis S. Shaw................... 1999 200,000 80,000 -- 200,000 --
Senior Vice President, General 1998 190,000 80,000 -- -- 8,178,967(5)
Counsel and Secretary
John C. Pietri(6)................ 1999 200,000 70,000 -- 165,000 --
Senior Vice President -- 1998 -- -- -- -- --
Engineering
Barry L. Babcock(7).............. 1999 623,000 -- -- 65,000 385,093(8)
Former Vice Chairman 1998 575,000 925,000(9) -- -- --
Howard L. Wood(10)............... 1999 311,300 -- 145,000
Former Vice Chairman 1998 575,000(11) 675,000(12) -- -- --
- -------------------------
(1) Includes $55,719 paid for club membership and dues and $20,351 attributed
to personal use of Charter Investment's airplane.
(2) Mr. Schumm became affiliated with Charter Investment on December 16, 1998.
(3) Mr. Barford was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer in July 2000.
(4) Includes $150,000 received as a one-time bonus.
(5) Received in March 1999, in connection with a one-time change of control
payment under the terms of a previous equity appreciation rights plan.
This payment was triggered by the acquisition of us by Mr. Allen on
December 23, 1998, but was income for 1999.
(6) Mr. Pietri became affiliated with Charter Investment on January 1, 1999.
(7) Mr. Babcock resigned as an executive officer, terminated his employment
and became a consultant in October 1999.
(8) Includes a bonus of $312,500 and accrued vacation of $48,077 paid in
connection with termination of Mr. Babcock's employment agreement, plus
$24,516 as consulting fees.
(9) Includes $500,000 earned as a one-time bonus upon signing of an employment
agreement.
(10) Mr. Wood resigned as an executive officer, terminated his employment and
became a consultant in November 1999.
(11) Includes a bonus of $468,750 and accrued vacation of $24,038 paid in
connection with termination of Mr. Wood's employment agreement, plus
$8,166 in consulting fees.
(12) Includes $250,000 earned as a one-time bonus upon signing of an employment
agreement.
114
117
JUNE 30, 2000 AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES AND OPTION VALUE TABLE
The following table sets forth for certain executive officers information
concerning options exercised from January 1, 1999, including the value realized
upon exercise, the number of securities for which options were held at June 30,
2000, the value of unexercised "in-the-money" options (i.e., the positive spread
between the exercise price of outstanding options and the market value of
Charter Communications, Inc.'s Class A common stock on June 30, 2000), the
options granted through June 30, 2000 and the value of unexercised options as of
June 30, 2000.
NUMBER OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SECURITIES UNDERLYING IN-THE-MONEY
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS OPTIONS AT
SECURITIES AT JUNE 30, 2000 JUNE 30, 2000(1)
ACQUIRED VALUE --------------------------- ---------------------------
ON EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Jerald L. Kent.......... -- -- 2,641,548 4,402,579 -- --
Steven A. Schumm........ -- -- 221,760 560,921 -- --
David G. Barford........ -- -- 56,667 183,333 -- --
Curtis S. Shaw.......... -- -- 56,667 168,333 -- --
John C. Pietri.......... -- -- 46,750 143,250 -- --
Barry L. Babcock........ -- -- 65,000 -- -- --
Howard L. Wood.......... -- -- 145,000 -- -- --
- ---------------
(1) No options were in-the-money as of June 30, 2000.
1999 OPTION GRANTS
The following table shows individual grants of options made to certain
named executive officers during 1999. All such grants were made under the
Charter Communications Option Plan.
NUMBER OF POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT
MEMBERSHIP % OF TOTAL ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF
UNITS OPTIONS MEMBERSHIP UNIT PRICE
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO APPRECIATION FOR OPTION TERM(1)
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES EXERCISE EXPIRATION --------------------------------
NAME GRANTED IN 1999 PRICE DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------------- ---------------
Jerald L. Kent..................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Steven A. Schumm................... 782,681 5.7% $20.00 2/8/09 $9,844,478 $24,947,839
David G. Barford................... 200,000 1.5% 20.00 2/8/09 2,515,579 6,374,970
Curtis S. Shaw..................... 200,000 1.5% 20.00 2/8/09 2,515,579 6,374,970
John C. Pietri..................... 165,000 1.2% 20.00 2/8/09 2,075,352 5,259,350
Barry L. Babcock................... 65,000 0.5% 20.00 2/8/09 817,563 2,071,865
Howard L. Wood..................... 65,000 1.1% 20.00 2/8/09 817,563 2,071,865
80,000 19.00 11/8/09 955,920 2,422,488
- ---------------
(1) This column shows the hypothetical gains on the options granted based on
assumed annual compound price appreciation of 5% and 10% over the full
ten-year term of the options. The assumed rates of appreciation are mandated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not represent our estimate
or projection of future prices.
OPTION PLAN
The Charter Communications Option Plan was adopted in February 1999. This
plan provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 25,009,798 membership
units in Charter Communications Holding Company. Under the terms of the plan,
each membership unit acquired as a result of the exercise of options will be
exchanged automatically for shares of Class A common stock of Charter
Communications, Inc. on a one-for-one basis. The plan provides for grants of
options to current and
115
118
prospective employees and consultants of Charter Communications Holding Company
and its affiliates and current and prospective non-employee directors of Charter
Communications, Inc. The plan is intended to promote the long-term financial
interest of Charter Communications Holding Company and its affiliates by
encouraging eligible individuals to acquire an ownership position in Charter
Communications Holding Company and its affiliates and providing incentives for
performance. The options expire after ten years from the date of grant. Under
the plan, the plan administrator has the discretion to accelerate the vesting of
any options.
The following table shows options outstanding under The Charter
Communications Option Plan:
OUTSTANDING EXERCISE VESTED AS OF
DATE OF GRANT OPTIONS PRICE JULY 31, 2000
------------- ----------- -------- -------------
February 9, 1999...................................... 8,162,696 $20.00 2,647,599(1)
April 5, 1999......................................... 366,062 20.73 99,850(2)
November 8, 1999...................................... 4,203,000 19.00 240,000(3)
February 15, 2000..................................... 5,182,000 19.47 --(4)
May 1, 2000........................................... 1,415,600 15.03 --(5)
July 26, 2000......................................... 1,469,800 14.31 --(6)
---------- ---------
Total outstanding options........................ 20,799,158 2,987,449
========== =========
(1) On the 3rd day of each month, 1/45 of the remaining options vest.
(2) One-fourth of the options granted on April 5, 1999 vested on July 5, 2000,
the 15-month anniversary of April 5, 1999, with the remainder vesting 1/45
on each monthly anniversary for 45 months following July 5, 2000.
(3) One-fourth of the options granted on November 8, 1999 will vest on February
8, 2001, the 15-month anniversary of November 8, 1999, with the remainder
vesting 1/45 on each monthly anniversary for 45 months following February
8, 2001.
(4) One-fourth of the options granted on February 15, 2000 will vest on May 15,
2001, the 15-month anniversary of February 15, 2000, with the remainder
vesting 1/45 on each monthly anniversary for 45 months following May 15,
2001.
(5) One-fourth of the options granted on May 1, 2000 vest on August 1, 2001,
the 15-month anniversary of May 1, 2000, with the remainder vesting 1/45 on
each monthly anniversary for 45 months following August 1, 2001.
(6) One-fourth of the options granted on July 26, 2000 vest on October 26,
2001, the 15-month anniversary of July 26, 2000, with the remainder vesting
1/45 on each monthly anniversary for 45 months following October 26, 2001.
Any unvested options issued under the plan vest immediately upon a change
of control of Charter Communications Holding Company. Options will not vest upon
a change of control, however, to the extent that any such acceleration of
vesting would result in the disallowance of specified tax deductions that would
otherwise be available to Charter Communications Holding Company or any of its
affiliates or to the extent that any optionee would be liable for any excise tax
under a specified section of the U.S. federal tax code. In the plan, a change of
control includes:
(1) a sale of more than 49.9% of the outstanding membership units in
Charter Communications Holding Company, except where Mr. Allen and his
affiliates retain effective voting control of Charter Communications
Holding Company;
(2) a merger or consolidation of Charter Communications Holding
Company with or into any other corporation or entity, except where Mr.
Allen and his affiliates retain effective voting control of Charter
Communications Holding Company; or
116
119
(3) any other transaction or event, including a sale of the assets of
Charter Communications Holding Company, that results in Mr. Allen holding
less than 50.1% of the voting power of the surviving entity, except where
Mr. Allen and his affiliates retain effective voting control of Charter
Communications Holding Company.
If an optionee's employment with or service to Charter Communications
Holding Company or its affiliates is terminated other than for cause, the
optionee has the right to exercise any vested options within sixty days of the
termination of employment. After this sixty-day period, all vested and unvested
options held by the optionee are automatically canceled. If an optionee's
employment or service is terminated for cause, any unexercised options are
automatically canceled. In this case, Mr. Allen, or, at his option, Charter
Communications Holding Company will have the right for ninety days after
termination to purchase all membership units held by the optionee for a purchase
price equal to the exercise price at which the optionee acquired the membership
units, or the optionee's purchase price for the membership units if they were
not acquired on the exercise of an option.
In the event of an optionee's death or disability, all vested options may
be exercised until the earlier of their expiration and one year after the date
of the optionee's death or disability. Any options not so exercised will
automatically be canceled. Upon termination for any other reason, all unvested
options will immediately be canceled and the optionee will not be entitled to
any payment. All vested options will be automatically canceled if not exercised
within ninety days after termination.
LIMITATION OF DIRECTORS' LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION MATTERS. Charter
Communications, Inc.'s restated certificate of incorporation limits the
liability of directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. The
Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may eliminate or
limit the personal liability of a director for monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:
(1) any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation
and its shareholders;
(2) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
(3) unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or
redemptions; or
(4) any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
Charter Communications, Inc.'s bylaws provide that we will indemnify all
persons whom we may indemnify pursuant thereto to the fullest extent permitted
by law.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling Charter
Communications, Inc. pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed
that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is therefore unenforceable.
117
120
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of Charter Communications, Inc. common stock and Charter
Communications Holding Company common membership units as of August 31, 2000 by:
- the directors of Charter Communications, Inc.;
- each of the executive officers of Charter Communications, Inc. named in
the summary compensation table;
- all current directors and executive officers as a group; and
- each person known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding
shares of Charter Communications, Inc. common stock and shares of common
stock issuable upon exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company
membership units that are issuable upon exercise of options that are
vested or will vest within 60 days or upon exchange of membership units
held in a subsidiary of Charter Holdings.
With respect to the percentage of voting power of Charter Communications,
Inc. set forth in the following table:
- each holder of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share;
and
- each holder of Class B common stock is entitled to a number of votes
based on the number of outstanding Class B common stock and outstanding
membership units exchangeable for Class B common stock. For example, Mr.
Allen is entitled to ten votes for each share of Class B common stock
held by him or his affiliates and ten votes for each membership unit held
by him or his affiliates.
NUMBER OF
CLASS A PERCENTAGE OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SHARES BENEFICIALLY SHARES BENEFICIALLY PERCENTAGE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED(1) OWNED(2) VOTING POWER(3)
- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------
Paul G. Allen(4)(5)(7)............................ 332,469,275 60.1% 93.5%
Charter Investment, Inc.(6)....................... 217,585,246 48.7% *
Vulcan Cable III Inc.(4)(7)....................... 106,715,233 31.8% *
Jerald L. Kent(8)................................. 3,397,311 1.4% *
Howard L. Wood(9)................................. 145,000 * *
Marc B. Nathanson(10)............................. 9,829,806 4.1% *
Ronald L. Nelson(11).............................. 57,500 * *
Nancy B. Peretsman(12)............................ 50,000 * *
William D. Savoy(13).............................. 602,165 * *
Steven A. Schumm(14).............................. 290,682 * *
David G. Barford(15).............................. 75,833 * *
Curtis S. Shaw(15)................................ 78,333 * *
John C. Pietri(16)................................ 65,500 * *
Barry L. Babcock(17).............................. 65,000 * *
All current directors and executive officers as a
group (21 persons)(18).......................... 347,131,114 61.1% 93.9%
Janus Capital Corporation(19)..................... 15,958,030 6.5% *
TCID of Michigan, Inc.(20)........................ 15,117,743 6.1% *
118
121
- ---------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3. The named
holders of Charter Communications, Inc. Class B common stock and of Charter
Communications Holding Company membership units are deemed to be beneficial
owners of an equal number of shares of Charter Communications, Inc. Class A
common stock because such holdings are either convertible for (in the case
of Class B shares) or exchangeable into (in the case of the membership
units) shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. Unless
otherwise noted, the named holders have sole investment and voting power
with respect to the shares listed as beneficially owned.
(2) The calculation of this percentage assumes for each person that: the 50,000
shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Allen have been converted into
shares of Class A common stock; all shares of Class A common stock that
such person has the right to acquire upon exchange of Charter
Communications Holding Company membership units upon exercise of options
that have vested or will vest within 60 days have been acquired; and that
none of the other listed persons or entities has received any shares of
common stock that are issuable to him or her pursuant to the exercise of
options or otherwise.
(3) The calculation of this percentage assumes that Mr. Allen's equity
interests are retained in the form that maximizes voting power (i.e., the
50,000 shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Allen have not been
converted into shares of Class A common stock; that the membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company owned by Vulcan Cable III have not
been exchanged for shares of Class A common stock; and that the membership
units of Charter Communications Holding Company owned by Charter Investment
have not been exchanged for shares of Class A common stock).
(4) The address of these persons is 110 110th Street, NE, Suite 550, Bellevue,
WA 98004.
(5) The total listed is comprised of 217,585,246 membership units held by
Charter Investment, Inc.; 106,715,233 membership units held by Vulcan Cable
III; 8,118,796 shares of Class A common stock held directly by Mr. Allen;
and 50,000 shares of Class B common stock held directly by Mr. Allen (100%
of the Class B common stock issued and outstanding).
(6) The address of this person is Charter Communications, Inc., 12444
Powerscourt Drive, Suite 100, St. Louis, MO 63131.
(7) Of the total number of membership units in Charter Communications Holding
Company held by Vulcan Cable III, 562,165 membership units are subject to
options granted by Vulcan Cable III to Mr. Savoy that have vested or will
vest within 60 days.
(8) The total listed is comprised of 3,375,311 shares of Class A common stock
issuable upon the exchange of membership units that are issuable upon the
exercise of options that have vested or will vest within 60 days, and
22,000 shares of Class A common stock held directly by Mr. Kent.
(9) Represents 145,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of
membership units that are issuable upon exercise of options that have
vested.
(10) The total listed includes 40,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon exchange of membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested. Also includes 9,789,806 shares of Class A common
stock as follows: 3,951,636 shares for which Mr. Nathanson has sole
investment and voting power, 5,444,861 shares for which he has shared
voting and investment power; and 393,309 shares for which he has sole
investment power and shared voting power. The address of this person is c/o
Falcon Holding Group, Inc. and Affiliates, 10900 Wilshire Blvd., Los
Angeles, CA 90024.
119
122
(11) The total listed includes 40,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon the exchange of membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested, and 2,500 shares held as custodian for a minor as
to which Mr. Nelson disclaims beneficial ownership.
(12) The total listed includes 40,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon the exchange of membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested.
(13) The total listed is comprised of 40,000 shares of Class A common stock
issuable upon the exchange of membership units that are issuable upon
exercise of options that have vested and 562,165 shares of Class A common
stock that Mr. Savoy would receive upon exercise of options from Vulcan
Cable III to purchase such shares that have vested or will vest within 60
days.
(14) The total listed includes 286,982 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon the exchange of membership units that would be issued upon exercise of
options that have vested or will vest within 60 days and 3,700 shares for
which Mr. Schumm has shared investment and voting power.
(15) The total listed includes 73,333 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon the exchange of membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested or will vest within 60 days.
(16) The total listed includes 60,500 shares of Class A common stock issuable
upon exchange of membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested or will vest within 60 days.
(17) Represents 65,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of
membership units that would be issued upon exercise of options that have
vested.
(18) The total listed is comprised of 50,000 shares of Class B common stock
convertible into shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis;
18,079,177 shares of Class A common stock; 324,300,479 shares of Class A
common stock issuable upon the exchange of Class B common stock from
outstanding Charter Communications Holding Company membership units; and
4,701,458 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of Class B
common stock from membership units that are issuable upon exercise of
options that have vested or will vest within 60 days.
(19) As reported in Schedule 13G provided to Charter Communications, Inc. on
February 16, 2000, Janus Capital Corporation is a registered investment
advisor that provides investment advice to investment companies and other
clients. As a result of being an investment advisor, Janus Capital may be
deemed to beneficially own shares held by its clients. As indicated in the
Schedule 13G, Mr. Thomas Bailey, President, Chairman of the Board and 12.2%
shareholder of Janus Capital disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to
such shares. The address of these persons is 100 Fillmore St., Denver,
Colorado 80206-4923.
(20) Represents shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of
preferred membership units held in an indirect subsidiary of Charter
Holdings.
120
123
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The following sets forth certain transactions in which we and our
directors, executive officers and affiliates and the directors and executive
officers of Charter Communications, Inc., are involved. We believe that each of
the transactions described below was on terms no less favorable to us than could
have been obtained from independent third parties.
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
MERGER WITH MARCUS
On April 23, 1998, Mr. Allen acquired approximately 99% of the non-voting
economic interests in Marcus Cable, and agreed to acquire the remaining
interests in Marcus Cable. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1.4
billion, excluding $1.8 billion in assumed liabilities. On February 22, 1999,
Marcus Holdings was formed, and all of Mr. Allen's interests in Marcus Cable
were transferred to Marcus Holdings on March 15, 1999. On March 31, 1999, Mr.
Allen completed the acquisition of all remaining interests in Marcus Cable.
On December 23, 1998, Mr. Allen acquired approximately 94% of the equity of
Charter Investment, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.2
billion, excluding $2.0 billion in debt assumed. On February 9, 1999, Charter
Holdings was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment. On
February 10, 1999, Charter Operating was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of
Charter Holdings. In April 1999, Mr. Allen merged Marcus Holdings into Charter
Holdings, and the operating subsidiaries of Marcus Holdings and all of the cable
systems they owned came under the ownership of Charter Holdings, and, in turn,
Charter Operating. On May 25, 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company was
formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment, Inc. All of Charter
Investment's equity interests in Charter Holdings were transferred to Charter
Communications Holding Company.
In March 1999, we paid $20 million to Vulcan Northwest, an affiliate of Mr.
Allen, for reimbursement of direct costs incurred in connection with Mr. Allen's
acquisition of Marcus Cable. Such costs were principally comprised of financial,
advisory, legal and accounting fees.
At the time Charter Holdings issued $3.6 billion in principal amount of
notes in March 1999, this merger had not yet occurred. Consequently, Marcus
Holdings was a party to the indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings
notes as a guarantor of Charter Holdings' obligations. Charter Holdings loaned
some of the proceeds from the sale of the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes to
Marcus Holdings, which amounts were used to complete the cash tender offers for
then-outstanding notes of subsidiaries of Marcus Holdings. Marcus Holdings
issued a promissory note in favor of Charter Holdings. The promissory note was
in the amount of $1.7 billion, with an interest rate of 9.92% and a maturity
date of April 1, 2007. Marcus Holdings guaranteed its obligations under the
promissory note by entering into a pledge agreement in favor of Charter Holdings
pursuant to which Marcus Holdings pledged all of its equity interests in Marcus
Cable as collateral for the payment and performance of the promissory note.
Charter Holdings pledged this promissory note to the trustee under the
indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes as collateral for the
equal and ratable benefit of the holders of the March 1999 Charter Holdings
notes. Upon the closing of the merger, and in accordance with the terms of the
March 1999 Charter Holdings notes and the indentures governing the March 1999
Charter Holdings notes:
- the guarantee issued by Marcus Holdings was automatically terminated;
- the promissory note issued by Marcus Holdings was automatically
extinguished, with no interest having accrued or being paid; and
- the pledge in favor of Charter Holdings of the equity interests in Marcus
Cable as collateral under the promissory note and the pledge in favor of
the trustee of the promissory note as collateral for the March 1999
Charter Holdings notes were automatically released.
121
124
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS. Prior to March 18, 1999, pursuant to a
series of management agreements with certain of our subsidiaries, Charter
Investment provided management and consulting services to those subsidiaries. In
exchange for these services, Charter Investment was entitled to receive
management fees of 3% to 5% of the gross revenues of all of our systems plus
reimbursement of expenses. However, our previous credit facilities limited such
management fees to 3% of gross revenues. The balance of management fees payable
under the previous management agreements was accrued. Payment is at the
discretion of Charter Investment. Certain deferred portions of management fees
bore interest at the rate of 8% per annum. Following the closing of Charter
Operating's current credit facilities, the previous management agreements were
replaced by a revised management agreement. The material terms of our previous
management agreements are substantially similar to the material terms of the
revised management agreement.
PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MARCUS. On October 6, 1998, Marcus
Cable entered into a management consulting agreement with Charter Investment
pursuant to which Charter Investment agreed to provide certain management and
consulting services to Marcus Cable and its subsidiaries, in exchange for a fee
equal to 3% of the gross revenues of Marcus Cable's systems plus reimbursement
of expenses. Management fees expensed by Marcus Cable during the period from
October 1998 to December 31, 1998 were approximately $3.3 million. Upon Charter
Holdings' merger with Marcus Holdings and the closing of Charter Operating's
current credit facilities, this agreement was terminated and the subsidiaries of
Marcus Cable began to receive management and consulting services from Charter
Investment under the revised management agreement described below.
THE REVISED MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. On February 23, 1999, Charter Investment
entered into a revised management agreement with Charter Operating, which was
amended and restated as of March 17, 1999. Upon the closing of Charter
Operating's credit facilities on March 18, 1999, our previous management
agreements and the management consulting agreement with Marcus Cable terminated
and the revised management agreement became operative. Under the revised
management agreement, Charter Investment agreed to manage the operations of the
cable television systems owned by Charter Operating's subsidiaries, as well as
any cable television systems Charter Operating subsequently acquires. The term
of the revised management agreement is ten years.
The revised management agreement provided that Charter Operating would pay
Charter Investment a management fee equal to its actual costs to provide these
services and a management fee of 3.5% of gross revenues. Gross revenues include
all revenues from the operation of Charter Operating's cable systems, including,
without limitation, subscriber payments, advertising revenues, and revenues from
other services provided by Charter Operating's cable systems. Gross revenues do
not include interest income or income from investments unrelated to our cable
systems.
Payment of the management fee to Charter Investment is permitted under
Charter Operating's current credit facilities, but ranks below Charter
Operating's payment obligations under its credit facilities. In the event any
portion of the management fee due and payable is not paid by Charter Operating,
it is deferred and accrued as a liability. Any deferred amount of the management
fee will bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually, from
the date it was due and payable until the date it is paid. As of December 31,
1999, no interest had accrued.
Pursuant to the terms of the revised management agreement, Charter
Operating agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Charter Investment and its
shareholders, directors, officers and employees. This indemnity extends to any
and all claims or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by
them in connection with any action not constituting gross negligence or willful
misconduct taken by them in good faith in the discharge of their duties to
Charter Operating.
122
125
The total management fees, including expenses, earned by Charter Investment
under all management agreements were as follows:
TOTAL FEES
FEES PAID EARNED
--------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Six months ended June 30, 2000.............................. $33,154 $27,515
Year Ended December 31, 1999................................ 48,528 54,330
Year Ended December 31, 1998................................ 17,073 27,500
Year Ended December 31, 1997................................ 14,772 20,290
Year Ended December 31, 1996................................ 11,792 15,443
As of June 30, 2000, approximately $19.8 million remains unpaid under all
management agreements.
ASSIGNMENT AND AMENDMENT OF REVISED CHARTER OPERATING MANAGEMENT
AGREEMENT. On November 12, 1999, Charter Investment assigned to Charter
Communications, Inc. all of its rights and obligations under the revised Charter
Operating management agreement. In connection with the assignment, the revised
Charter Operating management agreement was amended to eliminate the 3.5%
management fee. Under the amended agreement, Charter Communications, Inc. is
entitled to reimbursement from Charter Operating for all of its expenses, costs,
losses, liabilities and damages paid or incurred by it in connection with the
performance of its services under the amended agreement, with no cap on the
amount of reimbursement.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY. On
November 12, 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. entered into a management
agreement with Charter Communications Holding Company. Under this agreement,
Charter Communications, Inc. manages and operates the cable television systems
owned or to be acquired by Charter Communications Holding Company and its
subsidiaries, to the extent such cable systems are not subject to management
agreements between Charter Communications, Inc. and specific subsidiaries of
Charter Communications Holding Company.
The terms of this management agreement are substantially similar to the
terms of the Charter Operating management agreement. Charter Communications,
Inc. is entitled to reimbursement from Charter Communications Holding Company
for all expenses, costs, losses, liabilities and damages paid or incurred by
Charter Communications, Inc. in connection with the performance of its services,
which expenses will include any fees Charter Communications, Inc. is obligated
to pay under the mutual services agreement described below. There is no cap on
the amount of reimbursement to which Charter Communications, Inc. is entitled.
MUTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHARTER INVESTMENT, INC. Charter
Communications, Inc. has only fifteen employees, all of whom are also executive
officers of Charter Investment. Effective November 12, 1999, Charter
Communications, Inc. and Charter Investment entered into a mutual services
agreement pursuant to which each entity leases the necessary personnel and
provides services to the other as may be reasonably requested in order to manage
Charter Communications Holding Company and to manage and operate the cable
systems owned by its subsidiaries, including Charter Holdings. In addition,
officers of Charter Investment also serve as officers of Charter Communications,
Inc. The officers and employees of each entity are available to the other to
provide the services described above. All expenses and costs incurred with
respect to the services provided are paid by Charter Communications, Inc.
Charter Communications, Inc. will indemnify and hold harmless Charter Investment
and its directors, officers and employees from and against any and all claims
that may be made against any of them in connection with the mutual services
agreement except due to its or their gross negligence or willful misconduct. The
term of the mutual services agreement is ten years, commencing on November 12,
1999, and the agreement may be terminated at any time by either party upon
thirty days' written notice to the other.
123
126
FALCON MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. On November 12, 1999, Falcon Cable
Communications, a parent company of the Falcon operating companies, entered into
a management consulting agreement with Charter Communications, Inc. pursuant to
which Charter Communications, Inc. agreed to provide certain management and
consulting services to Falcon and its subsidiaries. The term of the management
agreement is ten years. The management agreement provides that Falcon will pay
Charter Communications, Inc. a management fee equal to its actual costs to
provide these services but limited to 5% of gross revenues.
Gross revenues include all revenues from the operation of Falcon's cable
systems, including, without limitation, subscriber payments, advertising
revenues, and revenues from other services provided by Falcon's cable systems.
Gross revenues do not include interest income or income from investments
unrelated to cable systems.
Payment of the management fee is subject to certain restrictions under the
Falcon credit facilities. In the event any portion of the management fee due and
payable is not paid by Falcon, it is deferred and accrued as a liability. Any
deferred amount of the management fee will bear interest at the rate of 10% per
annum, compounded annually, from the date it was due and payable until the date
it is paid.
FANCH MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. On November 12, 1999, CC VI Operating Company,
LLC, the parent company of the Fanch operating companies, entered into a
management consulting agreement with Charter Communications, Inc. pursuant to
which Charter Communications, Inc. agreed to provide certain management and
consulting services to Fanch and its subsidiaries. The term of the management
agreement is ten years. The management agreement provides that Fanch will pay
Charter Communications, Inc. a management fee equal to its actual costs to
provide these services but limited to 5% of gross revenues.
Gross revenues include all revenues from the operation of Fanch's cable
systems, including, without limitation, subscriber payments, advertising
revenues, and revenues from other services provided by Fanch's cable systems.
Gross revenues do not include interest income or income from investments
unrelated to cable systems.
Payment of the management fee is subject to certain restrictions under the
Fanch credit facilities. In the event any portion of the management fee due and
payable is not paid by Fanch, it is deferred and accrued as a liability. Any
deferred amount of the management fee will bear interest at the rate of 10% per
annum, compounded annually, from the date it was due and payable until the date
it is paid.
AVALON MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENT. Under the Avalon limited liability company
agreements, Charter Communications, Inc. agreed to provide certain management
and consulting services to CC Michigan, CC New England and their subsidiaries.
Under these arrangements, CC Michigan and CC New England will pay Charter
Communications, Inc. a management fee equal to its actual costs to provide these
services but limited to 2% of gross revenues.
Gross revenues include all revenues from the operation of the Avalon cable
systems, including, without limitation, subscriber payments, advertising
revenues, and revenues from other services provided by Avalon's cable systems.
Gross revenues do not include interest income or income from investments
unrelated to cable systems.
Payment of the management fee is permitted under the current credit
facilities of CC Michigan and CC New England, but ranks below the senior debt of
such companies and shall not be paid except to the extent allowed under such
credit facilities. In the event any portion of the management fee due and
payable is not paid by CC Michigan or CC New England, it is deferred and accrued
as a liability. Any deferred amount of the management fee will bear interest at
the rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually, from the date it was due and
payable until the date it is paid.
124
127
BRESNAN MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. On February 14, 2000, CC VIII Operating LLC,
parent of the Bresnan cable systems, and several wholly owned subsidiaries,
entered into a management consulting agreement with Charter Communications, Inc.
pursuant to which Charter Communications, Inc. agreed to provide certain
management and consulting services to the Bresnan cable systems. The management
agreement provides that Bresnan will pay Charter Communications, Inc. a
management fee equal to its actual cost to provide these services without
limitation as to the amount. The term of the management agreement is ten years.
Payment of the management fee is subject to certain restrictions under the
Bresnan credit facilities. In the event that any portion of the management fee
due and payable is not paid by Bresnan, it is deferred and accrued as a
liability. Any deferred amount of the management fee will bear interest at the
rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually, from the date it was due and payable
until the date it is paid.
CONSULTING AGREEMENT
On March 10, 1999, Charter Holdings entered into a consulting agreement
with Vulcan Northwest and Charter Investment. Pursuant to the terms of the
consulting agreement, Charter Holdings retained Vulcan Northwest and Charter
Investment to provide advisory, financial and other consulting services with
respect to acquisitions of the business, assets or stock of other companies by
Charter Holdings or by any of its affiliates. Such services include
participation in the evaluation, negotiation and implementation of these
acquisitions. The agreement expires on December 31, 2000, and automatically
renews for successive one-year terms unless otherwise terminated.
All reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Vulcan Northwest and
Charter Investment are Charter Holdings' responsibility and must be reimbursed.
Charter Holdings must also pay Vulcan Northwest and Charter Investment a fee for
their services rendered for each acquisition made by Charter Holdings or any of
its affiliates. This fee equals 1% of the aggregate value of such acquisition.
Neither Vulcan Northwest nor Charter Investment received or will receive a fee
in connection with the American Cable, Renaissance, Greater Media, Helicon,
Vista, Cable Satellite, InterMedia, Rifkin, Avalon, Falcon, Fanch, Bresnan,
Interlake, Farmington, Capital Cable and Kalamazoo acquisitions. Charter
Holdings has also agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Vulcan Northwest and
Charter Investment, and their respective officers, directors, shareholders,
agents, employees and affiliates, for all claims, actions, demands and expenses
that arise out of this consulting agreement and the services they provide to
Charter Holdings.
Mr. Allen owns 100% of Vulcan Northwest and is the Chairman of the board.
William D. Savoy, another of Charter Communications, Inc.'s directors, is the
President and a director of Vulcan Northwest.
TRANSACTIONS WITH MR. ALLEN
On December 21, 1998, Mr. Allen contributed approximately $431 million to
Charter Investment and received non-voting common stock of Charter Investment.
Such non-voting common stock was converted to voting common stock on December
23, 1998. The $431 million contribution was used to redeem stock of certain
shareholders in Charter Investment.
On December 23, 1998, Mr. Allen contributed approximately $1.3 billion to
Charter Investment and received voting common stock of Charter Investment.
Additionally, Charter Investment borrowed approximately $6.2 million in the form
of a bridge loan from Mr. Allen. This bridge loan was contributed by Mr. Allen
to Charter Investment in March 1999. No interest on such bridge loan was accrued
or paid by Charter Investment. On the same date, Mr. Allen also contributed
approximately $223.5 million to Vulcan Cable II, Inc., a company owned by Mr.
Allen. Vulcan II was merged with and into Charter Investment. The $1.3 billion
and $223.5 million contributions by Mr. Allen were
125
128
used by Charter Investment to purchase the remaining interest in CCA Group and
CharterComm Holdings.
On January 5, 1999, Charter Investment borrowed approximately $132.2
million in the form of a bridge loan from Mr. Allen. This bridge loan was
contributed by Mr. Allen to Charter Investment in March 1999. No interest on
such bridge loan was accrued or paid by Charter Investment. On the same date,
Mr. Allen also acquired additional voting common stock of Charter Investment
from Jerald L. Kent, Howard L. Wood and Barry L. Babcock for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $176.7 million.
On January 11, 1999, Charter Investment borrowed $25 million in the form of
a bridge loan from Mr. Allen. This bridge loan was contributed by Mr. Allen to
Charter Investment in March 1999. No interest on such bridge loan was accrued or
paid by Charter Investment.
On March 16, 1999, Mr. Allen contributed approximately $124.8 million in
cash to Charter Investment. In connection with this contribution and the
contribution of the three bridge loans described above, Mr. Allen received
11,316 shares of common stock of Charter Investment.
All other contributions to Charter Investment by Mr. Allen were used in
operations of Charter Investment and were not contributed to Charter Holdings.
On August 10, 1999, Vulcan Cable III Inc. purchased 24.1 million Charter
Communications Holding Company membership units for $500 million. On September
22, 1999, Mr. Allen, through Vulcan Cable III Inc., contributed an additional
$825 million, consisting of approximately $644.3 million in cash and
approximately $180.7 million in equity interests in Rifkin that Vulcan Cable III
Inc. had acquired in the Rifkin acquisition in exchange for 39.8 million Charter
Communications Holding Company membership units. Charter Communications Holding
Company in turn contributed the cash and equity interests to Charter Holdings.
As part of the membership interests purchase agreement, Vulcan Ventures
Incorporated, Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Investment and Charter
Communications Holding Company entered into an agreement on September 21, 1999
regarding the right of Vulcan Ventures to use up to eight of our digital cable
channels. Specifically, we will provide Vulcan Ventures with exclusive rights
for carriage of up to eight digital cable television programming services or
channels on each of the digital cable television systems with local control of
the digital product now or hereafter owned, operated, controlled or managed by
us of 550 megahertz or more. If the system offers digital services but has less
than 550 megahertz of capacity, then the programming services will be equitably
reduced. Upon request of Vulcan Ventures, we will attempt to reach a
comprehensive programming agreement pursuant to which we will pay the
programmer, if possible, a fee per digital subscriber. If such fee arrangement
is not achieved, then we and the programmer shall enter into a standard
programming agreement. We believe that this transaction is on terms at least as
favorable to us as Mr. Allen would negotiate with other cable operators.
In November 1999, in connection with Charter Communications, Inc.'s initial
public offering, Mr. Allen, through Vulcan Cable III Inc., purchased $750
million of membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company at a per
membership unit price equal to the net initial public offering price.
During the second and third quarters of 1999, one of our subsidiaries sold
interests in several airplanes to Mr. Allen for approximately $8 million. We
believe that the purchase price paid by Mr. Allen for these interests was the
fair market price.
ALLOCATION OF BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES WITH MR. ALLEN
As described under "-- Business Relationships," Mr. Allen and a number of
his affiliates have interests in various entities that provide services or
programming to a number of our subsidiaries. Given the diverse nature of Mr.
Allen's investment activities and interests, and to avoid the possibility
126
129
of future disputes as to potential business, Charter Communications Holding
Company and Charter Communications, Inc., under the terms of their respective
organizational documents, may not, and may not allow their subsidiaries to,
engage in any business transaction outside the cable transmission business
except for the joint venture with Digeo Broadband, Inc., incidental businesses
engaged in as of the closing of the initial public offering of Charter
Communications, Inc. and as an owner and operator of the business of Chat TV.
This restriction will remain in effect until all of the shares of Charter
Communications, Inc.'s high-vote Class B common stock have been converted into
shares of Class A common stock due to Mr. Allen's equity ownership falling below
specified threshholds.
Should Charter Communications, Inc. or Charter Communications Holding
Company wish to pursue, or allow their subsidiaries to pursue, a business
transaction outside of this scope, it must first offer Mr. Allen the opportunity
to pursue the particular business transaction. If he decides not to do so and
consents to Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company
or any of their subsidiaries engaging in the business transaction, it will be
able to do so. In any such case, the respective restated certificate of
incorporation and the amended and restated limited liability company agreement
of Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company would
be amended accordingly to appropriately modify the current restrictions on their
ability to engage in any business other than the cable transmission business.
The cable transmission business means the business of transmitting video, audio,
including telephony, and data over cable television systems owned, operated or
managed by Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company
or any of their subsidiaries from time to time. The businesses of RCN
Corporation, a company in which Mr. Allen has made a significant investment, are
not considered cable transmission businesses under these provisions. See
"-- Business Relationships -- RCN Corporation."
Under Delaware corporate law, each director of Charter Communications,
Inc., including Mr. Allen, is generally required to present to Charter
Communications, Inc. any opportunity he or she may have to acquire any cable
transmission business or any company whose principal business is the ownership,
operation or management of cable transmission businesses so that we may
determine whether we wish to pursue such opportunities. However, Mr. Allen and
the other directors generally will not have an obligation to present to Charter
Communications, Inc. other business opportunities and they may exploit such
opportunities for their own account.
ASSIGNMENTS OF ACQUISITIONS
On January 1, 1999, Charter Investment entered into a membership purchase
agreement with ACEC Holding Company, LLC for the acquisition of American Cable.
On February 23, 1999, Charter Investment assigned its rights and obligations
under this agreement to one of our subsidiaries, Charter Communications
Entertainment II, LLC, effective as of March 8, 1999, or such earlier date as
mutually agreed to by the parties. The acquisition of American Cable was
completed in May 1999.
On February 17, 1999, Charter Investment entered into an asset purchase
agreement with Greater Media, Inc. and Greater Media Cablevision, Inc. for the
acquisition of the Greater Media systems. On February 23, 1999, Charter
Investment assigned its rights and obligations under this agreement to one of
our subsidiaries, Charter Communications Entertainment I, LLC. The acquisition
of the Greater Media systems was completed in June 1999.
On April 26, 1999, Charter Investment entered into a purchase and sale
agreement with InterLink Communications Partners, LLLP and the other sellers
listed on the signature pages of the agreement. On June 30, 1999, Charter
Investment assigned its rights and obligations under this agreement to Charter
Operating. The acquisition contemplated by these agreements was completed in
September 1999.
On April 26, 1999, Charter Investment entered into a purchase and sale
agreement with Rifkin Acquisition Partners L.L.L.P and the other sellers listed
on the signature pages of the agreement. On
127
130
June 30, 1999, Charter Investment assigned its rights and obligations under this
agreement to Charter Operating. The acquisition contemplated by these agreements
was completed in September 1999.
On April 26, 1999, Charter Investment entered into the RAP indemnity
agreement with InterLink Communications Partners, LLLP and the other sellers and
InterLink partners listed on the signature pages of the agreement. On June 30,
1999, Charter Investment assigned its rights and obligations under this
agreement to Charter Operating.
In May 1999, Charter Investment entered into the Falcon purchase agreement.
As of June 22, 1999, pursuant to the first amendment to the Falcon purchase
agreement, Charter Investment assigned its rights under the Falcon purchase
agreement to Charter Communications Holding Company.
In May 1999, Charter Investment entered into the Fanch purchase agreement.
On September 21, 1999, Charter Investment assigned its rights and obligations to
purchase stock interests under this agreement to Charter Communications Holding
Company and its rights and obligations to purchase partnership interests and
assets under this agreement to Charter Communications VI, LLC, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Communications Holding Company.
In June 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company entered into the
Bresnan purchase agreement. In February 2000, Charter Communications Holding
Company assigned its rights under the Bresnan purchase agreement to purchase
certain assets to Charter Holdings and Charter Holdings accepted such assignment
and assumed all obligations of Charter Communications Holding Company under the
Bresnan purchase agreement with respect to those assets.
INTERCOMPANY LOANS
In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company loaned $856.0
million to Charter Operating. In January 2000, Charter Communications Holding
Company loaned an additional $66.0 million to Charter Operating. In February and
March 2000, Charter Operating repaid $890 million. The remaining balance of
$32.0 million was repaid in May 2000.
In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company loaned $21.0
million to CC VI Operating Company, LLC, maturing November 30, 2009. The funds
were used by CC VI Operating Company to pay down a portion of amounts
outstanding under the Fanch credit facilities. Effective December 31, 1999,
Charter Communications Holding Company forgave the amounts outstanding,
including accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $314,000, and contributed
such amounts to CC VI Holdings, LLC, the parent company of the Fanch companies.
In November 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company loaned $173.0
million to Falcon Cable Communications, LLC. In January 2000, Charter
Communications Holding Company loaned an additional $373.0 million to Falcon
Cable Communications with an interest rate of 7.54%. In February 2000, Falcon
Cable Communications repaid all outstanding balances.
In November and December 1999, Charter Communications Holding Company
loaned $12.0 million to Charter Operating. As of June 30, 2000, $5.0 million
with an interest rate of 7.830% remained outstanding. In July 2000, $1.0 million
was repaid, and the remaining $4.0 million was repaid in August 2000.
EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENTS
Effective as of December 23, 1998, Jerald L. Kent entered into an
employment agreement with Mr. Allen for a three-year term with automatic
one-year renewals. Mr. Allen assigned the employment agreement to Charter
Investment as of December 23, 1998. Charter Investment subsequently assigned Mr.
Kent's employment agreement to Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter
Communications, Inc. has assumed all rights and obligations of Charter
Investment under the agreement, except with respect to the grant of options
which were granted by Charter Communications Holding Company.
128
131
Under this agreement, Mr. Kent has agreed to serve as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Charter Communications, Inc., with responsibility for the
nationwide general management, administration and operation of all present and
future business of Charter Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries. During the
initial term of the agreement, Mr. Kent receives an annual base salary of
$1,250,000, or such higher rate as may from time to time be determined by
Charter Communications, Inc.'s board of directors in its discretion. In
addition, Mr. Kent is eligible to receive an annual bonus in an aggregate amount
not to exceed $625,000, to be determined by the board based on an assessment of
the performance of Mr. Kent as well as the achievement of certain financial
targets.
Under the agreement, Mr. Kent is entitled to participate in any disability
insurance, pension, or other benefit plan afforded to employees generally or
executives of Charter Communications, Inc. Mr. Kent will be reimbursed by
Charter Communications, Inc. for life insurance premiums up to $30,000 per year,
and is granted personal use of the corporate airplane. Mr. Kent also is entitled
to the use of a car valued at up to $100,000 and the fees and dues for his
membership in a country club of his choice. Mr. Kent did not avail himself of
the use of a car, nor was he reimbursed for life insurance premiums, in 1999.
Also under this agreement and a related agreement with Charter
Communications Holding Company, Mr. Kent received options to purchase 7,044,127
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units with an exercise price
of $20.00. The options have a term of ten years and vested 25% on December 23,
1998. The remaining 75% vest 1/36 on the first day of each of the 36 months
commencing January 1, 2000. The terms of these options provide that immediately
following the issuance of membership units received upon exercise of such
options, these units will be automatically exchanged for shares of Charter
Communications, Inc. Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
The agreement further provides that Charter Communications, Inc. will
indemnify and hold harmless Mr. Kent to the maximum extent permitted by law from
and against any claims, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses in
connection with or arising out of the performance by Mr. Kent of his duties.
If the agreement expires because Charter Communications, Inc. gives Mr.
Kent notice of its intention not to extend the initial term, or if the agreement
is terminated by Mr. Kent for good reason or by Charter Communications, Inc.
without cause:
- Charter Communications, Inc. will pay to Mr. Kent an amount equal to the
aggregate base salary due to Mr. Kent for the remaining term and the
board of directors will consider additional amounts, if any, to be paid
to Mr. Kent; and
- any unvested options of Mr. Kent shall immediately vest.
Effective as of November 12, 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. entered
into a consulting agreement with Howard L. Wood. In connection with this
agreement, Mr. Wood received options to purchase 40,000 membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company, which vested immediately and have an
exercise price of $19.00. Upon exercise of such options, the membership units
received are immediately exchanged for shares of Charter Communications, Inc.
Class A common stock on one-for-one basis. The consulting agreement has a
one-year term with automatic one-year renewals. Under this agreement, Mr. Wood
provides consulting services to Charter Communications, Inc. and will also be
responsible for such other duties as the Chief Executive Officer determines.
During the term of this agreement, Mr. Wood will receive annual cash
compensation initially at a rate of $60,000. In addition, Mr. Wood is entitled
to receive health benefits as well as use of an office and a full-time
secretary. Charter Communications, Inc. will indemnify and hold harmless Mr.
Wood to the maximum extent permitted by law from and against any claims,
damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses incurred in connection with or
arising out of the performance by him of his duties.
129
132
Effective as of December 23, 1998, Howard L. Wood entered into an
employment agreement with Charter Investment for a one-year term with automatic
one-year renewals. Under this agreement, Mr. Wood agreed to serve as an officer
of Charter Investment. During the initial term of the agreement, Mr. Wood was
entitled to receive a base salary for the remaining month of the term of
$312,500, or such higher rate as determined by the Chief Executive Officer in
his discretion. In addition, Mr. Wood was eligible to receive an annual bonus to
be determined by the board of directors in its discretion. Mr. Wood received a
one-time payment as part of his employment agreement of $250,000. Under the
agreement, Mr. Wood was entitled to participate in any disability insurance,
pension or other benefit plan afforded to employees generally or executives of
Charter Investment. Charter Investment agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Mr.
Wood to the maximum extent permitted by law from and against any claims,
damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses incurred in connection with or
arising out of the performance by Mr. Wood of his duties. Effective on November
12, 1999, this employment agreement ceased to be effective. Mr. Wood received an
amount equal to his base salary for the remaining month of the term plus a bonus
of $312,500. In addition, the options then held by Mr. Wood vested in full.
A company controlled by Mr. Wood occasionally leases an airplane to Charter
Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates for business travel.
Charter Communications, Inc. or its subsidiaries or affiliates, as applicable,
in turn, pays to such company market rates for such use. Mr. Wood reimburses
Charter Communications, Inc. for the full annual cost of two individuals
qualified to operate the plane and who are otherwise available to Charter in
connection with its own flight operations.
In addition, Mr. Wood's daughter, a Vice President of Charter Investment,
received a bonus in the form of a three-year promissory note bearing interest at
7% per year. One-third of the original outstanding principal amount of the note
and interest are forgiven as long as she remains employed by Charter Investment
at the end of each of the first three anniversaries of the issue date in
February 1999. The outstanding balance on the note as of June 30, 2000 was
$150,000.
Effective as of May 25, 1999, Marc B. Nathanson entered into a letter
agreement with Charter Communications, Inc. for a three-year term. Under this
agreement, Mr. Nathanson agreed to serve as Vice-Chairman and as a director of
Charter Communications, Inc. During the term of this agreement, Mr. Nathanson
will receive a benefit equal to $193,197 per year, which amount is being paid by
Charter Communications, Inc. to a company controlled by Mr. Nathanson. In
addition, Mr. Nathanson is entitled to the rights and benefits provided to other
directors of Charter Communications, Inc. Charter Communications, Inc. will
indemnify and hold harmless Mr. Nathanson to the maximum extent permitted by law
from and against any claims, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses
incurred in connection with or arising out of the performance by Mr. Nathanson
of his duties.
Effective as of December 23, 1998, Barry L. Babcock entered into an
employment agreement with Charter Investment for a one-year term with automatic
one-year renewals. Under this agreement, Mr. Babcock agreed to serve as Vice
Chairman of Charter Investment with responsibilities including the government
and public relations of Charter Investment. During the initial term of the
agreement, Mr. Babcock was entitled to receive a base salary of $625,000, or
such higher rate as may have been determined by the Chief Executive Officer in
his discretion. This employment agreement was terminated in October 1999.
Pursuant to the termination agreement, Mr. Babcock received an amount equal to
his base salary for the remaining month of the term plus a $312,500 bonus. In
addition, the options held by Mr. Babcock vested in full.
Effective as of November 12, 1999, Charter Communications, Inc. entered
into a consulting agreement with Mr. Babcock which expired in March 2000. During
the term of this agreement, Mr. Babcock received monthly cash compensation at a
rate of $10,000 per month, disability and health benefits and the use of an
office and secretarial services, upon request. Charter
130
133
Communications, Inc. agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Mr. Babcock to the
maximum extent permitted by law from and against any claims, damages,
liabilities, losses, costs or expenses incurred in connection with or arising
out of the performance by Mr. Babcock of his duties.
OTHER RELATIONSHIPS
David L. McCall, Senior Vice President of Operations -- Eastern Division of
Charter Communications, Inc., is a partner in a partnership that leases office
space to us. The partnership has received approximately $177,500 pursuant to
such lease and related agreements for the year ended December 31, 1999. In
addition, approximately $646,000 was paid in 1999 to a construction company
controlled by Mr. McCall's brother, Marvin A. McCall for construction services.
In January 1999, Charter Investment issued bonuses to executive officers in
the form of three-year promissory notes. One-third of the original outstanding
principal amount of each of these notes and interest is forgiven, as long as the
employee is still employed by Charter Investment or any of its affiliates, at
the end of each of the first three anniversaries of the issue date. The
promissory notes bear interest at 7% per year.
In April 2000, upon commencement of employment with Charter Communications,
Inc., David C. Andersen, Senior Vice President -- Communications, received a
bonus of $150,000 in the form of a three-year promissory note. One-third of the
original outstanding principal amount and interest are forgiven, as long as Mr.
Andersen is still employed by Charter Communications, Inc. or any of its
affiliates at the end of each of the first three anniversaries of the issue date
in April 2000. The promissory note bears interest at 7% per year.
The outstanding principal amounts of such notes as of June 30, 2000 are as
follows:
INDIVIDUAL AMOUNT
---------- --------
David C. Andersen................................. $150,000
David G. Barford.................................. $300,000
Mary Pat Blake.................................... $300,000
Eric A. Freesmeier................................ $300,000
Thomas R. Jokerst................................. $300,000
Kent D. Kalkwarf.................................. $300,000
Ralph G. Kelly.................................... $300,000
David L. McCall................................... $300,000
John C. Pietri.................................... $150,000
Steven A. Schumm.................................. $600,000
Curtis S. Shaw.................................... $300,000
Stephen E. Silva.................................. $200,000
In September 2000, upon commencement of employment with Charter
Communications, Inc. James (Trey) H. Smith, III, Senior Vice President of
Operations -- Western Division, received a bonus of $200,000 in the form of a
three-year promissory note. One-third of the original outstanding principal
amount and interest are forgiven, as long as Mr. Smith is still employed by
Charter Communications, Inc. or any of its affiliates at the end of each of the
first three anniversaries of the issue date in September 2000. The promissory
note bears interest at 7% per year.
Marc B. Nathanson was the Chairman of the board of directors of Falcon
Holding Group, Inc., which was the general partner of Falcon Holding Group, L.P.
from whom the Falcon cable systems were acquired.
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS
Mr. Allen or certain affiliates of Mr. Allen own equity interests or
warrants to purchase equity interests in various entities which provide a number
of our affiliates with services or programming.
131
134
Among these entities are High Speed Access Corp., WorldGate Communications,
Inc., Wink Communications, Inc., ZDTV, L.L.C. operating as techtv, USA Networks,
Oxygen Media, Inc., Digeo Broadband, Inc., Go2Net, Inc. and RCN Corporation.
These affiliates include Charter Investment and Vulcan Ventures, Inc. Mr. Allen
owns 100% of the equity of Vulcan Ventures, and is its Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Savoy is also a Vice President and a director of Vulcan Ventures. The
various cable, Internet and telephony companies that Mr. Allen has invested in
may mutually benefit one another. The Digeo Broadband Internet portal joint
venture announced in the fourth quarter of 1999 is an example of a cooperative
business relationship among his affiliated companies. We can give no assurance,
nor should you expect, that this joint venture will be successful, that we will
realize any benefits from this or other relationships with Mr. Allen's
affiliated companies or that we will enter into any joint ventures or business
relationships in the future with Mr. Allen's affiliated companies.
Mr. Allen and his affiliates have made, and in the future likely will make,
numerous investments outside of us and our business. We cannot assure you that,
in the event that we or any of our subsidiaries enter into transactions in the
future with any affiliate of Mr. Allen, such transactions will be on terms as
favorable to us as terms we might have obtained from an unrelated third party.
Also, conflicts could arise with respect to the allocation of corporate
opportunities between us and Mr. Allen and his affiliates. We have not
instituted any formal plan or arrangement to address potential conflicts of
interest.
HIGH SPEED ACCESS. High Speed Access is a provider of high-speed Internet
access over cable modems. In November 1998, Charter Investment entered into a
systems access and investment agreement with Vulcan Ventures and High Speed
Access and a related network services agreement with High Speed Access.
Additionally, Vulcan Ventures and High Speed Access entered into a programming
content agreement. Charter Investment's rights and obligations under these
agreements were assigned by Charter Investment to Charter Communications Holding
Company upon closing of Charter Communications, Inc.'s initial public offering.
These agreements provided High Speed Access with exclusive access to at least
750,000 of our homes either that have an installed cable drop from our cable
system or that are eligible for a cable drop by virtue of our cable system
passing the home. The term of the systems access and investment agreement
continues until the earlier of termination of the network services agreement or
midnight of the day High Speed Access ceases to provide High Speed Access
services to cable subscribers in a geographic area or region. The term of the
network services agreement is, as to a particular cable system, five years from
the date revenue billing commences for that cable system. Following the
five-year initial term, the network services agreement automatically renews on a
year-to-year basis unless Charter Communications Holding Company provides notice
of termination prior to the end of the five-year term in accordance with the
terms of the agreement. Additionally, Charter Communications Holding Company can
terminate High Speed Access' exclusivity rights, on a system-by-system basis, if
High Speed Access fails to meet performance benchmarks or otherwise breaches the
agreements including a commitment to provide content designated by Vulcan
Ventures. The programming content agreement is effective until terminated for
any breach and will automatically terminate upon the expiration of the systems
access and investment agreement. Under the terms of the network services
agreement, we split revenue with High Speed Access based on set percentages of
gross revenues in each category of service. The programming content agreement
provides each of Vulcan Ventures and High Speed Access with a license to use
certain content and materials of the other on a non-exclusive, royalty-free
basis. Operations began in the first quarter of 1999. Net receipts from High
Speed Access for the year ended December 31, 1999 were approximately $461,000.
Net receipts from High Speed Access for the six months ended June 30, 2000 were
approximately $901,000.
Concurrently with entering into these agreements, High Speed Access issued
8 million shares of series B convertible preferred stock to Vulcan Ventures at a
purchase price of $2.50 per share. Vulcan Ventures also subscribed to purchase
2.5 million shares of series C convertible preferred stock, at a
132
135
purchase price of $5.00 per share on or before November 25, 2000, and received
an option to purchase an additional 2.5 million shares of series C convertible
preferred stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per share. In April 1999, Vulcan
Ventures purchased the entire 5 million shares of series C convertible preferred
stock for $25 million in cash. The shares of series B and series C convertible
preferred stock issued to Vulcan Ventures automatically converted at a price of
$3.23 per share into 22,224,688 million shares of common stock upon completion
of High Speed Access' initial public offering in June 1999.
Additionally, High Speed Access granted Vulcan Ventures warrants to
purchase up to 5,006,500 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $5.00 per
share. These warrants were converted to warrants to purchase up to 7,750,000
shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.23 per share upon completion of
High Speed Access' initial public offering. The warrants were subsequently
assigned to Charter Communications Holding Company. On May 12, 2000, the
warrants were amended and restated. The amended and restated warrant gives
Charter Communications, Inc. the right to purchase up to 12,000,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $3.23 per share. A portion of the amended
and restated warrant relates to warrants that may be earned under the agreements
described above, and the other portion relates to warrants that may be earned
under an agreement entered into with High Speed Access on May 12, 2000,
described below.
Warrants earned under the agreements described above become vested at the
time systems are committed by us and are based upon the number of homes passed.
Warrants under these agreements can only be earned until July 31, 2003, and are
earned at the rate of 1.55 shares of common stock for each home passed in excess
of 750,000. Warrants earned under the agreements described above are exercisable
until May 25, 2006. Such warrants may be forfeited in certain circumstances,
generally if we withdraw a committed system.
As of June 30, 2000, Charter Communications, Inc. has earned 869,650
warrants under the agreements described above.
On May 12, 2000, Charter Communications, Inc. entered into a separate
agreement with High Speed Access. Charter Communications, Inc.'s rights and
obligations under this agreement were assigned by Charter Communications, Inc.
to Charter Communications Holding Company on August 1, 2000. Under the
agreement, we agreed to commit homes passed by our cable television systems to
High Speed Access for which High Speed Access will provide residential Tier 2
and above technical support and network operations center support. Such systems
will be in locations where we have formally launched or intend to launch cable
modem-based Internet access to residential customers. Tier 2 support is customer
service support beyond the initial screening of a problem.
We have agreed to commit an aggregate of 5,000,000 homes passed, including
all homes passed in systems previously committed by us to High Speed Access
(other than full turnkey systems), on or prior to May 12, 2003. We may also
commit additional homes passed in excess of the initial 5,000,000. With respect
to each system launched or intended to be launched, we will pay a per customer
fee to High Speed Access according to agreed pricing terms. In addition, we will
also compensate High Speed Access for services that exceed certain minimum
thresholds.
Warrants that may be earned under the new agreement become vested at the
time an authorization to proceed is delivered to High Speed Access with respect
to a system, and will be based upon the number of homes passed in such system.
With respect to the initial aggregate 5,000,000 homes passed, the warrant
provides that Charter Communications Holding Company will have the right to
purchase 0.775 shares of common stock for every home passed. With respect to any
additional homes passed in excess of 5,000,000, the warrant provides that
Charter Communications Holding Company will have the right to purchase 1.55
shares of common stock for every home passed. Warrants earned under the new
agreement are exercisable until 7 1/2 years from the date they are earned. Such
warrants are generally not subject to forfeiture, even if the new agreement is
terminated.
133
136
The new agreement governing the services to be provided by High Speed
Access has a term of five years. Charter Communications Holding Company has the
option to renew the agreement for additional successive 5-year terms on similar
terms. On each renewal date, High Speed Access will issue Charter Communications
Holding Company an additional warrant for each renewal term. These renewal
warrants will grant Charter Communications Holding Company the right to purchase
additional shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share. The number of
shares of common stock subject to a renewal warrant will be determined based
upon 0.50 shares of common stock for every home passed in each system committed
to High Speed Access during the initial 5-year term and each 5-year renewal
term.
Either party may terminate the new agreement, in whole or in part, if the
other party defaults. Either party may also terminate the new agreement if the
other party becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy. Charter Communications
Holding Company may terminate the new agreement if High Speed Access merges with
another party or experiences a change of control. If High Speed Access
terminates the new agreement, Charter Communications Holding Company may, in
certain circumstances, be required to pay a termination fee.
High Speed Access has agreed to increase the number of shares of common
stock subject to the amended and restated warrant, upon Charter Communications
Holding Company's request, if the number of warrants earned exceeds 11,500,000.
High Speed Access also granted Charter Communications Holding Company certain
registration rights with respect to shares of common stock held by Charter
Communications Holding Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
including shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the amended and
restated warrant.
Vulcan Ventures owns 37.1% of the outstanding stock of High Speed Access.
Jerald L. Kent, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of
Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter Communications, Inc., Stephen
E. Silva, Senior Vice President -- Corporate Development and Technology of
Charter Communications, Inc., and Mr. Savoy, a member of the boards of directors
of Charter Holdings, Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter
Communications, Inc., are all members of the board of directors of High Speed
Access.
WORLDGATE. WorldGate is a provider of Internet access through cable
systems. On November 7, 1997, Charter Investment signed an affiliation agreement
with WorldGate pursuant to which WorldGate's services will be offered to some of
our customers. This agreement was assigned by Charter Investment to Charter
Communications Holding Company upon the closing of our initial public offering.
The term of the agreement is five years unless terminated by either party for
failure of the other party to perform any of its obligations or undertakings
required under the agreement. The agreement automatically renews for additional
successive two-year periods upon expiration of the initial five-year term.
Pursuant to the agreement, we have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to
deploy the WorldGate Internet access service within a portion of our cable
systems and to install the appropriate headend equipment in all of our major
markets in those systems. Major markets for purposes of this agreement include
those in which we have more than 25,000 customers. We incur the cost for the
installation of headend equipment. In addition, we have agreed to use our
reasonable best efforts to deploy such service in all non-major markets that are
technically capable of providing interactive pay-per-view service, to the extent
we determine that it is economically practical. When WorldGate has a telephone
return path service available, we will, if economically practical, use all
reasonable efforts to install the appropriate headend equipment and deploy the
WorldGate service in our remaining markets. Telephone return path service is the
usage of telephone lines to connect to the Internet to transmit data or receive
data. We have also agreed to market the WorldGate service within our market
areas. We pay a monthly subscriber access fee to WorldGate based on the number
of subscribers to the WorldGate service. We have the discretion to determine
what fees, if any, we will charge our subscribers for access to the WorldGate
service. We started offering WorldGate
134
137
service in 1998. For the six months ended June 30, 2000, we paid WorldGate
approximately $386,000. For the year ended December 31, 1999, we paid to
WorldGate approximately $1,661,000. For the year ended December 31, 1998, we
paid to WorldGate approximately $276,000. We charged our subscribers
approximately $200,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2000, $263,000 for the
year ended December 31, 1999 and approximately $22,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
On November 24, 1997, Charter Investment acquired 70,423 shares of
WorldGate's series B preferred stock at a purchase price of $7.10 per share and
was issued warrants exercisable for 394,880 shares of WorldGate series B
preferred stock at a price of $7.10 per share. These shares of WorldGate's
series B preferred stock and warrants to purchase WorldGate series B preferred
stock were assigned to Charter Communications Holding Company upon the closing
of our initial public offering. On February 3, 1999, a subsidiary of Charter
Holdings acquired 90,909 shares of series C preferred stock at a purchase price
of $11.00 per share. As a result of a stock split and WorldGate's initial public
offering, each share of series B preferred stock converted into two-thirds of a
share of WorldGate's common stock, and each share of series C preferred stock
converted into two-thirds of a share of WorldGate's common stock.
On July 25, 2000, Charter Communications Holding Company entered into a
joint venture, named TV Gateway LLC, with WorldGate and several other cable
operators to develop and deploy a server-based interactive program guide.
Charter Communications Holding Company invested $850,000, providing it a 16.25%
ownership in the joint venture. For the first four years after the formation of
TV Gateway, Charter Communications Holding Company will earn additional
ownership units, up to a maximum of 750,000 ownership units, as the interactive
program guide is deployed to our customers. In connection with the formation of
the joint venture, on August 15, 2000, Charter Communications Holding Company
purchased 31,211 shares of common stock of WorldGate at $16.02 per share for an
aggregate purchase price of $500,000. As a result of this purchase, Charter
Communications Holding Company received a $125,000 credit from WorldGate against
future equipment purchases relating to the deployment of its service.
Additionally, WorldGate granted Charter Communications Holding Company warrants
to purchase up to 500,000 shares of WorldGate common stock for a period of seven
years at a purchase price of $24.78. For a period of three years from the date
of closing, Charter Communications Holding Company will also be issued warrants
to purchase common stock of WorldGate based on the number of two-way digital
homes passed in the systems in which Charter Communications Holding Company has
deployed WorldGate service.
WINK. Wink offers an enhanced broadcasting system that adds interactivity
and electronic commerce opportunities to traditional programming and
advertising. Viewers can, among other things, find news, weather and sports
information on-demand and order products through use of a remote control. On
October 8, 1997, Charter Investment signed a cable affiliation agreement with
Wink to deploy this enhanced broadcasting technology in our systems.
This agreement was assigned by Charter Investment to Charter Communications
Holding Company upon the closing of our initial public offering. The term of the
agreement is three years. Either party has the right to terminate the agreement
for the other party's failure to comply with any of its respective material
obligations under the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, Wink granted us the
non-exclusive license to use their software to deliver the enhanced broadcasting
to all of our cable systems. We pay a fixed monthly license fee to Wink. We also
supply all server hardware required for deployment of Wink services. In
addition, we agreed to promote and market the Wink service to our customers
within the area of each system in which such service is being provided. We share
in the revenue Wink generates from all fees collected by Wink for transactions
generated by our customers. The amount of revenue shared is based on the number
of transactions per month. As of June 30, 2000, minimal revenue and expenses
have been recognized as a result of this agreement.
135
138
On November 30, 1998, Vulcan Ventures acquired 1,162,500 shares of Wink's
series C preferred stock for approximately $9.3 million. In connection with such
acquisition, Wink issued to Vulcan Ventures warrants to purchase shares of
common stock. Additionally, Microsoft Corporation, of which Mr. Allen is a
director, owns an equity interest in Wink.
TECHTV. techtv operates a cable television channel which broadcasts shows
about technology and the Internet. Pursuant to a carriage agreement which
Charter Communications Holding Company intends to enter into with techtv. techtv
has currently agreed to provide us with programming for broadcast via our cable
television systems at no cost. The term of the proposed carriage agreement, with
respect to each of our cable systems, is from the date of launch of techtv on
that cable system until April 30, 2008. The carriage agreement grants us a
limited non-exclusive right to receive and to distribute techtv to our
subscribers in digital or analog format. The carriage agreement does not grant
us the right to distribute techtv over the Internet. Effective May 1, 2001, we
will pay a monthly per subscriber fee to techtv for cable systems that
distribute techtv on a level of service received by fewer than 50% of the total
system's customers. Additionally, we agreed to use commercially reasonable
efforts to publicize the programming schedule of techtv in each of our cable
systems that offers or will offer techtv. Upon reaching a specified threshold
number of techtv subscribers, then, in the event techtv inserts any
infomercials, advertorials and/or home shopping into the techtv programming, we
receive from techtv a percentage of net product revenues resulting from our
distribution of these services. techtv may not offer its services to any other
cable operator which serves the same or fewer number of subscribers at a more
favorable rate or on more favorable carriage terms.
On February 5, 1999, Vulcan Programming, which is 100% owned by Mr. Allen,
acquired an approximate one-third interest in techtv. Mr. Savoy is the president
and director of Vulcan Programming. In January 2000, Vulcan Ventures acquired an
additional 64% in techtv for $204.8 million bringing its interest in techtv to
97%. The remaining 3% of techtv is owned by its management and employees. Mr.
Allen and Mr. Savoy are each directors of techtv and Mr. Savoy is Vice President
of techtv.
USA NETWORKS. USA Networks operates USA Network and The Sci-Fi Channel,
which are cable television networks. USA Networks also operates Home Shopping
Network, which is a retail sales program available via cable television systems.
On May 1, 1994, we signed an affiliation agreement with USA Networks.
This agreement was assigned by Charter Investment to Charter Communications
Holding Company upon the closing of our initial public offering. Pursuant to
this affiliation agreement, USA Networks has agreed to provide their programming
for broadcast via our cable television systems. The term of the affiliation
agreement was until December 30, 1999, however, it has been extended to December
31, 2000. The affiliation agreement grants us the nonexclusive right to
cablecast the USA Network programming service. We pay USA Networks a monthly fee
for the USA Network programming service based on the number of subscribers in
each of our systems and the number and percentage of such subscribers receiving
the USA Network programming service. Additionally, we agreed to use best efforts
to publicize the schedule of the USA Network programming service in the
television listings and program guides which we distribute. We have paid to USA
Networks for programming approximately $12,879,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2000, $16,740,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999, approximately
$556,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998, and approximately $204,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1997. In addition, we received commissions from Home
Shopping Network for sales generated by our customers totaling approximately
$1,649,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2000, $1,826,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1999, approximately $121,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998
and approximately $62,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997.
136
139
Mr. Allen and Mr. Savoy are also directors of USA Networks. As of April
2000, Mr. Allen owned approximately 8.8% and Mr. Savoy owned less than 1% of the
capital stock of USA Networks.
OXYGEN MEDIA, LLC. Oxygen Media provides programming content aimed at the
female audience for distribution over the Internet and cable television systems.
Vulcan Ventures invested $50 million in 1999 in Oxygen Media. In addition,
Charter Communications Holding Company plans to enter into a carriage agreement
with Oxygen Media pursuant to which we will carry Oxygen Media programming
content on certain of our cable systems. Mr. Savoy, a director of Charter
Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications Holding Company serves on the
board of directors of Oxygen Media. Mr. Allen owns an approximate 7% interest in
Oxygen.
PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS. On October 7, 1996, the former owner of our Falcon
cable systems entered into a letter agreement and a cable television agreement
with Trail Blazers Inc. for the cable broadcast in the metropolitan area
surrounding Portland, Oregon of pre-season, regular season and playoff
basketball games of the Portland Trail Blazers, a National Basketball
Association basketball team. Mr. Allen is the 100% owner of the Portland Trail
Blazers and Trail Blazers Inc. We continue to operate under the terms of these
agreements since our acquisition of the Falcon cable systems in November 1999.
Under the letter agreement, Trail Blazers Inc. is paid a fixed fee for each
subscriber in areas directly served by the Falcon cable systems. Under the cable
television agreement, we share subscription revenues with Trail Blazers Inc.
Trail Blazers Inc. provides technical facilities and services in connection with
the cable broadcast of the Portland Trail Blazers basketball games. The letter
agreement and the cable television agreement will terminate on September 30,
2001. We expensed approximately $241,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999
and approximately $727,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 in connection
with the cable broadcast of Portland Trail Blazers basketball games under the
cable television agreement.
DIGEO BROADBAND, INC. Charter Communications Holding Company has entered
into a joint venture with Vulcan Ventures and Go2Net to provide broadband portal
services. See "Business -- Products and Services." Mr. Allen owns approximately
33% of the outstanding equity of Go2Net. Mr. Savoy, a director of Charter
Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company, is also a
director of Go2Net.
RCN CORPORATION. On February 28, 2000, Vulcan Ventures purchased shares of
convertible preferred stock of RCN Corporation for an aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.65 billion. Vulcan Ventures owns a 28.0% equity interest in
RCN Corporation as of June 30, 2000. None of Charter Communications, Inc.,
Charter Communications Holding Company, Charter Holdings or their respective
shareholders, members or subsidiaries, other than Vulcan Ventures, has any
interest in the RCN investment and none of them is expected to have any interest
in any subsequent investment in RCN that Vulcan Ventures may make. Charter
Communications, Inc.'s certificate of incorporation and Charter Communications
Holding Company's limited liability company agreement provide that the
businesses of RCN are not deemed to be "cable transmission businesses." Mr.
Savoy, a director of Charter Communications, Inc. is also a director of RCN.
137
140
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
The following description of our indebtedness is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the relevant credit facilities, indentures and related documents
governing the debt.
EXISTING CREDIT FACILITIES
CHARTER OPERATING CREDIT FACILITIES. On March 18, 1999, Charter Operating
entered into senior secured credit facilities arranged by Chase Securities Inc.,
NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC and TD Securities (USA) Inc. Obligations
under the Charter Operating credit facilities are guaranteed by Charter
Operating's parent, Charter Holdings, and by Charter Operating's subsidiaries.
The obligations under the Charter Operating credit facilities are secured by
pledges by Charter Operating of intercompany obligations and the ownership
interests of Charter Operating and its subsidiaries, but are not secured by the
other assets of Charter Operating or its subsidiaries. The obligations under the
Charter Operating credit facilities are also secured by pledges of intercompany
obligations and the ownership interests of Charter Holdings in Charter
Operating, but are not secured by the other assets of Charter Holdings or
Charter Operating.
The Charter Operating credit facilities provide for borrowings of up to
$4.7 billion consisting of:
- an eight and one-half year reducing revolving loan in the amount of $1.25
billion;
- an eight and one-half year Tranche A term loan in the amount of $1.0
billion; and
- a nine-year Tranche B term loan in the amount of $2.45 billion.
The Charter Operating credit facilities provide for the amortization of the
principal amount of the Tranche A term loan facility and the reduction of the
revolving loan facility beginning on June 30, 2002 with respect to the Tranche A
term loan and on March 31, 2004 with respect to the revolving credit facility,
with a final maturity date, in each case, of September 18, 2007. The
amortization of the principal amount of the Tranche B term loan facility is
substantially "back-ended," with more than 90% of the principal balance due in
the year of maturity. The final maturity date of the Tranche B term loan
facility is March 18, 2008. The Charter Operating credit facilities also provide
for an incremental term facility of up to $1.0 billion conditioned upon receipt
of additional new commitments from lenders. Up to 50% of the borrowings under it
may be repaid on terms substantially similar to that of the Tranche A term loan
and the remaining portion on terms substantially similar to that of the Tranche
B term loan. In March 2000, $600.0 million of the incremental term facility was
drawn down, thereby increasing the Tranche B term loan. The maturity date for
this term loan is September 18, 2008.
The Charter Operating credit facilities also contain provisions requiring
mandatory loan prepayments under some circumstances, such as when significant
amounts of assets are sold and the proceeds are not promptly reinvested in
assets useful in the business of Charter Operating. In the event that any
existing 8.250% Charter Holdings notes remain outstanding on the date which is
six months prior to the scheduled final maturity, the term loans under the
Charter Operating credit facility will mature and the revolving credit facility
will terminate on such date.
The Charter Operating credit facilities provide Charter Operating with two
interest rate options, to which a margin is added: a base rate option, generally
the "prime rate" of interest; and an interest rate option based on the interbank
eurodollar rate. Interest rate margins for the Charter Operating credit
facilities depend upon performance measured by a leverage ratio, which is the
ratio of indebtedness to annualized operating cash flow. This leverage ratio is
based on the debt of Charter Operating and its subsidiaries, exclusive of
outstanding notes and other debt for money borrowed,
138
141
including guarantees by Charter Operating and by Charter Holdings. The interest
rate margins for the Charter Operating credit facilities are as follows:
- with respect to the revolving loan and the Tranche A term loan, the
margin ranges from 1.5% to 2.25% for eurodollar loans and from 0.5% to
1.25% for base rate loans; and
- with respect to the Tranche B term loan, the margin ranges from 2.25% to
2.75% for eurodollar loans and from 1.25% to 1.75% for base rate loans.
The Charter Operating credit facilities contain representations and
warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, information requirements, events
of default and financial covenants. The events of default include a
cross-default provision that is triggered by the failure of Charter Operating,
Charter Holdings or Charter Operating's subsidiaries to make payment on debt
with an outstanding total principal amount exceeding $50.0 million, the
acceleration of debt of this amount prior to its maturity or the failure to
comply with specified covenants. The financial covenants, which are generally
tested on a quarterly basis, measure performance against standards set for
leverage, debt service coverage, and operating cash flow coverage of cash
interest expense.
The Charter Operating credit facilities also contain a change of control
provision, making it an event of default, and permitting acceleration of the
debt, in the event that either:
- Mr. Allen, including his estate, heirs and other related entities, fails
to maintain a 25% direct or indirect voting and economic interest in
Charter Operating; or
- a change of control occurs under the indentures governing the March 1999
Charter Holdings notes or the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes.
The various negative covenants place limitations on the ability of Charter
Holdings, Charter Operating and their subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur debt;
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- incur liens;
- make acquisitions;
- make investments or asset sales; or
- enter into transactions with affiliates.
Distributions under the Charter Operating credit facilities to Charter
Holdings to pay interest on the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are generally
permitted. Distributions under the Charter Operating credit facilities to
Charter Holdings to pay interest on the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are
generally permitted, provided Charter Operating's cash flow for the four
complete quarters preceding the distribution exceeds 1.75 times its cash
interest expense, including the amount of such distribution. In each case, such
distributions to Charter Holdings are not permitted during the existence of a
default under the Charter Operating credit facilities.
As of June 30, 2000, $4.2 billion was outstanding and $0.5 billion was
available for borrowing under the Charter Operating credit facilities.
CHARTER HOLDINGS SENIOR BRIDGE LOAN FACILITY. On August 4, 2000, Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation entered into a
senior bridge loan agreement providing for senior increasing rate bridge loans
in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.0 billion.
On August 14, 2000, Charter Holdings borrowed $1.0 billion under the senior
bridge loan facility and used the majority of the proceeds to repay a portion of
the amounts outstanding under the
139
142
Charter Operating revolving credit facility. The bridge loan initially bears
interest at an annual rate equal to the yield corresponding to the bid price on
Charter Holdings 10.25% notes less 0.25% (10.21% as of August 14, 2000). If this
loan is not repaid within 90 days following August 14, 2000, the interest rate
will increase by 1.25% at the end of such 90-day period and will increase by an
additional 0.50% at the end of each additional 90-day period. Unless additional
default interest is assessed, the interest rate on the bridge loan will not
exceed 15% annually. If the bridge loan has not been repaid in full by August
14, 2001, then it will be converted to a term loan. The term loan will bear
interest at a fixed rate equal to the greater of the applicable rate of the
bridge loan on the date on the conversion plus 0.50% and the yield corresponding
to the bid price on Charter Holdings 10.25% notes as of the date immediately
prior to the conversion. If the term loan is not repaid within 90 days after the
conversion from the bridge loans, the interest rate thereon will increase by
0.50% at the end of each 90-day period. The interest rate on the term loan will
not exceed 15% annually. The term loan will mature on the tenth anniversary of
the initial senior bridge loan borrowing.
Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation
must use the net cash proceeds of any of the following to pay back the loans in
full plus any accrued and unpaid interest:
- any direct or indirect public offering or private placement of any debt
or equity securities by Charter Communications, Inc., Charter
Communications Holding Company, Charter Holdings and Charter
Communications Holdings Capital Corporation or any subsidiary;
- any future bank borrowings other than under any of the existing credit
facilities of Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications
Holding Company, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings
Capital Corporation or any subsidiary; and
- any future asset sales by Charter Communications, Inc., Charter
Communications Holding Company, Charter Holdings and Charter
Communications Holdings Capital Corporation or any subsidiary.
FALCON CREDIT FACILITIES. In connection with the Falcon acquisition, the
required percentage of lenders under the senior secured credit facilities of
Falcon Cable Communications agreed to amend and restate the Falcon credit
agreement, which amendment and restatement was effective as of November 12,
1999, the date that Charter Communications Holding Company closed the Falcon
acquisition. The obligations under the Falcon credit facilities are guaranteed
by the direct parent of Falcon Cable Communications, Charter Communications VII,
LLC, and by the subsidiaries of Falcon Cable Communications. The obligations
under the Falcon credit facilities are secured by pledges of the ownership
interests and intercompany obligations of Falcon Cable Communications and its
subsidiaries, but are not secured by other assets of Falcon Cable Communications
or its subsidiaries.
The Falcon credit facilities have maximum borrowing availability of $1.25
billion consisting of the following:
- a revolving facility in the amount of approximately $646.0 million;
- a term loan B in the amount of approximately $197.0 million;
- a term loan C in the amount of approximately $295.5 million; and
- a supplemental revolving facility of $110.0 million.
140
143
In addition to the above, the Falcon credit facilities provide for, at the
option of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities for a total of $700.0
million, less the $110.0 million outstanding under the supplemental revolving
facility above. These supplemental credit facilities are available, subject to
the borrower's ability to obtain additional commitments from the lenders. The
terms of such additional borrowings are subject to certain restrictions that may
be no more materially restrictive than the provisions of the Falcon credit
facilities and will be determined at the time of borrowing.
The revolving facility and the supplemental revolving facility amortize
beginning in 2001 and 2003, respectively, and ending on December 29, 2006 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The term loan B and term loan C facilities
amortize beginning in 1999 and ending on June 29, 2007 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
The Falcon credit facilities also contain provisions requiring mandatory
loan prepayments under certain circumstances, such as when significant amounts
of assets are sold and the proceeds are not promptly reinvested in assets useful
in the business of Falcon Cable Communications.
The Falcon credit facilities provide Falcon Cable Communications with two
interest rate options, to which a margin is added: a base rate option, generally
the "prime rate" of interest; and an interest rate option based on the interbank
eurodollar rate. Interest rates for these credit facilities, as well as a fee
payable on unborrowed amounts available thereunder, depend upon performance
measured by a "leverage ratio" which is the ratio of indebtedness to annualized
operating cash flow. This leverage ratio is based on the debt of Falcon Cable
Communications and its subsidiaries, exclusive of the Falcon debentures
described below. The interest rate margins for the Falcon credit facilities are
as follows:
- with respect to the revolving loan facility, the margin ranges from 1.0%
to 2.0% for eurodollar loans and from 0.0% to 1.0% for base rate loans;
- with respect to Term Loan B, the margin ranges from 1.75% to 2.25% for
eurodollar loans and from 0.75% to 1.25% for base rate loans; and
- with respect to Term Loan C, the margin ranges from 2.0% to 2.5% for
eurodollar loans and from 1.0% to 1.5% for base rate loans.
The Falcon credit facilities contain representations and warranties,
affirmative and negative covenants, information requirements, events of default
and financial covenants. The events of default for the Falcon credit facilities
include a cross-default provision that is triggered by, among other things, the
failure to make payment relating to specified outstanding debt of Falcon Cable
Communications, its direct and indirect parent companies, CC VII Holdings, LLC
and Charter Communications VII, or specified subsidiary guarantors in a total
amount of principal and accrued interest exceeding $10.0 million, the
acceleration of debt of this amount prior to its maturity or the failure to
comply with specified covenants. The financial covenants, which are generally
tested on a quarterly basis, measure performance against standards set for
leverage, debt service coverage, and operating cash flow coverage of cash
interest expense.
The Falcon credit facilities also contain a change of control provision,
making it an event of default, and permitting acceleration of the debt, in the
event that either:
- Mr. Allen, including his estate, heirs and other related entities, fails
to maintain a 25% direct or indirect voting and economic interest in
Falcon Cable Communications; or
- a change of control occurs under the terms of other specified debt of
Falcon.
141
144
The various negative covenants place limitations on the ability of Falcon
Cable Communications and its subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur debt;
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- incur liens;
- make acquisitions;
- make investments or asset sales; or
- enter into transactions with affiliates.
Distributions under the Falcon credit facilities to pay interest on the
Falcon debentures are generally permitted, except during the existence of a
default under the Falcon credit facilities.
Distributions to Charter Holdings to pay interest on the January 2000
Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes will generally
be permitted, provided Falcon Cable Communications' cash flow for the most
recent fiscal quarter preceding the distribution exceeds 1.75 times its cash
interest expense, including the amount of such distribution. Distributions to
Charter Holdings will also be permitted if Falcon Cable Communications meets
specified financial ratios. In each case, such distributions to Charter Holdings
are not permitted during the existence of a default under the Falcon credit
facilities.
As of June 30, 2000, $1,059.5 million was outstanding and $189.1 million
was available for borrowing under the Falcon credit facilities.
FANCH CREDIT FACILITIES. On November 12, 1999, the Fanch acquisition was
closed and CC VI Operating Company, LLC, the parent company of the Fanch cable
systems, entered into senior secured credit facilities arranged by Chase
Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC. The obligations under the
Fanch credit facilities are guaranteed by CC VI Operating's parent, CC VI
Holdings, LLC, and by the subsidiaries of CC VI Operating. The obligations under
the Fanch credit facilities are secured by pledges of the ownership interests
and intercompany obligations of CC VI Operating and its subsidiaries, but are
not secured by other assets of CC VI Operating or its subsidiaries.
The Fanch credit facilities have maximum borrowings of $1.2 billion,
consisting of:
- a revolving facility in the amount of approximately $350.0 million;
- a term loan A in the amount of approximately $450.0 million; and
- a term loan B in the amount of approximately $400.0 million.
The revolving facility amortizes beginning in 2004 and ending in May 2008.
The term loan A and term loan B facilities amortize beginning in 2003 and ending
in May 2008 and November 2008, respectively.
In addition to the foregoing, the Fanch credit facilities provide for
supplemental credit facilities in the maximum amount of $300.0 million. These
supplemental credit facilities may be in the form of an additional term loan or
an aggregate increase in the amount of the term loan A or the revolving
facility. These supplemental credit facilities are available, subject to the
borrower's ability to obtain additional commitments from lenders. The
amortization of the additional term loans under the supplemental credit
facilities prior to May 2009 is limited to 1% per annum of the aggregate
principal amount of such additional term loans.
142
145
The Fanch credit facilities also contain provisions requiring mandatory
loan prepayments under specific circumstances, including when significant
amounts of assets are sold and the proceeds are not promptly reinvested in
assets useful in the business of CC VI Operating.
The Fanch credit facilities provide CC VI Operating with the following two
interest rate options, to which a margin is added: a base rate option, generally
the prime rate of interest; and an interest rate option rate based on the
interbank Eurodollar rate. Interest rates for the Fanch credit facilities, as
well as a fee payable on unborrowed amounts available thereunder, depend upon
performance measured by a leverage ratio, which is the ratio of indebtedness to
annualized operating cash flow. This leverage ratio is based on the debt of CC
VI Operating and its subsidiaries. The interest rate margins for the Fanch
credit facilities are as follows:
- with respect to the revolving loan facility and term loan A, the margin
ranges from 1.0% to 2.25% for eurodollar loans and from 0.0% to 1.25% for
base rate loans; and
- with respect to term loan B, the margin ranges from 2.50% to 3.00% for
eurodollar loans and from 1.50% to 2.00% for base rate loans.
The Fanch credit facilities contain representations and warranties,
affirmative and negative covenants, information requirements, events of default
and financial covenants. The events of default for the Fanch credit facilities
include a cross-default provision that is triggered by the failure to make
payment on debt of CC VI Operating, CC VI Holdings and the subsidiaries of CC VI
Operating in a total amount of $25.0 million, the acceleration of debt of this
amount prior to its maturity or the failure to comply with specified covenants.
The financial covenants, which are generally tested on a quarterly basis,
measure performance against standards set for leverage, debt service coverage,
and operating cash flow coverage of cash interest expense.
The Fanch credit facilities also contain a change of control provision,
making it an event of default, and permitting acceleration of the debt, in the
event of any of the following:
- Mr. Allen, including his estate, heirs and other related entities, fails
to maintain a 25% direct or indirect voting and economic interest in CC
VI Operating;
- CC VI Operating is no longer a direct or indirect subsidiary of Charter
Communications Holding Company; or
- A change of control occurs under specified indebtedness of CC VI
Holdings, CC VI Operating or CC VI Operating's subsidiaries.
Various negative covenants place limitations on the ability of CC VI
Operating and its subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur debt;
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- incur liens;
- make acquisitions;
- make investments or asset sales; or
- enter into transactions with affiliates.
Distributions under the Fanch credit facilities to Charter Holdings to pay
interest on the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes are generally permitted, provided CC VI Operating's cash flow for
the four complete quarters preceding the distribution exceeds 1.75 times its
cash interest expense, including the amount of such distribution. Distributions
to Charter Holdings will also be permitted if CC VI Operating meets specified
financial ratios. In
143
146
each case, such distributions to Charter Holdings are not permitted during the
existence of a default under the Fanch credit facilities.
As of June 30, 2000, approximately $850.0 million was outstanding and
$350.0 million was available for borrowing under the Fanch credit facilities.
AVALON CREDIT FACILITIES. On November 15, 1999, the Avalon acquisition was
closed and CC Michigan, LLC and CC New England, LLC (formerly Avalon Cable of
Michigan, Inc. and Avalon Cable of New England LLC, respectively) entered into
senior secured credit facilities arranged by Bank of Montreal. The obligations
under the Avalon credit facilities are guaranteed by the parent of the Avalon
borrowers, CC V Holdings, LLC (formerly Avalon Cable LLC) and by the
subsidiaries of the Avalon borrowers. The obligations under the Avalon credit
facilities are secured by pledges of the ownership interests and intercompany
obligations of the Avalon borrowers and their subsidiaries, but are not secured
by other assets of the Avalon borrowers or their subsidiaries. The Avalon credit
facilities are also secured by a pledge of CC V Holdings' equity interest in the
Avalon borrowers and intercompany obligations with respect to the Avalon
borrowers.
The Avalon credit facilities have maximum borrowings of $300.0 million,
consisting of:
- a revolving facility in the amount of approximately $175.0 million;
and
- a term loan B in the amount of approximately $125.0 million.
We borrowed $165.0 million under the Avalon credit facilities to fund a
portion of the Avalon purchase price.
Amounts available under the revolving facility reduce annually in specified
percentages beginning in the fourth year following the closing date of the
facility. The term loan B facility amortizes beginning in the fourth year
following the closing date.
In addition to the foregoing, the Avalon credit facilities provide for
supplemental credit facilities in the maximum amount of $75.0 million. These
supplemental credit facilities may be in the form of an additional term loan or
an aggregate increase in the amount of the revolving facility. These
supplemental credit facilities will be available, subject to the borrowers'
ability to obtain additional commitments from lenders. These supplemental credit
facilities are available to the Avalon borrowers until December 31, 2003, and,
if borrowed, the weighted average life and final maturity will not be less than
that of the revolving facility.
The Avalon credit facilities also contain provisions requiring mandatory
loan prepayments under specific circumstances, including when significant
amounts of assets are sold and the proceeds are not promptly reinvested in
assets useful in the business of the Avalon borrowers.
The Avalon credit facilities provide the following two interest rate
options, to which a margin is added: a base rate option, generally the "prime
rate" of interest; and an interest rate option based on the interbank eurodollar
rate. Interest rates for the Avalon credit facilities, as well as a fee payable
on unborrowed amounts available thereunder, will depend upon performance
measured by a leverage ratio, which is the ratio of indebtedness to annualized
operating cash flow. This leverage ratio is based on the debt of the Avalon
borrowers and their subsidiaries. The interest rate margins for the Avalon
credit facilities are as follows:
- with respect to the revolving loan facility, the margin ranges from 1.0%
to 1.875% for eurodollar loans and from 0.0% to 0.875% for base rate
loans; and
- with respect to term loan B, the margin ranges from 2.50% to 2.75% for
eurodollar loans and from 1.50% to 1.750% for base rate loans.
144
147
The Avalon credit facilities contain representations and warranties,
affirmative and negative covenants, information requirements, events of default
and financial covenants. The events of default for the Avalon credit facilities
include a cross-default provision that is triggered by the failure to make
payment on debt of the Avalon borrowers, CC V Holdings and specified
subsidiaries of the Avalon borrowers in a total amount of $20.0 million, the
acceleration of debt of this amount prior to its maturity or the failure to
comply with specified covenants. The financial covenants, which are generally
tested on a quarterly basis, measure performance against standards set for
leverage, debt service coverage, and operating cash flow coverage of cash
interest expense.
The Avalon credit facilities also contain a change of control provision,
making it an event of default, and permitting acceleration of the debt, in the
event that Mr. Allen, including his estate, heirs and other related entities,
fails to maintain a 25% direct or indirect voting and economic interest in the
Avalon borrowers.
Various negative covenants place limitations on the ability of the Avalon
borrowers and their subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur debt;
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- incur liens;
- make acquisitions;
- make investments or asset sales; or
- enter into transactions with affiliates.
Distributions under the Avalon credit facilities to pay interest on certain
indebtedness of CC V Holdings are generally permitted, except during the
existence of a default under the Avalon credit facilities.
Distributions under the Avalon credit facilities to Charter Holdings to pay
interest on the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes are generally permitted, provided the Avalon borrowers'
consolidated cash flow for the four complete quarters preceding the distribution
exceeds 2.1 times their combined cash interest expense, including the amount of
such distribution. Distributions to Charter Holdings will also be permitted if
the Avalon borrowers meet specified financial ratios. In each case, such
distributions to Charter Holdings are not permitted during the existence of a
default under the Avalon credit facilities.
As of June 30, 2000, there was approximately $170.0 million outstanding and
$130.0 million was available for borrowing under the Avalon credit facilities.
BRESNAN CREDIT FACILITIES. In connection with the Bresnan acquisition, our
subsidiary, CC VIII Operating, LLC (formerly Bresnan Telecommunications Company)
amended and restated its previous senior secured credit facilities and increased
the available borrowings under the facilities. At the closing of the Bresnan
acquisition, we borrowed approximately $599.9 million to replace the borrowings
outstanding under the previous credit facilities and an additional $31.3 million
to fund a portion of the Bresnan purchase price.
The obligations under the Bresnan credit facilities are guaranteed by the
parent company of the Bresnan borrower, CC VIII Holdings, LLC (formerly Bresnan
Communications Group LLC), and by the subsidiaries of the Bresnan borrower. The
obligations under the Bresnan credit facilities are secured by pledges of the
ownership interests and intercompany obligations of the Bresnan borrower and its
subsidiaries, but are not secured by other assets of the Bresnan borrower or its
subsidiaries. The Bresnan credit facilities are also secured by a pledge of CC
VIII Holdings' equity interest in the Bresnan borrower and intercompany
obligations with respect to the Bresnan borrower.
145
148
The Bresnan credit facilities provide for borrowings of up to $900.0
million, consisting of:
- a reducing revolving loan facility in the amount of $200.0 million;
- a term loan A facility in the amount of $403.0 million; and
- a term loan B facility in the amount of $297.0 million.
The Bresnan credit facilities provide for the amortization of the principal
amount of the term loan A facility and the reduction of the revolving loan
facility beginning March 31, 2002, with a final maturity date of June 30, 2007.
The amortization of the term loan B facility is substantially "back-ended", with
more than ninety percent of the principal balance due on the final maturity date
of February 2, 2008. The Bresnan credit facilities also provide for an
incremental facility of up to $200.0 million, which is conditioned upon receipt
of additional commitments from lenders. If the incremental facility becomes
available, it may be in the form of revolving loans or term loans, but may not
amortize more quickly than the reducing revolving loan facility or the term loan
A facility, and may not have a final maturity date earlier than six calendar
months after the maturity date of the term loan B facility.
The Bresnan credit facilities provide the following two interest rate
options, to which a margin is added: a base rate, generally the "prime rate" of
interest; and an interest rate option based on the interbank eurodollar rate.
Interest rate margins for the Bresnan credit facilities depend upon performance
measured by a leverage ratio, which is the ratio of total debt to annualized
operating cash flow. The leverage ratio is based on the debt of the Bresnan
borrower and its subsidiaries. The interest rate margins for the Bresnan credit
facilities are as follows:
- with respect to the term loan A facility and the revolving loan facility,
the margin ranges from 0.75% to 2.25% for eurodollar loans and from 0.0%
to 1.25% for base rate loans; and
- with respect to the term loan B facility, the margin ranges from 2.5% to
2.75% for eurodollar loans and from 1.5% to 1.75% for base rate loans.
The Bresnan credit facilities contain various representations and
warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, information requirements, events
of default and financial covenants. The events of default for the Bresnan credit
facilities include a cross-default provision that is triggered by, among other
things, the failure to make payment on the debt of the Bresnan borrower, its
subsidiaries and CC VIII Holdings in a total amount in excess of $25.0 million,
the acceleration of debt of this amount prior to its maturity or failure to
comply with specified covenants. The financial covenants, which are generally
tested on a quarterly basis, measure performance against standards set for
leverage, debt service coverage, and operating cash flow coverage of cash
interest expense.
Certain negative covenants place limitations on the ability of the Bresnan
borrower and its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
- incur debt;
- pay dividends or make other distributions;
- incur liens;
- make acquisitions;
- make investments or asset sales; or
- enter into transactions with affiliates.
146
149
The Bresnan credit facilities contain a change in control provision making
it an event of default permitting acceleration of the debt in the event of any
of the following:
- Mr. Allen, including his estate, heirs and related entities, fails to
maintain, directly or indirectly, at least 51% voting interest in the
Bresnan borrower, or ceases to own of record or beneficially, directly or
indirectly, at least 25% of the equity interests of the Bresnan borrower;
- a change of control or similar defined term shall occur in any agreement
governing debt of CC VIII Holding or the Bresnan borrower, and such debt
is at least in the amount of $25.0 million;
- Charter Communications Holding Company shall cease to own, directly or
indirectly, at least 51% of the equity interests in the Bresnan borrower;
or
- the Bresnan borrower shall cease to be a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of CC VIII Holdings.
Distributions under the Bresnan credit facilities to pay interest on
certain indebtedness of CC VIII Holdings are generally permitted, except during
the existence of a default.
Distributions under the Bresnan credit facilities to Charter Holdings to
pay interest on the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 notes
are generally permitted provided the Bresnan borrower's consolidated cash flow
for the four complete quarters preceding the distribution exceeds 1.75 times the
consolidated interest expense of the Bresnan borrower, including the amount of
such distribution. In each case, such distributions to Charter Holdings are not
permitted during the existence of a default under the Bresnan credit facilities.
As of June 30, 2000, there was $638.9 million outstanding and $261.1
million was available for borrowing under the Bresnan credit facilities.
EXISTING PUBLIC DEBT
MARCH 1999 CHARTER HOLDINGS NOTES. The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes
were issued under three separate indentures, each dated as of March 17, 1999,
among Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation,
as the issuers, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee. Charter Holdings
and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation exchanged these notes
for new March 1999 Charter Holdings notes with substantially similar terms,
except that the new March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are registered under the
Securities Act and, therefore, do not bear legends restricting their transfer.
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations of
Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation. The
March 1999 8.250% Charter Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2007 and as of June
30, 2000, there was $600.0 million in total principal amount outstanding. The
March 1999 8.625% Charter Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2009 and as of June
30, 2000, there was $1.5 billion in total principal amount outstanding. The
March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2011 and as of June
30, 2000, the total accreted value was $1.0 billion. Cash interest on the March
1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes will not accrue prior to April 1, 2004.
The March 1999 Charter Holdings notes are senior debts of Charter Holdings
and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation. They rank equally with
the current and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Charter Holdings,
including the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes.
Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation
will not have the right to redeem the March 1999 8.250% Charter Holdings notes
prior to their maturity date on April 1, 2007. Before April 1, 2002, Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital
147
150
Corporation may redeem up to 35% of each of the March 1999 8.625% Charter
Holdings notes and the March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes, in each case,
at a premium with the proceeds of certain offerings of equity securities. In
addition, on or after April 1, 2004, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications
Holdings Capital Corporation may redeem some or all of the March 1999 8.625%
Charter Holdings notes and the March 1999 9.920% Charter Holdings notes at any
time, in each case, at a premium. The optional redemption price declines to 100%
of the principal amount of March 1999 Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for redemption on or after April 1, 2007.
In the event of a specified change of control event, Charter Holdings and
Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation must offer to repurchase any
then outstanding March 1999 Charter Holdings notes at 101% of their principal
amount or accreted value, as applicable, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any.
The indentures governing the March 1999 Charter Holdings notes contain
certain covenants that restrict the ability of Charter Holdings and Charter
Communications Holdings Capital Corporation and their restricted subsidiaries
to:
- incur additional debt;
- create specified liens;
- pay dividends on stock or repurchase stock;
- make investments;
- sell all or substantially all of our assets or merge with or into other
companies;
- sell assets;
- in the case of restricted subsidiaries, create or permit to exist
dividend or payment restrictions with respect to us; and
- engage in certain transactions with affiliates.
RENAISSANCE NOTES. The 10% senior discount notes due 2008 were issued by
Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media (Tennessee) LLC and
Renaissance Media Capital Corporation, with Renaissance Media Group LLC as
guarantor and the United States Trust Company of New York as trustee.
Renaissance Media Group LLC, which is the direct or indirect parent company of
these issuers, is now a subsidiary of Charter Operating. The Renaissance notes
and the Renaissance guarantee are unsecured, unsubordinated debt of the issuers
and the guarantor, respectively. In October 1998, the issuers of the Renaissance
notes exchanged $163.2 million of the original issued and outstanding
Renaissance notes for an equivalent value of new Renaissance notes. The form and
terms of the new Renaissance notes are the same in all material respects as the
form and terms of the original Renaissance notes except that the issuance of the
new Renaissance notes was registered under the Securities Act.
There will not be any payment of interest in respect of the Renaissance
notes prior to October 15, 2003. Interest on the Renaissance notes shall be paid
semi-annually in cash at a rate of 10% per annum beginning on October 15, 2003.
The Renaissance notes are redeemable at the option of the issuers thereof, in
whole or in part, at any time on or after April 15, 2003, initially at 105% of
their principal amount at maturity, plus accrued interest, declining to 100% of
the principal amount at maturity, plus accrued interest, on or after April 15,
2006. In addition, at any time prior to April 15, 2001, the issuers of the
Renaissance notes may redeem up to 35% of the original total principal amount at
maturity of the Renaissance notes with the proceeds of one or more sales of
equity interests at 110% of their accreted value on the redemption date,
provided that after any such
148
151
redemption at least $106.0 million total principal amount at maturity of
Renaissance notes remains outstanding.
Our acquisition of Renaissance triggered change of control provisions of
the Renaissance notes that required us to offer to purchase the Renaissance
notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their accreted value on the date of
the purchase, plus accrued interest, if any. In May 1999, we made an offer to
repurchase the Renaissance notes, and holders of Renaissance notes representing
30% of the total principal amount outstanding at maturity tendered their
Renaissance notes for repurchase.
The indentures governing the Renaissance notes contains certain covenants
that restrict the ability of the issuers of the Renaissance notes and their
restricted subsidiaries to:
- incur additional debt;
- create liens;
- engage in sale-leaseback transactions;
- pay dividends or make other distributions in respect of their equity
interests;
- redeem capital stock;
- make investments or certain other restricted payments;
- sell assets;
- issue or sell capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
- enter into transactions with shareholders or affiliates; and
- effect a consolidation or merger.
The Renaissance notes contain events of default that include a
cross-default provision triggered by the failure of Renaissance Media Group LLC
or any of its specified subsidiaries to make payment on debt at maturity with a
total principal amount of $10.0 million or more or the acceleration of debt of
this amount prior to maturity.
As of June 30, 2000, there was outstanding $114.4 million total principal
amount at maturity of Renaissance notes, with an accreted value of $87.2
million.
THE AVALON 11.875% NOTES. On December 10, 1998, CC V Holdings, LLC,
formerly known as Avalon Cable LLC, and CC V Holdings Finance, Inc. (formerly
Avalon Cable Holdings Finance, Inc.) jointly issued $196.0 million total
principal amount at maturity of 11.875% senior discount notes due 2008. On July
22, 1999, the issuers exchanged $196.0 million of the original issued and
outstanding Avalon notes for an equivalent amount of new Avalon notes. The form
and terms of the new Avalon notes are substantially identical to the original
Avalon notes except that they are registered under the Securities Act and,
therefore, are not subject to the same transfer restrictions.
The Avalon notes are guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of CC V Holdings.
There will be no current payments of cash interest on the Avalon notes
before December 1, 2003. The Avalon notes accrete in value at a rate of 11.875%
per annum, compounded semi-annually, to an aggregate principal amount of $196.0
million on December 1, 2003. After December 1, 2003, cash interest on the Avalon
notes:
- will accrue at the rate of 11.875% per year on the principal amount at
maturity; and
- will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each
year, commencing June 1, 2004.
On December 1, 2003, the issuers of the Avalon notes will be required to
redeem an amount equal to $369.79 per $1,000 in principal amount at maturity of
each Avalon note, on a pro rata basis, at a redemption price of 100% of the
principal amount then outstanding at maturity of the Avalon notes so redeemed.
149
152
On or after December 1, 2003, the issuers of the Avalon notes may redeem
the Avalon notes, in whole or in part, at a specified premium. The optional
redemption price declines to 100% of the principal amount of the Avalon notes
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, for redemptions on or after
December 1, 2006. Before December 1, 2001, the issuers may redeem up to 35% of
the total principal amount at maturity of the Avalon notes with the proceeds of
one or more equity offerings and/or equity investments.
In the event of specified change of control events, holders of the Avalon
notes have the right to sell their Avalon notes to the issuers of the Avalon
notes at 101% of:
- the accreted value of the Avalon notes in the case of repurchases of
Avalon notes prior to December 1, 2003; or
- the total principal amount of the Avalon notes in the case of repurchases
of Avalon notes on or after December 1, 2003, plus accrued and unpaid
interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the date of purchase.
Our acquisition of Avalon triggered this right. On December 3, 1999, we
commenced a change of control repurchase offer with respect to the Avalon notes.
In January 2000, we completed change of control offers in which we repurchased
$16.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 11.875% notes at a purchase
price of 101% of accreted value as of January 28, 2000. The aggregate repurchase
price of $10.5 million was funded with proceeds of the sale of the January 2000
Charter Holdings notes.
Among other restrictions, the indenture governing the Avalon notes limits
the ability of the issuers and their specified subsidiaries to:
- incur additional debt;
- pay dividends or make specified other restricted payments;
- enter into transactions with affiliates;
- make certain investments;
- sell assets or subsidiary stock;
- engage in sale-leaseback transactions;
- create liens;
- create or permit to exist restrictions dividends or other payments from
restricted subsidiaries;
- redeem equity interests;
- merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all of their combined
assets; and
- with respect to restricted subsidiaries, issue capital stock.
The Avalon notes contain events of default that include a cross-default
provision triggered by the failure of CC V Operating, CC V Holdings Finance,
Inc. or any specified subsidiary to make payment on debt with a total principal
amount of $5.0 million or more or the acceleration of debt of this amount prior
to maturity.
As of June 30, 2000, the total principal amount at maturity of the
outstanding Avalon notes was $179.8 million, with an accreted value of $121.2
million.
JANUARY 2000 CHARTER HOLDINGS NOTES. The January 2000 Charter Holding
notes were issued under three separate indentures, each dated as of January 12,
2000 among Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital
Corporation, as the issuers, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee. In
June 2000, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital
Corporation exchanged these notes for new January 2000 Charter Holdings notes,
with substantially similar terms, except that the new January 2000 Charter
Holdings notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and,
therefore, do not bear legends restricting their transfer.
150
153
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are general unsecured obligations
of Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation. The
January 2000 10% Charter Holdings notes mature on April 1, 2009 and as of June
30, 2000, there was $675.0 million in total principal amount of these notes
outstanding. The January 2000 10.25% Charter Holdings notes mature on January
15, 2010 and as of June 30, 2000, there was $325.0 million in total principal
amount of these notes outstanding. The January 2000 11.75% Charter Holdings
notes mature on January 15, 2010 and as of June 30, 2000, the total accreted
value of these notes was approximately $316.8 million. Cash interest on the
January 2000 11.75% Charter Holdings notes will not accrue prior to January 15,
2005.
The January 2000 Charter Holdings notes are senior debts of Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation. They rank
equally with the current and future unsecured and unsubordinated debt of Charter
Holdings.
Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation
will not have the right to redeem the January 2000 10.00% Charter Holdings notes
prior to their maturity date on April 1, 2009. Before January 15, 2003, Charter
Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation may redeem up
to 35% of the January 2000 10.25% Charter Holdings notes and the January 2000
11.75% Charter Holdings notes, in each case, at a premium with the proceeds of
certain offerings of equity securities. In addition, on or after January 15,
2005, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation
may redeem some or all of the January 2000 10.25% Charter Holdings notes and the
January 2000 11.75% Charter Holdings notes at any time, in each case, at a
premium. The optional redemption price declines to 100% of the principal amount
of the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, for redemption on or after January 15, 2008.
In the event of a specified change of control event, Charter Holdings and
Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation must offer to repurchase any
then outstanding January 2000 Charter Holdings notes at 101% of their aggregate
principal amount or accreted value, as applicable, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any.
The indentures governing the January 2000 Charter Holdings notes contain
substantially identical events of default, affirmative covenants and negative
covenants as those contained in the indentures governing the March 1999 Charter
Holdings notes.
INTERCOMPANY LOANS
For a description of certain intercompany loans made by Charter
Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company to certain of
their subsidiaries, see "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions -- Transactions with Management and Others -- Intercompany Loans."
151
154
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK AND MEMBERSHIP UNITS
GENERAL
Our capital stock and the provisions of our restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are as described below. These summaries are qualified
by reference to the restated certificate of incorporation and the bylaws, copies
of which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
incorporated by reference hereto.
Our authorized capital stock consists of 1.750 billion shares of Class A
common stock, par value $.001 per share, 750 million shares of Class B common
stock, par value $.001 per share, and 250 million shares of preferred stock, par
value $.001 per share.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and Charter Communications
Holding Company's amended and restated limited liability company agreement
contain provisions that are designed to cause the number of shares of our common
stock that are outstanding to equal the number of common membership units of
Charter Communications Holding Company owned by Charter Communications, Inc. and
to cause the value of a share of common stock to be equal to the value of a
common membership unit. These provisions are meant to allow a holder of our
common stock to easily understand the economic interest that such holder's
common shares represent of Charter Communications Holding Company's business.
In particular, provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation
provide that:
(1) at all times the number of shares of our common stock outstanding will
be equal to the number of Charter Communications Holding Company common
membership units owned by Charter Communications, Inc.;
(2) Charter Communications, Inc. will not hold any assets other than, among
other allowable assets:
- working capital and cash held for the payment of current obligations
and receivables from Charter Communications Holding Company;
- common membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company;
and
- obligations and equity interests of Charter Communications Holding
Company that correspond to obligations and equity interests issued
by Charter Communications, Inc.;
(3) Charter Communications, Inc. will not borrow any money or enter into
any capital lease unless Charter Communications Holding Company enters
into the same arrangements with Charter Communications, Inc. so that
Charter Communications, Inc.'s liability flows through to Charter
Communications Holding Company.
Provisions in Charter Communications Holding Company's amended and restated
limited liability company agreement provide that upon the contribution by
Charter Communications, Inc. of assets acquired through the issuance of common
stock by Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company
will issue to Charter Communications, Inc. an equal number of common membership
units as Charter Communications, Inc. issued shares of common stock. In the
event of the contribution by Charter Communications, Inc. of assets acquired
through the issuance of indebtedness or preferred interests of Charter
Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company will issue to
Charter Communications, Inc. a corresponding obligation to allow Charter
Communications, Inc. to pass through to Charter Communications Holding Company
these liabilities or preferred interests.
152
155
COMMON STOCK
There are 233,735,768 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding
and 50,000 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. If, as
described below, all shares of Class B common stock convert to shares of Class A
common stock as a result of dispositions by Mr. Allen and his affiliates, the
holders of Class A common stock will be entitled to elect all members of the
board of directors, other than any members elected separately by the holders of
any preferred shares.
VOTING RIGHTS. The holders of Class A common stock and Class B common
stock generally have identical rights, except:
- each Class A common shareholder is entitled to one vote per share; and
- each Class B common shareholder is entitled to a number of votes based on
the number of outstanding Class B common stock and Charter Communications
Holding Company membership units exchangeable for Class B common stock.
For example, Mr. Allen is entitled to ten votes for each share of Class B
common stock held by him or his affiliates and ten votes for each
membership unit held by him or his affiliates; and
- the Class B common shareholders have the sole power to vote to amend or
repeal the provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation
relating to:
(1) the activities in which Charter Communications, Inc. may engage;
(2) the required ratio of outstanding shares of common stock to
outstanding membership units owned by Charter Communications, Inc.;
and
(3) the restrictions on the assets and liabilities that Charter
Communications, Inc. may hold.
The effect of the provisions described in the final bullet point is that
holders of Class A common stock have no right to vote on these matters. These
provisions allow Mr. Allen, for example, to amend the restated certificate of
incorporation to permit Charter Communications, Inc. to engage in currently
prohibited business activities without having to seek the approval of holders of
Class A common stock.
The voting rights relating to the election of Charter Communications,
Inc.'s board of directors are as follows:
- The Class B common shareholders, voting separately as a class, are
entitled to elect all but one member of our board of directors.
- Class A and Class B common shareholders, voting together as one class,
are entitled to elect the remaining member of our board of directors who
is not elected by the Class B common shareholders.
- Class A common shareholders and Class B common shareholders are not
entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.
- In addition, Charter Communications, Inc. may issue one or more series of
preferred stock that entitle the holders of such preferred stock to elect
directors.
Other than the election of directors and any matters where Delaware law or
Charter Communications, Inc.'s restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws
requires otherwise, all matters to be voted on by shareholders must be approved
by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Class A common stock
and Class B common stock present in person or represented by proxy, voting
together as a single class, subject to any voting rights granted to holders of
any preferred stock.
Amendments to Charter Communications, Inc.'s restated certificate of
incorporation that would adversely alter or change the powers, preferences or
special rights of the Class A common stock or
153
156
the Class B common stock must be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to
be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of the affected class, voting
as a separate class. In addition, the following actions by Charter
Communications, Inc. must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding Class B common stock,
voting as a separate class:
- the issuance of any Class B common stock other than to Mr. Allen and his
affiliates and other than pursuant to specified stock splits and
dividends;
- the issuance of any stock other than Class A common stock (and other than
Class B common stock as described above); and
- the amendment, modification or repeal of any provision of its restated
certificate of incorporation relating to capital stock or the removal of
directors.
Charter Communications, Inc. will lose its rights to manage the business of
Charter Communications Holding Company and Charter Investment will become the
sole manager of Charter Communications Holding Company if at any time a court
holds that the holders of the Class B common stock no longer:
- have the number of votes per share of Class B common stock described
above;
- have the right to elect, voting separately as a class, all but one member
of Charter Communications Inc.'s board of directors, except for any
directors elected separately by the holders of preferred stock; or
- have the right to vote as a separate class on matters that adversely
affect the Class B common stock with respect to:
(1) the issuance of equity securities of Charter Communications, Inc.
other than the Class A common stock; or
(2) the voting power of the Class B common stock.
These provisions are contained in the amended and restated limited
liability company agreement of Charter Communications Holding Company. The Class
B common stock could lose these rights if a holder of Class A common stock
successfully challenges in a court proceeding the voting rights of the Class B
common stock. In any of these circumstances, Charter Communications, Inc. would
also lose its 100% voting control of Charter Communications Holding Company as
provided in Charter Communications Holding Company's amended and restated
limited liability company agreement. These provisions exist to assure Mr. Allen
that he will be able to control Charter Communications Holding Company in the
event he was no longer able to control Charter Communications, Inc. through his
ownership of Class B common stock. These events could have a material adverse
impact on our business and the market price of the Class A common stock. See
"Risk Factors -- Our Structure."
DIVIDENDS. Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will
share ratably (based on the number of shares of common stock held) in any
dividend declared by our board of directors, subject to any preferential rights
of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A
common stock and Class B common stock may be paid only as follows:
- shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of Class A
common stock;
- shares of Class B common stock may be paid only to holders of Class B
common stock; and
- the number of shares of each class of common stock payable per share of
such class of common stock shall be equal in number.
154
157
Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may not pay a
stock dividend unless the number of outstanding Charter Communications Holding
Company common membership units are adjusted accordingly. This provision is
designed to maintain the equal value between shares of common stock and
membership units and the one-to-one exchange ratio.
CONVERSION OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK. Each share of outstanding Class B
common stock will automatically convert into one share of Class A common stock
if, at any time, Mr. Allen or any of his affiliates sells any shares of common
stock of Charter Communications, Inc. or membership units of Charter
Communications Holding Company and as a result of such sale, Mr. Allen and his
affiliates no longer own directly and indirectly common stock and other equity
interests in Charter Communications, Inc. and membership units in Charter
Communications Holding Company that in total represent at least:
- 20% of the sum of the values, calculated as of November 12, 1999, of the
shares of Class B common stock directly or indirectly owned by Mr. Allen
and his affiliates and the shares of Class B common stock for which
outstanding Charter Communications Holding Company membership units
directly or indirectly owned by Mr. Allen and his affiliates were
exchangeable on that date, and
- 5% of the sum of the values, calculated as of the measuring date, of
shares of outstanding common stock and other equity interests in Charter
Communications, Inc. and the shares of Charter Communications, Inc.
common stock for which outstanding Charter Communications Holding Company
membership units are exchangeable on such date.
These provisions exist to assure that Mr. Allen will no longer be able to
control Charter Communications, Inc. if after sales of his equity interests he
owns an insignificant economic interest in our business. The conversion of all
Class B common stock in accordance with these provisions would not trigger
Charter Communications Holding Company's limited liability company agreement
provisions described above whereby Charter Communications, Inc. would lose its
management rights and special voting rights relating to Charter Communications
Holding Company in the event of an adverse determination of a court affecting
the rights of the Class B common stock.
Each holder of a share of Class B common stock has the right to convert
such share into one share of Class A common stock at any time on a one-for-one
basis. If a Class B common shareholder transfers any shares of Class B common
stock to a person other than an authorized Class B common shareholder, these
shares of Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of Class A
common stock. Authorized Class B common shareholders are Paul G. Allen, entities
controlled by Mr. Allen, Mr. Allen's estate, any organization qualified under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that is Mr. Allen's beneficiary
upon his death and certain trusts established by or for the benefit of Mr.
Allen. In this context, "controlled" means the ownership of more than 50% of the
voting power and economic interest of an entity and "transfer" means the
transfer of record or beneficial ownership of any such share of Class B common
stock.
OTHER RIGHTS. Shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will
be treated equally in the event of any merger or consolidation of Charter
Communications, Inc. so that:
- each class of common shareholders will receive per share the same kind
and amount of capital stock, securities, cash and/or other property
received by any other class of common shareholders, provided that any
shares of capital stock so received may differ in a manner similar to the
manner in which the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common
stock differ; or
155
158
- each class of common shareholders, to the extent they receive a different
kind (other than as described above) or different amount of capital
stock, securities, cash and/or other property than that received by any
other class of common shareholders, will receive for each share of common
stock they hold, stock, securities, cash and/or other property having a
value substantially equivalent to that received by such other class of
common shareholders.
Upon Charter Communications, Inc.'s liquidation, dissolution or winding up,
after payment in full of the amounts required to be paid to preferred
shareholders, if any, all common shareholders, regardless of class, are entitled
to share ratably in any assets and funds available for distribution to common
shareholders.
No shares of any class of common stock are subject to redemption or have
preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of common stock.
PREFERRED STOCK
Charter Communications, Inc.'s board of directors is authorized, subject to
the approval of the holders of the Class B common stock, to issue from time to
time up to an aggregate of 250 million shares of preferred stock in one or more
series and to fix the numbers, powers, designations, preferences, and any
special rights of the shares of each such series thereof, including:
- dividend rights and rates;
- conversion rights;
- voting rights;
- terms of redemption (including any sinking fund provisions) and
redemption price or prices;
- liquidation preferences; and
- the number of shares constituting and the designation of such series.
There are no shares of preferred stock outstanding. Charter Communications,
Inc. has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.
OPTIONS
As of August 31, 2000, options to purchase a total of 20,799,158 membership
units in Charter Communications Holding Company are outstanding pursuant to the
Charter Communications Option Plan. Of these options, 2,987,449 have vested. In
addition, an option to purchase 7,044,127 membership units in Charter
Communications Holding Company is outstanding pursuant to an employment
agreement and a related agreement with Mr. Kent, Charter Communications, Inc.'s
chief executive officer. Of Mr. Kent's options, 2,935,053 have vested as of
August 31, 2000. The membership units received upon exercise of any of the
options described in this paragraph are automatically exchanged for shares of
our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis. In addition, a portion of the
unvested options will vest each month. See "Management -- Option Plan" and
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Employment and Consulting
Agreements."
ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS OF PROVISIONS OF CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
Provisions of Charter Communications, Inc.'s restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may
delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or
156
159
takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best interest,
including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price
for the shares held by shareholders.
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. Our bylaws provide that, subject to the
rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, special meetings of our
shareholders may be called only by the chairman of our board of directors, our
chief executive officer or a majority of our board of directors.
ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR
NOMINATIONS. Our bylaws provide that shareholders seeking to bring business
before an annual meeting of shareholders, or to nominate candidates for election
as directors at an annual meeting of shareholders, must provide timely prior
written notice of their proposals. To be timely, a shareholder's notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than 45 days nor more than
70 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our
proxy statement for the prior year's annual meeting. If, however, the date of
the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date of
the prior year's annual meeting, notice by the shareholder must be received not
less than 90 days prior to the annual meeting or by the 10th day following the
public announcement of the date of the meeting, whichever occurs later, and not
more than 120 days prior to the annual meeting. Our bylaws specify requirements
as to the form and content of a shareholder's notice. These provisions may limit
shareholders in bringing matters before an annual meeting of shareholders or in
making nominations for directors at an annual meeting of shareholders.
AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED SHARES. The authorized but unissued shares of
Class A common stock are available for future issuance without shareholder
approval and, subject to approval by the holders of the Class B common stock,
the authorized but unissued shares of Class B common stock and preferred stock
are available for future issuance. These additional shares may be utilized for a
variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise
additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The
existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock
could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by
means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
MEMBERSHIP UNITS
The Charter Communications Holding Company limited liability company
agreement provides for three separate classes of common membership units
designated Class A, Class B and Class C and one class of preferred membership
units designated Class A. There are 572,832,242 Charter Communications Holding
Company common membership units issued and outstanding and 3,006,202 preferred
membership units issued and outstanding as described below.
CLASS A COMMON MEMBERSHIP UNITS. There are a total of 324,300,479 issued
and outstanding Class A common membership units consisting of 217,585,246 units
owned by Charter Investment and 106,715,233 units owned by Vulcan Cable III,
Inc.
CLASS B COMMON MEMBERSHIP UNITS. There are a total of 233,735,768 issued
and outstanding Class B common membership units all of which are owned by
Charter Communications, Inc. In addition, as of August 31, 2000, there were
27,843,285 Class B common membership units underlying options issued under the
Charter Communications Option Plan and under agreements with Mr. Kent. 5,922,502
of these units are subject to options that vested as of that date.
CLASS C COMMON MEMBERSHIP UNITS. There are a total of 14,795,995 issued
and outstanding Class C common membership units. These units are owned by some
of the sellers in the Bresnan acquisition.
157
160
CLASS A PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP UNITS. There are a total of 3,006,202 issued
and outstanding Class A preferred membership units. These units are owned by
some of the sellers in the Rifkin acquisition.
Any matter requiring a vote of the members of Charter Communications
Holding Company requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Class B
common membership units. Charter Communications, Inc. owns all Class B common
membership units and therefore controls Charter Communications Holding Company.
Because Mr. Allen owns high vote Class B common stock of Charter Communications,
Inc. that entitles him to approximately 95% of the voting power of the
outstanding common stock of Charter Communications, Inc., Mr. Allen controls
Charter Communications, Inc. and through this company has voting control of
Charter Communications Holding Company.
The net cash proceeds that Charter Communications, Inc. receives from any
issuance of shares of common stock will be immediately transferred to Charter
Communications Holding Company in exchange for membership units equal in number
to the number of shares of common stock issued by Charter Communications, Inc.
EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS
Charter Communications, Inc. is a party to an agreement permitting Vulcan
Cable III Inc., Charter Investment and any other affiliate of Mr. Allen to
exchange at any time on a one-for-one basis any or all of their Charter
Communications Holding Company common membership units for shares of Class B
common stock. This exchange may occur directly or, at the election of the
exchanging holder, indirectly through a tax-free reorganization such as a share
exchange or a statutory merger of any Allen-controlled entity with and into
Charter Communications, Inc. or a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter
Communications, Inc. In the case of an exchange in connection with a tax-free
share exchange or a statutory merger, shares of Class A common stock held by Mr.
Allen or the Allen-controlled entity will also be exchanged for Class B common
stock. Mr. Allen currently owns shares of Class A common stock as a result of
the exercise of put rights granted to sellers in the Falcon acquisition who
received shares of Class A common stock in connection with that acquisition. Mr.
Allen or his affiliates may in the future own additional shares of Class A
common stock, for example, if they were required to repurchase shares of Class A
common stock as a result of the exercise of put rights granted to the Rifkin and
Bresnan sellers in respect of their shares of Class A common stock.
Similar exchange agreements also permit all other holders of Charter
Communications Holding Company common membership units, other than Charter
Communications, Inc., to exchange at any time on a one-for-one basis any or all
of their common membership units for shares of Class A common stock. These other
holders include those sellers under the Bresnan acquisition that received common
membership units of Charter Communications Holding Company in connection with
that acquisition.
Charter Communications Holding Company common membership units are
exchangeable at any time for shares of our Class A common stock or, in the case
of Mr. Allen and his affiliates, Class B common stock which is then convertible
into shares of Class A common stock. The exchange agreements, Mr. Kent's option
agreement and the Charter Communications Option Plan state that common
membership units are exchangeable for shares of common stock at a value equal to
the fair market value of the common membership units. The exchange ratio of
common membership units to shares of Class A common stock will be one to one
because Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications Holding Company
have been structured so that the fair market value of a share of the Class A
common stock equals the fair market value of a common membership unit owned by
Charter Communications, Inc.
158
161
Our organizational documents achieve this result by:
- limiting the assets and liabilities that Charter Communications, Inc. may
hold; and
- requiring the number of shares of our common stock outstanding at any
time to equal the number of common membership units owned by Charter
Communications, Inc.
If we fail to comply with these provisions or they are changed, the
exchange ratio may vary from one to one and will then be based on a
pre-determined formula contained in the exchange agreements, Mr. Kent's option
agreement and the Charter Communications Option Plan. This formula will be based
on the then current relative fair market values of common membership units and
common stock.
SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION PROVISIONS
OVERVIEW. Charter Communications Holding Company's amended and restated
limited liability company agreement contains a number of provisions affecting
allocation of tax losses and tax profits to its members. In some situations,
these provisions could result in Charter Communications, Inc. having to pay
income taxes in an amount that is more than it would have had to pay if these
provisions did not exist. The purpose of these provisions is to allow Mr. Allen
to take advantage for tax purposes of the losses expected to be generated by
Charter Communications Holding Company. We do not expect that these special tax
allocation provisions will materially affect our results of operations or
financial condition.
SPECIAL LOSS ALLOCATION PROVISIONS. The Charter Communications Holding
Company amended and restated limited liability company agreement provides that,
through the end of 2003, tax losses of Charter Communications Holding Company
that would otherwise have been allocated to us based generally on the percentage
of outstanding membership units will be allocated instead to the membership
units held by Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc. We expect that
the effect of these special loss allocation provisions will be that Mr. Allen,
through his investment in Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc.,
will receive tax savings.
Except as described below, the special loss allocation provisions should
not adversely affect Charter Communications, Inc. or its shareholders. This is
because Charter Communications, Inc. would not be in a position to benefit from
tax losses until Charter Communications Holding Company generates allocable tax
profits, and we do not expect Charter Communications Holding Company to generate
tax profits for the foreseeable future.
The special loss allocation provisions will reduce Mr. Allen's rights to
receive distributions upon a liquidation of Charter Communications Holding
Company if over time there are insufficient allocations to be made under the
special profit allocation provisions described below to restore these
distribution rights.
SPECIAL PROFIT ALLOCATION PROVISIONS. The amended and restated limited
liability company agreement further provides that, beginning at the time Charter
Communications Holding Company first becomes profitable (as determined under the
applicable federal income tax rules for determining book profits), tax profits
that would otherwise have been allocated to Charter Communications, Inc. based
generally on its percentage of outstanding membership units will instead be
allocated to Mr. Allen, through the membership units held by Vulcan Cable III
Inc. and Charter Investment. We expect that these special profit allocation
provisions will provide tax savings to Charter Communications, Inc. and result
in additional tax costs for Mr. Allen. The special profit allocations will also
have the effect of restoring over time Mr. Allen's rights to receive
distributions upon a liquidation of Charter Communications Holding Company.
These special profit allocations generally will continue
159
162
until such time as Mr. Allen's rights to receive distributions upon a
liquidation of Charter Communications Holding Company that had been reduced as a
result of the special loss allocations have been fully restored. We cannot
assure you that Charter Communications Holding Company will become profitable.
POSSIBLE ADVERSE IMPACT FROM THE SPECIAL ALLOCATION PROVISIONS. In a
number of situations, these special tax allocations could result in our having
to pay more taxes than if the special tax allocation provisions had not been
adopted.
For example, the special profit allocation provisions may result in an
allocation of tax profits to the membership units held by Vulcan Cable III Inc.
and Charter Investment that is less than the amount of the tax losses previously
allocated to these units pursuant to the special loss allocation provisions
described above. In this case, we could be required to pay higher taxes but only
commencing at the time when Mr. Allen's rights to receive distributions upon a
liquidation of Charter Communications Holding Company have been fully restored
as described above. These tax payments could reduce our reported net income for
the relevant period.
As another example, under their exchange agreement with Charter
Communications, Inc., Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment may exchange
some or all of their membership units for Class B common stock prior to the date
that the special profit allocation provisions have had the effect of fully
restoring Mr. Allen's rights to receive distributions upon a liquidation of
Charter Communications Holding Company. Charter Communications, Inc. will then
be allocated tax profits attributable to the membership units it receives in
such exchange pursuant to the special profit allocation provisions. As a result,
Charter Communications, Inc. could be required to pay higher taxes in years
following such an exchange of common stock for membership units than if the
special tax allocation provisions had not been adopted. These tax payments could
reduce our reported net income for the relevant period.
However, we do not anticipate that the special tax allocations will result
in Charter Communications, Inc. having to pay taxes in an amount that is
materially different on a present value basis than the taxes that would be
payable had the special tax allocation provisions not been adopted, although
there is no assurance that a material difference will not result.
IMPACT OF MERGER AND OTHER NON-TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS; MR. ALLEN'S
REIMBURSEMENT OBLIGATIONS. Mr. Allen, through Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter
Investment, has the right to transfer his Charter Communications Holding Company
membership units in a non-taxable transaction, including a merger, to Charter
Communications, Inc. for common stock. Such a transaction may occur prior to the
date that the special profit allocation provisions have had the effect of fully
restoring Mr. Allen's rights to receive distributions upon a liquidation of
Charter Communications Holding Company. In this case, the following will apply.
Vulcan Cable III Inc. or Charter Investment may elect to cause Charter
Communications Holding Company to make additional special allocations in order
to restore Mr. Allen's rights to receive distributions upon a liquidation of
Charter Communications Holding Company. If this election is not made, or if an
election is made but these additional special allocations are insufficient to
restore these rights to Mr. Allen, Mr. Allen, Vulcan Cable III Inc. or Charter
Investment, whichever person or entity receives the Class B common stock, will
agree to make specified payments to Charter Communications, Inc. in respect of
the common stock received. The payments will equal the amount that Charter
Communications, Inc. actually pays in income taxes solely as a result of the
allocation to it of tax profits because of the losses previously allocated to
membership units transferred to it. Any of these payments would be made at the
time Charter Communications, Inc. actually pays these income taxes.
160
163
BRESNAN SPECIAL ALLOCATION PROVISIONS. Charter Communications Holding
Company's amended and restated limited liability company agreement contains
provisions for special allocations of tax losses and tax profits between the
Bresnan sellers receiving membership units on the one hand and Mr. Allen,
through Vulcan Cable III Inc. and Charter Investment, Inc., on the other.
Because of these provisions, Charter Communications, Inc. could under some
circumstances be required to pay higher taxes in years following an exchange by
the Bresnan sellers of membership units for shares of Class A common stock.
However, we do not anticipate that any such exchange for Class A common stock
will result in our having to pay taxes in an amount that is materially different
on a present value basis than the taxes that would have been payable had the
special allocations not been adopted, although there is no assurance that a
material difference will not result.
The effect of the special loss allocations discussed above is that Mr.
Allen and some of the sellers in the Bresnan transaction receive tax savings
while at the same time reducing their rights to receive distributions upon a
liquidation of Charter Communications Holding Company. If and when special
profit allocations occur, their rights to receive distributions upon a
liquidation of Charter Communications Holding Company will be restored over
time, and they will likely incur some additional tax costs.
OTHER MATERIAL TERMS OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
AGREEMENT OF CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY
GENERAL.
Charter Communications Holding Company's amended and restated limited
liability company agreement contains provisions that permit each member (and its
officers, directors, agents, shareholders, members, partners or affiliates) to
engage in businesses that may compete with the businesses of Charter
Communications Holding Company or any subsidiary. However, the directors of
Charter Communications, Inc., including Mr. Allen and Mr. Kent, are subject to
fiduciary duties under Delaware corporate law that generally require them to
present business opportunities in the cable transmission business to Charter
Communications, Inc.
The amended and restated limited liability company agreement restricts the
business activities that Charter Communications Holding Company may engage in.
See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Allocation of Business
Opportunities with Mr. Allen."
TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS. The amended and restated limited liability company
agreement restricts the ability of each member to transfer its membership
interest unless specified conditions have been met. These conditions include:
- the transfer will not result in the loss of any license or regulatory
approval or exemption that has been obtained by Charter Communications
Holding Company and is materially useful in its business as then
conducted or proposed to be conducted;
- the transfer will not result in a material and adverse limitation or
restriction on the operations of Charter Communications Holding Company
and its subsidiaries taken as a whole;
- the proposed transferee agrees in writing to be bound by the limited
liability company agreement; and
- except for a limited number of permitted transfers under the limited
liability company agreement, the transfer has been approved by the
manager in its sole discretion.
SPECIAL REDEMPTION RIGHTS RELATING TO CLASS A PREFERRED MEMBERSHIP
UNITS. The holders of Class A preferred membership units have the right under a
separate redemption and put agreement to
161
164
cause Charter Communications Holding Company to redeem their preferred
membership units at specified redemption prices.
SPECIAL RIGHTS GRANTED FORMER OWNERS OF BRESNAN. The amended and restated
limited liability company agreement provides that Charter Communications, Inc.
must provide the Bresnan sellers that are affiliates of Blackstone Group L.P.
consultative rights reasonably acceptable to Charter Communications, Inc. so
that, as long as these Bresnan sellers hold Class C common membership units,
they may preserve their status and benefits they get from being a venture
capital operating company.
AMENDMENTS TO THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. Any amendment to
the limited liability company agreement generally may be adopted only upon the
approval of a majority of the Class B common membership units. The agreement may
not be amended in a manner that adversely affects the rights of any class of
common membership units without the consent of holders holding a majority of the
membership units of that class.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
HOLDERS OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK. Charter Communications, Inc., Mr. Allen,
Charter Investment, Vulcan Cable III Inc., Mr. Kent, Mr. Babcock and Mr. Wood
are parties to a registration rights agreement. The agreement gives Mr. Allen
and his affiliates the right to cause us to register the shares of Class A
common stock issued to them upon conversion of any shares of Class B common
stock that they may hold. The agreement gives Messrs. Kent, Babcock and Wood the
right to cause us to register the shares of Class A common stock issuable to
them upon exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company membership units.
This registration rights agreement provides that each eligible holder is
entitled to unlimited "piggyback" registration rights permitting them to include
their shares of Class A common stock in registration statements filed by us.
These holders may also exercise their demand rights causing us, subject to
specified limitations, to register their Class A shares, provided that the
amount of shares subject to each demand has a market value at least equal to $50
million or, if the market value is less than $50 million, all of the Class A
shares of the holders participating in the offering are included in such
registration. We are obligated to pay the costs associated with all such
registrations.
Holders may elect to have their shares registered pursuant to a shelf
registration statement if at the time of the election, Charter Communications,
Inc. is eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3 and the amount of
shares to be registered has a market value equal to at least $100.0 million on
the date of the election.
Mr. Allen also has the right to cause Charter Communications, Inc. to file
a shelf registration statement in connection with the resale of shares of Class
A common stock then held by or issuable to specified sellers under the Falcon
and Bresnan acquisitions that have the right to cause Mr. Allen to purchase
equity interests issued to them as a result of these acquisitions.
All shares of Class A common stock issuable to the registration rights
holders in exchange for Charter Communications Holding Company membership units
and upon conversion of outstanding Class B common stock and conversion of Class
B common stock issuable to the registration rights holders upon exchange of
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units are subject to the
registration rights described above.
FALCON SELLERS. The Falcon sellers are entitled to registration rights
with respect to the shares of Class A common stock issued in exchange for
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units received by them in
connection with the Falcon acquisition.
162
165
These Falcon sellers or their permitted transferees have "piggyback"
registration rights and up to four "demand" registration rights with respect to
these shares of Class A common stock. The demand registration rights must be
exercised with respect to tranches of Class A common stock worth at least $40
million at the time of notice of demand or at least $60 million at the initial
public offering price. A majority of the holders of Class A common stock making
a demand may also require us, on a one-time basis, to satisfy our registration
obligations by filing a shelf registration statement for shares worth a total of
at least $100 million. 122,668 shares of Class A common stock covered by this
prospectus are registered hereby.
BRESNAN SELLERS. The Bresnan sellers are entitled to registration rights
with respect to the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exchange of the
Charter Communications Holding Company membership units and Class A Units in CC
VIII, LLC held by them.
We may register the shares of our Class A common stock issuable to the
Bresnan sellers in exchange for these units for resale pursuant to a shelf
registration statement on Form S-1.
The Bresnan sellers collectively will have unlimited "piggyback"
registration rights and up to four "demand" registration rights with respect to
the Class A common stock issued in exchange for the membership units in Charter
Communications Holding Company and Class A Units in CC VIII, LLC. The demand
registration rights must be exercised with respect to tranches of Class A common
stock worth at least $40 million at the time of notice of demand or at least $60
million at the initial public offering price.
KALAMAZOO SELLER. The seller in the Kalamazoo transaction is entitled to
registration rights with respect to the shares of Class A common stock issued in
connection with that transaction. The Kalamazoo seller will have unlimited
"piggyback" registration rights and up to two "demand" registration rights with
respect to these shares of Class A common stock. The demand registration rights
must be exercised with respect to tranches of Class A common stock worth at
least $25 million at the time of the notice of demand.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is ChaseMellon
Shareholder Services, L.L.C.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
We have 233,735,768 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding.
In addition, the following shares of Class A common stock will be issuable in
the future:
- 324,300,479 shares of Class A common stock will be issuable upon
conversion of Class B common stock issuable upon exchange of Charter
Communications Holding Company membership units held by Vulcan III and
Charter Investment. These membership units are exchangeable for shares of
Class B common stock on a one-for-one basis. Shares of Class B common
stock are convertible into Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis;
- 39,011,744 shares of Class A common stock will be issuable upon the
exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company membership units and
CC VIII, LLC membership units issued to specified sellers in the Bresnan
acquisition. These units are exchangeable for shares of Class A common
stock;
163
166
- 50,000 shares of Class A common stock will be issuable upon conversion of
outstanding Class B common stock on a one-for-one basis;
- 27,843,285 shares of Class A common stock will be issuable upon the
exchange of membership units in Charter Communications Holding Company
that are received upon the exercise of options granted under the Charter
Communications Option Plan and under agreements Mr. Kent, our chief
executive officer. Upon issuance, these membership units will be
immediately exchanged for shares of Class A common stock, without any
further action by the optionholder. As of August 31, 2000, 5,922,502 of
these options have vested; and
- All or a portion of 52,516 shares of Class A common stock which
constituted 10% of the shares issuable as payment of a portion of the
merger consideration in the Chat TV transaction, but which will be issued
on September 15, 2001 in the event that no indemnity claims have been
made under the Chat TV acquisition agreement. Additional Class A common
stock may be issued eighteen and/or thirty-six months following September
14, 2000 if certain performance targets are satisfied.
Of the total number of our shares of Class A common stock issuable as
described above, 28,274,462 shares will be eligible for immediate public resale
following their issuance.
In addition, of the total number of shares of Class A common stock issued
or issuable as described above, 363,312,223 shares may only be sold in
compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, unless registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to demand or piggyback registration
rights. Substantially all of the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon
exchange of Charter Communications Holding Company membership units and upon
conversion of shares of our Class B common stock have demand and piggyback
registration rights attached to them.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of Class A common stock, or the
perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market
prices for the Class A common stock. In addition, any such sale or perception
could make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or equity-related
securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
A registration statement on Form S-8 covering the Class A common stock
issuable pursuant to the exercise of options under the Charter Communications
Option Plan was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2000.
The shares of Class A common stock covered by the Form S-8 registration
statement generally may be resold in the public market without restriction or
limitation, except in the case of our affiliates who generally may only resell
such shares in accordance with the provisions of Rule 144 of the Securities Act
of 1933.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of Class A common stock offered in this
prospectus will be passed upon for Charter Communications, Inc. by Paul,
Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of Charter Communications, Inc., Charter
Communications Properties Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries, CCA Group, CharterComm
Holdings, L.P. and subsidiaries, Marcus Cable Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries,
the Greater Media Cablevision Systems, Helican Partners I, L.P. and affiliates,
the Sonic Communications Cable Television Systems, Long Beach Acquisition Corp.
and CC V Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries included in this prospectus, to the
extent and for
164
167
the periods indicated in their reports, have been audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their reports with respect
thereto, and are included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority of
said firm as experts in giving said reports.
The combined financial statements of Helicon Partners I, L.P. and
affiliates as of December 31, 1997 and 1998 and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1998, the combined financial statements of
TCI Falcon Systems as of September 30, 1998 and December 31, 1997 and for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, and for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1997, the consolidated financial statements
of Marcus Cable Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and
the consolidated financial statements of Bresnan Communications Group LLC as of
December 31, 1998 and 1999 and February 14, 2000, and for each of the years in
the three year period ended December 31, 1999, and the period from January 1,
2000 to February 14, 2000, have been included herein in reliance upon the
reports of KPMG LLP, independent certified public accountants, appearing
elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Renaissance Media Group LLC, the
combined financial statements of the Picayune, MS, LaFourche, LA, St. Tammany,
LA, St. Landry, LA, Pointe Coupee, LA, and Jackson, TN cable systems, the
financial statements of Indiana Cable Associates, Ltd., the consolidated
financial statements of R/N South Florida Cable Management Limited Partnership,
the combined financial statements of Fanch Cable Systems Sold to Charter
Communications, Inc. and the consolidated financial statements of Falcon
Communications, L.P., included in this prospectus, have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and are included herein in reliance upon such
reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The audited combined financial statements of InterMedia Cable Systems
(comprised of components of InterMedia Partners and InterMedia Capital Partners
IV, L.P.), the audited financial statements of Rifkin Cable Income Partners
L.P., the audited consolidated financial statements of Rifkin Acquisition
Partners, L.L.L.P., the audited consolidated financial statements of Cable
Michigan Inc. and subsidiaries, the audited consolidated financial statements of
Avalon Cable LLC and subsidiaries, the audited financial statements of Indiana
Cable Associates, Ltd, the audited consolidated financial statements of R/N
South Florida Cable Management Limited Partnership, the audited consolidated
financial statements of Avalon Cable of Michigan Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries, the audited consolidated financial statements of Cable Michigan,
Inc. and subsidiaries, the audited financial statements of Amrac Clear View, a
Limited Partnership, the audited combined financial statements of the Combined
Operations of Pegasus Cable Television of Connecticut, Inc. and the
Massachusetts Operations of Pegasus Cable Television, Inc., included in this
prospectus, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
accountants. The entities and periods covered by these audits are indicated in
their reports. The financial statements have been so included in reliance on the
reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
The financial statements of Cable Systems, Inc. and Fanch Narragansett CSI
Limited Partnership, the consolidated financial statements of North Texas
Cablevision, Ltd. and the financial statements of Spring Green Communications,
L.P., included in this prospectus, have been audited by Shields & Co.,
independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus, and are included herein in reliance upon such reports given
on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
165
168
The financial statements of Amrac Clear View, a Limited Partnership, as of
December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, included in this prospectus, have been so included in
reliance on the report of Greenfield, Altman, Brown, Berger & Katz, P.C.,
independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-1 to register the Class A common stock offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the registration statement,
does not contain all the information included in that registration statement.
For further information about us and the Class A common stock offered in this
prospectus, you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits. We
are required to file annual, quarterly and other information with the SEC. You
may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the public reference
facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the SEC's regional offices at 3475 Lenox Road,
N.E., Suite 1000, Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1232. Copies of such material may be
obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. You can also review such material
by accessing the SEC's Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov. This site
contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
We intend to furnish to each holder of our Class A common stock annual
reports containing audit financial statements and quarterly reports containing
unaudited financial information for the first three quarters of each fiscal
year. We will also furnish to each holder of our Class A common stock such other
reports as may be required by law.
166
169
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
-------
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-8
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-9
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-10
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and
1998.................................................... F-11
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the Period from December 24,
1998, through December 31, 1998......................... F-12
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
for the Year ended December 31, 1999, and for the Period
from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998....... F-13
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the Period from December 24,
1998, through December 31, 1998......................... F-14
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-15
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, LLC AND
SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-38
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Period from
January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 and for the
Year ended December 31, 1997............................ F-39
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder's
Investment for the Period from January 1, 1998 through
December 23, 1998 and for the Year ended December 31,
1997.................................................... F-40
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 1998 through December 23, 1998 and for the
Year ended December 31, 1997............................ F-41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-42
CCA GROUP:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-49
Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997............ F-50
Combined Statements of Operations for the Period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998 and for the
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-51
Combined Statements of Shareholders' Deficit for the
Period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998
and for the Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996...... F-52
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998 and for the
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-53
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-54
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-68
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997........ F-69
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998 and for the
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-70
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for the
Period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998
and for the Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996...... F-71
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998 and for the
Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-72
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-73
F-1
170
PAGE
-------
MARCUS CABLE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-86
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 1999.................................... F-87
Consolidated Statement of Members' Deficit for the Three
Months Ended March 31, 1999............................. F-88
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 1999.................................... F-89
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-90
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-96
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and
1997.................................................... F-97
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the
Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31,
1998.................................................... F-98
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity/Partners'
Capital for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period
Ended December 31, 1998................................. F-99
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the
Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31,
1998.................................................... F-100
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-101
RENAISSANCE MEDIA GROUP LLC:
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-112
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 1999........... F-113
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Four Months
Ended April 30, 1999.................................... F-114
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Members' Equity for
the Four Months Ended April 30, 1999.................... F-115
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Four Months
Ended April 30, 1999.................................... F-116
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-117
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-125
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998........ F-126
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended
December 31, 1998....................................... F-127
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Members' Equity for
the Year Ended December 31, 1998........................ F-128
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended
December 31, 1998....................................... F-129
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year
Ended December 31, 1998................................. F-130
PICAYUNE, MS, LAFOURCHE, LA, ST. TAMMANY, LA, ST. LANDRY,
LA, POINTE COUPEE, LA AND JACKSON, TN CABLE TELEVISION
SYSTEMS:
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-140
Combined Balance Sheet as of April 8, 1998................ F-141
Combined Statement of Operations for the Period from
January 1, 1998 through April 8, 1998................... F-142
Combined Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the Period
from January 1, 1998 through April 8, 1998.............. F-143
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 1998 through April 8, 1998................... F-144
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-145
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-152
Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and
1997.................................................... F-153
Combined Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997........................ F-154
Combined Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the Years
Ended December 31, 1996 and 1997........................ F-155
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997........................ F-156
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-157
F-2
171
PAGE
-------
GREATER MEDIA CABLEVISION SYSTEMS:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-164
Combined Statement of Income for the Nine Months Ended
June 30, 1999........................................... F-165
Combined Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the Nine
Months Ended June 30, 1999.............................. F-166
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
June 30, 1999........................................... F-167
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-168
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-172
Combined Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1998 and
1997.................................................... F-173
Combined Statements of Income for the Years Ended
September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998....................... F-174
Combined Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the Years
Ended September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998................. F-175
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998....................... F-176
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-177
HELICON PARTNERS I, L.P. AND AFFILIATES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-183
Combined Statement of Operations for the Seven Months
Ended July 30, 1999..................................... F-184
Combined Statement of Changes in Partners' Deficit for the
Seven Months Ended July 30, 1999........................ F-185
Combined Statement of Cash Flows for the Seven Months
Ended July 30, 1999..................................... F-186
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-187
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-192
Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and
1998.................................................... F-193
Combined Statements of Operations for Each of the Years in
the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 1998........... F-194
Combined Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit for
Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended
December 31, 1998....................................... F-195
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Years in
the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 1998........... F-196
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-197
RIFKIN CABLE INCOME PARTNERS L.P.:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-209]
Balance Sheet as of September 13, 1999.................... F-210
Statement of Operations for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-211
Statement of Equity for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-212
Statement of Cash Flows for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-213
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-214
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-218
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and 1998............... F-219
Statement of Operations for Each of the Three Years in the
Period Ended December 31, 1998.......................... F-220
Statement of Partners' Equity (Deficit) for Each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1998....... F-221
Statement of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the
Period Ended December 31, 1998.......................... F-222
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-223
F-3
172
PAGE
-------
RIFKIN ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.L.L.P.:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-227
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 13, 1999....... F-228
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period
January 1, 1999 through September 13, 1999.............. F-229
Consolidated Statement of Partners' Capital for the period
January 1, 1999 through September 13, 1999.............. F-230
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period
January 1, 1999 through September 13, 1999.............. F-231
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-232
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-241
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and
1997.................................................... F-242
Consolidated Statement of Operations for Each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1998............. F-243
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for Each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1998............. F-244
Consolidated Statement of Partners' Capital (Deficit) for
Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31,
1998.................................................... F-245
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-246
INDIANA CABLE ASSOCIATES, LTD.:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-260
Balance Sheet as of September 13, 1999.................... F-261
Statement of Operations for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-262
Statement of Equity for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-263
Statement of Cash Flows for the period January 1, 1999 to
September 13, 1999...................................... F-264
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-265
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-269
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and 1998............ F-270
Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
1996, 1997 and 1998..................................... F-271
Statement of Partners' Deficit for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998........................ F-272
Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1996, 1997 and 1998..................................... F-273
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-274
R/N SOUTH FLORIDA CABLE MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-278
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 13, 1999....... F-279
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period
January 1, 1999 to September 13, 1999................... F-280
Consolidated Statement of Equity for the period January 1,
1999 to September 13, 1999.............................. F-281
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period
January 1, 1999 to September 13, 1999................... F-282
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-283
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-287
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and
1998.................................................... F-288
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998........................ F-289
Consolidated Statement of Partners' Equity (Deficit) for
the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998........ F-290
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998........................ F-291
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-292
F-4
173
PAGE
-------
INTERMEDIA CABLE SYSTEMS (COMPRISED OF COMPONENTS OF
INTERMEDIA PARTNERS AND INTERMEDIA CAPITAL PARTNERS IV,
L.P.):
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-296
Combined Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1999 and
December 31, 1998....................................... F-297
Combined Statements of Operations for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 1999 and for the Years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997.............................. F-298
Combined Statements of Changes in Equity for the Nine
Months Ended September 30, 1999 and for the Years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997.............................. F-299
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 1999 and for the Years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997.............................. F-300
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-301
SONIC COMMUNICATIONS CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-312
Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Assets for the
Period from April 1, 1998, through May 20, 1998......... F-313
Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from April 1, 1998,
through May 20, 1998.................................... F-314
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-315
LONG BEACH ACQUISITION CORP.:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-318
Statement of Operations for the Period from April 1, 1997,
through May 23, 1997.................................... F-319
Statement of Stockholder's Equity for the Period from
April 1, 1997, through May 23, 1997..................... F-320
Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from April 1, 1997,
through May 23, 1997.................................... F-321
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-322
FANCH CABLE SYSTEMS SOLD TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.:
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-326
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-327
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-328
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-329
Combined Balance Sheets as of November 11, 1999 and
December 31, 1998....................................... F-330
Combined Statements of Operations for the Period from
January 1, 1999 to November 11, 1999 and for the Years
Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997........................ F-331
Combined Statements of Net Assets for the Period from
January 1, 1999 to November 11, 1999 and for the Years
Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997........................ F-332
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
January 1, 1999 to November 11, 1999 and for the Years
Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997........................ F-333
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-334
FALCON COMMUNICATIONS, L.P.:
Report of Independent Auditors............................ F-339
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and
November 12, 1999....................................... F-340
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 1998 and for the
Period from January 1, 1999 to November 12, 1999........ F-341
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity (Deficit) for
the each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1998 and for the Period from January 1, 1999 to
November 12, 1999....................................... F-342
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 1998 and for the
Period from January 1, 1999 to November 12, 1999........ F-343
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-345
F-5
174
PAGE
-------
TCI FALCON SYSTEMS:
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-365
Combined Balance Sheets at September 30, 1998 and December
31, 1997................................................ F-366
Combined Statements of Operations and Parent's Investment
for the period from January 1, 1998 through September
30, 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1996.................................................... F-367
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the period from
January 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998 and for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-368
Notes to Combined Financial Statements for the period from
January 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998 and for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996.................. F-369
CC V HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................. F-376
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1999........ F-377
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Period from
November 15, 1999, through December 31, 1999, and for
the Period from January 1, 1999, through November 14,
1999.................................................... F-378
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
for the Period from January 1, 1999, through November
14, 1999................................................ F-379
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
November 15, 1999, through December 31, 1999, and for
the Period from January 1, 1999, through November 14,
1999.................................................... F-380
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-381
AVALON CABLE LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-393
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998 and
1997.................................................... F-394
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and for the period from September 4,
1997 (inception) through December 31, 1997.............. F-395
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Members' Interest
from September 4, 1997 (inception) through December 31,
1998.................................................... F-396
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and for the period from September 4,
1997 (inception) through December 31, 1997.............. F-397
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-398
AVALON CABLE OF MICHIGAN HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-412
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998 and
1997.................................................... F-413
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and for the period from September 4,
1997 (inception) through December 31, 1997.............. F-414
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
for the period from September 4, 1997 (inception)
through December 31, 1998............................... F-415
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and for the period from September 4,
1997 (inception) through December 31, 1997.............. F-416
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-417
CABLE MICHIGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-430
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and
November 5, 1998........................................ F-431
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for the period from
January 1, 1998 to November 5, 1998..................... F-432
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders'
Deficit for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997
and for the period from January 1, 1998 to November 5,
1998.................................................... F-433
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for the period from
January 1, 1998 to November 5, 1998..................... F-434
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-435
F-6
175
PAGE
-------
AMRAC CLEAR VIEW, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-449
Balance Sheet as of May 28, 1998.......................... F-450
Statement of Operations for the period from January 1,
1998 through May 28, 1998............................... F-451
Statement of Changes in Partners' Equity (Deficit) for the
period from January 1, 1998 through May 28, 1998........ F-452
Statement of Cash Flows for the period from January 1,
1998 through May 28, 1998............................... F-453
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-454
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-458
Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1997.............. F-459
Statements of Net Earnings for the years ended December
31, 1995, 1996 and 1997................................. F-460
Statements of Changes in Partners' Equity (Deficit) for
the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997........ F-461
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997..................................... F-462
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-463
PEGASUS CABLE TELEVISION, INC.:
Report of Independent Accountants......................... F-466
Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1997
and June 30, 1998....................................... F-467
Combined Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the six months
ended June 30, 1998..................................... F-468
Combined Statements of Changes in Stockholder's Deficit
for the three years ended December 31, 1997 and for the
six months ended June 30, 1998.......................... F-469
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the six months
ended June 30, 1998..................................... F-470
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................... F-471
BRESNAN COMMUNICATIONS GROUP LLC:
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-477
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and
1999.................................................... F-478
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Members' Equity
(Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1998
and 1999................................................ F-479
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999........................ F-480
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-481
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-489
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and
February 14, 2000....................................... F-490
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Members' Equity
(Deficit) for the Year ended December 31,1999 and for
the Period from January 1, 2000 to February 14, 2000.... F-491
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year ended
December 31, 1999 and for the Period from January 1,
2000 to February 14, 2000............................... F-492
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-493
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2000 and
December 31, 1999 (unaudited)........................... F-501
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 (unaudited)................ F-502
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 (unaudited)................ F-503
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 (unaudited)................ F-504
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).... F-505
F-7
176
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Charter
Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from
December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
financial statements of Charter Communications VI Operating Company, LLC and
subsidiaries, and CC VII -- Falcon Systems, as of December 31, 1999, and for the
periods from the dates of acquisition through December 31, 1999, which
statements on a combined basis reflect total assets and total revenues of 31
percent and 6 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated totals of the
Company. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included
for those entities, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other
auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Charter Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24,
1998, through December 31, 1998, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
St. Louis, Missouri,
March 2, 2000
F-8
177
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Charter Communications VI
Operating Company, LLC
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Charter Communications VI
Operating Company, LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, member's equity and cash flows for the
period from inception (November 9, 1999) to December 31, 1999 (not presented
separately herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Charter
Communications VI Operating Company, LLC and subsidiaries at December 31, 1999,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the period
from November 9, 1999 to December 31, 1999 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 11, 2000
F-9
178
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Sole Member
CC VII Holdings, LLC
We have audited the combined balance sheet of the CC VII -- Falcon Systems
as of December 31, 1999, and the related combined statements of operations and
parent's investment and cash flows for the period from November 13, 1999
(commencement date) to December 31, 1999 (not presented separately herein).
These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of the CC
VII -- Falcon Systems at December 31, 1999 and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the period from November 13, 1999 (commencement date) to
December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 2000
F-10
179
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 133,706 $ 9,573
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $11,471 and $1,728, respectively........... 93,743 15,108
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 35,142 2,519
----------- ----------
Total current assets................................. 262,591 27,200
----------- ----------
INVESTMENT IN CABLE PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment............................. 3,490,573 716,242
Franchises................................................ 14,985,793 3,590,054
----------- ----------
18,476,366 4,306,296
----------- ----------
OTHER ASSETS................................................ 227,550 2,031
----------- ----------
$18,966,507 $4,335,527
=========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ -- $ 10,450
Accounts payable and accrued expenses..................... 706,775 127,586
Payables to related party................................. 13,183 4,334
----------- ----------
Total current liabilities............................ 719,958 142,370
----------- ----------
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities..................... 8,936,455 1,991,756
----------- ----------
DEFERRED MANAGEMENT FEES -- RELATED PARTY................... 21,623 15,561
----------- ----------
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES................................. 145,124 38,461
----------- ----------
MINORITY INTEREST........................................... 5,381,331 2,146,549
----------- ----------
REDEEMABLE SECURITIES....................................... 750,937 --
----------- ----------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Class A common stock...................................... 195 --
Class B common stock...................................... -- --
Preferred stock........................................... -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................ 3,075,694 832
Retained deficit.......................................... (66,231) (2)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... 1,421 --
----------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity........................... 3,011,079 830
----------- ----------
$18,966,507 $4,335,527
=========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-11
180
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
REVENUES.................................................... $1,428,244 $13,713
---------- -------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operating, general and administrative..................... 737,957 7,134
Depreciation and amortization............................. 745,315 8,318
Option compensation expense............................... 79,979 845
Corporate expense charges -- related party................ 51,428 473
---------- -------
1,614,679 16,770
---------- -------
Loss from operations................................... (186,435) (3,057)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense.......................................... (477,799) (2,353)
Interest income........................................... 34,467 133
Other, net................................................ (8,039) --
---------- -------
Loss before income taxes and minority interest......... (637,806) (5,277)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE.......................................... (1,030) --
---------- -------
Loss before minority interest.......................... (638,836) (5,277)
MINORITY INTEREST IN LOSS OF SUBSIDIARY..................... 572,607 5,275
---------- -------
Net loss............................................... $ (66,229) $ (2)
========== =======
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, basic and diluted.................... $ (2.22) $ (0.04)
========== =======
Weighted-average common shares outstanding.................. 29,811,202 50,000
========== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-12
181
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ACCUMULATED
CLASS A CLASS B ADDITIONAL OTHER TOTAL
COMMON COMMON PAID-IN RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE STOCKHOLDERS'
STOCK STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT INCOME EQUITY
------- ------- ---------- -------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE, December 24, 1998.......... $ -- $-- $ 832 $ -- $ -- $ 832
Net loss.......................... -- -- -- (2) -- (2)
---- -- ---------- -------- ------ ----------
BALANCE, December 31, 1998.......... -- -- 832 (2) -- 830
Issuance of Class B common stock
to Mr. Allen.................... -- -- 950 -- -- 950
Net proceeds from initial public
offering of Class A common
stock........................... 196 -- 3,547,724 -- -- 3,547,920
Issuance of common stock in
exchange for additional equity
of subsidiary................... 26 -- 638,535 -- -- 638,561
Distributions to Charter
Investment...................... -- -- (2,233) -- -- (2,233)
Equity classified as redeemable
securities...................... (27) -- (700,759) -- -- (700,786)
Option compensation expense....... -- -- 4,493 -- -- 4,493
Loss on issuance of equity by
subsidiary...................... -- -- (413,848) -- -- (413,848)
Net loss.......................... -- -- -- (66,229) -- (66,229)
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities available for sale... -- -- -- -- 1,421 1,421
---- -- ---------- -------- ------ ----------
BALANCE, December 31, 1999.......... $195 $-- $3,075,694 $(66,231) $1,421 $3,011,079
==== == ========== ======== ====== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
F-13
182
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
1998
YEAR ENDED THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................. $ (66,229) $ (2)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities--
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary................ (572,607) (5,275)
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 745,315 8,318
Option compensation expense............................ 79,979 845
Noncash interest expense............................... 100,674 --
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions--
Accounts receivable.................................... (32,366) (8,753)
Prepaid expenses and other............................. 13,627 (211)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................. 177,321 10,227
Payables to related party, including deferred
management fees...................................... 27,653 473
Other operating activities................................ 6,549 2,022
------------ --------
Net cash provided by operating activities......... 479,916 7,644
------------ --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment................. (741,508) (13,672)
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired........... (7,629,564) --
Loan to Marcus Cable Holdings............................. (1,680,142) --
Other investing activities................................ (26,755) --
------------ --------
Net cash used in investing activities............. (10,077,969) (13,672)
------------ --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings of long-term debt, including proceeds from
Charter Holdings Notes................................. 10,114,188 14,200
Repayments of long-term debt.............................. (5,694,375) --
Payments for debt issuance costs.......................... (113,481) --
Net proceeds from initial public offering of Class A
common stock........................................... 3,547,920 --
Proceeds from issuance of Class B common stock............ 950 --
Capital contributions to Charter Holdco by Vulcan Cable... 1,894,290 --
Distributions to Charter Investment....................... (10,931) --
Other financing activities................................ (16,375) --
------------ --------
Net cash provided by financing activities......... 9,722,186 14,200
------------ --------
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS................... 124,133 8,172
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period.............. 9,573 1,401
------------ --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period.................... $ 133,706 $ 9,573
============ ========
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST...................................... $ 314,606 $ 5,538
============ ========
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:
Transfer of operating subsidiaries to the Company......... $ 1,252,370 $ --
Transfer of equity interests to the Company............... 180,710 --
Issuance of equity as partial payments for acquisitions... 683,312 --
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-14
183
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
Charter Communications, Inc.
On July 22, 1999, Charter Investment, Inc. (Charter Investment), a company
controlled by Paul G. Allen, formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Charter
Communications, Inc. (Charter), a Delaware corporation, with a nominal initial
investment.
On November 12, 1999, Charter sold 195.5 million shares of Class A common
stock in an initial public offering and 50,000 shares of high vote Class B
common stock to Mr. Allen. The net proceeds from the offerings of approximately
$3.55 billion were used to purchase membership units of Charter Communications
Holding Company, LLC (Charter Holdco), except for a portion of the proceeds that
were retained by Charter to acquire a portion of the equity interests of Avalon
Cable of Michigan Holdings, Inc. (Avalon). In exchange for the contribution of
the net proceeds from the offerings and equity interests of Avalon, Charter
received 195.55 million membership units of Charter Holdco on November 12, 1999,
representing a 100% voting interest and an approximate 40.6% economic interest.
Prior to November 12, 1999, Charter Holdco was owned 100% by Charter
Investment and Vulcan Cable III Inc. (Vulcan Cable), both entities controlled by
Mr. Allen. Subsequent to November 12, 1999, Mr. Allen controls Charter through
his ownership of all of the high vote Class B common stock and Charter controls
Charter Holdco through its ownership of all the voting interests. Charter's
purchase of 50,000 membership units of Charter Holdco was accounted for as a
reorganization of entities under common control similar to a pooling of
interests. Accordingly, beginning December 23, 1998, the date Mr. Allen first
controlled Charter Holdco, the assets and liabilities of Charter Holdco are
reflected in the consolidated financial statements of Charter at Mr. Allen's
basis and minority interest is recorded representing that portion of the
economic interests not owned by Charter. For financial reporting purposes,
50,000 of the membership units previously issued by Charter Holdco to companies
controlled by Mr. Allen are considered held by Charter effective December 23,
1998, representing an economic interest of less than 1%.
Charter is a holding company whose sole asset is a controlling equity
interest in Charter Holdco, an indirect owner of cable systems. Charter and
Charter Holdco and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the Company.
The Company owns and operates cable systems serving approximately 6.1
million (unaudited) customers, including customers from the Bresnan acquisition
(see Note 21) completed in February 2000. The Company offers a full range of
traditional cable television services and has begun to offer digital cable
television services, interactive video programming and high-speed Internet
access.
Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC
Charter Holdco, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed in
February 1999 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Investment. Charter
Investment through its wholly owned subsidiary, Charter Communications
Properties Holdings, LLC (CCPH), commenced operations with the acquisition of a
cable system on September 30, 1995.
Effective December 23, 1998, through a series of transactions, Mr. Allen
acquired approximately 94% of Charter Investment for an aggregate purchase price
of $2.2 billion, excluding $2.0 billion in debt assumed (the "Paul Allen
Transaction"). In conjunction with the
F-15
184
Paul Allen Transaction, Charter Investment acquired, for fair value from
unrelated third parties, all of the interests it did not already own in
CharterComm Holdings, LLC (CharterComm Holdings) and CCA Group (comprised of CCA
Holdings Corp., CCT Holdings Corp. and Charter Communications Long Beach, Inc.),
all cable television operating companies, for $2.0 billion, excluding $1.8
billion in debt assumed. Charter Investment previously managed and owned
minority interests in these companies. These acquisitions were accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, results of operations
of CharterComm Holdings and CCA Group are included in the financial statements
from the date of acquisition. In February 1999, Charter Investment transferred
all of its cable television operating subsidiaries to a wholly owned subsidiary
of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC (Charter Holdings), Charter
Communications Operating, LLC (Charter Operating). Charter Holdings is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Charter Holdco. This transfer was accounted for as a
reorganization of entities under common control similar to a pooling of
interests.
As a result of the change in ownership of CCPH, CharterComm Holdings and
CCA Group, Charter Holdco has applied push-down accounting in the preparation of
its consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, on December 23, 1998,
Charter Holdco increased its members' equity by $2.2 billion to reflect the
amounts paid by Mr. Allen and Charter Investment. The purchase price was
allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative
fair values, including amounts assigned to franchises of $3.6 billion.
On April 23, 1998, Mr. Allen and a company controlled by Mr. Allen,
(collectively, the "Mr. Allen Companies") purchased substantially all of the
outstanding partnership interests in Marcus Cable Company, L.L.C. (Marcus Cable)
for $1.4 billion, excluding $1.8 billion in assumed liabilities. The owner of
the remaining partnership interest retained voting control of Marcus Cable. In
February 1999, Marcus Cable Holdings, LLC (Marcus Holdings) was formed, and Mr.
Allen's interests in Marcus Cable were transferred to Marcus Holdings on March
15, 1999. On March 31, 1999, Mr. Allen purchased the remaining partnership
interests in Marcus Cable, including voting control. On April 7, 1999, Marcus
Holdings was merged into Charter Holdings and Marcus Cable was transferred to
Charter Holdings. For financial reporting purposes, the merger was accounted for
as an acquisition of Marcus Cable effective March 31, 1999, the date Mr. Allen
obtained voting control of Marcus Cable. Accordingly, the results of operations
of Marcus Cable have been included in the consolidated financial statements from
April 1, 1999. The assets and liabilities of Marcus Cable have been recorded in
the consolidated financial statements using historical carrying values reflected
in the accounts of the Mr. Allen Companies. Total member's equity of Charter
Holdco increased by $1.3 billion as a result of the Marcus Cable acquisition.
Previously, on April 23, 1998, the Mr. Allen Companies recorded the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed of Marcus Cable based on their relative fair
values.
The consolidated financial statements of Charter Holdco include the
accounts of Charter Operating and CCPH, the accounts of CharterComm Holdings and
CCA Group and their subsidiaries since December 23, 1998 (date acquired by
Charter Investment), and the accounts of Marcus Cable since March 31, 1999. All
subsidiaries are indirect wholly owned by Charter Holdco. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These investments are
carried at cost that approximates market value.
F-16
185
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, including all direct and
certain indirect costs associated with the construction of cable television
transmission and distribution facilities, and the cost of new customer
installations. The costs of disconnecting a customer are charged to expense in
the period incurred. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense as incurred, while equipment replacement and betterments are
capitalized.
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets as follows:
Cable distribution systems.................................. 3-15 years
Buildings and leasehold improvements........................ 5-15 years
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 3-5 years
Franchises
Costs incurred in obtaining and renewing cable franchises are deferred and
amortized over the lives of the franchises. Costs relating to unsuccessful
franchise applications are charged to expense when it is determined that the
efforts to obtain the franchise will not be successful. Franchise rights
acquired through the purchase of cable systems represent management's estimate
of fair value and are generally amortized using the straight-line method over a
period of 15 years. The period of 15 years is management's best estimate of the
useful lives of the franchises and assumes substantially all of those franchises
that expire during the period will be renewed by the Company. Accumulated
amortization related to franchises was $650.5 million and $5.3 million, as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Amortization expense related to
franchises for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from
December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, was $520.0 million and $5.3
million, respectively.
Deferred Financing Costs
Costs related to borrowings are deferred and amortized to interest expense
using the effective interest method over the terms of the related borrowings. As
of December 31, 1999, others assets include $120.7 million of deferred financing
costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10.3 million.
Impairment of Assets
If facts and circumstances suggest that a long-lived asset may be impaired,
the carrying value is reviewed. If a review indicates that the carrying value of
such asset is not recoverable based on projected undiscounted net cash flows
related to the asset over its remaining life, the carrying value of such asset
is reduced to its estimated fair value.
Revenues
Cable television revenues from basic and premium services are recognized
when the related services are provided.
Installation revenues are recognized to the extent of direct selling costs
incurred. The remainder, if any, is deferred and amortized to income over the
estimated average period that customers are expected to remain connected to the
cable system. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, no installation revenue has been
deferred, as direct selling costs have exceeded installation revenue.
Local governmental authorities impose franchise fees on the Company ranging
up to a federally mandated maximum of 5.0% of gross revenues. Such fees are
collected on a monthly
F-17
186
basis, from the Company's customers and are periodically remitted to local
franchise authorities. Franchise fees collected and paid are reported as
revenues and expenses.
Channel Launch Payments
The Company receives upfront payments from certain programmers to launch
and promote new cable television channels. A portion of these payments
represents reimbursement of advertising costs paid by the Company to promote the
new channels. These reimbursements have been immaterial. The remaining portion
is being amortized as an offset to programming expense over the respective terms
of the program agreements which range from one to 20 years. For the year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24, 1998, through December
31, 1998, the Company amortized and recorded as a reduction of programming costs
$3.4 million and $12, respectively. As of December 31, 1999, the unamortized
portion of payments received totaled $13.4 million and is included in other
long-term liabilities.
Direct Response Advertising
The Company expenses the production costs of advertising as incurred,
except for direct response advertising, which is deferred and amortized over its
expected period of future benefits. Direct response advertising consists
primarily of direct mailings and radio, newspaper and cross-channel television
advertisements that include a phone number for use in ordering the Company's
products and services. The deferred advertising costs are amortized to
advertising expense over the periods during which the future benefits are
expected to be received. The periods range from two to four years depending on
the type of service the customer subscribes to and represents the period the
customer is expected to remain connected to the cable system. As of December 31,
1999, $700 of deferred advertising costs is included in other assets.
Advertising expense was $30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999,
including amortization of deferred advertising costs totaling $87.
Investments and Other Comprehensive Income
Investments in equity securities are accounted for in accordance with SFAS
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The
Company owns common stock of WorldGate Communications, Inc. (WorldGate) that is
classified as "available for sale" and reported at market value with unrealized
gains and losses recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income. Based on
quoted market prices, the investment was valued at $5.4 million as of December
31, 1999, and is included in other assets. Comprehensive loss for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24, 1998, through December
31, 1998, was $64.8 million and $2, respectively.
Interest Rate Hedge Agreements
The Company manages fluctuations in interest rates by using interest rate
hedge agreements, as required by certain debt agreements. Interest rate swaps,
caps and collars are accounted for as hedges of debt obligations, and
accordingly, the net settlement amounts are recorded as adjustments to interest
expense in the period incurred. Premiums paid for interest rate caps are
deferred, included in other assets, and are amortized over the original term of
the interest rate agreement as an adjustment to interest expense.
The Company's interest rate swap agreements require the Company to pay a
fixed rate and receive a floating rate thereby creating fixed rate debt.
Interest rate caps and collars are entered into by the Company to reduce the
impact of rising interest rates on floating rate debt.
The Company's participation in interest rate hedging transactions involves
instruments that have a close correlation with its debt, thereby managing its
risk. Interest rate hedge agreements have been designated for hedging purposes
and are not held or issued for speculative purposes.
F-18
187
Income Taxes
Substantially all of the taxable income, gains, losses, deductions and
credits of Charter Holdco are passed through to its partners, Charter
Investment, Vulcan Cable and Charter. Prior to November 12, 1999, income taxes
were the responsibility of the owners of Charter Investment and Vulcan Cable and
are not provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Beginning November 12, 1999, Charter is responsible for its share of taxable
income (loss) of Charter Holdco allocated to Charter in accordance with
partnership tax rules and regulations. The tax basis of Charter's investment in
Charter Holdco is not materially different than the carrying value of the
investment for financial reporting purposes as of December 31, 1999.
Charter Holdco's limited liability company agreement provides that through
the end of 2003, tax losses of Charter Holdco that would otherwise have been
allocated to Charter will instead be allocated to the membership units held by
Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment. At the time Charter first becomes
profitable (as determined under the applicable federal income tax rules), the
profits that would otherwise have been allocated to Charter will instead be
allocated to the membership units held by Vulcan Cable and Charter Investment
until the tax benefits are fully restored. Management does not expect Charter
Holdco to generate tax profits in the foreseeable future.
Segments
In 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. Segments have been identified based upon
management responsibility. The individual segments have been aggregated into one
segment, cable services.
Loss per Common Share
For purposes of the loss per common share calculation for the period from
December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, Mr. Allen's 50,000 shares of high
vote Class B common stock are considered to be outstanding for the entire
period. Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by
50,000 shares for 1998 and 29,811,202 shares for 1999, representing the weighted
average common shares outstanding during 1999. Diluted loss per common share
equals basic loss per common share for the periods presented, as the effect of
stock options is anti-dilutive because the Company generated net losses. All
membership units of Charter Holdco are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into
common stock of Charter at the option of the holders. Should the holders
exchange units for shares, the effect would not be dilutive.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United Sates requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3. ACQUISITIONS:
During 1999, the Company acquired cable systems in 11 separate transactions
for an aggregate purchase price, of $7.6 billion, net of cash acquired,
excluding debt assumed of $2.5 billion. In connection with two of the
acquisitions, Charter Holdco issued equity interests totaling $683.3 million.
The purchase prices were allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their relative fair values, including amounts assigned to franchises of
$9.7 billion. The allocation of the purchase prices for these acquisitions are
based, in part, on
F-19
188
preliminary information, which is subject to adjustment upon obtaining complete
valuation information. Management believes that finalization of the purchase
prices and allocation will not have a material impact on the consolidated
results of operations or financial position of the Company.
The above acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, and accordingly, results of operations of the acquired assets have
been included in the financial statements from the dates of acquisition.
Unaudited pro forma operating results of the Company as though the
acquisitions discussed above, including the Paul Allen Transaction and the
acquisition of Marcus Holdings, and the initial public offering of common stock
and the March 1999 refinancing of debt discussed herein, had occurred on January
1, 1998, with adjustments to give effect to amortization of franchises, interest
expense, minority interest and certain other adjustments are as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(UNAUDITED)
Revenues.......................................... $ 2,624,394 $ 2,412,252
Loss from operations.............................. (355,030) (333,595)
Loss before minority interest..................... (1,181,635) (1,165,806)
Net loss.......................................... (479,744) (473,317)
The unaudited pro forma financial information has been presented for
comparative purposes and does not purport to be indicative of the results of
operations had these transactions been completed as of the assumed date or which
may be obtained in the future.
4. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is summarized as follows:
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
Balance, beginning of period....................... $ 1,728 $1,702
Acquisitions of cable systems...................... 5,860 --
Charged to expense................................. 20,872 26
Uncollected balances written off, net of
recoveries....................................... (16,989) --
-------- ------
Balance, end of period............................. $ 11,471 $1,728
======== ======
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at December 31:
1999 1998
---- ----
Cable distribution systems............................ $3,523,217 $661,749
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements............ 108,214 26,670
Vehicles and equipment................................ 176,221 30,590
---------- --------
3,807,652 719,009
Less--Accumulated depreciation........................ (317,079) (2,767)
---------- --------
$3,490,573 $716,242
========== ========
F-20
189
For the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24,
1998, through December 31, 1998, depreciation expense was $225.0 million and
$2.8 million, respectively.
6. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at December
31:
1999 1998
---- ----
Accounts payable........................................ $112,233 $ 7,439
Liability for pending transfer of cable system.......... 88,200 --
Accrued interest........................................ 85,870 30,809
Programming costs....................................... 72,245 11,856
Capital expenditures.................................... 66,713 15,560
Franchise fees.......................................... 46,524 12,534
Accrued general and administrative...................... 39,648 6,688
Accrued income taxes.................................... 4,188 15,205
Other accrued liabilities............................... 191,154 27,495
-------- --------
$706,775 $127,586
======== ========
The liability for pending transfer of cable system represents the fair
value of a cable system to be transferred upon obtaining necessary regulatory
approvals in connection with the transaction with InterMedia Capital Partners IV
L. P., InterMedia Partners and their affiliates. Such approvals were
subsequently obtained and the system assets were transferred in March 2000.
7. LONG-TERM DEBT:
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31:
1999 1998
---- ----
Charter Holdings:
14.000% Senior Secured Discount Debentures................ $ -- $ 109,152
11.250% Senior Notes...................................... -- 125,000
8.250% Senior Notes....................................... 600,000 --
8.625% Senior Notes....................................... 1,500,000 --
9.920% Senior Discount Notes.............................. 1,475,000 --
Renaissance:
10.000% Senior Discount Notes............................. 114,413 --
Rifkin:
11.125% Senior Subordinated Notes......................... 900 --
Avalon:
9.375% Senior Subordinated Notes.......................... 150,000 --
11.875% Senior Discount Notes............................. 196,000 --
7.000% Note payable, due 2003............................. 500 --
CC VII Holdings, LLC (Falcon):
8.375% Senior Debentures.................................. 375,000 --
9.285% Senior Discount Debentures......................... 435,250 --
F-21
190
1999 1998
---- ----
Credit Facilities:
Credit Agreements (including CCPH, CCA Group and
CharterComm Holdings).................................. -- 1,726,500
Charter Operating......................................... 2,906,000 --
CC Michigan, LLC and CC New England, LLC (Avalon)......... 170,000 --
CC VI Operating Company, LLC (Fanch)...................... 850,000 --
Falcon Cable Communications, LLC.......................... 865,500 --
---------- ----------
9,638,563 1,960,652
Current maturities........................................ -- (10,450)
Unamortized net (discount) premium........................ (702,108) 41,554
---------- ----------
$8,936,455 $1,991,756
========== ==========
In March 1999, Charter Holdings and Marcus Holdings extinguished
substantially all existing long-term debt, excluding borrowings under its credit
agreements, and refinanced substantially all existing credit agreements at
various subsidiaries with a new credit agreement entered into by Charter
Operating (the "Charter Operating Credit Facilities").
Charter Holdings Notes
In March 1999, Charter Holdings and Charter Communications Holdings Capital
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Charter Holdings, (collectively, the
"Issuers") issued $600.0 million 8.250% Senior Notes due 2007 (the "8.250%
Senior Notes") for net proceeds of $598.4 million, $1.5 billion 8.625% Senior
Notes due 2009 (the "8.625% Senior Notes") for net proceeds of $1,495.4 million,
and $1,475.0 million 9.920% Senior Discount Notes due 2011 (the "9.920% Senior
Discount Notes") for net proceeds of $905.5 million, (collectively with the
8.250% Senior Notes and the 8.625% Senior Notes, referred to as the "Charter
Holdings Notes").
The 8.250% Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to maturity. Interest is
payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, beginning October 1,
1999 until maturity.
The 8.625% Senior Notes are redeemable at the option of the Issuers at
amounts decreasing from 104.313% to 100% of par value beginning on April 1,
2004, plus accrued and unpaid interest, to the date of redemption. At any time
prior to April 1, 2002, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 8.625% Senior Notes at a redemption price of 108.625% of
the principal amount under certain conditions. Interest is payable semi-annually
in arrears on April 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 1999, until maturity.
The 9.920% Senior Discount Notes are redeemable at the option of the
Issuers at amounts decreasing from 104.960% to 100% of accreted value beginning
April 1, 2004. At any time prior to April 1, 2002, the Issuers may redeem up to
35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9.920% Senior Discount Notes at a
redemption price of 109.920% of the accreted value under certain conditions.
Thereafter, cash interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and
October 1 beginning April 1, 2004, until maturity. The discount on the 9.920%
Senior Discount Notes is being accreted using the effective interest method. The
unamortized discount was $497.2 million at December 31, 1999.
The Charter Holdings Notes rank equally with current and future unsecured
and unsubordinated indebtedness (including accounts payables of the Company).
The Issuers are required to make an offer to repurchase all of the Charter
Holdings Notes, at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal or 101% of
the accreted value, together with accrued and unpaid interest, upon a change of
control of the Company.
F-22
191
Renaissance Notes
In connection with the acquisition of Renaissance Media Group LLC
(Renaissance) during the second quarter of 1999, the Company assumed $163.2
million principal amount at maturity of senior discount notes due April 2008
(the "Renaissance Notes"). As a result of the change in control of Renaissance,
the Company was required to make an offer to repurchase the Renaissance Notes at
101% of their accreted value. In May 1999, the Company made an offer to
repurchase the Renaissance Notes pursuant to this requirement, and the holders
of the Renaissance Notes tendered an amount representing 30% of the total
outstanding principal amount at maturity for repurchase. These notes were
repurchased using a portion of the proceeds from the Charter Holdings Notes.
As of December 31, 1999, $114.4 million aggregate principal amount at
maturity of Renaissance Notes with an accreted value of $83.0 million remain
outstanding. Interest on the Renaissance Notes shall be paid semi-annually at a
rate of 10% per annum beginning on October 15, 2003.
The Renaissance Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole
or in part, at any time on or after April 15, 2003, initially at 105% of their
principal amount at maturity, plus accrued and unpaid interest, declining to
100% of the principal amount at maturity, plus accrued and unpaid interest, on
or after April 15, 2006. In addition, at any time prior to April 15, 2001, the
Company may redeem up to 35% of the original principal amount at maturity with
the proceeds of one or more sales of membership units at 110% of their accreted
value, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the redemption date, provided that
after any such redemption, at least $106 million aggregate principal amount at
maturity remains outstanding.
Rifkin Notes
The Company acquired Rifkin Acquisition Partners L.L.L.P. and InterLink
Communications, Partners, LLLP (collectively, "Rifkin") in September 1999 and
assumed Rifkin's 11.125% senior subordinated notes due 2006 (the "Rifkin Notes")
together with a $3.0 million promissory note payable to Monroe Rifkin,. Interest
on the Rifkin Notes is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each
year. In September 1999, the Company commenced an offer to repurchase any and
all of the outstanding Rifkin Notes, for cash at a premium over the principal
amounts. In conjunction with this tender offer, the Company sought and obtained
the consent of a majority in principal amount of the note holders of the
outstanding Rifkin Notes to proposed amendments to the indenture governing the
Rifkin Notes, which eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants.
In October 1999, the Company repurchased a portion of the Rifkin Notes with a
total outstanding principal amount of $124.1 million for a total of $140.6
million, including a consent fee to the holders who delivered timely consents
amending the indenture, and repurchased the promissory note issued to Monroe
Rifkin for $3.4 million. These notes were paid using borrowings from the Charter
Operating Credit Facilities. At December 31, 1999, $900 aggregate principal of
Rifkin Notes remain outstanding.
Avalon Notes
The Company acquired CC V Holdings, LLC (Avalon) (formerly known as Avalon
Cable LLC) in November 1999 and assumed Avalon's 11.875% Senior Discount Notes
Due 2008 (the "Avalon 11.875% Notes") and 9.375% Subordinated Notes Due 2008
(the "Avalon 9.375% Notes"). As of December 31, 1999, $196.0 million aggregate
principal amount of the Avalon 11.875% Notes with an accreted value of $124.8
million and $150.0 million principal amount of the Avalon 9.375% Notes were
outstanding. After December 1, 2003, cash interest on the Avalon 11.875% Notes
will be payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing
June 1, 2004.
F-23
192
On December 3, 1999, the Company commenced a change of control offer with
respect to the Avalon 9.375% Notes and a change of control offer with respect to
the Avalon 11.875% Notes at purchase prices of 101% of principal amount or
accreted value, as applicable. In January 2000, the Company completed the
repurchase of the Avalon 9.375% Notes with a total outstanding principal amount
of $134.0 million for a total of $137.4 million. In addition to the change of
control repurchase, the Company repurchased the remaining outstanding principal
amount of $16.0 million in the open market for $16.3 million. Also in January
2000, the Company repurchased a portion of the Avalon 11.875% Notes with a total
outstanding principal amount of $16.3 million for a total of $10.5 million. The
repurchase of the Avalon 9.375% Notes and the Avalon 11.875% Notes was funded by
a portion of the cash proceeds from the issuance of additional notes by Charter
Holdings in January 2000 (the "January 2000 Charter Holdings Notes"). Avalon
11.875% Notes with a total principal amount at maturity of $179.8 million and an
accreted value of $116.4 million remain outstanding after the repurchases.
Falcon Debentures
The Company acquired CC VII Holdings, LLC (Falcon) (formerly known as
Falcon Communications, L.P.) in November 1999 and assumed Falcon's 8.375% Senior
Debentures Due 2010 (the "Falcon 8.375% Debentures") and 9.285% Senior Discount
Debentures Due 2010 (the "Falcon 9.285% Debentures", collectively, with the
Falcon 8.375% Debentures, the "Falcon Debentures"). As of December 31, 1999,
$375.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Falcon 8.375% Debentures and
$435.3 million aggregate principal amount of the Falcon 9.285% Debentures, with
an accreted value of $323.0 million were outstanding.
On December 10, 1999, the Company commenced change of control offers and
offered to repurchase the Falcon Debentures at purchase prices of 101% of
principal amount, plus unpaid and accrued interest, or accreted value, as
applicable. In February 2000, the Company completed the repurchase of the Falcon
8.375% Debentures with a total outstanding principal amount of $317.4 million
for a total of $328.6 million. In addition to the change of control repurchase,
the Company repurchased the Falcon 8.375% Debentures with a total outstanding
principal amount of $57.6 million in the open market for $59.4 million. Also, in
February 2000, the Company repurchased the Falcon 9.285% Debentures with an
aggregate principal amount of $230.0 million for a total of $173.8 million. In
addition to the change of control repurchase, the Company repurchased the Falcon
9.285% Debentures with an aggregate principal amount of $205.3 million in the
open market for $154.3 million. The repurchase of all the Falcon Debentures was
funded by a portion of the proceeds from the January 2000 Charter Holdings
Notes.
Helicon Notes
The Company acquired Helicon I, L.P. and affiliates (Helicon) in July 1999
and assumed Helicon's 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2003 (the "Helicon Notes").
On November 1, 1999, the Company redeemed all of the Helicon Notes at a purchase
price equal to 103% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest, for $124.8
million using borrowings from the Charter Operating Credit Facilities.
Charter Operating Credit Facilities
The Charter Operating Credit Facilities provide for two term facilities,
one with a principal amount of $1.0 billion that matures September 2007 (Term
A), and the other with the principal amount of $1.85 billion that matures March
2008 (Term B). The Charter Operating Credit Facilities also provide for a $1.25
billion revolving credit facility with a maturity date of September 2007 and at
the options of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities, in the amount of
$500.0 million available until March 18, 2002. Amounts under the Charter
Operating Credit Facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar
rate, as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.75% (8.22% to 8.97% as of December
31, 1999). A quarterly commitment fee of between
F-24
193
0.25% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the unborrowed balance of Term A and
the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 1999, the unused availability
was $1.2 billion. In March 2000, the credit agreement was amended to increase
the amount of the supplemental credit facility to $1.0 billion. In connection
with this amendment, $600.0 million of the supplemental credit facility (the
"Incremental Term Loan") was drawn down. The Incremental Term Loan maturity date
is September 18, 2008.
Avalon Credit Facilities
In connection with the Avalon acquisition, the Company entered into a new
credit agreement (the "Avalon Credit Facilities"). The Avalon Credit Facilities
have maximum borrowings of $300.0 million, consisting of a revolving facility in
the amount of $175.0 million that matures May 15, 2008, and a Term B loan in the
amount of $125.0 million that matures on November 15, 2008. The Avalon Credit
Facilities also provide for, at the options of the lenders, supplemental credit
facilities in the amounts of $75 million available until December 31, 2003. All
amounts mature in June 2008. Amounts under the Avalon Credit Facilities bear
interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar rate, as defined, plus a margin up
to 2.75% (7.995% to 8.870% as of December 31, 1999). A quarterly commitment fee
of between 0.250% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the unborrowed balance. The
Company borrowed $170.0 million under the Avalon Credit Facilities to fund a
portion of the Avalon purchase price. As of December 31, 1999, unused
availability was $ 130.0 million.
Fanch Credit Facilities
In connection with the acquisition of cable systems of Fanch Cablevision
L.P. and affiliates (Fanch), the Company entered into a new credit agreement
(the "Fanch Credit Facilities"). The Fanch Credit Facilities provide for two
term facilities, one with a principal amount of $450.0 million that matures May
2008 (Term A), and the other with the principal amount of $400.0 million that
matures November 2008 (Term B). The Fanch Credit Facilities also provide for a
$350.0 million revolving credit facility with a maturity date of May 2008 and at
the options of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities, in the amount of
$300.0 million available until December 31, 2004. Amounts under the Fanch Credit
Facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the Eurodollar rate, as defined,
plus a margin of up to 2.75% (8.12% to 8.87% as of December 31, 1999). A
quarterly commitment fee of between 0.250% and 0.375% per annum is payable on
the unborrowed balance. The Company used $850.0 million of the credit facilities
to fund a portion of the Fanch purchase price. As of December 31, 1999, unused
availability was $ 350.0 million.
Falcon Credit Facilities
In connection with the Falcon acquisition, the existing Falcon credit
agreement (the "Falcon Credit Facilities") was amended to provide for two term
facilities, one with a principal amount of $200.0 million that matures June 2007
(Term B), and the other with the principal amount of $300.0 million that matures
December 2007 (Term C). The Falcon Credit Facilities also provide for a $646.0
million revolving credit facility with a maturity date of December 2006 and at
the options of the lenders, supplemental credit facilities in the amounts of
$700.0 million with a maturity date of December 2007. At December 31, 1999,
$110.0 million was outstanding under the supplemental credit facilities. Amounts
under the Falcon Credit Facilities bear interest at the Base Rate or the
Eurodollar rate, as defined, plus a margin of up to 2.5% (7.57% to 8.73% as of
December 31, 1999). A quarterly commitment fee of between 0.25% and 0.375% per
annum is payable on the unborrowed balance. As of December 31, 1999, unused
availability was $ 390.5 million. However, debt covenants limit the amount that
can be borrowed to $342.0 million at December 31, 1999.
F-25
194
The indentures governing the debt agreements require issuers of the debt
and/or its subsidiaries to comply with various financial and other covenants,
including the maintenance of certain operating and financial ratios. These debt
instruments also contain substantial limitations on, or prohibitions of
distributions, additional indebtedness, liens, asset sales and certain other
items. As a result of limitations and prohibitions of distributions,
substantially all of the net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries are
restricted for distribution to Charter Holdings, Charter Holdco and Charter.
Based upon outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 1999, the amortization
of term loans, scheduled reductions in available borrowings of the revolving
credit facilities, and the maturity dates for all senior and subordinated notes
and debentures, aggregate future principal payments on the total borrowings
under all debt agreements at December 31, 1999, are as follows:
YEAR AMOUNT
---- ------
2000........................................................ $ --
2001........................................................ 5,000
2002........................................................ 93,875
2003........................................................ 284,229
2004........................................................ 261,423
Thereafter.................................................. 8,994,036
----------
$9,638,563
==========
8. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
A summary of debt and the related interest rate hedge agreements at
December 31, 1999, is as follows:
CARRYING NOTIONAL FAIR
VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -----
DEBT
Charter Holdings:
8.250% Senior Notes.................................. $ 598,557 $ -- $ 558,000
8.625% Senior Notes.................................. 1,495,787 -- 1,395,000
9.920% Senior Discount Notes......................... 977,807 -- 881,313
Renaissance:
10.000% Senior Discount Notes........................ 86,507 -- 79,517
Rifkin:
11.125% Senior Subordinated Notes.................... 954 -- 990
Avalon:
9.375% Senior Subordinated Notes..................... 151,500 -- 151,500
11.875% Senior Discount Notes........................ 129,212 -- 129,212
7.000% Note payable, due 2003........................ 500 -- 500
CC VII Holdings, LLC (Falcon):
8.375% Senior Debentures............................. 378,750 -- 378,750
9.285% Senior Discount Debentures.................... 325,381 -- 325,381
Credit Facilities:
Charter Operating.................................... 2,906,000 -- 2,906,000
CC Michigan LLC and CC New England LLC (Avalon)...... 170,000 -- 170,000
CC VI Operating, LLC (Fanch)......................... 850,000 -- 850,000
Falcon Cable Communications, LLC..................... 865,500 -- 865,500
F-26
195
CARRYING NOTIONAL FAIR
VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -----
INTEREST RATE HEDGE AGREEMENTS
Swaps.................................................. $ (6,827) $4,542,713 $ (47,220)
Caps................................................... -- 15,000 16
Collars................................................ 1,361 240,000 (199)
A summary of debt and the related interest rate hedge agreements at
December 31, 1998, is as follows:
CARRYING NOTIONAL FAIR
VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -----
DEBT
Credit Agreements (including CCPH, CCA Group and
CharterComm Holdings)................................ $1,726,500 $ -- $1,726,500
14.000% Senior Secured Discount Debentures............. 138,102 -- 138,102
11.250% Senior Notes................................... 137,604 -- 137,604
INTEREST RATE HEDGE AGREEMENTS
Swaps.................................................. $ 23,216 $1,105,000 $ 23,216
Caps................................................... -- 15,000 --
Collars................................................ 4,174 310,000 4,174
As the long-term debt under the credit agreements bears interest at current
market rates, their carrying amount approximates market value at December 31,
1999 and 1998. The fair values of the notes and the debentures are based on
quoted market prices.
The weighted average interest pay rate for the Company's interest rate swap
agreements was 8.06% and 7.66% at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
weighted average interest rate for the Company's interest rate cap agreements
was 9.0% and 8.55% at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The weighted
average interest rate for the Company's interest rate collar agreements were
9.13% and 7.74% for the cap and floor components, respectively, at December 31,
1999, and 8.61% and 7.31%, respectively, at December 31, 1998.
The notional amounts of interest rate hedge agreements do not represent
amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of the Company's
exposure through its use of interest rate hedge agreements. The amounts
exchanged are determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms
of the contracts.
The fair value of interest rate hedge agreements generally reflects the
estimated amounts that the Company would (receive) or pay (excluding accrued
interest) to terminate the contracts on the reporting date, thereby taking into
account the current unrealized gains or losses of open contracts. Dealer
quotations are available for the Company's interest rate hedge agreements.
Management believes that the sellers of the interest rate hedge agreements
will be able to meet their obligations under the agreements. In addition, some
of the interest rate hedge agreements are with certain of the participating
banks under the Company's credit facilities, thereby reducing the exposure to
credit loss. The Company has policies regarding the financial stability and
credit standing of major counterparties. Nonperformance by the counterparties is
not anticipated nor would it have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
At December 31, 1999, 1.5 billion shares of $.001 par value Class A common
stock, 750 million shares of $.001 par value Class B common stock, and 250
million shares of $.001 par value preferred stock are authorized. At December
31, 1999, 221.7 million, 50,000 and no shares
F-27
196
of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and preferred stock, respectively,
were issued and outstanding. The 221.7 million shares of Class A common stock
includes 26.8 million shares classified as redeemable securities (see Note 16).
At December 31, 1998, there were 750 million share authorized and 50,000 shares
of Class B common stock issued and outstanding.
10. INCOME TAXES:
Certain indirect subsidiaries of Charter Holdings are Corporations and file
separate federal and state income tax returns. Results of operations from these
subsidiaries are not material to the consolidated results of operations of the
Company. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 1999, represents
taxes assessed by certain state jurisdictions. Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are not material.
Charter files separate federal and state income tax returns and is
responsible for its share of taxable income (loss) of Charter Holdco as
determined by partnership tax rules and regulations and Charter Holdco's limited
liability company agreement (see Note 2). Management does not expect Charter to
pay any income taxes in the foreseeable future. Any net deferred income tax
assets will be offset entirely by a valuation allowance because of current and
expected future losses.
11. REVENUES:
Revenues consist of the following:
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
Basic.............................................. $1,002,954 $ 9,347
Premium............................................ 124,788 1,415
Pay-per-view....................................... 27,537 260
Digital video...................................... 8,299 10
Advertising sales.................................. 71,997 493
Cable modem........................................ 10,107 55
Other.............................................. 182,562 2,133
---------- -------
$1,428,244 $13,713
========== =======
12. OPERATING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
Operating, general and administrative expenses consist of the following:
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
Programming........................................ $330,754 $3,137
General and administrative......................... 237,480 2,377
Service............................................ 99,486 847
Advertising........................................ 31,281 344
Marketing.......................................... 23,447 225
Other.............................................. 15,509 204
-------- ------
$737,957 $7,134
======== ======
F-28
197
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Charter Investment provides management services to the Company including
centralized customer billing services, data processing and related support,
benefits administration and coordination of insurance coverage and
self-insurance programs for medical, dental and workers' compensation claims.
Certain costs for services are billed and charged directly to the Company's
operating subsidiaries and are included in operating costs. These billings are
allocated based on the number of basic customers. Such costs totaled $16.5
million and $128 for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from
December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, respectively. All other costs
incurred by Charter Investment on behalf of the Company are recorded as expenses
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and are included in
corporate expense charges-related party. Management believes that costs incurred
by Charter Investment on the Company's behalf and included in the accompanying
financial statements are not materially different than costs the Company would
have incurred as a stand-alone entity.
Charter Investment utilizes a combination of excess insurance coverage and
self-insurance programs for its medical, dental and workers' compensation
claims. Charges are made to the Company as determined by independent actuaries
at the present value of the actuarially computed present and future liabilities
for such benefits. Medical coverage provides for $1.0 million aggregate stop
loss protection and a loss limitation of $100 per person per year. Workers'
compensation coverage provides for $1.0 million aggregate stop loss protection
and a loss limitation of $250 per person per year.
The Company is charged a management fee as stipulated in the management
agreement between Charter Investment and Charter. To the extent management fees
charged to the Company are greater (less) than the corporate expenses incurred
by Charter Investment, the Company records distributions to (capital
contributions from) Charter Investment. For the year ended December 31, 1999,
the Company recorded distributions of $10.9 million, a portion of which have
been allocated to minority interest. For the period from December 24, 1998,
through December 31, 1998, the management fee charged to the Company
approximated the corporate expenses incurred by Charter Investment on behalf of
the Company. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, management fees currently payable
of $9.2 million and $473, respectively, are included in payables to related
party. For the period from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, the
management fee charged to the Company approximated the corporate expenses
incurred by Charter Investment and Charter on behalf of the Company. The credit
facilities and indebtedness prohibit payments of management fees in excess of
3.5% of revenues until repayment of such indebtedness. Any amount in excess of
3.5% of revenues owed to Charter Investment based on the management agreement is
recorded as deferred management fees-related party.
Charter, Mr. Allen and certain affiliates of Mr. Allen own equity interests
or warrants to purchase equity interests in various entities that provide
services or programming to the Company, including High Speed Access Corp. (High
Speed Access), WorldGate, Wink Communications, Inc. (Wink), ZDTV, LLC (ZDTV),
USA Networks, Inc. (USA Networks) and Oxygen Media Inc. (Oxygen Media). In
addition, certain officers or directors of the Company also serve as directors
of High Speed Access and USA Networks. The Company and its affiliates do not
hold controlling interests in any of these companies.
Certain of the Company's cable customers receive cable modem-based Internet
access through High Speed Access and TV-based Internet access through WorldGate.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24, 1998,
through December 31, 1998, revenues attributable to these services were less
than 1% of total revenues.
The Company receives programming and certain interactive features embedded
into programming for broadcast via its cable systems from Wink, ZDTV, USA
Networks and Oxygen Media. The Company pays a fee for the programming service
generally based on the number of
F-29
198
customers receiving the service. Such fees for the year ended December 31, 1999,
and for the period from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, were
approximately 1% of total operating costs. In addition, the Company receives
commissions from USA Networks for home shopping sales generated by its
customers. Such revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the
period from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, were less than 1% of
total revenues.
14. MINORITY INTEREST AND EQUITY INTERESTS OF CHARTER HOLDCO:
Minority interest represents total members' equity of Charter Holdco
multiplied by 59.4% as of December 31, 1999, and 99.96% as of December 31, 1998,
the ownership percentages of Charter Holdco not owned by Charter. Members'
equity of Charter Holdco was $9.1 billion as of December 31, 1999, and $2.2
billion as of December 31, 1998. Gains (losses) arising from issuances by
Charter Holdco of its membership units are recorded as capital transactions
thereby increasing (decreasing) stockholders' equity and (decreasing) increasing
minority interest on the consolidated balance sheets.
Changes to minority interest consist of the following:
MINORITY
INTEREST
--------
Initial transfer of Charter Investment's operating
subsidiaries to
Charter Holdco............................................ $2,150,979
Option compensation expense................................. 845
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary..................... (5,275)
----------
Balance, December 31, 1998.................................. 2,146,549
Distributions to Charter Investment......................... (8,698)
Transfer of Marcus Holdings' operating subsidiaries to
Charter Holdco............................................ 1,252,370
Transfer of Rifkin equity interests to Charter Holdco....... 180,710
Charter Holdco equity issued to Falcon and Rifkin sellers... 683,312
Charter Holdco equity issued to Vulcan Cable for cash....... 1,894,290
Contribution of marketable securities by Charter
Investment................................................ 951
Accretion of preferred equity of Charter Holdco............. 1,755
Exchange of Charter Holdco units for Charter common stock... (638,561)
Equity classified as redeemable securities.................. (50,151)
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary..................... (572,607)
Option compensation expense................................. 75,486
Gain on issuance of equity by Charter Holdco................ 413,848
Unrealized gain on marketable securities available for
sale...................................................... 2,077
----------
Balance, December 31, 1999.................................. $5,381,331
==========
The preferred equity interests in Charter Holdco held by the Rifkin sellers
were exchangeable into Class A common stock of Charter at the option of the
Rifkin sellers only at the time of the initial public offering. In November
1999, preferred equity interests of $130.3 million were exchanged into common
stock of Charter. The membership units of Charter Holdco held by the Falcon
sellers were exchangeable into Class A common stock of Charter. The units are
also puttable to Mr. Allen for cash. In November 1999, membership units of $43.4
million were put to Mr. Allen and $506.6 million were exchanged into the Class A
common stock of Charter. For a two-year period, equity held by the Rifkin and
Falcon sellers may be put to Mr. Allen for cash.
Pursuant to a membership interests purchase agreement, as amended, Vulcan
Cable contributed $500.0 million in cash on August 10, 1999, to Charter Holdco,
contributed an additional $180.7 million in certain equity interests acquired in
connection with the acquisition of
F-30
199
Rifkin in September 1999, to Charter Holdco, and contributed $644.3 million in
September 1999 to Charter Holdco. All funds and equity interests were
contributed to Charter Holdings. Concurrently with closing of the initial public
offering, Vulcan Cable contributed $750 million in cash to Charter Holdco.
15. OPTION PLAN:
In accordance with an employment agreement between Charter Investment and
the President and Chief Executive Officer of Charter and a related option
agreement with the President and Chief Executive Officer, an option to purchase
7,044,127 Charter Holdco membership interests, was issued to the President and
Chief Executive Officer. The option vests over a four-year period from the date
of grant and expires ten years from the date of grant.
In February 1999, Charter Holdings adopted an option plan providing for the
grant of options. The plan was assumed by Charter Holdco. The option plan
provides for grants of options to employees, officers and directors of Charter
Holdco and its affiliates and consultants who provide services to Charter
Holdco. Options granted vest over five years from the grant date, commencing 15
months after the date of grant. Options not exercised accumulate and are
exercisable, in whole or in part, in any subsequent period, but not later than
ten years from the date of grant.
Membership units received upon exercise of the options are automatically
exchanged for shares of Class A common stock of Charter on a one-for-one basis.
A summary of the activity for the Company's option plan for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 23, 1998, through December
31, 1998, is as follows:
1999 1998
---------------------- ---------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
------ -------- ------ --------
Options outstanding, beginning of period......... 7,044,127 $20.00 -- $--
Granted
December 23, 1998.............................. 7,044,127 20.00
February 9, 1999............................... 9,111,681 20.00
April 5, 1999.................................. 473,000 20.73
November 8, 1999............................... 4,741,400 19.00
Cancelled........................................ (612,600) 19.95
---------- ------ --------- ------
Options outstanding, end of period............... 20,757,608 $19.79 7,044,127 $20.00
========== ====== ========= ======
10.0
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life...... 9.2 years years
========== =========
Options Exercisable, end of period............... 2,091,032 $19.90 1,761,032 $20.00
========== ====== ========= ======
Weighted average fair value of options granted... $12.59 $12.50
========== =========
In February 2000, the Company granted 5.7 million options at $19.47 per
share.
The Company uses the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, to
account for the option plans. Option compensation expense of $80.0 million and
$845 for the year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24,
1998, to December 31, 1998, respectively, has been recorded in the consolidated
financial statements since the exercise prices were less than the estimated fair
values of the underlying membership interests on the date of grant. Estimated
fair values were determined by the Company using the valuation inherent in the
Paul Allen Transaction and valuations of public companies in the cable
television industry adjusted for factors specific to the
F-31
200
Company. Compensation expense is being recorded over the vesting period of each
grant that varies from four to five years. As of December 31, 1999, deferred
compensation remaining to be recognized in future periods totaled $79.4 million.
No stock option compensation expense was recorded for the options granted on
November 8, 1999, since the exercise price is equal to the estimated fair value
of the underlying membership interests on the date of grant. Since the
membership units are exchangeable into Class A common stock of Charter on a
one-for-one basis, the estimated fair value was equal to the initial offering
price of Class A common stock.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), requires pro forma disclosure of the impact
on earnings as if the compensation costs for these plans had been determined
consistent with the fair value methodology of this statement. The Company's net
loss would have been increased to the following unaudited pro forma amounts
under SFAS 123:
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
Net loss:
As reported...................................... $(66,229) $ (2)
Pro forma (unaudited)............................ (68,923) (2)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
As reported...................................... (2.22) (0.04)
Pro forma (unaudited)............................ (2.31) (0.04)
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted average
assumptions were used for grants during the year ended December 31, 1999, and
for the period from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, respectively:
risk-free interest rates of 5.5% and 4.8%; expected volatility of 43.8% and
43.7%; and expected lives of 10 years. The valuations assume no dividends are
paid.
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under noncancelable
operating leases. Leases and rental costs charged to expense for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24, 1998, through December
31, 1998, were $11.2 million and $70, respectively. As of December 31, 1999,
future minimum lease payments are as follows:
2000........................................................ $9,036
2001........................................................ 7,141
2002........................................................ 4,645
2003........................................................ 3,153
2004........................................................ 2,588
Thereafter.................................................. 8,845
The Company also rents utility poles in its operations. Generally, pole
rentals are cancelable on short notice, but the Company anticipates that such
rentals will recur. Rent expense incurred for pole rental attachments for the
year ended December 31, 1999, and for the period from December 24, 1998, through
December 31, 1998, was $14.3 million and $137, respectively.
Litigation
The Company is a party to lawsuits and claims that arose in the ordinary
course of conducting its business. In the opinion of management, after
consulting with legal counsel, the
F-32
201
outcome of these lawsuits and claims will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Redeemable Securities
As previously disclosed in Charter's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, the Rifkin and Falcon sellers who own membership units of Charter
Holdco, including those sellers that exchanged their units for common stock of
Charter, and certain Helicon sellers who purchased Class A common stock in
November 1999, may have rescission rights arising out of possible violations of
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the
offers and sales of these equity interests. Accordingly, the maximum potential
cash obligation related to the rescission rights, estimated at $750.9 million,
has been excluded from stockholders' equity or minority interest and classified
as "redeemable securities" on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
1999. One year after the dates of issuance of these equity interests (when these
rescission rights will have expired), the Company will reclassify the respective
amounts to stockholders' equity or minority interest, as applicable.
Regulation in the Cable Television Industry
The cable television industry is subject to extensive regulation at the
federal, local and, in some instances, state levels. The Cable Communications
Policy Act of 1984 (the "1984 Cable Act"), the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act" and together with
the 1984 Cable Act, the "Cable Acts"), and the Telecommunications Act of 1996
(the "1996 Telecom Act"), establish a national policy to guide the development
and regulation of cable television systems. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) has principal responsibility for implementing the policies of
the Cable Acts. Many aspects of such regulation are currently the subject of
judicial proceedings and administrative or legislative proposals. Legislation
and regulations continue to change, and the Company cannot predict the impact of
future developments on the cable television industry.
The 1992 Cable Act and the FCC's rules implementing that act generally have
increased the administrative and operational expenses of cable television
systems and have resulted in additional regulatory oversight by the FCC and
local or state franchise authorities. The Cable Acts and the corresponding FCC
regulations have established rate regulations.
The 1992 Cable Act permits certified local franchising authorities to order
refunds of basic service tier rates paid in the previous twelve-month period
determined to be in excess of the maximum permitted rates. During 1999, the
amounts refunded by the Company have been insignificant. The Company may be
required to refund additional amounts in the future.
The Company believes that it has complied in all material respects with the
provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including the rate setting provisions
promulgated by the FCC. However, in jurisdictions that have chosen not to
certify, refunds covering the previous twelve-month period may be ordered upon
certification if the Company is unable to justify its basic rates. As of
December 31, 1999, approximately 18% of the Company's local franchising
authorities are certified to regulate basic tier rates. The Company is unable to
estimate at this time the amount of refunds, if any, that may be payable by the
Company in the event certain of its rates are successfully challenged by
franchising authorities or found to be unreasonable by the FCC. The Company does
not believe that the amount of any such refunds would have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
The 1996 Telecom Act, among other things, immediately deregulated the rates
for certain small cable operators and in certain limited circumstances rates on
the basic service tier, and as of March 31, 1999, deregulated rates on the cable
programming service tier (CPST). The FCC has taken the position that it will
still adjudicate pending CPST complaints but will strictly limit its review, and
possible refund orders, to the time period predating the sunset date, March 31,
1999.
F-33
202
The Company does not believe any adjudications regarding their pre-sunset
complaints will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
A number of states subject cable television systems to the jurisdiction of
centralized state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a
character similar to that of a public utility. State governmental agencies are
required to follow FCC rules when prescribing rate regulation, and thus, state
regulation of cable television rates is not allowed to be more restrictive than
the federal or local regulation.
17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
The Company's employees may participate in 401(k) plans (the "401(k)
Plans"). Employees that qualify for participation can contribute up to 15% of
their salary, on a before tax basis, subject to a maximum contribution limit as
determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company matches 50% of the first
5% of participant contributions. The Company made contributions to the 401(k)
Plans totaling $2.9 million and $20 for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
for the period from December 24, 1998, through December 31, 1998, respectively.
18. ACCOUNTING STANDARD NOT YET IMPLEMENTED:
The Company is required to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards Board No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133) on January 1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 establishes
accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument
(including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be
recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its
fair value and that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special
accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to
offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement, and requires
that a company must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of
transactions that receive hedge accounting. The Company has not yet quantified
the impact of adopting SFAS No. 133 on the consolidated financial statements nor
has the Company determined the timing of the adoption of SFAS No. 133. However,
SFAS No. 133 could increase the volatility in earnings (losses).
19. PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
As the result of limitations on and prohibition of distributions,
substantially all of the net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries are
restricted for distribution to Charter, the parent company. The following
parent-only financial statements of Charter account for the investment in
Charter Holdco under the equity method of accounting. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the
Company and notes thereto.
F-34
203
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 19,369 $ --
Other current assets........................................ 694 --
Investment in Charter Holdco................................ 3,762,016 830
---------- ----
$3,782,079 $830
========== ====
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities......................................... $ 9,175 $ --
Payables to related parties................................. 10,888 --
Redeemable securities....................................... 750,937 --
Stockholders' equity........................................ 3,011,079 830
---------- ----
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........ $3,782,079 $830
========== ====
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
REVENUES
Interest income............................................. $ 570 $--
Management fees............................................. 716 --
----------- ---
Total revenues.................................... 1,286 --
EXPENSES
Equity in losses of Charter Holdco.......................... (66,229) (2)
General and administrative expenses......................... (716) --
Interest expense............................................ (570) --
----------- ---
Total expenses.................................... (67,515) (2)
----------- ---
Net loss.................................................. $ (66,229) $(2)
=========== ===
F-35
204
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 24,
YEAR ENDED 1998, THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................. $ (66,229) $(2)
Equity in losses of Charter Holdco........................ 66,229 2
Change in assets and liabilities.......................... 19,369 --
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in Charter Holdco.............................. (3,290,436) --
Payment for acquisition................................... (258,434) --
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of Class B common stock to Mr. Allen............. 950 --
Net proceeds from initial public offering of common
stock.................................................. 3,547,920 --
----------- ---
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS................... 19,369 --
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period.............. -- --
----------- ---
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period.................... $ 19,369 $--
=========== ===
20. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
Year ended December 31, 1999:
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
----- ------ ----- ------
Revenues..................................... $160,955 $308,038 $376,189 $ 583,062
Loss from operations......................... (17,535) (54,032) (38,296) (76,572)
Loss before minority interest................ (76,713) (155,186) (164,153) (242,784)
Net loss..................................... (27) (35) (35) (66,132)
Basic and diluted loss per common share...... (0.54) (0.70) (0.70) (0.56)
Weighted average shares outstanding.......... 50,000 50,000 50,000 118,124,333
21. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
On January 6, 2000, Charter Holdings issued the January 2000 Charter
Holdings Notes with a principal amount of $1.5 billion. The January 2000 Charter
Holdings Notes are comprised of $675.0 million 10.00% Senior Notes due 2009,
$325.0 million 10.25% Senior Notes due 2010, and $532.0 million 11.75% Senior
Discount Notes due 2010. The net proceeds were approximately $1.3 billion, after
giving effect to discounts, commissions and expenses. The proceeds from the
January 2000 Charter Holdings Notes were used to finance the repurchases of debt
assumed in certain transactions.
On February 14, 2000, Charter Holdco and Charter Holdings completed the
acquisition of Bresnan Communications Company Limited Partnership (Bresnan).
Prior to the acquisition, Charter Holdco assigned a portion of its rights to
purchase Bresnan to Charter Holdings. Charter Holdco and Charter Holdings
purchased 52% of Bresnan from certain sellers for cash and certain sellers
contributed 18% of Bresnan to Charter Holdco for 14.8 million Class C common
membership units of Charter Holdco, an approximate 2.6% equity interest in
Charter Holdco. Charter Holdco then transferred its ownership interest to
Charter Holdings. Thereafter, Charter Holdings and certain sellers contributed
all of the outstanding interests in Bresnan to CC VIII, LLC (CC VIII), a
subsidiary of Charter Holdings and Bresnan was dissolved. In exchange for the
F-36
205
contribution of their interests in Bresnan, the sellers received approximately
24.2 million Class A preferred membership units in CC VIII representing 30% of
the equity of CC VIII and are entitled to a 2% annual return on their preferred
membership units. The purchase price for Bresnan was approximately $3.1 billion
subject to adjustment and was comprised of $1.1 billion in cash, $384.6 million
and $629.5 million in equity in Charter Holdco and CC VIII, respectively, and
approximately $1.0 billion in assumed debt. All the membership units received by
the sellers are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for Class A common stock of
Charter. The Bresnan cable systems acquired are located in Michigan, Minnesota,
Wisconsin and Nebraska, and serve approximately 686,000 (unaudited) customers.
In March 2000, Charter repurchased all of the outstanding Bresnan 9.25%
Senior Discount Notes Due 2009 with an accreted value of $192.1 million and the
Bresnan 8.00% Senior Notes Due 2009 with a principal amount of $170.0 million
for a total of $369.7 million. The notes were repurchased using a portion of the
proceeds of the January 2000 Charter Holdings Notes.
F-37
206
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Charter Communications Properties Holdings, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholder's investment and cash flows of Charter Communications
Properties Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries for the period from January 1, 1998,
through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended December 31, 1997. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the results of the operations and the cash flows of
Charter Communications Properties Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries for the period
from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended December
31, 1997, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
St. Louis, Missouri,
February 5, 1999
F-38
207
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1,
1998, THROUGH YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 23, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
REVENUES.................................................... $ 49,731 $18,867
-------- -------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operating, general and administrative..................... 25,952 11,767
Depreciation and amortization............................. 16,864 6,103
Corporate expense allocation -- related party............. 6,176 566
-------- -------
48,992 18,436
-------- -------
Income from operations................................. 739 431
-------- -------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense.......................................... (17,277) (5,120)
Interest income........................................... 44 41
Other, net................................................ (728) 25
-------- -------
(17,961) (5,054)
-------- -------
Net loss............................................... $(17,222) $(4,623)
======== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-39
208
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S INVESTMENT
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED
STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL
------ ------- ----------- --------
BALANCE, December 31, 1996.................... $-- $ 5,900 $ (3,252) $ 2,648
Net loss.................................... -- -- (4,623) (4,623)
-- ------- -------- --------
BALANCE, December 31, 1997.................... -- 5,900 (7,875) (1,975)
Capital contributions....................... -- 10,800 -- 10,800
Net loss.................................... -- -- (17,222) (17,222)
-- ------- -------- --------
BALANCE, December 23, 1998.................... $-- $16,700 $(25,097) $ (8,397)
== ======= ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated statement.
F-40
209
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1,
1998, THROUGH YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 23, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................. $ (17,222) $ (4,623)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities --
Depreciation and amortization........................ 16,864 6,103
Noncash interest expense............................. 267 123
Loss on sale of cable system......................... -- 1,363
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and
equipment......................................... (14) 130
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisition --
Receivables............................................ 10 (227)
Prepaid expenses and other............................. (125) 18
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................. 16,927 894
Payables to manager of cable systems -- related
party................................................ 5,288 (153)
Other operating activities............................. 569 --
--------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities......... 22,564 3,628
--------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment................ (15,364) (7,880)
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired............. (167,484) --
Proceeds from sale of cable system........................ -- 12,528
Other investing activities................................ (486) --
--------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities...................................... (183,334) 4,648
--------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings of long-term debt.............................. 217,500 5,100
Repayments of long-term debt.............................. (60,200) (13,375)
Capital contributions..................................... 7,000 --
Payments for debt issuance costs.......................... (3,487) (12)
--------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities...................................... 160,813 (8,287)
--------- --------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS............................................... 43 (11)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period.............. 626 637
--------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period.................... $ 669 $ 626
========= ========
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST...................................... $ 7,679 $ 3,303
========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-41
210
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
Charter Communications Properties Holdings, LLC (CCPH), a Delaware limited
liability company, formerly Charter Communications Properties Holdings, Inc.,
through its wholly owned cable television operating subsidiary, Charter
Communications Properties, LLC (CCP), commenced operations with the acquisition
of a cable television system on September 30, 1995. Prior to February 19, 1999,
CCPH was wholly owned by Charter Investment, Inc. (Charter Investment).
Effective December 23, 1998, as part of a series of transactions, through
which Paul G. Allen acquired Charter Investment, Mr. Allen acquired CCPH for an
aggregate purchase price of $211 million, excluding $214 million in debt assumed
(the "Paul Allen Transaction"). In conjunction with the Paul Allen Transaction,
CCPH was converted from a corporation to a limited liability company. Also, in
conjunction with the Paul Allen Transaction, Charter Investment for fair value
acquired from unrelated third parties all of the interest it did not already own
in CharterComm Holdings, LLC (CharterComm Holdings) and CCA Group (comprised of
CCA Holdings, Corp., CCT Holdings Corp. and Charter Communications Long Beach,
Inc.), all cable television operating companies, for $2.0 billion, excluding
$1.8 billion in debt assumed. Charter Investment previously managed and owned
minority interests in these companies. In February 1999, Charter Investment
transferred all of its cable television operating subsidiaries to a wholly owned
subsidiary of Charter Communications Holdings, LLC (Charter Holdings), Charter
Communications Operating, LLC (Charter Operating). Charter Holdings was a wholly
owned subsidiary of Charter Investment. The transfer was accounted for as a
reorganization of entities under common control similar to a pooling of
interests.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
CCPH and CCP, its wholly owned cable operating subsidiary (collectively, the
"Company"). The accounts of CharterComm Holdings and CCA Group are not included
since these companies were not owned and controlled by Charter Investment prior
to December 23, 1998.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. These investments are
carried at cost that approximates market value.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, including all direct and
certain indirect costs associated with the construction of cable transmission
and distribution facilities, and the cost of new customer installations. The
costs of disconnecting a customer are charged to expense in the period incurred.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred,
while equipment replacement and betterments are capitalized.
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets as follows:
Cable distribution systems.................................. 3-15 years
Buildings and leasehold improvements........................ 5-15 years
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 3-5 years
F-42
211
For the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the
year ended December 31, 1997, depreciation expense was $6.2 million and $3.9
million, respectively.
Franchises
Costs incurred in obtaining and renewing cable franchises are deferred and
amortized over the lives of the franchises. Costs relating to unsuccessful
franchise applications are charged to expense when it is determined that the
efforts to obtain the franchise will not be successful. Franchise rights
acquired through the purchase of cable systems represent management's estimate
of fair value and are generally amortized using the straight-line method over a
period of 15 years. The period of 15 years is management's best estimate of the
useful lives of the franchises and assumes substantially all of those franchises
that expire during the period will be renewed by the Company.
Other Assets
Debt issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense using the
effective interest method over the term of the related debt. The interest rate
cap costs are being amortized over the terms of the agreement, which
approximates three years.
Impairment of Assets
If facts and circumstances suggest that a long-lived asset may be impaired,
the carrying value is reviewed. If a review indicates that the carrying value of
such asset is not recoverable based on projected undiscounted net cash flows
related to the asset over its remaining life, the carrying value of such asset
is reduced to its estimated fair value.
Revenues
Cable television revenues from basic and premium services are recognized
when the related services are provided.
Installation revenues are recognized to the extent of direct selling costs
incurred. The remainder, if any, is deferred and amortized to income over the
estimated average period that customers are expected to remain connected to the
cable system. As of December 23, 1998, and December 31, 1997, no installation
revenue has been deferred, as direct selling costs have exceeded installation
revenue.
Fees collected from programmers to guarantee carriage are deferred and
amortized to income over the life of the contracts. Local governmental
authorities impose franchise fees on the Company ranging up to a federally
mandated maximum of 5.0% of gross revenues. Such fees are collected on a monthly
basis from the Company's customers and are periodically remitted to local
franchise authorities. Franchise fees collected and paid are reported as
revenues and expenses.
Interest Rate Hedge Agreements
The Company manages fluctuations in interest rates by using interest rate
hedge agreements, as required by certain debt agreements. Interest rate swaps,
caps and collars are accounted for as hedges of debt obligations, and
accordingly, the net settlement amounts are recorded as adjustments to interest
expense in the period incurred. Premiums paid for interest rate caps are
deferred, included in other assets, and are amortized over the original term of
the interest rate agreement as an adjustment to interest expense.
The Company's interest rate swap agreements require the Company to pay a
fixed rate and receive a floating rate thereby creating fixed rate debt.
Interest rate caps and collars are entered into by the Company to reduce the
impact of rising interest rates on floating rate debt.
F-43
212
The Company's participation in interest rate hedging transactions involves
instruments that have a close correlation with its debt, thereby managing its
risk. Interest rate hedge agreements have been designated for hedging purposes
and are not held or issued for speculative purposes.
Income Taxes
The Company filed a consolidated income tax return with Charter Investment.
Income taxes were allocated to the Company in accordance with the tax-sharing
agreement between the Company and Charter Investment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3. ACQUISITION:
In 1998, the Company acquired a cable system for an aggregate purchase
price, net of cash acquired, of $228.4 million, comprised of $167.5 million in
cash and $60.9 million in a note payable to the seller. The excess of the cost
of properties acquired over the amounts assigned to net tangible assets at the
date of acquisition was $207.6 million and is included in franchises.
The above acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, and accordingly, results of operations of the acquired assets have
been included in the financial statements from the dates of acquisition. The
purchase price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets based on
estimated fair values at the acquisition date.
Unaudited pro forma operating results as though the acquisition discussed
above, excluding the Paul Allen Transaction, had occurred on January 1, 1997,
with adjustments to give effect to amortization of franchises, interest expense
and certain other adjustments are as follows:
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1,
1998, THROUGH YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 23, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
Revenues........................................... $ 67,007 $ 63,909
Loss from operations............................... (7,097) (7,382)
Net loss........................................... (24,058) (26,099)
The unaudited pro forma information has been presented for comparative
purposes and does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations had
the transaction been completed as of the assumed date or which may be obtained
in the future.
F-44
213
4. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is summarized as follows:
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1, FOR THE YEAR
1998, THROUGH ENDED
DECEMBER 23, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1997
------------- ------------
Balance, beginning of period....................... $ 52 $ 87
Acquisition of system............................ 96 --
Charged to expense............................... 1,122 325
Uncollected balances written off, net of
recoveries.................................... (778) (360)
------ -----
Balance, end of period............................. $ 492 $ 52
====== =====
5. SALE OF FT. HOOD SYSTEM:
In February 1997, the Company sold the net assets of the Ft. Hood system,
which served customers in Texas, for an aggregate sales price of approximately
$12.5 million. The sale of the Ft. Hood system resulted in a loss of
approximately $1.4 million, which is included in operating, general and
administrative costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 1997.
6. INCOME TAXES:
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequence attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
basis. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is
the result of changes in the liability or asset recorded for deferred taxes. A
valuation allowance must be established for any portion of a deferred tax asset
for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
No current provision (benefit) for income taxes was recorded. The effective
income tax rate is less than the federal rate of 35% primarily due to providing
a valuation allowance on deferred income tax assets.
7. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Charter Investment provides management services to the Company including
centralized customer billing services, data processing and related support,
benefits administration and coordination of insurance coverage and
self-insurance programs for medical, dental and workers' compensation claims.
Certain costs for services are billed and charged directly to the Company's
operating subsidiaries and are included in operating costs. These billings are
determined based on the number of basic customers. Such costs totaled $437 and
$220, respectively, for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23,
1998, and the year ended December 31, 1997. All other costs incurred by Charter
Investment on behalf of the Company are expensed in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and are included in corporate expense
allocations related party. The cost of these services is allocated based on the
number of basic customers. Management considers these allocations to be
reasonable for the operations of the Company.
Charter Investment utilized a combination of excess insurance coverage and
self-insurance programs for its medical, dental and workers' compensation
claims. Charges are made to the Company as determined by independent actuaries,
at the present value of the actuarially
F-45
214
computed present and future liabilities for such benefits. Medical coverage
provides for $2.4 million aggregate stop loss protection and a loss limitation
of $100 per person per year. Workers' compensation coverage provides for $800
aggregate stop loss protection and a loss limitation of $150 per person per
year.
The Company is charged a management fee based on percentages of revenues as
stipulated in the management agreement between Charter Investment and the
Company. For the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and the
year ended December 31, 1997, the management fee charged to the Company
approximated the corporate expenses incurred by Charter Investment on behalf of
the Company.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under noncancelable
operating leases. Leases and rental costs charged to expense for the period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended December 31,
1997, were $278 and $130, respectively.
The Company also rents utility poles in its operations. Generally, pole
rentals are cancelable on short notice, but the Company anticipates that such
rentals will recur. Rent expense incurred for pole rental attachments for the
period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended
December 31, 1997, was $421 and $271, respectively.
Litigation
The Company is a party to lawsuits that arose in the ordinary course of
conducting its business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with
legal counsel, the outcome of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Regulation in the Cable Television Industry
The cable television industry is subject to extensive regulation at the
federal, local and, in some instances, state levels. The Cable Communications
Policy Act of 1984 (the "1984 Cable Act"), the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act" and together with
the 1984 Cable Act, the "Cable Acts"), and the Telecommunications Act of 1996
(the "1996 Telecom Act"), establish a national policy to guide the development
and regulation of cable systems. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has
principal responsibility for implementing the policies of the Cable Acts. Many
aspects of such regulation are currently the subject of judicial proceedings and
administrative or legislative proposals. Legislation and regulations continue to
change, and the Company cannot predict the impact of future developments on the
cable television industry.
The 1992 Cable Act and the FCC's rules implementing that act generally have
increased the administrative and operational expenses of cable systems and have
resulted in additional regulatory oversight by the FCC and local or state
franchise authorities. The Cable Acts and the corresponding FCC regulations have
established rate regulations.
The 1992 Cable Act permits certified local franchising authorities to order
refunds of basic service tier rates paid in the previous twelve-month period
determined to be in excess of the maximum permitted rates. As of December 31,
1998, the amount refunded by the Company has been insignificant. The Company may
be required to refund additional amounts in the future.
The Company believes that it has complied in all material respects with the
provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including the rate setting provisions
promulgated by the FCC. However, in
F-46
215
jurisdictions that have chosen not to certify, refunds covering the previous
twelve-month period may be ordered upon certification if the Company is unable
to justify its basic rates. The Company is unable to estimate at this time the
amount of refunds, if any, that may be payable by the Company in the event
certain of its rates are successfully challenged by franchising authorities or
found to be unreasonable by the FCC. The Company does not believe that the
amount of any such refunds would have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
The 1996 Telecom Act, among other things, immediately deregulated the rates
for certain small cable operators and in certain limited circumstances rates on
the basic service tier, and as of March 31, 1999, deregulates rates on the cable
programming service tier (CPST). The FCC has taken the position that it will
still adjudicate pending CPST complaints but will strictly limit its review, and
possible refund orders, to the time period predating the sunset date, March 31,
1999. The Company does not believe any adjudications regarding their pre-sunset
complaints will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
A number of states subject cable systems to the jurisdiction of centralized
state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a character
similar to that of a public utility. State governmental agencies are required to
follow FCC rules when prescribing rate regulation, and thus, state regulation of
cable television rates is not allowed to be more restrictive than the federal or
local regulation. The Company is subject to state regulation in Connecticut.
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
401(k) Plan
The Company's employees may participate in the Charter Communications, Inc.
401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"). Employees that qualify for participation can
contribute up to 15% of their salary, on or before tax basis, subject to a
maximum contribution limit as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The
Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of the first 5% of contributions by
each employee. The Company contributed $74 and $29 for the period from January
1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended December 31, 1997,
respectively.
Appreciation Rights Plan
Certain employees of Charter participated in the 1995 Charter
Communications, Inc. Appreciation Rights Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan permitted
Charter Investment to grant 1,500,000 units to certain key employees, of which
1,251,500 were outstanding at December 31, 1997. Units received by an employee
vest at a rate of 20% per year, unless otherwise provided in the participant's
Appreciation Rights Unit Agreement. The appreciation rights entitled the
participants to receive payment, upon termination or change in control of
Charter Investment, of the excess of the unit value over the base value (defined
as the appreciation value) for each vested unit. The unit value was based on
adjusted equity, as defined in the Plan. Deferred compensation expense was based
on the appreciation value since the grant date and was being amortized over the
vesting period.
As a result of the acquisition of Charter Investment by Mr. Allen, the Plan
was terminated, all outstanding units became 100% vested and all amounts were
paid by Charter Investment in 1999. The cost of this plan was allocated to the
Company based on the number of basic customers. The Company considers this
allocation to be reasonable for the operations of the Company. For the period
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, the Company expensed $3,800,
included in corporate expense allocation-related party and increased
shareholder's investment for the cost of this plan.
F-47
216
10. ACCOUNTING STANDARD NOT YET IMPLEMENTED:
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133
establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative
instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability
measured at its fair value and that changes in the derivative's fair value be
recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are
met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and
losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement, and
requires that a company must formally document, designate and assess the
effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. SFAS No. 137,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -- Deferral of the
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133 -- An Amendment of FASB Statement No.
133, has delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 133 to fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2000. The Company has not yet quantified the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 133 on the consolidated financial statements nor has determined the
timing of its adoption of SFAS No. 133. However, SFAS No. 133 could increase
volatility in earnings (loss).
F-48
217
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To CCA Group:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of CCA Holdings
Corp., CCT Holdings Corp. and Charter Communications Long Beach, Inc.
(collectively CCA Group) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the
related combined statements of operations, shareholders' deficit and cash flows
for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996. These combined financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the combined financial position of CCA Group and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the combined results of their
operations and their cash flows for the period from January 1, 1998, through
December 23, 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
St. Louis, Missouri,
February 5, 1999
F-49
218
CCA GROUP
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET -- DECEMBER 31, 1997
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 4,501
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $926....................................... 9,407
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 1,988
Deferred income tax asset................................. 5,915
----------
Total current assets.............................. 21,811
----------
RECEIVABLE FROM RELATED PARTY, including accrued interest... 13,090
----------
INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment............................. 352,860
Franchises, net of accumulated amortization of $132,871... 806,451
----------
1,159,311
----------
OTHER ASSETS................................................ 13,731
----------
$1,207,943
==========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ 25,625
Accounts payable and accrued expenses..................... 48,554
Payables to manager of cable television systems -- related
party.................................................. 1,975
----------
Total current liabilities......................... 76,154
----------
DEFERRED REVENUE............................................ 1,882
----------
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES....................................... 117,278
----------
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities..................... 758,795
----------
DEFERRED MANAGEMENT FEES.................................... 4,291
----------
NOTES PAYABLE, including accrued interest................... 348,202
----------
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Common stock.............................................. 1
Additional paid-in capital................................ 128,499
Accumulated deficit....................................... (227,159)
----------
Total shareholders' deficit....................... (98,659)
----------
$1,207,943
==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined statements.
F-50
219
CCA GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1, YEAR ENDED
1998, THROUGH DECEMBER 31
DECEMBER 23, ---------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------- ---- ----
REVENUES............................................. $ 324,432 $ 289,697 $233,392
--------- --------- --------
EXPENSES:
Operating costs.................................... 135,705 122,917 102,977
General and administrative......................... 28,440 26,400 18,687
Depreciation and amortization...................... 136,689 116,080 96,547
Management fees -- related parties................. 17,392 11,414 8,634
--------- --------- --------
318,226 276,811 226,845
--------- --------- --------
Income from operations.......................... 6,206 12,886 6,547
--------- --------- --------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income.................................... 4,962 2,043 1,883
Interest expense................................... (113,824) (108,122) (88,999)
Other, net......................................... (294) 171 (2,504)
--------- --------- --------
(109,156) (105,908) (89,620)
--------- --------- --------
Net loss........................................ $(102,950) $ (93,022) $(83,073)
========= ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined statements.
F-51
220
CCA GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ADDITIONAL
COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED
STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL
------ ---------- ----------- -----
BALANCE, December 31, 1995................. $ 1 $ 99,999 $ (51,064) $ 48,936
Net loss................................. -- -- (83,073) (83,073)
--- -------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, December 31, 1996................. 1 99,999 (134,137) (34,137)
Capital contributions.................... -- 28,500 -- 28,500
Net loss................................. -- -- (93,022) (93,022)
--- -------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, December 31, 1997................. 1 128,499 (227,159) (98,659)
Capital contributions.................... -- 5,684 -- 5,684
Net loss................................. -- -- (102,950) (102,950)
--- -------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, December 23, 1998................. $ 1 $134,183 $(330,109) $(195,925)
=== ======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined statements.
F-52
221
CCA GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1, YEAR ENDED
1998, THROUGH DECEMBER 31
DECEMBER 23, ---------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------- ---- ----
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss........................................... $(102,950) $(93,022) $ (83,073)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities --
Depreciation and amortization................... 136,689 116,080 96,547
Amortization of debt issuance costs and non cash
interest cost................................. 44,701 49,107 39,927
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and
equipment..................................... 511 (156) 1,257
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
effects from acquisitions --
Accounts receivable, net...................... 4,779 222 (1,393)
Prepaid expenses and other.................... 243 (175) 216
Accounts payable and accrued expenses......... 3,849 8,797 3,855
Payables to manager of cable television
systems, including deferred management
fees....................................... 3,485 784 448
Deferred revenue.............................. 1,336 559 (236)
Other operating activities.................... 5,583 (3,207) 1,372
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities..... 98,226 78,989 58,920
--------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment......... (95,060) (82,551) (56,073)
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired.... -- (147,187) (122,017)
Other investing activities......................... (2,898) (1,296) 54
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities........... (97,958) (231,034) (178,036)
--------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings of long-term debt....................... 300,400 162,000 127,000
Repayments of long-term debt....................... (64,120) (39,580) (13,100)
Payments of debt issuance costs.................... (8,442) (3,360) (3,126)
Repayments under notes payable..................... (230,994) -- --
Capital contributions.............................. -- 28,500 --
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.................................... (3,156) 147,560 110,774
--------- -------- ---------
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS............ (2,888) (4,485) (8,342)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period....... 4,501 8,986 17,328
--------- -------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period............. $ 1,613 $ 4,501 $ 8,986
========= ======== =========
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST............................... $ 179,781 $ 49,687 $ 51,434
========= ======== =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined statements.
F-53
222
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
CCA Group consists of CCA Holdings Corp. (CCA Holdings), CCT Holdings Corp.
(CCT Holdings) and Charter Communications Long Beach, Inc. (CC-LB), all Delaware
corporations (collectively referred to as "CCA Group" or the "Company") and
their subsidiaries. The combined financial statements of each of these companies
have been combined by virtue of their common ownership and management. All
material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
CCA Holdings commenced operations in January 1995 in connection with
consummation of the Crown Transaction (as defined below). The accompanying
financial statements include the accounts of CCA Holdings; its wholly-owned
subsidiary, CCA Acquisition Corp. (CAC); CAC's wholly-owned subsidiary, Cencom
Cable Entertainment, Inc. (CCE); and Charter Communications Entertainment I,
L.P. (CCE-I), which is controlled by CAC through its general partnership
interest. Through December 23, 1998, CCA Holdings was approximately 85% owned by
Kelso Investment Associates V, L.P., an investment fund, together with an
affiliate (collectively referred to as "Kelso" herein) and certain other
individuals and approximately 15% by Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter),
manager of CCE-I's cable television systems.
CCT Holdings was formed on January 6, 1995. CCT Holdings commenced
operations in September 1995 in connection with consummation of the Gaylord
Transaction (as defined below). The accompanying financial statements include
the accounts of CCT Holdings and Charter Communications Entertainment II, L.P.
(CCE-II), which is controlled by CCT Holdings through its general partnership
interest. Through December 23, 1998, CCT Holdings was owned approximately 85% by
Kelso and certain other individuals and approximately 15% by Charter, manager of
CCE-II's cable television systems.
In January 1995, CAC completed the acquisition of certain cable television
systems from Crown Media, Inc. (Crown), a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards,
Incorporated (Hallmark) (the "Crown Transaction"). On September 29, 1995, CAC
and CCT Holdings entered into an Asset Exchange Agreement whereby CAC exchanged
a 1% undivided interest in all of its assets for a 1.22% undivided interest in
certain assets to be acquired by CCT Holdings from an affiliate of Gaylord
Entertainment Company, Inc. (Gaylord). Effective September 30, 1995, CCT
Holdings acquired certain cable television systems from Gaylord (the "Gaylord
Transaction"). Upon execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement, CAC and CCT
Holdings entered into a series of agreements to contribute the assets acquired
under the Crown Transaction to CCE-I and certain assets acquired in the Gaylord
acquisition to CCE-II. Collectively, CCA Holdings and CCT Holdings own 100% of
CCE-I and CCE-II.
CC-LB was acquired by Kelso and Charter in May 1997. The accompanying
financial statements include the accounts of CC-LB and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Long Beach Acquisition Corp. (LBAC) from the date of acquisition.
Through December 23, 1998, CC-LB was owned approximately 85% by Kelso and
certain other individuals and approximately 15% by Charter, manager of LBAC's
cable television systems.
Effective December 23, 1998, Paul G. Allen acquired 94% of Charter through
a series of transactions. In conjunction with Mr. Allen's acquisition, Charter
acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of CCA Holdings, CCT Holdings and CC-LB
on December 23, 1998.
F-54
223
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
In 1998, CCE-I provided cable television service to customers in
Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri and New Hampshire, CCE-II
provided cable television service to customers in California and LBAC provided
cable television service to customers in Long Beach, California, and certain
surrounding areas.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 1997,
cash equivalents consist primarily of repurchase agreements. These investments
are carried at cost that approximates market value.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, including all direct and
certain indirect costs associated with the construction of cable television
transmission and distribution facilities, and the cost of new customer
installation. The costs of disconnecting a residence are charged to expense in
the period incurred. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense as incurred, and equipment replacement costs and betterments are
capitalized.
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets as follows:
Cable distribution systems.................................. 3-15 years
Buildings and leasehold improvements........................ 5-15 years
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 3-5 years
In 1997, the Company shortened the estimated useful lives of certain property,
plant and equipment for depreciation purposes. As a result, additional
depreciation of $8,123 was recorded during 1997.
FRANCHISES
Costs incurred in obtaining and renewing cable franchises are deferred and
amortized over the lives of the franchises. Costs relating to unsuccessful
franchise applications are charged to expense when it is determined that the
efforts to obtain the franchise will not be successful. Franchise rights
acquired through the purchase of cable television systems represent management's
estimate of fair value and are amortized using the straight-line method over 15
years.
OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs are amortized to interest expense over the term of the
related debt. The interest rate cap costs are being amortized over the terms of
the agreement, which approximates three years.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes."
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported
F-55
224
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
2. ACQUISITIONS:
In 1997, CC-LB acquired the stock of LBAC for an aggregate purchase price,
net of cash acquired, of $147,200. In connection with the completion of this
acquisition, LBAC recorded $55,900 of deferred income tax liabilities resulting
from differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of certain assets
acquired. The excess of the cost of properties acquired over the amounts
assigned to net tangible assets at the date of acquisition was $190,200 and is
included in franchises.
In 1996, the Company acquired cable television systems in three separate
transactions for an aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $122,000.
The excess of the cost of properties acquired over the amounts assigned to net
tangible assets at the dates of acquisition was $100,200 and is included in
franchises.
The above acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, and accordingly, results of operations of the acquired assets have
been included in the financial statements from the dates of the acquisitions.
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the 1997 acquisitions as though
the acquisitions had been made on January 1, 1997, with pro forma adjustments to
give effect to amortization of franchises, interest expense and certain other
adjustments as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1997
(UNAUDITED)
-------------
Revenues.................................................... $303,797
Income from operations...................................... 14,108
Net loss.................................................... (94,853)
The unaudited pro forma information has been presented for comparative
purposes and does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations had
these transactions been completed as of the assumed date or which may be
obtained in the future.
3. RECEIVABLE FROM RELATED PARTY:
In connection with the transfer of certain assets acquired in the Gaylord
Transaction to Charter Communications Properties, Inc. (CCP), Charter
Communications Properties Holding Corp. (CCP Holdings), the parent of CCP and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Charter, entered into a $9,447 promissory note with
CCT Holdings. The promissory note bears interest at the rates paid by CCT
Holdings on the Gaylord Seller Note. Principal and interest are due on September
29, 2005. Interest income has been accrued based on an average rate of interest
over the life of the Gaylord Seller Note, which approximates 15.4% and totaled
$1,899 for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and
$1,806 and $1,547 for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
As of December 31, 1997, interest receivable totaled $3,643.
F-56
225
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at December 31,
1997:
Cable distribution systems.................................. $ 426,241
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements.................. 15,443
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 24,375
---------
466,059
Less -- Accumulated depreciation............................ (113,199)
---------
$ 352,860
=========
Depreciation expense for the period from January 1, 1998, through December
23, 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, was $72,914,
$59,599 and $39,575, respectively.
5. OTHER ASSETS:
Other assets consists of the following at December 31, 1997:
Debt issuance costs......................................... $13,416
Note receivable............................................. 2,100
Other....................................................... 1,342
-------
16,858
Less -- Accumulated amortization............................ (3,127)
-------
$13,731
=======
6. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at December
31, 1997:
Accrued interest............................................ $ 8,389
Franchise fees.............................................. 6,434
Programming expenses........................................ 5,855
Accounts payable............................................ 4,734
Public education and governmental costs..................... 4,059
Salaries and related benefits............................... 3,977
Capital expenditures........................................ 3,629
Other....................................................... 11,477
-------
$48,554
=======
F-57
226
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
7. LONG-TERM DEBT:
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 1997:
CCE-I:
Term loans................................................ $274,120
Fund loans................................................ 85,000
Revolving credit facility................................. 103,800
--------
462,920
--------
CCE-II:
Term loans................................................ 105,000
Revolving credit facility................................. 123,500
--------
228,500
--------
LBAC:
Term loans................................................ 85,000
Revolving credit facility................................. 8,000
--------
93,000
--------
Total debt........................................ 784,420
Less -- Current maturities.................................. (25,625)
--------
Total long-term debt.............................. $758,795
========
CCE-I CREDIT AGREEMENT
CCE-I maintains a credit agreement (the "CCE-I Credit Agreement"), which
provides for a $280,000 term loan that matures on September 30, 2006, an $85,000
fund loan that matures on March 31, 2007, and a $175,000 revolving credit
facility with a maturity date of September 30, 2006. Amounts under the CCE-I
Credit Agreement bear interest at either the LIBOR Rate or Base Rate, as
defined, plus a margin of up to 2.75%. The variable interest rate ranged from
6.88% to 8.06% at December 23, 1998, and from 7.63% to 8.50% and 7.63% to 8.38%
at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Commencing June 30, 2002, and at the end of each calendar quarter
thereafter, available borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the
term loan shall be reduced on an annual basis by 12.0% in 2002 and 15.0% in
2003. Commencing June 30, 2002, and at the end of each calendar quarter
thereafter, the available borrowings for the fund loan shall be reduced on an
annual basis by 0.75% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2003. A quarterly commitment fee of
between 0.375% and 0.5% per annum is payable on the unborrowed balance of the
revolving credit facility.
COMBINED CREDIT AGREEMENT
CCE-II and LBAC maintain a credit agreement (the "Combined Credit
Agreement") which provides for two term loan facilities, one with the principal
amount of $100,000 that matures on March 31, 2005, and the other with the
principal amount of $90,000 that matures on March 31, 2006. The Combined Credit
Agreement also provides for a $185,000 revolving credit facility, with a
maturity date of March 31, 2005. Amounts under the Combined Credit Agreement
bear interest at either the LIBOR Rate or Base Rate, as defined, plus a margin
of up to 2.5%. The variable interest rate ranged from 6.56% to 7.59% at December
23, 1998, and from 7.50% to 8.38% at December 31, 1997, respectively.
F-58
227
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Commencing March 31, 2001, and at the end of each quarter thereafter,
available borrowings under the revolving credit facility and one term loan shall
be reduced on an annual basis by 5.0% in 2001, 15.0% in 2002 and 18.0% in 2003.
Commencing in December 31, 1999, and at the end of each quarter thereafter,
available borrowings under the other term loan shall be reduced on annual basis
by 0.5% in 1999, 0.8% in 2000, 1.0% in 2001, 1.0% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2003. A
quarterly commitment fee of between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum, based upon the
intercompany indebtedness of the Company, is payable on the unborrowed balance
of the revolving credit facility.
CCE CREDIT AGREEMENT
In October 1998, Charter Communications Entertainment, L.P. (CCE L.P.), a
98% direct and indirect owner of CCE-I and CCE-II and indirectly owned
subsidiary of the Company, entered into a credit agreement (the "CCE L.P. Credit
Agreement") which provides for a term loan facility with the principal amount of
$130,000 that matures on September 30, 2007. Amounts under the CCE L.P. Credit
Agreement bear interest at the LIBOR Rate or Base Rate, as defined, plus a
margin of up to 3.25%. The variable interest rate at December 23, 1998, was
8.62%.
Commencing June 30, 2002, and the end of each calendar quarter thereafter,
the available borrowings for the term loan shall be reduced on an annual basis
by 0.75% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2003.
CCE-II HOLDINGS CREDIT AGREEMENT
CCE-II Holdings, LLC (CCE-II Holdings), a wholly owned subsidiary of CCE
L.P. and the parent of CCE-II, entered into a credit agreement (the "CCE-II
Holdings Credit Agreement") in November 1998, which provides for a term loan
facility with the principal amount of $95,000 that matures on September 30,
2006. Amounts under the CCE-II Holdings Credit Agreement bear interest at either
the LIBOR Rate or Base Rate, as defined, plus a margin of up to 3.25%. The
variable rate at December 23, 1998, was 8.56%.
Commencing June 30, 2002, and at the end of each quarter thereafter,
available borrowings under the revolving credit facility and one term loan shall
be reduced on an annual basis by 0.5% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2003.
The credit agreements require the Company to comply with various financial
and nonfinancial covenants, including the maintenance of annualized operating
cash flow to fixed charge ratio, as defined, not to exceed 1.0 to 1.0. These
debt instruments also contain substantial limitations on, or prohibitions of,
distributions, additional indebtedness, liens asset sales and certain other
items.
8. NOTES PAYABLE:
Notes payable consists of the following at December 31, 1997:
HC Crown Note............................................... $ 82,000
Accrued interest on HC Crown Note........................... 36,919
Gaylord Seller Note......................................... 165,688
Accrued interest on Gaylord Seller Note..................... 63,595
--------
Total............................................. $348,202
========
In connection with the Crown Transaction, the Company entered into an
$82,000 senior subordinated loan agreement with a subsidiary of Hallmark, HC
Crown Corp., and pursuant to
F-59
228
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
such loan agreement issued a senior subordinated note (the "HC Crown Note"). The
HC Crown Note was an unsecured obligation. The HC Crown Note was limited in
aggregate principal amount to $82,000 and has a stated maturity date of December
31, 1999 (the "Stated Maturity Date"). Interest has been accrued at 13% per
annum, compounded semiannually, payable upon maturity. In October 1998, the
Crown Note and accrued interest was paid in full.
In connection with the Gaylord Transaction, CCT Holdings entered into a
$165,700 subordinated loan agreement with Gaylord (the "Gaylord Seller Note").
Interest expense has been accrued based on an average rate of interest over the
life of the Gaylord Seller Note, which approximated 15.4%.
In connection with the Gaylord Transaction, CCT Holdings, CCE L.P. and
Gaylord entered into a contingent payment agreement (the "Contingent
Agreement"). The Contingent Agreement indicates CCE L.P. will pay Gaylord 15% of
any amount distributed to CCT Holdings in excess of the total of the Gaylord
Seller Note, Crown Seller Note and $450,000. In conjunction with the Paul G.
Allen acquisition of Charter and the Company, Gaylord was paid an additional
$132,000 pursuant to the Contingent Agreement and the Gaylord Seller Note was
paid in full.
9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
A summary of debt and the related interest rate hedge agreements at
December 31, 1997, is as follows:
1997
--------------------------------
CARRYING NOTIONAL FAIR
VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -----
DEBT
Debt under credit agreements............................ $784,420 $ -- $784,420
HC Crown Note (including accrued interest).............. 118,919 -- 118,587
Gaylord Seller Note (including accrued interest)........ 229,283 -- 214,074
INTEREST RATE HEDGE AGREEMENTS
Swaps................................................... -- 405,000 (1,214)
Caps.................................................... -- 120,000 --
Collars................................................. -- 190,000 (437)
As the long-term debt under the credit agreements bear interest at current
market rates, their carrying amount approximates fair market value at December
31, 1997. Fair value of the HC Crown Note is based upon trading activity at
December 31, 1997. Fair value of the Gaylord Seller Note is based on current
redemption value.
The weighted average interest pay rate for the Company's interest rate swap
agreements was 7.82% at December 31, 1997. The weighted average interest rate
for the Company's interest rate cap agreements was 8.49% at December 31, 1997.
The weighted average interest rates for the Company's interest rate collar
agreements were 9.04% and 7.57% for the cap and floor components, respectively,
at December 31, 1997.
The notional amounts of interest rate hedge agreements do not represent
amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of the Company's
exposure through its use of interest rate hedge agreements. The amounts
exchanged are determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms
of the contracts.
F-60
229
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The fair value of interest rate hedge agreements generally reflects the
estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay (excluding accrued
interest) to terminate the contracts on the reporting date, thereby taking into
account the current unrealized gains or losses of open contracts. Dealer
quotations are available for the Company's interest rate hedge agreements.
Management believes that the sellers of the interest rate hedge agreements
will be able to meet their obligations under the agreements. In addition, some
of the interest rate hedge agreements are with certain of the participating
banks under the Company's Senior Credit Facility thereby reducing the exposure
to credit loss. The Company has policies regarding the financial stability and
credit standing of major counterparties. Nonperformance by the counterparties is
not anticipated nor would it have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations or the financial position of the Company.
10. COMMON STOCK:
The Company's common stock consist of the following at December 31, 1997:
CCA Holdings:
Common stock -- Class A, voting, $.01 par value, 100,000
shares authorized; 75,515 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ $ 1
Common stock -- Class B, voting, $.01 par value, 20,000
shares authorized; 4,300 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ --
Common stock -- Class C, nonvoting, $.01 par value, 5,000
shares authorized; 185 shares issued and outstanding... --
---
1
---
CCT Holdings:
Common stock -- Class A, voting, $.01 par value, 20,000
shares authorized; 16,726 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ --
Common stock -- Class B, voting, $.01 par value, 4,000
shares authorized; 3,000 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ --
Common stock -- Class C, nonvoting, $.01 par value, 1,000
shares authorized; 275 shares issued and outstanding... --
---
CC-LB:
Common stock -- Class A, voting, $.01 par value, 31,000
shares authorized, 27,850 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ --
Common stock -- Class B, voting, $.01 par value, 2,000
shares authorized, 1,500 shares issued and
outstanding............................................ --
Common stock -- Class C, nonvoting, $.01 par value, 2,000
shares authorized, 650 shares issued and outstanding... --
---
Total common stock................................ $ 1
===
CCA HOLDINGS
The Class A Voting Common Stock (CCA Class A Common Stock) and Class C
Nonvoting Common Stock (CCA Class C Common Stock) have certain preferential
rights upon liquidation of CCA Holdings. In the event of liquidation,
dissolution or "winding up" of CCA Holdings, holders of CCA Class A and Class C
Common Stock are entitled to a preference of $1,000 per share. After such amount
is paid, holders of Class B Voting Common Stock (CCA Class B Common Stock) are
entitled to receive $1,000 per share. Thereafter, Class A and Class C
shareholders shall ratably receive the remaining proceeds.
F-61
230
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
If upon liquidation, dissolution or "winding up" the assets of CCA Holdings
are insufficient to permit payment to Class A and Class C shareholders for their
full preferential amounts, all assets of CCA Holdings shall then be distributed
ratably to Class A and Class C shareholders. Furthermore, if the proceeds from
liquidation are inadequate to pay Class B shareholders their full preferential
amounts, the proceeds are to be distributed on a pro rata basis to Class B
shareholders.
Upon the occurrence of any Conversion Event (as defined within the Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation) Class C shareholders may convert any
or all of their outstanding shares into the same number of Class A shares.
Furthermore, CCA Holdings may automatically convert outstanding Class C shares
into the same number of Class A shares.
CCA Holdings is restricted from making cash dividends on its common stock
until the balance outstanding under the HC Crown Note is repaid.
Charter and Kelso entered into a Stockholders' Agreement providing for
certain restrictions on the transfer, sale or purchase of CCA Holdings' common
stock.
CCT HOLDINGS
The Class A Voting Common Stock (CCT Class A Common Stock) and Class C
Nonvoting Common Stock (CCT Class C Common Stock) have certain preferential
rights upon liquidation of CCT Holdings. In the event of liquidation,
dissolution or "winding up" of CCT Holdings, holders of CCT Class A Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock are entitled to a preference of $1,000 per share. After
such amount is paid, holders of Class B Voting Common Stock (CCT Class B Common
Stock) are entitled to receive $1,000 per share. Thereafter, Class A and Class C
shareholders shall ratably receive the remaining proceeds.
If upon liquidation, dissolution or "winding up" the assets of CCT Holdings
are insufficient to permit payment to Class A Common Stock and Class C
shareholders for their full preferential amount, all assets of the Company shall
then be distributed ratably to Class A and Class C shareholders. Furthermore, if
the proceeds from liquidation are inadequate to pay Class B shareholders their
full preferential amount, the proceeds are to be distributed on a pro rata basis
to Class B shareholders.
Upon the occurrence of any Conversion Event (as defined within the Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation), Class C shareholders may convert any
or all of their outstanding shares into the same number of Class A shares.
Furthermore, CCT Holdings may automatically convert outstanding Class C shares
into the same number of Class A shares.
CCT Holdings is restricted from making cash dividends on its common stock
until the balance outstanding under the note payable to seller is repaid.
Charter and Kelso entered into a Stockholders' Agreement providing for
certain restrictions on the transfer, sale or purchase of CCT Holdings' common
stock.
CC-LB
The Class A Voting Common Stock (CC-LB Class A Common Stock) and Class C
Nonvoting Common Stock (CC-LB Class C Common Stock) have certain preferential
rights upon liquidation of CC-LB. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or
"winding up" of CC-LB, holders of CC-LB Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock are entitled to a preference of $1,000 per share. After such amount is
paid, holders of Class B Voting Common Stock (CC-LB Class B Common Stock) are
entitled to receive $1,000 per share. Thereafter, Class A, Class B and Class C
shareholders shall ratably receive the remaining proceeds.
F-62
231
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
If upon liquidation, dissolution or "winding up" the assets of CC-LB are
insufficient to permit payment to Class A and Class C shareholders for their
full preferential amount, all assets of the Company shall then be distributed
ratably to Class A and Class C shareholders. Furthermore, if the proceeds from
liquidation are inadequate to pay Class B shareholders their full preferential
amount, the proceeds are to be distributed on a pro rata basis to Class B
shareholders.
CC-LB Class C Common Stock may be converted into CC-LB Class A Common Stock
upon the transfer of CC-LB Class C Common Stock to a person not affiliated with
the seller. Furthermore, CC-LB may automatically convert outstanding Class C
shares into the same number of Class A shares.
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Charter provides management services to the Company under the terms of a
contract which provides for annual base fees equal to $9,277 and $9,485 for the
period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the year ended
December 31, 1997, respectively, plus an additional fee equal to 30% of the
excess, if any, of operating cash flow (as defined in the management agreement)
over the projected operating cash flow. Payment of the additional fee is
deferred due to restrictions provided within the Company's credit agreements.
Deferred management fees bear interest at 8.0% per annum. The additional fees
for the periods from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, totaled $2,160, $1,990 and $1,255,
respectively. In addition, the Company receives financial advisory services from
an affiliate of Kelso, under terms of a contract which provides for fees equal
to $1,064 and $1,113 per annum as of January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998,
and December 31, 1997, respectively. Management and financial advisory service
fees currently payable of $2,281 are included in payables to manager of cable
television systems -- related party at December 31, 1997.
The Company pays certain acquisition advisory fees to an affiliate of Kelso
and Charter, which typically equal approximately 1% of the total purchase price
paid for cable television systems acquired. Total acquisition fees paid to the
affiliate of Kelso for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23,
1998, were $-0-. Total acquisition fees paid to the affiliate of Kelso in 1997
and 1996 were $-0- and $1,400, respectively. Total acquisition fees paid to
Charter for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, were
$-0-. Total acquisition fees paid to Charter in 1997 and 1996 were $-0- and
$1,400, respectively.
The Company and all entities managed by Charter collectively utilize a
combination of insurance coverage and self-insurance programs for medical,
dental and workers' compensation claims. Medical coverage provides for $2,435
aggregate stop loss protection and a loss limitation of $100 per person per
year. Workers' compensation coverage provides for $800 aggregate stop loss
protection and a loss limitation of $150 per person per year. Charges are
determined by independent actuaries at the present value of the actuarially
computed present and future liabilities for such benefits. The Company is
allocated its share of the charges monthly based upon its total number of
employees, historical claims and medical cost trend rates. Management considers
this allocation to be reasonable for the operations of the Company. For the
period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, the Company expensed
$1,950 relating to insurance allocations. During 1997 and 1996, the Company
expensed $1,689 and $2,065, respectively, relating to insurance allocations.
Beginning in 1996, the Company and other entities managed by Charter
employed the services of Charter's National Data Center (the "National Data
Center"). The National Data Center performs certain customer billing services
and provides computer network, hardware and
F-63
232
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
software support to the Company and other affiliated entities. The cost of these
services is allocated based on the number of customers. Management considers
this allocation to be reasonable for the operations of the Company. For the
period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, the Company expensed
$843 relating to these services. During 1997 and 1996, the Company expensed $723
and $466 relating to these services, respectively.
CCE-I maintains a regional office. The regional office performs certain
operational services on behalf of CCE-I and other affiliated entities. The cost
of these services is allocated to CCE-I and affiliated entities based on their
number of customers. Management considers this allocation to be reasonable for
the operations of CCE-I. From the period January 1, 1998, through December 23,
1998, the Company expensed $1,926 relating to these services. During 1997 and
1996, CCE-I expensed $861 and $799, respectively, relating to these services.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
LEASES
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under noncancelable
operating leases. Lease and rental costs charged to expense for the period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, was $2,222. Rent expense incurred
under these leases during 1997 and 1996 was $1,956 and $1,704, respectively.
The Company also rents utility poles in its operations. Generally, pole
rentals are cancelable on short notice, but the Company anticipates that such
rentals will recur. Rent expensed incurred for pole attachments for the period
from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, was $2,430. Rent expense
incurred for pole attachments during 1997 and 1996 was $2,601 and $2,330,
respectively.
LITIGATION
The Company is a party to lawsuits that arose in the ordinary course of
conducting its business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with
legal counsel, the outcome of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
13. REGULATION IN THE CABLE TELEVISION INDUSTRY:
The cable television industry is subject to extensive regulation at the
federal, local and, in some instances, state levels. The Cable Communications
Policy Act of 1984 (the "1984 Cable Act"), the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act" and together with
the 1984 Cable Act, the "Cable Acts"), and the Telecommunications Act of 1996
(the "1996 Telecom Act"), establish a national policy to guide the development
and regulation of cable television systems. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) has principal responsibility for implementing the policies of
the Cable Acts. Many aspects of such regulation are currently the subject of
judicial proceedings and administrative or legislative proposals. Legislation
and regulations continue to change, and the Company cannot predict the impact of
future developments on the cable television industry.
The 1992 Cable Act and the FCC's rules implementing that act generally have
increased the administrative and operational expenses of cable television
systems and have resulted in additional regulatory oversight by the FCC and
local or state franchise authorities. The Cable Acts and the corresponding FCC
regulations have established rate regulations.
The 1992 Cable Act permits certified local franchising authorities to order
refunds of basic service tier rates paid in the previous twelve-month period
determined to be in excess of the
F-64
233
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
maximum permitted rates. As of December 23, 1998, the amount refunded by the
Company has been insignificant. The Company may be required to refund additional
amounts in the future.
The Company believes that it has complied in all material respects with the
provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, including the rate setting provisions
promulgated by the FCC. However, in jurisdictions that have chosen not to
certify, refunds covering the previous twelve-month period may be ordered upon
certification if the Company is unable to justify its basic rates. The Company
is unable to estimate at this time the amount of refunds, if any, that may be
payable by the Company in the event certain of its rates are successfully
challenged by franchising authorities or found to be unreasonable by the FCC.
The Company does not believe that the amount of any such refunds would have a
material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of
the Company.
The 1996 Telecom Act, among other things, immediately deregulated the rates
for certain small cable operators and in certain limited circumstances rates on
the basic service tier, and as of March 31, 1999, deregulates rates on the cable
programming service tier (CPST). The FCC is currently developing permanent
regulations to implement the rate deregulation provisions of the 1996 Telecom
Act. The Company cannot predict the ultimate effect of the 1996 Telecom Act on
the Company's financial position or results of operations.
The FCC may further restrict the ability of cable television operators to
implement rate increases or the United States Congress may enact legislation
that could delay or suspend the scheduled March 1999 termination of CPST rate
regulation. This continued rate regulation, if adopted, could limit the rates
charged by the Company.
A number of states subject cable television systems to the jurisdiction of
centralized state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a
character similar to that of a public utility. State governmental agencies are
required to follow FCC rules when prescribing rate regulation, and thus, state
regulation of cable television rates is not allowed to be more restrictive than
the federal or local regulation. The Company is subject to state regulation in
Connecticut.
14. INCOME TAXES:
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequence attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is
the result of changes in the liability or asset recorded for deferred taxes. A
valuation allowance must be established for any portion of a deferred tax asset
for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
For the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and the
years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, no current provision (benefit) for
income taxes was recorded. The effective income tax rate is less than the
federal rate of 35% primarily due to providing a valuation allowance on deferred
income tax assets.
F-65
234
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Deferred taxes are comprised of the following at December 31, 1997:
Deferred income tax assets:
Accounts receivable....................................... $ 252
Other assets.............................................. 7,607
Accrued expenses.......................................... 4,740
Deferred revenue.......................................... 624
Deferred management fees.................................. 1,654
Tax loss carryforwards.................................... 80,681
Tax credit carryforward................................... 1,360
Valuation allowance....................................... (40,795)
---------
Total deferred income tax assets.................. 56,123
---------
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment............................. (38,555)
Franchise costs........................................... (117,524)
Other..................................................... (11,407)
---------
Total deferred income tax liabilities............. (167,486)
---------
Net deferred income tax liability................. $(111,363)
=========
At December 31, 1997, the Company had net operating loss (NOL)
carryforwards for regular income tax purposes aggregating $204,400, which expire
in various years from 1999 through 2012. Utilization of the NOLs carryforwards
is subject to certain limitations.
15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
The Company's employees may participate in the Charter Communications, Inc.
401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"). Employees that qualify for participation can
contribute up to 15% of their salary, on a before tax basis, subject to a
maximum contribution limit as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The
Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of the first 5% of contributions by
each employee. For the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998,
the Company contributed $585 to the 401(k) plan. During 1997 and 1996, the
Company contributed approximately $499 and $435 to the 401(k) Plan,
respectively.
Certain employees of the Company are participants in the 1996 Charter
Communications/ Kelso Group Appreciation Rights Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan
covers certain key employees and consultants within the group of companies and
partnerships controlled by affiliates of Kelso and managed by Charter. The Plan
permits the granting of up to 1,000,000 units, of which 705,000 were outstanding
at December 31, 1997. Unless otherwise provided in a particular instance, units
vest at a rate of 20% per annum. The Plan entitles participants to receive
payment of the appreciated unit value for vested units, upon the occurrence of
certain events specified in the Plan (i.e. change in control, employee
termination) The units do not represent a right to an equity interest to any
entities within the CCA Group. Compensation expense is based on the appreciated
unit value and is amortized over the vesting period.
As a result of the acquisition of Charter and the Company, the Plan was
terminated, all outstanding units became 100% vested and all amounts were paid
by Charter in 1999. For the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23,
1998, the Company recorded $5,684 of expense, included in management fees, and a
contribution from Charter related to the Appreciation Rights Plan.
F-66
235
CCA GROUP
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
16. ACCOUNTING STANDARD NOT YET IMPLEMENTED:
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted SFAS No.
133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No.
133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every
derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or
liability measured at its fair value and that changes in the derivative's fair
value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting
criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's
gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the income
statement, and requires that a company must formally document, designate and
assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. SFAS No.
133 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The Company has
not yet quantified the impacts of adopting SFAS No. 133 on its consolidated
financial statements nor has it determined the timing or method of its adoption
of SFAS No. 133. However, SFAS No. 133 could increase volatility in earnings
(loss).
17. SUBSEQUENT EVENT:
Subsequent to December 23, 1998, CCA Holdings, CCT Holdings and CC-LB
converted to limited liability companies and are now known as CCA Holdings LLC,
CCT Holdings LLC and Charter Communications Long Beach, LLC, respectively.
F-67
236
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To CharterComm Holdings, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CharterComm
Holdings, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the
period from January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998, and for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of CharterComm Holdings, L.P.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 23,
1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
St. Louis, Missouri,
February 5, 1999
F-68
237
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET -- DECEMBER 31, 1997
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 2,742
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $330....................................... 3,158
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 342
--------
Total current assets.............................. 6,242
--------
INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment............................. 235,808
Franchises, net of accumulated amortization of $119,968... 480,201
--------
716,009
--------
OTHER ASSETS................................................ 16,176
--------
$738,427
========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt...................... $ 5,375
Accounts payable and accrued expenses..................... 30,507
Payables to manager of cable television systems -- related
party.................................................. 1,120
--------
Total current liabilities......................... 37,002
--------
DEFERRED REVENUE............................................ 1,719
--------
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities..................... 666,662
--------
DEFERRED MANAGEMENT FEES.................................... 7,805
--------
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES....................................... 5,111
--------
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED LIMITED UNITS -- 577.81 units,
issued and outstanding.................................... 20,128
--------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
General Partner........................................... --
Common Limited Partners -- 220.24 units issued and
outstanding............................................ --
--------
Total partners' capital........................... --
--------
$738,427
========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-69
238
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1,
1998, YEAR ENDED
THROUGH DECEMBER 31
DECEMBER 23, --------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------ ---- ----
REVENUES.............................................. $196,801 $175,591 $120,280
-------- -------- --------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operating costs..................................... 83,745 75,728 50,970
General and administrative.......................... 14,586 12,607 9,327
Depreciation and amortization....................... 86,741 76,535 53,133
Management fees -- related party.................... 14,780 8,779 6,014
-------- -------- --------
199,852 173,649 119,444
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from operations.................... (3,051) 1,942 836
-------- -------- --------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income..................................... 211 182 233
Interest expense.................................... (66,121) (61,498) (41,021)
Other, net.......................................... (1,895) 17 (468)
-------- -------- --------
(67,805) (61,299) (41,256)
-------- -------- --------
Loss before extraordinary item................... (70,856) (59,357) (40,420)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM -- Loss on early retirement of
debt................................................ (6,264) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net loss......................................... (77,120) (59,357) (40,420)
REDEMPTION PREFERENCE ALLOCATION:
Special Limited Partner units....................... -- -- (829)
Redeemable Preferred Limited units.................. -- -- (4,081)
NET LOSS ALLOCATED TO REDEEMABLE PREFERRED LIMITED
UNITS............................................... 20,128 2,553 4,063
-------- -------- --------
Net loss applicable to partners' capital
accounts....................................... $(56,992) $(56,804) $(41,267)
======== ======== ========
NET LOSS ALLOCATION TO PARTNERS' CAPITAL ACCOUNTS:
General Partner..................................... $(56,992) $(21,708) $(38,391)
Common Limited Partners............................. -- (35,096) (2,876)
-------- -------- --------
$(56,992) $(56,804) $(41,267)
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-70
239
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
COMMON
GENERAL LIMITED
PARTNER PARTNERS TOTAL
------- -------- -----
BALANCE, December 31, 1995.............................. $ 29,396 $ 2,202 $ 31,598
Capital contributions................................. 30,703 2,300 33,003
Allocation of net loss................................ (38,391) (2,876) (41,267)
-------- -------- --------
BALANCE, December 31, 1996.............................. 21,708 1,626 23,334
Capital contributions................................. -- 33,470 33,470
Allocation of net loss................................ (21,708) (35,096) (56,804)
-------- -------- --------
BALANCE, December 31, 1997.............................. -- -- --
Capital contributions................................. 4,920 -- 4,920
Allocation of net loss................................ (56,992) -- (56,992)
-------- -------- --------
BALANCE, December 23, 1998.............................. $(52,072) $ -- $(52,072)
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-71
240
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1,
1998,
THROUGH YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
DECEMBER 23, -----------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------ ---- ----
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.............................................. $ (77,120) $ (59,357) $ (40,420)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by operating activities --
Extraordinary item -- Loss on early retirement of
debt............................................. 6,264 -- --
Depreciation and amortization...................... 86,741 76,535 53,133
Amortization of debt issuance costs, debt discount
and interest rate cap agreements................. 14,563 14,212 9,564
Loss on disposal of property, plant and
equipment........................................ 1,714 203 367
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisition --
Accounts receivable, net......................... 2,000 369 (303)
Prepaid expenses and other....................... (203) 943 245
Accounts payable and accrued expenses............ (1,970) 3,988 9,911
Payables to manager of cable television systems,
including deferred management fees............ 9,456 3,207 3,479
Deferred revenue................................. 770 (82) 452
Other operating activities....................... 5,378 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities........ 47,593 40,018 36,428
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment............ (85,044) (72,178) (48,324)
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired....... (5,900) (159,563) (145,366)
Other investing activities............................ 5,280 1,577 (2,089)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities.............. (85,664) (230,164) (195,779)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings of long-term debt.......................... 547,400 231,250 260,576
Repayments of long-term debt.......................... (505,300) (67,930) (34,401)
Partners' capital contributions....................... -- 29,800 --
Payment of debt issuance costs........................ (3,651) (3,593) (11,732)
Payment of Special Limited Partnership units.......... -- -- (43,243)
Repayments of note payable -- related party........... -- -- (15,000)
Payments for interest rate cap agreements............. -- -- (35)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities.......... 38,449 189,527 156,165
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.... 378 (619) (3,186)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period.......... 2,742 3,361 6,547
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period................ $ 3,120 $ 2,742 $ 3,361
========= ========= =========
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST.................................. $ 61,559 $ 42,538 $ 28,860
========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
F-72
241
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
CharterComm Holdings, L.P. (CharterComm Holdings) was formed in March 1996
with the contributions of Charter Communications Southeast Holdings, L.P.
(Southeast Holdings), Charter Communications, L.P. (CC-I) and Charter
Communications II, L.P. (CC-II). This contribution was accounted for as a
reorganization under common control and, accordingly, the consolidated financial
statements and notes have been restated to include the results and financial
position of Southeast Holdings, CC-I and CC-II.
Through December 23, 1998, CharterComm Holdings was owned 75.3% by
affiliates of Charterhouse Group International, Inc., a privately owned
investment firm (collectively referred to herein as "Charterhouse"), indirectly
owned 5.7% by Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter), manager of the
Partnership's (as defined below) cable television systems, and owned 19.0%
primarily by other institutional investors.
Effective December 23, 1998, Paul G. Allen acquired 94% of Charter through
a series of transactions. In conjunction with Mr. Allen's acquisition, Charter
acquired 100% of the outstanding partnership interests in CharterComm Holdings
on December 23, 1998.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
CharterComm Holdings and its subsidiaries collectively referred to as the
"Partnership" herein. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
In 1998, the Partnership through its subsidiaries provided cable television
service to customers in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina,
South Carolina and Tennessee.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 1997,
cash equivalents consist primarily of repurchase agreements. These investments
are carried at cost that approximates market value.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, including all direct and
certain indirect costs associated with the construction of cable television
transmission and distribution facilities, and the cost of new customer
installation. The costs of disconnecting a customer are charged to expense in
the period incurred. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense as incurred, and equipment replacement and betterments are capitalized.
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets as follows:
Cable distribution systems.................................. 3-15 years
Buildings and leasehold improvements........................ 5-15 years
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 3-5 years
F-73
242
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
In 1997, the Partnership shortened the estimated useful lives of certain
property, plant and equipment for depreciation purposes. As a result, an
additional $4,775 of depreciation was recorded during 1997.
FRANCHISES
Costs incurred in obtaining and renewing cable franchises are deferred and
amortized over the lives of the franchises. Costs relating to unsuccessful
franchise applications are charged to expense when it is determined that the
efforts to obtain the franchise will not be successful. Franchise rights
acquired through the purchase of cable television systems represent management's
estimate of fair value and are generally amortized using the straight-line
method over a period of 15 years. In addition, approximately $100,000 of
franchise rights are being amortized over a period of 3 to 11 years.
OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term
of the related debt. The interest rate cap costs are being amortized over the
terms of the agreement, which approximates three years.
IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
If facts and circumstances suggest that a long-lived asset may be impaired,
the carrying value is reviewed. If a review indicates that the carrying value of
such asset is not recoverable based on projected undiscounted cash flows related
to the asset over its remaining life, the carrying value of such asset is
reduced to its estimated fair value.
REVENUES
Cable television revenues from basic and premium services are recognized
when the related services are provided.
Installation revenues are recognized to the extent of direct selling costs
incurred. The remainder, if any, is deferred and amortized to income over the
estimated average period that customers are expected to remain connected to the
cable television system. As of December 31, 1997, no installation revenue has
been deferred, as direct selling costs exceeded installation revenue.
Fees collected from programmers to guarantee carriage are deferred and
amortized to income over the life of the contracts. Local governmental
authorities impose franchise fees on the Partnership ranging up to a federally
mandated maximum of 5.0% of gross revenues. On a monthly basis, such fees are
collected from the Partnership's customers and are periodically remitted to
local franchises. Franchise fees collected and paid are reported as revenue.
INTEREST RATE HEDGE AGREEMENTS
The Partnership manages fluctuations in interest rates by using interest
rate hedge agreements, as required by certain debt agreements. Interest rate
swaps, caps and collars are accounted for as hedges of debt obligations, and
accordingly, the net settlement amounts are recorded as adjustments to interest
expense in the period incurred. Premiums paid for interest rate caps are
deferred, included in other assets, and are amortized over the original term of
the interest rate agreement as an adjustment to interest expense.
F-74
243
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The Partnership's interest rate swap agreements require the Partnership to
pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate thereby creating fixed rate debt.
Interest rate caps and collars are entered into by the Partnership to reduce the
impact of rising interest rates on floating rate debt.
The Partnership's participation in interest rate hedging transactions
involves instruments that have a close correlation with its debt, thereby
managing its risk. Interest rate hedge agreements have been designed for hedging
purposes and are not held or issued for speculative purposes.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other, net includes gain and loss on disposition of property, plant and
equipment, and other miscellaneous items, all of which are not directly related
to the Partnership's primary line of business. In 1996, the Partnership recorded
$367 of nonoperating losses for its portion of insurance deductibles pertaining
to damage caused by hurricanes to certain cable television systems.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are the responsibility of the partners and are not provided
for in the accompanying financial statements except for Peachtree Cable TV, Inc.
(Peachtree), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, which is a C corporation and
for which taxes are presented in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. ACQUISITIONS:
In 1998, the Partnership acquired cable television systems in one
transaction for a purchase price net of cash acquired, of $5,900. The excess
cost of properties acquired over the amounts assigned to net tangible assets at
the date of acquisition was $5,000 and is included in franchises.
In 1997, the Partnership acquired cable television systems in three
separate transactions for an aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired, of
$159,600. The excess of the cost of properties acquired over the amounts
assigned to net tangible assets at the date of acquisition was $126,400 and is
included in franchises.
In 1996, the Partnership acquired cable television systems in three
separate transactions for an aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired, of
$145,400. The excess of the cost of properties acquired over the amounts
assigned to net tangible assets at the date of acquisition was $118,200 and is
included in franchises.
The above acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, and accordingly, results of operations of the acquired assets have
been included in the financial statements from the dates of acquisition.
F-75
244
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the 1997 acquisitions as though
the acquisitions had been made on January 1, 1997, with pro forma adjustments to
give effect to amortization of franchises, interest expense and certain other
adjustments are as follows.
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1997
------------
(UNAUDITED)
Revenues.................................................... $182,770
Income from operations...................................... 2,608
Net loss.................................................... (61,389)
The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of
the results of operations had these transactions been completed as of the
assumed date or which may be obtained in the future.
3. DISTRIBUTIONS AND ALLOCATIONS:
For financial reporting purposes, redemption preference allocations,
profits and losses are allocated to partners in accordance with the liquidation
provision of the applicable partnership agreement.
As stated in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership may make
distributions to the partners out of all available funds at such times and in
such amounts as the General Partner may determine in its sole discretion.
4. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED LIMITED UNITS:
As of December 31, 1995, certain Redeemable Preferred Limited Partner units
of CC-I and CC-II were outstanding. During 1996, the Partnership issued certain
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partner units of CharterComm Holdings.
The Preferred Limited Partners' preference return has been reflected as an
addition to the Redeemable Preferred Limited Partner units, and the decrease has
been allocated to the General Partner and Common Limited Partner consistent with
the liquidation and distribution provisions in the partnership agreements.
At December 23, 1998, the balance related to the CharterComm Holdings
Preferred Limited Partner units was as follows:
Contribution, March 1996.................................... $ 20,052
1996 redemption preference allocation..................... 2,629
Allocation of net loss.................................... --
--------
Balance, December 31, 1996.................................. 22,681
1997 redemption preference allocation..................... --
Allocation of net loss.................................... (2,553)
--------
Balance, December 31, 1997.................................. 20,128
1998 redemption preference allocation..................... --
Allocation of net loss.................................... (20,128)
--------
Balance, December 23, 1998.................................. $ --
========
F-76
245
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The 1998 and 1997 redemption preference allocations of $4,617 and $4,020,
respectively, have not been reflected in the Preferred Limited Partners' capital
accounts since the General Partner and Common Limited Partners' capital accounts
have been reduced to $-0-.
5. SPECIAL LIMITED PARTNER UNITS (CC-I):
Prior to March 28, 1996, certain Special Limited Partner units of CC-I were
outstanding. CC-I's profits were allocated to the Special Limited Partners until
allocated profits equaled the unrecovered preference amount (preference amounts
range from 6% to 17.5% of the unrecovered initial cost of the partnership units
and unrecovered preference amounts per annum). When there was no profit to
allocate, the preference return was reflected as a decrease in Partners'
Capital.
In accordance with a purchase agreement and through the use of a capital
contribution from Charter Communications Southeast, L.P. (Southeast), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Southeast Holdings, resulting from the proceeds of the Notes
(see Note 9), CC-I paid the Special Limited Partners $43,243 as full
consideration for their partnership interests on March 28, 1996.
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at December 31,
1997:
Cable distribution systems.................................. $274,837
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements.................. 5,439
Vehicles and equipment...................................... 14,669
--------
294,945
Less -- Accumulated depreciation............................ (59,137)
--------
$235,808
========
Depreciation expense for the period from January 1, 1998, through December
23, 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, was $44,307,
$33,634 and $16,997, respectively.
7. OTHER ASSETS:
Other assets consist of the following at December 31, 1997:
Debt issuance costs......................................... $18,385
Other assets................................................ 3,549
-------
21,934
Less -- Accumulated amortization............................ (5,758)
-------
$16,176
=======
As a result of the payment and termination of the CC-I Credit Agreement and
CC-II Credit Agreement (see Note 9), debt issuance costs of $6,264 were written
off as an extraordinary loss on early retirement of debt for the period from
January 1, 1998, through December 23, 1998.
F-77
246
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
8. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at December
31, 1997:
Accrued interest............................................ $ 9,804
Franchise fees.............................................. 3,524
Programming costs........................................... 3,391
Accounts payable............................................ 2,479
Capital expenditures........................................ 2,099
Salaries and related benefits............................... 2,079
Other....................................................... 7,131
-------
$30,507
=======
9. LONG-TERM DEBT:
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 1997:
Senior Secured Discount Debentures.......................... $146,820
11 1/4% Senior Notes........................................ 125,000
Credit Agreements:
CC-I...................................................... 112,200
CC-II..................................................... 339,500
--------
723,520
Less:
Current maturities........................................ (5,375)
Unamortized discount...................................... (51,483)
--------
$666,662
========
SENIOR SECURED DISCOUNT DEBENTURES
On March 28, 1996, Southeast Holdings and CharterComm Holdings Capital
Corporation (Holdings Capital), a wholly owned subsidiary of Southeast Holdings
(collectively the "Debentures Issuers"), issued $146,820 of Senior Secured
Discount Debentures (the "Debentures") for proceeds of $75,000. Proceeds from
the Debentures were used to pay fees and expenses related to the issuance of the
Debentures and the balance of $72,400 was a capital contribution to Southeast.
The Debentures are secured by all of Southeast Holdings' ownership interest in
Southeast and rank pari passu in right and priority of payment to all other
existing and future indebtedness of the Debentures Issuers. The Debentures are
effectively subordinated to the claims of creditors of Southeast Holdings'
subsidiaries, including the Combined Credit Agreement (as defined herein). The
Debentures are redeemable at the Debentures Issuers' option at amounts
decreasing from 107% to 100% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date, beginning on March 15, 2001. The Debentures Issuers are
required to make an offer to purchase all of the Debentures, at a purchase price
equal to 101% of the principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid
interest, upon a Change in Control, as defined in the Debentures Indenture. No
interest is payable on the Debentures prior to March 15, 2001. Thereafter,
interest on the Debentures is payable semiannually in arrears beginning
September 15, 2001, until maturity on March 15, 2007. The discount on the
Debentures is being accreted using the effective interest method at an interest
rate of 14% from the date of issuance to March 15, 2001.
F-78
247
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
11 1/4% SENIOR NOTES
Southeast and CharterComm Capital Corporation (Southeast Capital), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Southeast (collectively the "Notes Issuers"), issued
$125,000 aggregate principal amount of 11 1/4% Senior Notes (the "Notes"). The
Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Notes Issuers and rank pari passu
in right and priority of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness
of the Notes Issuers. The Notes are effectively subordinated to the claims of
creditors of Southeast's subsidiaries, including the lenders under the Combined
Credit Agreement. The Notes are redeemable at the Notes Issuers' option at
amounts decreasing from 105.625% to 100% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption, beginning on March 15, 2001. The Notes
Issuers are required to make an offer to purchase all of the Notes, at a
purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, together with accrued and
unpaid interest, upon a Change in Control, as defined in the Notes Indenture.
Interest is payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15 until maturity on
March 15, 2006.
Southeast and Southeast Holdings are holding companies with no significant
assets other than their direct and indirect investments in CC-I and CC-II.
Southeast Capital and Holdings Capital were formed solely for the purpose of
serving as co-issuers and have no operations. Accordingly, the Notes Issuers and
Debentures Issuers must rely upon distributions from CC-I and CC-II to generate
funds necessary to meet their obligations, including the payment of principal
and interest on the Notes and Debentures.
COMBINED CREDIT AGREEMENT
In June 1998, CC-I and CC-II (the "Borrowers") replaced their existing
credit agreements and entered into a combined credit agreement (the "Combined
Credit Agreement"), which provides for two term loan facilities, one with the
principal amount of $200,000 that matures on June 30, 2007, and the other with
the principal amount of $150,000 that matures on December 31, 2007. The Combined
Credit Agreement also provides for a $290,000 revolving credit facility, with a
maturity date of June 30, 2007. Amounts under the Combined Credit Agreement bear
interest at the LIBOR Rate or Base Rate, as defined, plus a margin of up to
2.0%. The variable interest rates ranged from 6.69% to 7.31% at December 23,
1998.
Commencing March 31, 2002, and at the end of each calendar quarter
thereafter, the available borrowings for the revolving credit facility and the
$200,000 term loan shall be reduced on an annual basis by 11.0% in 2002 and
14.6% in 2003. Commencing March 31, 2002, and at the end of each calendar
quarter thereafter, the available borrowings for the $150,000 term loan shall be
reduced on an annual basis by 1.0% in 2002 and 1.0% in 2003. A quarterly
commitment fee of between 0.25% and 0.375% per annum is payable on the
unborrowed balance of the revolving credit facility.
The Debentures, Notes and Combined Credit Agreement require the Partnership
to comply with various financial and nonfinancial covenants including the
maintenance of a ratio of debt to annualized operating cash flow, as defined,
not to exceed 5.25 to 1 at December 23, 1998. These debt instruments also
contain substantial limitations on, or prohibitions of, distributions,
additional indebtedness, liens, asset sales and certain other items.
CC-I CREDIT AGREEMENT
CC-I maintained a credit agreement (the "CC-I Credit Agreement") with a
consortium of banks for borrowings up to $127,200, consisting of a revolving
line of credit of $63,600 and a
F-79
248
CHARTERCOMM HOLDINGS, L.P.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
term loan of $63,600. Interest accrued, at CC-I's option, at rates based upon
the Base Rate, as defined in the CC-I Credit Agreement, LIBOR, or prevailing bid
rates of certificates of deposit plus the applicable margin based upon CC-I's
leverage ratio at the time of the borrowings. The variable interest rates ranged
from 7.75% to 8.00% and 7.44% to 7.50% at December 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
In June 1998, the CC-I Credit Agreement was repaid and terminated in
conjunction with the establishment of the Combined Credit Agreement.
CC-II CREDIT AGREEMENT
CC-II maintained a credit agreement (the "CC-II Credit Agreement") with a
consortium of banks for borrowings up to $390,000, consisting of a revolving
credit facility of $215,000, and two term loans totaling $175,000. Interest
accrued, at CC-II's option, at rates based upon the Base Rate, as defined in the
CC-II Credit Agreement, LIBOR, or prevailing bid rates of certificates of
deposit plus the applicable margin based upon CC-II's leverage ratio at the time
of the borrowings. The variable interest rates ranged from 7.63% to 8.25% and
7.25% to 8.125% at December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
In June 1998, the CC-II Credit Agreement was repaid and terminated in
conjunction with the establishment of the Combined Credit Agreement.
10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
A summary of debt and the related interest rate hedge agreements at
December 31, 1997, is as follows:
CARRYING NOTIONAL FAIR
VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -----
